skip to main content
research-article

You Recommend, I Buy: How and Why People Engage in Instant Messaging Based Social Commerce

Published:22 April 2021Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

As an emerging business phenomenon especially in China, instant messaging (IM) based social commerce is growing increasingly popular, attracting hundreds of millions of users and is becoming one important way where people make everyday purchases. Such platforms embed shopping experiences within IM apps, e.g., WeChat, WhatsApp, where real-world friends post and recommend products from the platforms in IM group chats and quite often form lasting recommending/buying relationships. How and why do users engage in IM based social commerce? Do such platforms create novel experiences that are distinct from prior commerce? And do these platforms bring changes to user social lives and relationships? To shed light on these questions, we launched a qualitative study where we carried out semi-structured interviews on 12 instant messaging based social commerce users in China. We showed that IM based social commerce: 1) enables more reachable, cost-reducing, and immersive user shopping experience, 2) shapes user decision-making process in shopping through pre-existing social relationship, mutual trust, shared identity, and community norm, and 3) creates novel social interactions, which can contribute to new tie formation while maintaining existing social relationships. We demonstrate that all these unique aspects link closely to the characteristics of IM platforms, as well as the coupling of user social and economic lives under such business model. Our study provides important research and design implications for social commerce, and decentralized, trusted socio-technical systems in general.

