skip to main content
10.1145/3517031.3529243acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesetraConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Scanpath Comparison using ScanGraph for Education and Learning Purposes: Summary of previous educational studies performed with the use of ScanGraph

Authors Info & Claims
Published:08 June 2022Publication History
First page image

References

  1. Anderson, N.C., Anderson, F., Kingstone, A. and Bischof, W.F. 2014. A comparison of scanpath comparison methods. Behavior research methods, 1377–1392.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Beitlova, M., Popelka, S. and Vozenilek, V. 2020. Differences in Thematic Map Reading by Students and Their Geography Teacher. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 9, 492.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Brus, J., Kucera, M. and Popelka, S. 2019. Intuitiveness of geospatial uncertainty visualizations: a user study on point symbols. Geografie 124, 163-185.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Cristino, F., Mathôt, S., Theeuwes, J. and Gilchrist, I.D. 2010. ScanMatch: A novel method for comparing fixation sequences. Behavior research methods 42, 692-700.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Damerau, F.J. 1964. A technique for computer detection and correction of spelling errors. Communications of the ACM 7, 171-176.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Dewhurst, R., Nyström, M., Jarodzka, H., Foulsham, T., Johansson, R. and Holmqvist, K. 2012. It depends on how you look at it: Scanpath comparison in multiple dimensions with MultiMatch, a vector-based approach. Behavior research methods 44, 1079-1100.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Dolezalova, J. AND Popelka, S. 2016. ScanGraph: A Novel Scanpath Comparison Method Using Visualisation of Graph Cliques. Journal of Eye Movement Research 9.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Eraslan, S., Yaneva, V., Yesilada, Y. and Harper, S. 2017. Do web users with autism experience barriers when searching for information within web pages? In Proceedings of the 14th International Web for All Conference, 1-4.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Eraslan, S., Yaneva, V., Yesilada, Y. and Harper, S. 2019. Web users with autism: eye tracking evidence for differences. Behaviour & Information Technology 38, 678-700.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Havelková, L. and Gołębiowska, I.M. 2020. What Went Wrong for Bad Solvers during Thematic Map Analysis? Lessons Learned from an Eye-Tracking Study. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 9, 9.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Havelková, L. and Hanus, M. 2019. Research into map-analysis strategies: Theory-and data-driven approaches. Geografie 124, 187-216.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Jarodzka, H., Holmqvist, K. and Nyström, M. 2010. A vector-based, multidimensional scanpath similarity measure. In Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 2010 Symposium on Eye-Tracking Research & Applications2010 ACM, 211-218.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Levenshtein, V.I. 1966. Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions, and reversals. Soviet physics doklady 10, 707-710.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Mannan, S., Ruddock, K. and Wooding, D. 1995. Automatic control of saccadic eye movements made in visual inspection of briefly presented 2-D images. Spatial vision 9, 363-386.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Needleman, S.B. and Wunsch, C.D. 1970. A general method applicable to the search for similarities in the amino acid sequence of two proteins. Journal of molecular biology 48, 443-453.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Noton, D. and Stark, L. 1971. Scanpaths in saccadic eye movements while viewing and recognizing patterns. Vision Research 11, 929-IN928.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Popelka, S., Dolezalova, J. and Beitlova, M. 2018. New features of scangraph: a tool for revealing participants' strategy from eye-movement data. In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Eye Tracking Research & Applications2018 ACM, 103.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Popelka, S., Vondrakova, A. and Hujnakova, P. 2019. Eye-Tracking Evaluation of Weather Web Maps ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 8, 29.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Richardson, D.C. and Dale, R. 2005. Looking to understand: The coupling between speakers' and listeners' eye movements and its relationship to discourse comprehension. Cognitive science 29, 1045-1060.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Shepherd, S.V., Steckenfinger, S.A., Hasson, U. and Ghazanfar, A.A. 2010. Human-monkey gaze correlations reveal convergent and divergent patterns of movie viewing. Current Biology 20, 649-656.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Skrabankova, J., Popelka, S. and Beitlova, M. 2020. Students’ ability to work with graphs in physics studies related to three typical student groups. Journal of Baltic Science Education 19, 298-316.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Voßkühler, A., Nordmeier, V., Kuchinke, L. and Jacobs, A.M. 2008. OGAMA (Open Gaze and Mouse Analyzer): open-source software designed to analyze eye and mouse movements in slideshow study designs. Behavior research methods 40, 1150-1162.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Wagner, A., Halchenko, Y. and Hanke, M. 2019. multimatch-gaze: The MultiMatch algorithm for gaze path comparison in Python. Journal of Open Source Software 4, 1525.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. West, J.M., Haake, A.R., Rozanski, E.P. and Karn, K.S. 2006. eyePatterns: software for identifying patterns and similarities across fixation sequences. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Eye tracking research & applications (ETRA 2006), San Diego, California, USA2006 ACM, 149-154.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    ETRA '22: 2022 Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications
    June 2022
    408 pages
    ISBN:9781450392525
    DOI:10.1145/3517031

    Copyright © 2022 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 8 June 2022

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    ETRA '22 Paper Acceptance Rate15of39submissions,38%Overall Acceptance Rate69of137submissions,50%

    Upcoming Conference

    ETRA '24
    The 2024 Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications
    June 4 - 7, 2024
    Glasgow , United Kingdom

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format