skip to main content
10.1145/3412569.3412571acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesopencollabConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Recommending Tasks to Newcomers in OSS Projects: How Do Mentors Handle It?

Published:14 October 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

Software developers who want to start contributing to an Open Source Software (OSS) project often struggle to find appropriate first tasks. The voluntary, self-organizing distribution of decentralized labor and the distinct nature of some OSS projects intensifies this challenge. Mentors, who work closely with newcomers, develop strategies to recommend tasks. However, to date neither the challenges mentors face in recommending tasks nor their strategies have been formally documented or studied. In this paper, we interviewed mentors of well-established OSS projects (n=10) and qualitatively analyzed their answers to identify both challenges and strategies related to recommending tasks for newcomers. Then, we employed a survey (n=30) to map the strategies to challenges and collect additional strategies. Our study identified 7 challenges and 13 strategies related to task recommendation. Strategies such as "tagging the issues based on difficulty," "adding documentation," "assigning a small task first and then challenge the newcomers with bigger tasks," and "dividing tasks into smaller pieces" were frequently mentioned as ways to overcome multiple challenges. Our results provide insights for mentors about the strategies OSS communities can use to guide their mentors and for tool builders who design automated support for task assignment.

References

  1. Tammy D Allen, Lillian T Eby, Georgia T Chao, and Talya N Bauer. 2017. Taking stock of two relational aspects of organizational life: Tracing the history and shaping the future of socialization and mentoring research. Journal of Applied Psychology 102, 3 (March 2017), 324--337. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000086Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. John Anvik and Gail C. Murphy. 2011. Reducing the Effort of Bug Report Triage: Recommenders for Development-oriented Decisions. ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 20, 3, Article 10 (Aug. 2011), 35 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2000791.2000794Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. B. Ashok, Joseph Joy, Hongkang Liang, Sriram K. Rajamani, Gopal Srinivasa, and Vipindeep Vangala. 2009. DebugAdvisor: A Recommender System for Debugging. In Proceedings of the the 7th Joint Meeting of the European Software Engineering Conference and the ACM SIGSOFT Symposium on The Foundations of Software Engineering (ESEC/FSE '09). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 373--382. https://doi.org/10.1145/1595696.1595766Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Sogol Balali, Igor Steinmacher, Umayal Annamalai, Anita Sarma, and Marco Aurelio Gerosa. 2018. Newcomers' Barriers... Is That All? An Analysis of Mentors' and Newcomers' Barriers in OSS Projects. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 27, 3 (01 Dec 2018), 679--714. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-018-9310-8Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Sebastian Baltes and Stephan Diehl. 2016. Worse than spam: Issues in sampling software developers. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement. 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Sebastian Baltes and Stephan Diehl. 2018. Towards a theory of software development expertise. In ACM Symposium on the Foundations of oftware Engineering (FSE 2018). 187--200.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Ann Barcomb, Klaas-Jan Stol, Brian Fitzgerald, and Dirk Riehle. 2020. Managing Episodic Volunteers in Free/Libre/Open Source Software Communities. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Andrew Begel and Beth Simon. 2008. Novice Software Developers, All over Again. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop on Computing Education Research (ICER '08). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3--14. https://doi.org/10.1145/1404520.1404522Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Lucy M. Berlin. 1992. Beyond Program Understanding: A Look at Programming Expertise in Industry. Technical Report HPL-92-142. Hewlett-Packard Laboratories, Palo Alto, CA, USA. http://www.hpl.hp.com/techreports/92/HPL-92-142.html. Accessed in 18 February 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. H Russell Bernard. 2017. Research methods in anthropology: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Rowman & Littlefield.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Judith Bishop, Carlos Jensen, Walt Scacchi, and Arfon Smith. 2016. How to Use Open Source Software in Education. In Proceedings of the 47th ACM Technical Symposium on Computing Science Education (SIGCSE '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 321--322. https://doi.org/10.1145/2839509.2844665Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Kevin Buffardi. 2017. Comparing Remote and Co-located Interaction in Free and Open Source Software Engineering Projects. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education. 22--27.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Margaret Burnett, Anicia Peters, Charles Hill, and Noha Elarief. 2016. Finding Gender-Inclusiveness Software Issues with GenderMag: A Field Investigation. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2586--2598. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858274Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Gerardo Canfora, Massimiliano Di Penta, Rocco Oliveto, and Sebastiano Panichella. 2012. Who is Going to Mentor Newcomers in Open Source Projects?. