skip to main content
research-article

A Multilingual Evaluation for Online Hate Speech Detection

Published:14 March 2020Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

The increasing popularity of social media platforms such as Twitter and Facebook has led to a rise in the presence of hate and aggressive speech on these platforms. Despite the number of approaches recently proposed in the Natural Language Processing research area for detecting these forms of abusive language, the issue of identifying hate speech at scale is still an unsolved problem. In this article, we propose a robust neural architecture that is shown to perform in a satisfactory way across different languages; namely, English, Italian, and German. We address an extensive analysis of the obtained experimental results over the three languages to gain a better understanding of the contribution of the different components employed in the system, both from the architecture point of view (i.e., Long Short Term Memory, Gated Recurrent Unit, and bidirectional Long Short Term Memory) and from the feature selection point of view (i.e., ngrams, social network–specific features, emotion lexica, emojis, word embeddings). To address such in-depth analysis, we use three freely available datasets for hate speech detection on social media in English, Italian, and German.

References

  1. Sweta Agrawal and Amit Awekar. 2018. Deep learning for detecting cyberbullying across multiple social media platforms. In Proceedings of the 40th European Conference on IR Research—Advances in Information Retrieval (ECIR’18) (Lecture Notes in Computer Science), Gabriella Pasi, Benjamin Piwowarski, Leif Azzopardi, and Allan Hanbury (Eds.), Vol. 10772. Springer, 141--153. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76941-7_11Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Luis Enrique Argota Vega, Jorge Carlos Reyes-Magaña, Helena Gómez-Adorno, and Gemma Bel-Enguix. 2019. Detecting hate speech in Twitter using multiple features in a combinatorial framework. In Proceedings of the 13th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation. Association for Computational Linguistics, 447--452. DOI:https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/S19-2079Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Pinar Arslan, Michele Corazza, Elena Cabrio, and Serena Villata. 2019. Overwhelmed by negative emotions? Maybe you are being cyber-bullied! In Proceedings of the 34th ACM/SIGAPP Symposium on Applied Computing (SAC’19).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Xiaoyu Bai, Flavio Merenda, Claudia Zaghi, Tommaso Caselli, and Malvina Nissim. 2018. Hate speech detection in Italian social media. In Proceedings of the 6th Evaluation Campaign of Natural Language Processing and Speech Tools for Italian. Final Workshop (EVALITA’18) co-located with the 5th Italian Conference on Computational Linguistics (CLiC-it’18).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Xiaoyu Bai, Flavio Merenda, Claudia Zaghi, Tommaso Caselli, and Malvina Nissim. 2018. Detecting offensive speech in German social media. In Proceedings of the GermEval 2018 and 14th Conference on Natural Language Processing (KONVENS’18).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Francesco Barbieri, Francesco Ronzano, and Horacio Saggion. 2016. What does this emoji mean? A vector space skip-gram model for Twitter emojis. In Proceedings of the Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC’16).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Valerio Basile, Cristina Bosco, Elisabetta Fersini, Debora Nozza, Viviana Patti, Francisco Manuel Rangel Pardo, Paolo Rosso, and Manuela Sanguinetti. 2019. Multilingual detection of hate speech against immigrants and women in Twitter. In Proceedings of the 13th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation. Association for Computational Linguistics. 54--63. DOI:https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/S19-2007Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Valerio Basile and Malvina Nissim. 2013. Sentiment analysis on Italian tweets. In Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Computational Approaches to Subjectivity, Sentiment and Social Media Analysis. 100--107.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Elisa Bassignana, Valerio Basile, and Viviana Patti. 2018. Hurtlex: A multilingual lexicon of words to hurt. In Proceedings of the 5th Italian Conference on Computational Linguistics (CLiC-it’18), Vol. 2253. CEUR-WS, 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Christos Baziotis, Nikos Pelekis, and Christos Doulkeridis. 2017. Deep LSTM with attention for message-level and topic-based sentiment analysis. In Proceedings of the 11th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval’17). Association for Computational Linguistics, 747--754.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Piotr Bojanowski, Edouard Grave, Armand Joulin, and Tomas Mikolov. 2017. Enriching word vectors with subword information. Trans. Assoc. Computat. Ling. 5 (2017), 135--146.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Cristina Bosco, Felice Dell’Orletta, Fabio Poletto, Manuela Sanguinetti, and Maurizio Tesconi. 2018. Overview of the EVALITA 2018 hate speech detection task. In Proceedings of the 6th Evaluation Campaign of Natural Language Processing and Speech Tools for Italian. Final Workshop (EVALITA’18) co-located with the 5th Italian Conference on Computational Linguistics (CLiC-it’18).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Miguel Ángel Álvarez Carmona, Estefanía Guzmán-Falcón, Manuel Montes-y-Gómez, Hugo Jair Escalante, Luis Villaseñor Pineda, Verónica Reyes-Meza, and Antonio Rico Sulayes. 2018. Authorship and aggressiveness analysis in Mexican Spanish tweets. In Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Evaluation of Human Language Technologies for Iberian Languages (IberEval’18) co-located with the 34th Conference of the Spanish Society for Natural Language Processing (SEPLN’18). 74--96.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Kyunghyun Cho, Bart van Merrienboer, Caglar Gulcehre, Dzmitry Bahdanau, Fethi Bougares, Holger Schwenk, and Yoshua Bengio. 2014. Learning phrase representations using RNN encoder–decoder for statistical machine translation. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP’14). Association for Computational Linguistics, 1724--1734.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. François Chollet et al. 2015. Keras. Retrieved from https://github.com/fchollet/keras.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Mark Cieliebak, Jan Milan Deriu, Dominic Egger, and Fatih Uzdilli. 2017. A Twitter corpus and benchmark resources for German sentiment analysis. In Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Natural Language Processing for Social Media. Association for Computational Linguistics, 45--51.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Andrea Cimino, Lorenzo De Mattei, and Felice Dell’Orletta. 2018. Multi-task learning in deep neural networks at EVALITA 2018. In Proceedings of the 6th Evaluation Campaign of Natural Language Processing and Speech Tools for Italian. Final Workshop (EVALITA’18) co-located with the 5th Italian Conference on Computational Linguistics (CLiC-it’18).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Michele Corazza, Stefano Menini, Pinar Arslan, Rachele Sprugnoli, Elena Cabrio, Sara Tonelli, and Serena Villata. 2018. Comparing different supervised approaches to hate speech detection. In Proceedings of the 6th Evaluation Campaign of Natural Language Processing and Speech Tools for Italian. Final Workshop (EVALITA’18) co-located with the 5th Italian Conference on Computational Linguistics (CLiC-it’18).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Michele Corazza, Stefano Menini, Pinar Arslan, Rachele Sprugnoli, Elena Cabrio, Sara Tonelli, and Serena Villata. 2018. Identifying offensive tweets using recurrent neural networks. In Proceedings of the GermEval Workshop.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Michele Corazza, Stefano Menini, Elena Cabrio, Sara Tonelli, and Serena Villata. 2019. Cross-platform evaluation for Italian hate speech detection. In Proceedings of the 6th Italian Conference on Computational Linguistics. Retrieved from http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2481/paper22.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Michele Corazza, Stefano Menini, Elena Cabrio, Sara Tonelli, and Serena Villata. 2019. InriaFBK drawing attention to offensive language at Germeval2019. In Proceedings of the 15th Conference on Natural Language Processing (KONVENS’19). Retrieved from https://corpora.linguistik.uni-erlangen.de/data/konvens/proceedings/papers/germeval/Germeval_Task_2_2019_paper_1.INRIA.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Thomas Davidson, Dana Warmsley, Michael W. Macy, and Ingmar Weber. 2017. Automated hate speech detection and the problem of offensive language. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Web and Social Media (ICWSM’17). 512--515.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Liangjie Hong, Brian D. Davison, April Kontostathis, Lynne Edwards, Dawei Yin, and Zhenzhen Xue. 2009. Detection of harassment on Web 2.0. In Proceedings of the Content Analysis in the Web Conference. 1--7.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Jacob Devlin, Ming-Wei Chang, Kenton Lee, and Kristina Toutanova. 2019. BERT: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. In Proceedings of the Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT’19), Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers). 4171--4186. Retrieved from https://aclweb.org/anthology/papers/N/N19/N19-1423/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Polina Stadnikova, Dietrich Klakow, Dominik Stammbach, and Azin Zahraei. 