skip to main content
10.1145/3373722.3373784acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescsisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The Potential of Digital Technologies in Commercial and Political Communication

Authors Info & Claims
Published:22 January 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

Transnational corporation is a phenomenon that has become an expression of globalization. In terms of influence and financial capabilities, these corporations can be compared with the state power, and sometimes even surpass it. The capital owned by TNCs makes it possible to participate in the research and development of new technologies in order to increase the efficiency of their functioning and competitiveness in the market. In the era of digitalization, these corporations invest heavily in the development of modern software solutions and their implementation in the workflow. The transfer of documents into electronic format and conducting most of the daily activity on-line speaks about the virtualization of processes occurring in TNCs. The activities of these companies either completely go into the sphere of virtual reality, or partly when the company still produces a material product or organizes its delivery from a sender to a consignee. The purpose of this article is to describe the evolution of the electronic document management in TNC and to evaluate possibilities of applicability of the electronic document management of TNC in the everyday activity of the state bodies. The Danish TNC Maersk (the sea line, which is the leader in the field of container shipping) was chosen as an empirical basis for the research. Obtaining insider information about the functioning of these information systems was made possible thanks to a series of interviews with current and former employees of Maersk. As a model for the interpretation, the theory of the virtualization of society was elected, which is still relevant today. The research conducted in this article contributes both to the development of the theory of virtualization and to the practice of public governance.

References

  1. 5 Ways Blockchain will Change CRM for the better, Retrieved from https://www.rolustech.com/blog/5-ways-blockchain-will-change-crmGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Ada Scupola, and Antonello Zanfei. 2016. Governance and innovation in public sector services: The case of the digital library. Government Information Quarterly. 33, 2, 237--249.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Andrea Gaggioli. 2018. Blockchain Technology: Living in a Decentralized Everything. Cyberpsychology, Behaviour and Social Networking. 21, 1, 65--66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2017.29097.csiGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Arthur Kroker, and Michael Weinstein, M. 1994. Data Trash: The Theory of Virtual Class (Culture Text). St. Martin's Griffin, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Claude Serfati. 2011. Transnational corporations as financial groups. Work Organisation, Labour & Globalisatio. 5, 1, 10--38.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Christopher White. 2018. Crossing the Digital Divide: Monism, Dualism, and the Reason Collective Action is Critical for Cyber Theory Production. Politics and Governance. 6, 2, 73--82. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17645/pag.v6i2.1338Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. David Osborne, and Ted, Gaebler. 1992: Reinventing Government. How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector. A Plume Book, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Daniel Drescher. 2017. Blockchain basics: a non-technical introduction in 25 steps..Apress, Frankfurt-am-Mein. DOI 10.1007/978-1-4842-2604-9Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Dmitriy V. Ivanov. 2000: Virtualization of the Society [Virtualizacija obshhestva]. Oriental Studies, St Petersburg.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Horst Eidenmüller. 2011: The Transnational Law Market, Regulatory Competition, and Transnational Corporations. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies. 18, 2, 707--749.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Is there a place for EDI in the Public Sector? Retrieved from https://transformgov.org/articles/there-place-edi-public-sectorGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Leonid V. Smorgunov. 2018. Blockchain as a Procedural Justice Institute [Blokchejn kak institut procedurnoj spravedlivosti]. Polis. Political Studies. 5, 88--89. DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2018.05.08Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Nathan Schneider. 2018. An Internet of ownership: Democratic design for the online economy. The Sociological Review Monographs. 6, 2, 320--340. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0038026118758533Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Order of the Government of the Russian Federation of 25.10.2005 N 1789-p "On the Concept of Administrative Reform in the Russian Federation in 2006-2010" [Rasporjazhenie Pravitel'stva RF ot 25.10.2005 N 1789-r «O Koncepcii administrativnoj reformy v Rossijskoj Federacii v 2006-2010 godah»], Retrieved from http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_56259Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Program Evaluation: Methodology and Practice [Ocenka programm: Metodologija i praktika] 2009. In A.I.Kuzmin, P. O'Sallivan, and N.A.Kosheleva, (eds.) Presto-RK, Moscow.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Seulki Lee-Geiller and Taejun Lee. 2019. Using government websites to enhance democratic E-governance: A conceptual model for evaluation. Government Information Quarterly. 36, 2, 208--225.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Siraj Raval.. 2017. Decentralized Applications. Technology of Blockchain in Action. [Decentralizovannye prilozhenija. Tehnologija Blockchain v dejstvii]. Piter, St Petersburg.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Thomas J. Biersteker. 1980: The Illusion of State Power: Transnational Corporations and the Neutralization of Host Country Legislation. Journal of Peace Research. 17, 3, 207--221. DOI: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/002234338001700302Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Thomas Janowski, Elsa Estevez, and Rehema Baguma. 2018. Platform governance for sustainable development: Reshaping citizen-administration relationships in the digital age. Government Information Quarterly. 35, 4, Supplement, s1--s16.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Ursula Hoffmann-Lange. 2012. Vertical and Horizontal Accountability of Global Elites: Some Theoretical Reflections and a Preliminary Research Agenda. Historical Social Research. Elite Foundations of Social Theory and Politics, 193--208. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12759/ hsr.37.2012.1.193-208Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. The Potential of Digital Technologies in Commercial and Political Communication

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        CSIS'2019: Proceedings of the XI International Scientific Conference Communicative Strategies of the Information Society
        October 2019
        176 pages
        ISBN:9781450376709
        DOI:10.1145/3373722

        Copyright © 2019 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 22 January 2020

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Acceptance Rates

        CSIS'2019 Paper Acceptance Rate30of50submissions,60%Overall Acceptance Rate30of50submissions,60%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader