skip to main content
10.1145/503376.503413acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Evaluating the effectiveness of spatial memory in 2D and 3D physical and virtual environments

Published:20 April 2002Publication History

ABSTRACT

User interfaces can improve task performance by exploiting the powerful human capabilities for spatial cognition. This opportunity has been demonstrated by many prior experiments. It is tempting to believe that providing greater spatial flexibility-by moving from flat 2D to 3D user interfaces-will further enhance user performance. This paper describes an experiment that investigates the effectiveness of spatial memory in real-world physical models and in equivalent computer-based virtual systems. The different models vary the user's freedom to use depth and perspective in spatial arrangements of images representing web pages. Results show that the subjects' performance deteriorated in both the physical and virtual systems as their freedom to locate items in the third dimension increased. Subjective measures reinforce the performance measures, indicating that users found interfaces with higher dimensions more 'cluttered' and less efficient

References

  1. Barfield, W. and Rosenberg, C. Judgments of Azimuth and Elevation as a Function of Monoscopic and Binocular Depth Cues Using a Perspective Display. Human Factors 37, 1, 173--181. 1995.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Cockburn, A. and McKenzie, B. 3D or Not 3D? Evaluating the Effect of the Third Dimension in a Document Management System. In Proceedings of CHI'2001, Seattle, April 2001, ACM Press, 434--441. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Czerwinski, M., Dumais, S., Robertson, G., Dziadosz, S., Tiernan, S., and van Dantzich, M. Visualizing Implicit Queries for Information Management and Retrieval. In Proceedings of CHI'99, 1999, 560--567. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Czerwinski, M., van Dantzich, M, Robertson, G., and Hoffman, H. The Contribution of Thumbnail Image, Mouse-over Test and Spatial Location Memory to Web Page Retrieval in 3D. Proc. INTERACT'1999. 163--170.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Delucia, P. Effects of Pictorial Relative Size and Group-Intercept Information on Judgments about Potential Collisions in Perspective Displays. Human Factors 37, 3, 528--538. 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Egan, D. and Gomez, M. Assaying, Isolating, and Accommodating Individual Differences in Learning a Complex Skill. In Dillon, R (ed): Individual Differences in Cognition. NY: Academic Press, 173--217. 1985.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Gagnon, D. Videogames and Spatial Skills: An Exploratory Study. Educational Communication and Technology 33, 4, 263--275, 1985.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Jones, WP. and Dumais, ST. The Spatial Metaphor for User Interfaces: Experimental Tests of Reference by Location versus Name. ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems 4, 1, 42--63. 1986. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Leitheiser, B. and Munro, D. An Experimental Study of the Relationship Between Spatial Ability and the Learning of a Graphical User Interface. In Proceedings of the Inaugural Americas Conference on Information Systems, 1995. hsb.Baylor.edu/ramsower/acis/papers/leitheis.htmGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Risden, K., Czerwinski, M., Munzner, T. and Cook, D. An Initial Examination of Ease of Use for 2D and 3D Information Visualizations of Web Content. Int. J. Human-Computer Studies, 53, 695--714. 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Robertson, G., Czerwinski, M., Larson, K., Robbins, D., Thiel, D., and van Dantzich, M. Data Mountain: Using Spatial Memory for Document Management. In Proceedings of UIST'98, 1998, ACM Press. 153--162. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Robertson, G., van Dantzich, M., Czerwinski, M., Hinkley, K., Thiel, D., Robbins, D., Risden, K. and Gorokhovsky, V. The Task Gallery: A 3D Window Manager. In Proceedings of CHI'2000, The Hague, April 2000, ACM Press. 494--501. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Smallman, H., St. John, M, Oonk, H. and Cowen, M. Track Recognition Using Two-Dimensional Symbols or Three-Dimensional Realistic Icons. SPAWAR Systems Center Technical Report Number 1815. 2000. www.nosc.mil/sti/publications/pubs/tr/1818.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. St. John, M., Oonk, H. and Cowen, M. Using Two-Dimensional and Perspective Views of Terrain. SPAWAR Systems Center Technical Report Number 1815. 2000. www.nosc.mil/sti/publications/pubs/tr/1815.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Vicente, K., Hayes, B. and Williges, R. Assaying and Isolating Individual Differences in Searching a Hierarchical File System. Human Factors 29, 3, 349--359, 1987. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Ware, C., and Franck, G. Evaluating Stereo and Motion Cues for Visualizing Information Nets in Three Dimensions. ACM Trans. Graph. 15, 2, 121--139, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Wickens, C., Liang, C., Prevett, T. and Olmos, O. Egocentric and Exocentric Displays for Terminal Area Navigation. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 38th Annual Meeting, 1995, 16--20.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Wickens, C., Miller, S. and Tham, M. The Implications of Data-Link for Representing Pilot Request Information on 2D and 3D Air Traffic Control Displays. In Proc. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 38th Annual Meeting, 1995, 61--65.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Wickens, C., Olmos, O., Chudy, A. and Davenport, C. Aviation Display Support For Situation Awareness. Research Report ARL-97-10/LOGICON-97-2. 1997. www.aviation.uiuc.edu/new/html/ARL/TechPdf/97-10.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Evaluating the effectiveness of spatial memory in 2D and 3D physical and virtual environments

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          CHI '02: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
          April 2002
          478 pages
          ISBN:1581134533
          DOI:10.1145/503376
          • Conference Chair:
          • Dennis Wixon

          Copyright © 2002 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 20 April 2002

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • Article

          Acceptance Rates

          CHI '02 Paper Acceptance Rate61of414submissions,15%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

          Upcoming Conference

          CHI '24
          CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
          May 11 - 16, 2024
          Honolulu , HI , USA

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader