M. J. Kaelbling
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to open discussion on the adequacy and design of commenting techniques in programming (and, indeed, all computer processing) languages. The argument is made that the common notion of comment statements is too simplistics, and that a powerful alternative exists. A distinction is made between simple comment statements and scoped comments. Two types of scoped comments are mentioned, and their weaknesses are considered. The paper ends with a call for language designers to address this issue.
Index Terms
- Programming languages should NOT have comment statements
Recommendations
Definitional Interpreters for Higher-Order Programming Languages
Higher-order programming languages (i.e., languages in which procedures or labels can occur as values) are usually defined by interpreters that are themselves written in a programming language based on the lambda calculus (i.e., an applicative language ...
Definitional interpreters for higher-order programming languages
ACM '72: Proceedings of the ACM annual conference - Volume 2Higher-order programming languages (i.e., languages in which procedures or labels can occur as values) are usually defined by interpreters which are themselves written in a programming language based on the lambda calculus (i.e., an applicative language ...
Semantics of programming languages
A semantic specification of a programming language can be relevant for programmers to understand software written in the language, as well as for the implementers of a language to understand the intentions of its designers. In the early 1980s, Jan ...
Comments