References

  1. Tim Althoff and Jure Leskovec. 2015. Donor retention in online crowdfunding communities: A case study of donorschoose. org. In Proceedings of the 24th international conference on world wide web. 34--44.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Jennifer J Argo, Darren W Dahl, and Andrea C Morales. 2006. Consumer Contamination: How Consumers React to Products Touched by Others. Journal of Marketing, Vol. 70, 2 (2006), 81--94. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.70.2.81Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Jonah Berger and Raghuram Iyengar. 2013. Communication Channels and Word of Mouth: How the Medium Shapes the Message. Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 40, 3 (Jan 2013), 567--579. https://doi.org/10.1086/671345Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Michael S Bernstein, Adam Marcus, David R Karger, and Robert C Miller. 2010. Enhancing directed content sharing on the web. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 971--980.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Patrick Biernacki and Waldorf Dan. 1981. Snowball Sampling: Problems and Techniques of Chain Referral Sampling. Sociological Methods & Research, Vol. 10, 2 (1981), 141--163.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Cornell University Course Blog. 2016. Chinese WeChat: A better platform for network analysis. https://blogs.cornell.edu/info2040/2016/09/13/chinese-wechat-a-better-platform-for-network-analysis/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Hongbin Cai, Ginger Zhe Jin, Chong Liu, and Li-an Zhou. 2014. Seller reputation: From word-of-mouth to centralized feedback. International Journal of Industrial Organization, Vol. 34 (2014), 51--65.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Shun Cai, Yunjie Xu, and Jie Yu. 2008. The effects of web site aesthetics and shopping task on consumer online purchasing behavior. In Extended Abstracts Proceedings of the 2008 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2008, Florence, Italy, April 5-10, 2008 .Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Hancheng Cao, Zhilong Chen, Fengli Xu, Tao Wang, Yujian Xu, Lianglun Zhang, and Yong Li. 2020. When Your Friends Become Sellers: An Empirical Study of Social Commerce Site Beidian. In Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, Vol. 14. 83--94.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Hancheng Cao, Chia-Jung Lee, Shamsi Iqbal, Mary Czerwinski, Priscilla Wong, Sean Rintel, Brent Hecht, Jaime Teevan, and Longqi Yang. 2021 a. Large Scale Analysis of Multitasking Behavior During Remote Meetings. In the 2021 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445243Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Hancheng Cao, Vivian Yang, Victor Chen, Yu Jin Lee, Lydia Stone, N'godjigui Junior Diarrassouba, Mark E Whiting, and Michael S Bernstein. 2021 b. My Team Will Go On: Differentiating High and Low Viability Teams through Team Interaction. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 4, CSCW3 (2021), 1--27.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Monica Caraway, Daniel A Epstein, and Sean A Munson. 2017. Friends Don't Need Receipts: The Curious Case of Social Awareness Streams in the Mobile Payment App Venmo. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 1, CSCW (2017), 1--17.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Zhilong Chen, Hancheng Cao, Yuting Deng, Xuan Gao, Jinghua Piao, Fengli Xu, Yu Zhang, and Yong Li. 2020 a. A Large-Scale Mixed-Methods Analysis of Live Streaming Based Remote Education Experience in Chinese Colleges During the COVID-19 Pandemic. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.01662 (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Zhilong Chen, Hancheng Cao, Fengli Xu, Mengjie Cheng, Tao Wang, and Yong Li. 2020 b. Understanding the Role of Intermediaries in Online Social E-commerce: An Exploratory Study of Beidian. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 4, CSCW2 (2020), 1--24.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Cindy M. Y. Chung and Peter R. Darke. 2006. The consumer as advocate: Self-relevance, culture, and word-of-mouth. Marketing Letters, Vol. 17, 4 (2006), 269--279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-006-8426-7Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Karen Church and Rodrigo De Oliveira. 2013. What's up with WhatsApp? Comparing mobile instant messaging behaviors with traditional SMS. In Proceedings of the 15th international conference on Human-computer interaction with mobile devices and services. 352--361.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Juliet Corbin and Anselm Strauss. 2014. Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage publications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Margaret Craig-Lees, Sally Joy, and Beverly Browne. 1995. Consumer behaviour. Wiley.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Renata Goncc alves Curty and Ping Zhang. 2011. Social commerce: Looking back and forward. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 48, 1 (2011), 1--10.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Ernest Dichter. 1966. How word-of-mouth advertising works. Harvard Business Review, Vol. 6, 4 (1966), 147--166.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Xianghua Ding, Yunan Chen, Zhaofei Ding, and Yiwen Xu. 2019. Boundary Negotiation for Patient-Provider Communication via WeChat in China. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 3, CSCW (2019), 1--24.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. David Dubois, Andrea Bonezzi, and Matteo De Angelis. 2016. Sharing with Friends versus Strangers: How Interpersonal Closeness Influences Word-of-Mouth Valence. Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 53, 5 (2016), 712--727. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.13.0312Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Kirk W. Duthler. 2006. The Politeness of Requests Made Via Email and Voicemail: Support for the Hyperpersonal Model. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, Vol. 11, 2 (2006), 500--521. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00024.xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Clifford Geertz. 1978. The Bazaar Economy: Information and Search in Peasant Marketing. American Economic Review, Vol. 68 (1978), 28--32.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Jennifer Golbeck. 