2018. Offensive language detection with neural networks for Germeval Task 2018. In Proceedings of the GermEval 2018 and 14th Conference on Natural Language Processing (KONVENS’18).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Elisabetta Fersini, Paolo Rosso, and Maria Anzovino. 2018. Overview of the task on automatic misogyny identification at IberEval 2018. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Evaluation of Human Language Technologies for Iberian Languages (IberEval@SEPLN’18) (CEUR Workshop Proceedings), Vol. 2150. CEUR-WS.org, 214--228.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Darja Fišer, Ruihong Huang, Vinodkumar Prabhakaran, Rob Voigt, Zeerak Waseem, and Jacqueline Wernimont. 2018. In Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Abusive Language Online (ALW2’18). Association for Computational Linguistics.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Paula Fortuna, Ilaria Bonavita, and Sérgio Nunes. 2018. Merging datasets for hate speech classification in Italian. In Proceedings of the 6th Evaluation Campaign of Natural Language Processing and Speech Tools for Italian. Final Workshop (EVALITA’18) co-located with the 5th Italian Conference on Computational Linguistics (CLiC-it’18).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Antigoni-Maria Founta, Despoina Chatzakou, Nicolas Kourtellis, Jeremy Blackburn, Athena Vakali, and Ilias Leontiadis. 2018. A unified deep learning architecture for abuse detection. CoRR abs/1802.00385 (2018). arxiv:1802.00385.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Antigoni-Maria Founta, Constantinos Djouvas, Despoina Chatzakou, Ilias Leontiadis, Jeremy Blackburn, Gianluca Stringhini, Athena Vakali, Michael Sirivianos, and Nicolas Kourtellis. 2018. Large scale crowdsourcing and characterization of Twitter abusive behavior. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Web and Social Media (ICWSM’18). 491--500.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Björn Gambäck and Utpal Kumar Sikdar. 2017. Using convolutional neural networks to classify hate-speech. In Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Abusive Language Online. Association for Computational Linguistics, 85--90. Retrieved from: http://aclweb.org/anthology/W17-3013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Mario Graff, Sabino Miranda-Jiménez, Eric Sadit Tellez, Daniela Moctezuma, Vladimir Salgado, José Ortiz-Bejar, and Claudia N. Sánchez. 2018. Author profiling and aggressiveness analysis in Twitter using μTC and EvoMSA. In Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Evaluation of Human Language Technologies for Iberian Languages (IberEval’18) co-located with the 34th Conference of the Spanish Society for Natural Language Processing (SEPLN’18). 128--133.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Edouard Grave, Piotr Bojanowski, Prakhar Gupta, Armand Joulin, and Tomas Mikolov. 2018. Learning word vectors for 157 languages. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’18).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Sepp Hochreiter and Jürgen Schmidhuber. 1997. Long short-term memory. Neural Comput. 9, 8 (Nov. 1997), 1735--1780.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Matthew Honnibal and Ines Montani. 2017. spaCy 2: Natural language understanding with Bloom embeddings, convolutional neural networks and incremental parsing. To Appear (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Tianran Hu, Han Guo, Hao Sun, Thuy-vy Thi Nguyen, and Jiebo Luo. 2017. Spice up your chat: The intentions and sentiment effects of using emojis. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Web and Social Media (ICWSM’17). 102--111.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Vijayasaradhi Indurthi, Bakhtiyar Syed, Manish Shrivastava, Nikhil Chakravartula, Manish Gupta, and Vasudeva Varma. 2019. Using sentence embeddings to identify hate speech against immigrants and women in Twitter. In Proceedings of the 13th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation. Association for Computational Linguistics, 70--74. DOI:https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/S19-2009Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Rohan Kshirsagar, Tyrus Cukuvac, Kathy McKeown, and Susan McGregor. 2018. Predictive embeddings for hate speech detection on Twitter. In Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Abusive Language Online (ALW2’18). Association for Computational Linguistics, 26--32.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Gretel Liz De la Peña Sarracén, Reynaldo Gil Pons, Carlos Enrique Muñiz-Cuza, and Paolo Rosso. 2018. Hate speech detection using attention-based LSTM. In Proceedings of the 6th Evaluation Campaign of Natural Language Processing and Speech Tools for Italian. Final Workshop (EVALITA’18) co-located with the 5th Italian Conference on Computational Linguistics (CLiC-it’18).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Younghun Lee, Seunghyun Yoon, and Kyomin Jung. 2018. Comparative studies of detecting abusive language on Twitter. CoRR abs/1808.10245 (2018). arxiv:1808.10245Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Ping Liu, Wen Li, and Liang Zou. 2019. Transfer learning for offensive language detection using bidirectional transformers. In Proceedings of the 13th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation. Association for Computational Linguistics, 87--91. DOI:https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/S19-2011Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Tomas Mikolov, Edouard Grave, Piotr Bojanowski, Christian Puhrsch, and Armand Joulin. 2018. Advances in pre-training distributed word representations. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’18).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Pushkar Mishra, Helen Yannakoudakis, and Ekaterina Shutova. 2018. Neural character-based composition models for abuse detection. In Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Abusive Language Online (ALW’18). Association for Computational Linguistics, 1--10. DOI:https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/W18-5101Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. Saif M. Mohammad and Peter D. Turney. 2010. Emotions evoked by common words and phrases: Using Mechanical Turk to create an emotion lexicon. In Proceedings of the NAACL HLT 2010 Workshop on Computational Approaches to Analysis and Generation of Emotion in Text. Association for Computational Linguistics, 26--34.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Saif M. Mohammad and Peter D. Turney. 2013. Crowdsourcing a word–emotion association lexicon. Computat. Intell. 29, 3 (2013), 436--465.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. Roberto Navigli and Simone Paolo Ponzetto. 2012. BabelNet: The automatic construction, evaluation, and application of a wide-coverage multilingual semantic network. Artif. Intell. 193 (2012), 217--250.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Chikashi Nobata, Joel R. Tetreault, Achint Thomas, Yashar Mehdad, and Yi Chang. 2016. Abusive language detection in online user content. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW’16). 145–153.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Joaquin Padilla Montani and Peter Schüller. 2018. German abusive tweet detection. In Proceedings of the GermEval 2018 and 14th Conference on Natural Language Processing (KONVENS’18).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. F. Pedregosa, G. Varoquaux, A. Gramfort, V. Michel, B. Thirion, O. Grisel, M. Blondel, P. Prettenhofer, R. Weiss, V. Dubourg, J. Vanderplas, A. Passos, D. Cournapeau, M. Brucher, M. Perrot, and E. Duchesnay. 2011. Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 12 (2011), 2825--2830.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Juan Manuel Pérez and Franco M. Luque. 2019. Robust embeddings for tweet classification. In Proceedings of the 13th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation. Association for Computational Linguistics, 64--69. DOI:https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/S19-2008Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Emanuele Pianta, Luisa Bentivogli, and Christian Girardi. 2002. MultiWordNet: Developing an aligned multilingual database. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Global WordNet.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Marco Polignano and Pierpaolo Basile. 2018. HanSEL: Italian hate speech detection through ensemble learning and deep neural networks. In Proceedings of the 6th Evaluation Campaign of Natural Language Processing and Speech Tools for Italian. Final Workshop (EVALITA’18) co-located with the 5th Italian Conference on Computational Linguistics (CLiC-it’18).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  53. Valentino Santucci, Stefania Spina, Alfredo Milani, Giulio Biondi, and Gabriele Di Bari. 2018. Detecting hate speech for Italian language in social media. In Proceedings of the 6th Evaluation Campaign of Natural Language Processing and Speech Tools for Italian. Final Workshop (EVALITA’18) co-located with the 5th Italian Conference on Computational Linguistics (CLiC-it’18).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  54. Tatjana Scheffler, Erik Haegert, Santichai Pornavalaia, and Mino Lee Sasse. 2018. Feature explorations for hate speech classification. In Proceedings of the GermEval 2018 and 14th Conference on Natural Language Processing (KONVENS’18).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Mike Schuster, Kuldip K. Paliwal, and A. General. 1997. Bidirectional recurrent neural networks. IEEE Trans. Sig. Proc. 45, 11 (1997), 2673--2681.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. Abhishek Singh, Eduardo Blanco, and Wei Jin. 2019. Incorporating emoji descriptions improves tweet classification. In Proceedings of the Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (NAACL’19).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  57. Samuel L. Smith, David H. P. Turban, Steven Hamblin, and Nils Y. Hammerla. 2017. Offline bilingual word vectors, orthogonal transformations, and the inverted softmax. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR’17).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. Samuel L. Smith, David H. P. Turban, Steven Hamblin, and Nils Y. Hammerla. 2017. Offline bilingual word vectors, orthogonal transformations and the inverted softmax. CoRR abs/1702.03859 (2017). arxiv:1702.03859Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. Jacopo Staiano and Marco Guerini. 2014. Depeche mood: A lexicon for emotion analysis from crowd annotated news. In Proceedings of the 52nd Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 2: Short Papers). 427--433.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  60. Dirk von Grunigen, Ralf Grubenmann, Fernando Benites, Pius Von Daniken, and Mark Cieliebak. 2018. Classification of offensive content in tweets using convolutional neural networks and gated recurrent units. In Proceedings of the GermEval 2018 and 14th Conference on Natural Language Processing (KONVENS’18).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. Zeerak Waseem, Wendy Hui Kyong Chung, Dirk Hovy, and Joel Tetreault. 2017. In Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Abusive Language Online. Association for Computational Linguistics.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  62. Zeerak Waseem and Dirk Hovy. 2016. Hateful symbols or hateful people? Predictive features for hate speech detection on Twitter. In Proceedings of the Student Research Workshop in Conjunction with NAACL HLT 2018.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  63. Gregor Wiedeman, Eugen Ruppert, Raghav Jindal, and Chris Biemann. 2018. Transfer learning from LDA to BiLSTM-CNN for offensive language detection in Twitter. In Proceedings of the GermEval 2018 and 14th Conference on Natural Language Processing (KONVENS’18).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  64. Michael Wiegand, Anastasija Amann, Tatiana Anikina, Aikaterini Azoidou, Anastasia Borisenkov, Kirstin Kolmorgen, Insa Kroger, and Christine Schafer. 2018. Examining different types of classifiers and features. In Proceedings of the GermEval 2018 and 14th Conference on Natural Language Processing (KONVENS’18).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  65. Michael Wiegand, Josef Ruppenhofer, and Thomas Kleinbauer. 2019. Detection of abusive language: The problem of biased datasets. In Proceedings of the Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers). Association for Computational Linguistics, 602--608. DOI:https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/N19-1060Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  66. Michael Wiegand, Melanie Siegel, and Josef Ruppenhofer. 2018. Overview of the GermEval 2018 shared task on the identification of offensive language. In Proceedings of the GermEval 2018 and 14th Conference on Natural Language Processing (KONVENS’18).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  67. Ellery Wulczyn, Nithum Thain, and Lucas Dixon. 2017. Ex Machina: Personal attacks seen at scale. In Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW’17). 1391--1399.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  68. Marcos Zampieri, Shervin Malmasi, Preslav Nakov, Sara Rosenthal, Noura Farra, and Ritesh Kumar. 2019. Identifying and categorizing offensive language in social media (OffensEval). In Proceedings of the 13th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation. Association for Computational Linguistics, 75--86. DOI:https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/S19-2010Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  69. Robinson D. Zhang, Z. and J. Tepper. 2018. Detecting hate speech on Twitter using a convolution-GRU based deep neural network. In Proceedings of the Semantic Web Conference Proceedings (ESWC’18). Springer Verlag, 745--760.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. A Multilingual Evaluation for Online Hate Speech Detection

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        Full Access

        • Published in

          cover image ACM Transactions on Internet Technology
          ACM Transactions on Internet Technology  Volume 20, Issue 2
          Special Section on Emotions in Conflictual Social Interactions and Regular Papers
          May 2020
          256 pages
          ISSN:1533-5399
          EISSN:1557-6051
          DOI:10.1145/3386441
          • Editor:
          • Ling Liu
          Issue’s Table of Contents

          Copyright © 2020 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 14 March 2020
          • Revised: 1 December 2019
          • Accepted: 1 December 2019
          • Received: 1 March 2019
          Published in toit Volume 20, Issue 2

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        HTML Format

        View this article in HTML Format .

        View HTML Format