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGSOFT 20th International Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering (FSE '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 44, 11 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2393596.2393647Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Gloria Crisp and Irene Cruz. 2009. Mentoring college students: A critical review of the literature between 1990 and 2007. Research in higher education 50, 6 (2009), 525--545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-009-9130-2Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Davor Cubranic, Gail C. Murphy, Janice Singer, and Kellogg S. Booth. 2005. Hipikat: a project memory for software development. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 31, 6 (June 2005), 446--465.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Jose Ricardo da Silva, Esteban Clua, Leonardo Murta, and Anita Sarma. 2015. Niche vs. breadth: Calculating expertise over time through a fine-grained analysis. In 2015 IEEE 22nd International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution, and Reengineering (SANER). IEEE, 409--418.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Barthélémy Dagenais, Harold Ossher, Rachel K. E. Bellamy, Martin P. Robillard, and Jacqueline P. de Vries. 2010. Moving into a New Software Project Landscape. In Proceedings of the 32nd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering - Volume 1 (ICSE '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 275--284. https://doi.org/10.1145/1806799.1806842Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Amy Edmondson. 1999. Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams Amy Edmondson. Administrative Science Quarterly 44, 2 (1999), 350--383.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Fabian Fagerholm, Alejandro S. Guinea, Jürgen Münch, and Jay Borenstein. 2014. The Role of Mentoring and Project Characteristics for Onboarding in Open Source Software Projects. In ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM '14). ACM, 55:1-55:10. https://doi.org/10.1145/2652524.2652540Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Fabian Fagerholm, Patrik Johnson, Alejandro Sanchez Guinea, Jay Borenstein, and Jürgen Münch. 2014. Onboarding in Open Source Projects. IEEE Software 31, 6 (Nov. 2014), 54--61. https://doi.org/10.1109/MS.2014.107Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Yulin Fang and Derrick Neufeld. 2009. Understanding Sustained Participation in Open Source Software Projects. Journal of Management Information Systems 25, 4 (April 2009), 9--50. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222250401Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Samer Faraj and Lee Sproull. 2000. Coordinating expertise in software development teams. Management science 46, 12 (2000), 1554--1568.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. N. T. Feather. 1969. Attribution of responsibility and valence of success and failure in relation to initial confidence and task performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 13(2) (1969). https://doi.org/10.1037/h0028071Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Jane Forman and Laura Damschroder. 2007. Qualitative content analysis. Empirical methods for bioethics: A primer 11 (2007), 39--62.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Andrea Forte and Cliff Lampe. 2013. Defining, Understanding, and Supporting Open Collaboration: Lessons From the Literature. American Behavioral Scientist 57, 5 (2013), 535--547. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764212469362 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764212469362Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. D Randy Garrison, Martha Cleveland-Innes, Marguerite Koole, and James Kappelman. 2006. Revisiting methodological issues in transcript analysis: Negotiated coding and reliability. The Internet and Higher Education 9, 1 (2006), 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Susan Gershenfeld. 2014. A Review of Undergraduate Mentoring Programs. Review of Educational Research 84, 3 (2014), 365--391. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654313520512 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654313520512Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Karen Handley, Andrew Sturdy, Robin Fincham, and Timothy Clark. 2006. Within and beyond communities of practice: Making sense of learning through participation, identity and practice. Journal of management studies 43, 3 (2006), 641--653.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. P. N. Johnson-Laird. 1983. Mental Models: Towards a Cognitive Science of Language, Inference, and Consciousness. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Philip N. Johnson-Laird. 2010. Mental models and human reasoning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107, 43 (2010), 18243--18250. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1012933107 arXiv:http://www.pnas.org/content/107/43/18243.full.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Swapna Kumar, Melissa Johnson, and Truly Hardemon. 2013. Dissertations at a distance: Students perceptions of online mentoring in a doctoral program. International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education 27, 1 (2013). http://www.ijede.ca/index.php/jde/article/view/835Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Adriaan Labuschagne and Reid Holmes. 2015. Do Onboarding Programs Work?. In Proceedings of the 12th Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR '15). IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ, USA, 381--385. https://doi.org/10.1109/MSR.2015.45Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Timothy C Lethbridge. 2000. What knowledge is important to a software professional? Computer 33, 5 (2000), 44--50.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Craig Macdonald and Iadh Ounis. 2006. Voting for candidates: adapting data fusion techniques for an expert search task. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management. ACM, 387--396.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Yuri Malheiros, Alan Moraes, Cleyton Trindade, and Silvio Meira. 2012. A Source Code Recommender System to Support Newcomers. In Proceedings of the IEEE 36th Annual Computer Software and Applications Conference (COMPSAC '12). IEEE, Los Alamitos, California, USA, 19--24. https://doi.org/10.1109/COMPSAC.2012.11Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Kay Martinez. 