2006. Generating predictive movie recommendations from trust in social networks. In International Conference on Trust Management. Springer, 93--104.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Mark Granovetter. 1985. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American journal of sociology, Vol. 91, 3 (1985), 481--510.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Rebecca E Grinter and Leysia Palen. 2002. Instant messaging in teen life. In Proceedings of the 2002 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work. 21--30.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. David Holtz, Diana Lynn MacLean, and Sinan Aral. 2017. Social structure and trust in massive digital markets. (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Yifeng Hu, Jacqueline Fowler Wood, Vivian Smith, and Nalova Westbrook. 2004. Friendships through IM: Examining the relationship between instant messaging and intimacy. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, Vol. 10, 1 (2004), JCMC10111.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Gerald Häubl and Pablo Figueroa. 2002. Interactive 3D presentations and buyer behavior. In Extended Abstracts of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Ellen Isaacs, Alan Walendowski, Steve Whittaker, Diane J Schiano, and Candace Kamm. 2002. The character, functions, and styles of instant messaging in the workplace. In Proceedings of the 2002 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work. 11--20.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Sanghyun Kim and Hyunsun Park. 2013. Effects of various characteristics of social commerce (s-commerce) on consumers' trust and trust performance. International Journal of Information Management, Vol. 33, 2 (2013), 318--332.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Irwin King, Michael R Lyu, and Hao Ma. 2010. Introduction to social recommendation. In Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World wide web. 1355--1356.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Chinmay Kulkarni and Ed Chi. 2013. All the news that's fit to read: a study of social annotations for news reading. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2407--2416.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Joseph Lampel and Ajay Bhalla. 2007. The Role of Status Seeking in Online Communities: Giving the Gift of Experience. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, Vol. 12, 2 (2007), 434--455. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00332.xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Jure Leskovec and Eric Horvitz. 2008. Planetary-scale views on a large instant-messaging network. In Proceedings of the 17th international conference on World Wide Web. 915--924.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Ting-Peng Liang, Yi-Ting Ho, Yu-Wen Li, and Efraim Turban. 2011. What drives social commerce: The role of social support and relationship quality. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, Vol. 16, 2 (2011), 69--90.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Ting-Peng Liang and Efraim Turban. 2011. Introduction to the special issue social commerce: a research framework for social commerce. International Journal of electronic commerce, Vol. 16, 2 (2011), 5--14.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Sihui Liu. 2015. Research on Factors Influencing Social E-commerce User Acceptance Based on TAM Model. Ph.D. Dissertation. Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Peter V Marsden and Noah E Friedkin. 1993. Network studies of social influence. Sociological Methods & Research, Vol. 22, 1 (1993), 127--151.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Miller McPherson, Lynn Smith-Lovin, and James M Cook. 2001. Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual review of sociology, Vol. 27, 1 (2001), 415--444.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Shailey Minocha, Marian Petre, Ekaterini Tzanidou, Geke van Dijk, Dave Roberts, Nick Gassman, Nicola Millard, Barry Day, and David Travis. 2006. Evaluating E-Commerce Environments: Approaches to Cross-Disciplinary Investigation. In CHI '06 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montréal, Québec, Canada) (CHI EA '06). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1121--1126. https://doi.org/10.1145/1125451.1125663Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Carol Moser, Chanda Phelan, Paul Resnick, Sarita Y Schoenebeck, and Katharina Reinecke. 2017. No such thing as too much chocolate: evidence against choice overload in e-commerce. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 4358--4369.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Carol Moser, Sarita Y. Schoenebeck, and Paul Resnick. 2019. Impulse Buying: Design Practices and Consumer Needs. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Glasgow, Scotland Uk) (CHI '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300472Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Bonnie A Nardi, Steve Whittaker, and Erin Bradner. 2000. Interaction and outeraction: instant messaging in action. In Proceedings of the 2000 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work. 79--88.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Steven Reiss. 2012. Multifaceted Model of Intrinsic Motivation. Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning (2012), 2366--2368. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_1637Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. Jens Riegelsberger, M. Angela Sasse, and John D. McCarthy. 2003. Shiny Happy People Building Trust? Photos on e-Commerce Websites and Consumer Trust. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, USA) (CHI '03). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 121--128. https://doi.org/10.1145/642611.642634Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Everett M Rogers. 2010. Diffusion of innovations .Simon and Schuster.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Georgia Robins Sadler, Hau-Chen Lee, Rod Seung-Hwan Lim, and Judith Fullerton. 2010. Recruitment of hard-to-reach population subgroups via adaptations of the snowball sampling strategy. Nursing & health sciences, Vol. 12, 3 (2010), 369--374.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Amit Sharma. 2013. PopCore: a system for network-centric recommendation. In Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work companion. 31--34.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Amit Sharma and Dan Cosley. 2013. Do social explanations work? Studying and modeling the effects of social explanations in recommender systems. In Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on World Wide Web. 1133--1144.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. Amit Sharma and Dan Cosley. 2015. Studying and modeling the connection between people's preferences and content sharing. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing. 1246--1257.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. Amit Sharma and Dan Cosley. 2016. Distinguishing between personal preferences and social influence in online activity feeds. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing. 1091--1103.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. Amit Sharma, Mevlana Gemici, and Dan Cosley. 2013. Friends, strangers, and the value of ego networks for recommendation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1304.4837 (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Dong-Hee Shin. 2013. User experience in social commerce: in friends we trust. Behaviour & information technology, Vol. 32, 1 (2013), 52--67.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. Eulynn Shiu and Amanda Lenhart. 2004. How Americans use instant messaging. (2004).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. George Silverman. 2011. Secrets of word-of-mouth marketing: how to trigger exponential sales through runaway word of mouth. Amacom books.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. Ulrike Steinbrück, Heike Schaumburg, Sabrina Duda, and Thomas Krüger. 2002. A Picture Says More than a Thousand Words: Photographs as Trust Builders in e-Commerce Websites. In CHI '02 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA) (CHI EA '02). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 748--749. https://doi.org/10.1145/506443.506578Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  59. Andrew T Stephen and Olivier Toubia. 2010. Deriving value from social commerce networks. Journal of marketing research, Vol. 47, 2 (2010), 215--228.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  60. Anselm Strauss and Juliet Corbin. 1998. Basics of qualitative research techniques .Sage publications Thousand Oaks, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. Anselm Strauss and Juliet M Corbin. 1997. Grounded theory in practice .Sage.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  62. Luisa Sturiale and Alessandro Scuderi. 2013. Evaluation of Social Media Actions for the Agrifood System. Procedia Technology, Vol. 8 (2013), 200--208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.protcy.2013.11.028Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  63. Jiliang Tang, Xia Hu, and Huan Liu. 2013. Social recommendation: a review. Social Network Analysis and Mining, Vol. 3, 4 (2013), 1113--1133.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  64. Loren Terveen, Will Hill, Brian Amento, David McDonald, and Josh Creter. 1997. PHOAKS: A system for sharing recommendations. Commun. ACM, Vol. 40, 3 (1997), 59--62.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  65. Wan-Hsiu Sunny Tsai and Rita Linjuan Men. 2018. Social messengers as the new frontier of organization-public engagement: A WeChat study. Public relations review, Vol. 44, 3 (2018), 419--429.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  66. Yang Wang, Yao Li, and Jian Tang. 2015a. Dwelling and Fleeting Encounters. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI EA 15 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1145/2702613.2732762Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  67. Yang Wang, Yao Li, and Jian Tang. 2015b. Dwelling and fleeting encounters: Exploring why people use WeChat-A mobile instant messenger. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1543--1548.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  68. Robert A Westbrook. 1987. Product/consumption-based affective responses and postpurchase processes. Journal of marketing research, Vol. 24, 3 (1987), 258--270.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  69. Yen-Chun Jim Wu, Ju-Peng Shen, and Chan-Lan Chang. 2015. Electronic service quality of Facebook social commerce and collaborative learning. Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 51 (2015), 1395--1402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.10.001Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  70. Fengli Xu, Zhenyu Han, Jinghua Piao, and Yong Li. 2019. "I Think You'll Like It" Modelling the Online Purchase Behavior in Social E-commerce. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 3, CSCW (2019), 1--23.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  71. Manjit S Yadav, Kristine De Valck, Thorsten Hennig-Thurau, Donna L Hoffman, and Martin Spann. 2013. Social commerce: A contingency framework for assessing marketing potential. Journal of interactive marketing, Vol. 27, 4 (2013), 311--323.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  72. Jiang Yang, Mark S Ackerman, and Lada A Adamic. 2011. Virtual gifts and guanxi: supporting social exchange in a chinese online community. In Proceedings of the ACM 2011 conference on Computer supported cooperative work. 45--54.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  73. Ming Zeng, Hancheng Cao, Min Chen, and Yong Li. 2019. User behaviour modeling, recommendations, and purchase prediction during shopping festivals. Electronic Markets, Vol. 29, 2 (2019), 263--274.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  74. Lina Zhou, Ping Zhang, and Hans-Dieter Zimmermann. 2013. Social commerce research: An integrated view. Electronic commerce research and applications, Vol. 12, 2 (2013), 61--68.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. You Recommend, I Buy: How and Why People Engage in Instant Messaging Based Social Commerce

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
      Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction  Volume 5, Issue CSCW1
      CSCW
      April 2021
      5016 pages
      EISSN:2573-0142
      DOI:10.1145/3460939
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Copyright © 2021 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 22 April 2021
      Published in pacmhci Volume 5, Issue CSCW1

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader