Edward F. Gehringer
Abstract
We have implemented a peer-grading system for review of student assignments over the World-Wide Web and used it in approximately eight computer-science courses. Students prepare their assignments and submit them to our Peer Grader (PG) system. Other students are then assigned to review and grade the assignments. The system allows authors and reviewers to communicate with authors being able to update their submissions. Unique features of our approach include the ability to submit arbitrary sets of Web pages for review, and mechanisms for encouraging careful review of submissions. We have used the system to produce high-quality compilations of student work. Our assignment cycle consists of six phases, from signing up for an assignment to Web publishing of the final result. Based upon our experience with PG, we offer suggestions for improving the system to make it more easily usable by students at all levels.
- 1 The Deadalus Grow, Deadalus Integrated Writing Environment, http://www.daedalus.com/info/overtext.htmlGoogle Scholar
- 2 Downing, T. and Brown, L, "Learning by cooperative publishing on the World-Wide Web," Active Learning 7, 1997, pp. 14-16.Google Scholar
- 3 Ead, S. E., "Staff and peer assessment: Measuring an individual's contribution to group performance," Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 11, 1986, pp. 60-69.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 4 Ford, B. W., The effects of peer editing/grading on the grammar-usage and theme-composition ability of college freshmen. Dissertation Abstracts International, 33, 6687.Google Scholar
- 5 Gehringer, Edward F., "Strategies and mechanisms for electronic peer review," Proc. Frontiers in Education 2000, Kansas City, October 18-21, 2000 (to appear). Google ScholarDigital Library
- 6 Lopez-Real, Francis and Chan, Yin-Ping Rita, "Peer assessment of a group project in a primary mathematics education course," Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 24:1, March 1999, pp. 67-79.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 7 MacAlpinn, J. M. K., Improving and encouraging, peer assessment of student presentations, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 24:1, March 1999, pp. 15- 25.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 8 Persons, Obeua S., "Factors influencing students' peer evaluations in cooperative learning," Journal of Business for Education, Mar.-Apr. 1998.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 9 Rada, R., Acquah, S., Baker, B., and Ramsey, P., "Collaborative learning and the MUCH System," Computers and Education 20, 1993, pp. 225-233. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 10 Rafiq, Y., & Fullerton, H., "Peer assessment of group projects in civil engineering," Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 21, 1996, pp. 69-81.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 11 Rushton, C., Ramsey, P., and Rada, R., "Peer assessment in a collaborative hypermedia environment: A case-study," Journal of Computer-Based Instruction 20, 1993, pp. 75-80.Google Scholar
- 12 University of Portsmouth, "Transferable peer assessment," in National Council for Educational Technology {ed.}, Using information technology for assessment, recording and reporting: Case studyGoogle Scholar
- 13 Williams, Laurie A. and Kessler, Robert R., "All I really need to know about pair programming I learned in kindergarten," Communications of the ACM 43:5, May 2000, pp. 108-114. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Electronic peer review and peer grading in computer-science courses
Recommendations
Electronic peer review and peer grading in computer-science courses
SIGCSE '01: Proceedings of the thirty-second SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer Science EducationWe have implemented a peer-grading system for review of student assignments over the World-Wide Web and used it in approximately eight computer-science courses. Students prepare their assignments and submit them to our Peer Grader (PG) system. Other ...
Supporting Team Submissions and Peer Grading within Submitty: (Abstract Only)
SIGCSE '18: Proceedings of the 49th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science EducationSubmitty is an open source programming assignment submission system from the Rensselaer Center for Open Source Software (RCOS) at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (RPI) accessed via an online interface. Submitty allows students to submit their code ...
Peer Grading Without Protest: The SPARK Approach to Summative Peer Assessment
SIGCSE 2022: Proceedings of the 53rd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education - Volume 1As Computer Science Professors, we strive to construct courses that maximally support and contribute to student learning through carefully crafted in-class and out-of-class activities. There is evidence that homework enhances student learning, and that ...
Comments