2004. Mentoring New Teachers: Promise and Problems in Times of Teacher Shortage. Australian Journal of Education 48, 1 (2004), 95--108. https://doi.org/10.1177/000494410404800107 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1177/000494410404800107Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Ann Mihkelson. 1997. A Model of Research Mentoring for Higher Education-An Overview. (1997).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Janice M Morse. 1994. Designing funded qualitative research.. In Handbook of qualitative research. Sage Publications, Inc, 220--335.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Debora Nascimento, Kenia Cox, Thiago Almeida, Wendell Sampaio, Roberto Bittencourt, Rodrigo Souza, and Christina Chavez. 2013. Using Open Source Projects in software engineering education: A systematic mapping study. In IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference. IEEE, 1837--1843. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2013.6685155Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Katherine E Nugent, Gwen Childs, Rosalind Jones, and Pamela Cook. 2004. A mentorship model for the retention of minority students. Nursing Outlook 52, 2 (2004), 89--94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2003.09.008Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Gordon O'Brien. 1967. Methods of Analyzing Group Tasks. (1967), 1--40. https://doi.org/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/647762.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Ilan Oshri, Julia Kotlarsky, and Leslie P Willcocks. 2007. Global software development: Exploring socialization and face-to-face meetings in distributed strategic projects. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems 16, 1 (2007), 25--49.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Sebastiano Panichella. 2015. Supporting newcomers in software development projects. In IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance and Evolution (ICSME 2015). IEEE, 586--589. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSM.2015.7332519Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Yunrim Park and Carlos Jensen. 2009. Beyond pretty pictures: Examining the benefits of code visualization for open source newcomers. In Proceedings of the 5th IEEE International Workshop on Visualizing Software for Understanding and Analysis (VISSOFT '09). IEEE, 3--10.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. Stephanie C Payne and Ann H Huffman. 2005. A longitudinal examination of the influence of mentoring on organizational commitment and turnover. Academy of Management Journal 48, 1 (February 2005), 158--168. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2005.15993166Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. Gustavo Pinto, Igor Steinmacher, Fernando Figueira Filho, and Marco A. Gerosa. 2017. Training the Next Generation of Software Engineers using Open-Source Software: An Interview Study. In IEEE 30th International Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training (CSEET 2017). IEEE, Los Alamitos, California, USA, 5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Gustavo Pinto, Igor Steinmacher, and Marco Gerosa. 2016. More Common Than You Think: An In-Depth Study of Casual Contributors. In SANER. 112--123.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Alex Radermacher and Gursimran Walia. 2013. Gaps between industry expectations and the abilities of graduates. In Proceeding of the 44th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education. 525--530.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Belle Rose Ragins. 1989. Barriers to Mentoring: The Female Manager's Dilemma. Human Relations 42, 1 (January 1989), 1--22. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872678904200101Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  51. Donna Redman, Sharon Conley, and Terrence E. Deal. 2015. A cultural approach to mentoring new teachers. In Mentoring for school quality: How educators can be more professional and effective, Bruce S. Cooper and Carlos R. McCray (Eds.). Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham, Maryland, 65--80.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Jonah E Rockoff. 2008. Does mentoring reduce turnover and improve skills of new employees? Evidence from teachers in New York City. Technical Report. National Bureau of Economic Research.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Neil J Salkind. 2008. Encyclopedia of educational psychology. Sage Publications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. Anita Sarma, Xiaofan Chen, Sandeep Kuttal, Laura Dabbish, and Zhendong Wang. 2016. Hiring in the Global Stage: Profiles of Online Contributions. In 2016 IEEE 11th International Conference on Global Software Engineering (ICGSE). 1--10. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICGSE.2016.35Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Anita Sarma, Marco Aurélio Gerosa, Igor Steinmacher, and Rafael Leano. 2016. Training the Future Workforce Through Task Curation in an OSS Ecosystem. In 24th ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Foundations of Software Engineering (FSE 2016). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 932--935. https://doi.org/10.1145/2950290.2983984Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. Andreas Schilling, Sven Laumer, and Tim Weitzel. 2012. Who Will Remain? An Evaluation of Actual Person-Job and Person-Team Fit to Predict Developer Retention in FLOSS Projects. In Proceedings of the 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS '12). IEEE Computer Society, 3446--3455. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2012.644Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  57. Jefferson Silva, Igor Wiese, Daniel German, Christoph Treude, Marco Gerosa, and Igor Steinmacher. 2020. A Theory of the Engagement in Open Source Projects via Summer of Code Programs. In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering (FSE 2020) (FSE '20).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  58. Susan E. Sim and Richard C. Holt. 1998. The ramp-up problem in software projects: a case study of how software immigrants naturalize. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE '98). IEEE, 361--370. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSE.1998.671389Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. Donna Spencer. 2009. Card sorting: Designing usable categories. Rosenfeld Media.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. Igor Steinmacher, Ana Paula Chaves, and Marco Aurélio Gerosa. 2013. Awareness Support in Distributed Software Development: A Systematic Review and Mapping of the Literature. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 22, 2-3 (2013), 113--158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-012-9164-4Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  61. Igor Steinmacher, Tayana Conte, and Marco Aurélio Gerosa. 2015. Understanding and Supporting the Choice of an Appropriate Task to Start With In Open Source Software Communities. In 2015 48th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS '15). IEEE, 5299--5308.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  62. Igor Steinmacher, Tayana Conte, Marco Aurélio Gerosa, and David F. Redmiles. 2015. Social Barriers Faced by Newcomers Placing Their First Contribution in Open Source Software Projects. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1379--1392. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2675133.2675215Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  63. Igor Steinmacher, Tayana Uchoa Conte, Christoph Treude, and Marco Aurélio Gerosa. 2016. Overcoming Open Source Project Entry Barriers with a Portal for Newcomers. In 38th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 273--284. https://doi.org/0.1145/2884781.2884806Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  64. Igor Steinmacher, Christoph Treude, and Marco Gerosa. 2018. Let me in: Guidelines for the Successful Onboarding of Newcomers to Open Source Projects. IEEE Software (2018), 1--1. https://doi.org/10.1109/MS.2018.110162131Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  65. Igor Steinmacher, Igor Scaliante Wiese, and Marco Aurélio Gerosa. 2012. Recommending mentors to software project newcomers. In Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Recommendation Systems for Software Engineering (RSSE '12). IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA, 63--67. https://doi.org/10.1109/RSSE.2012.6233413Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  66. Heidrun Stoeger, Xiaoju Duan, Sigrun Schirner, Teresa Greindl, and Albert Ziegler. 2013. The effectiveness of a one-year online mentoring program for girls in STEM. Computers & Education 69 (2013), 408--418.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  67. Margaret-Anne Storey, Alexey Zagalsky, Fernando Figueira Filho, Leif Singer, and Daniel M German. 2016. How social and communication channels shape and challenge a participatory culture in software development. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 43, 2 (2016), 185--204.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  68. Anselm Strauss and Juliet M. Corbin. 2007. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  69. Chris Street. 2004. Examining Learning To Teach through a Social Lens: How Mentors Guide Newcomers into a Professional Commuity of Learners. Teacher Education Quarterly 31, 2 (2004), 7--24.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  70. Gil Taran and Lynn Carter. 2010. Improving distance mentoring: Challenges and how to deal with them in global development project courses. In Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training (CSEET). IEEE, 97--104.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  71. Erik H Trainer, Arun Kalyanasundaram, and James D Herbsleb. 2017. E-mentoring for software engineering: a socio-technical perspective. In 2017 IEEE/ACM 39th International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering Education and Training Track (ICSE-SEET). IEEE, 107--116.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  72. Georg von Krogh, Sebastian Spaeth, and Karim R. Lakhani. 2003. Community, joining, and specialization in open source software innovation: A case study. Research Policy 32, 7 (2003), 1217--1241.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  73. Jianguo Wang and Anita Sarma. 2011. Which bug should I fix: helping new developers onboard a new project. In Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Cooperative and Human Aspects of Software Engineering (CHASE '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 76--79.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  74. Vincent Wolff-Marting, Christoph Hannebauer, and Volker Gruhn. 2013. Patterns for tearing down contribution barriers to FLOSS projects. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Intelligent Software Methodologies, Tools and Techniques (SoMeT '13). IEEE, 9--14. https://doi.org/10.1109/SoMeT.2013.6645669Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  75. Frances Zlotnick. 2017. GitHub Open Source Survey 2017. http://opensourcesurvey.org/2017/. (jun 2017). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.806811Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Recommending Tasks to Newcomers in OSS Projects: How Do Mentors Handle It?

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          OpenSym '20: Proceedings of the 16th International Symposium on Open Collaboration
          August 2020
          149 pages
          ISBN:9781450387798
          DOI:10.1145/3412569

          Copyright © 2020 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 14 October 2020

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

          Acceptance Rates

          OpenSym '20 Paper Acceptance Rate12of21submissions,57%Overall Acceptance Rate108of195submissions,55%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader