Barbara Moskal
L. A. Smith King
Abstract
Computer ethics courses differ from technical courses in the manner in which they are taught and assessed. A common assignment in a computer ethics course is to write an essay that addresses a technical dilemma. Computer science faculty typically do not have training or experience in grading essays. The purpose of this paper is to present a scoring rubric that has been successfully used to grade and track students' knowledge development as they progress through a computer ethics course. Although this paper focuses upon a specific rubric, general principles will be emphasized to show how scoring rubrics can be used across different courses.
- Accreditation Board of Engineering and Technology. Engineering Criteria, 6th Edition {online}: 2001. http://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation.htm, accessed 14 August 2001.Google Scholar
- American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association & National Council on Measurement in Education (1999). Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.Google Scholar
- Brookhart, S. M., The Art and Science of Classroom Assessment: The Missing Part of Pedagogy, ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, Vol. 27, No.1, Washington, DC: The George Washington University, Graduate School of Education and Human Development, 1999.Google Scholar
- http://www.csab.org, accessed 14 August 2001.Google Scholar
- Johnson, D. G., "Who Should Teach Computer Ethics and Computers & Society?," Computers and Society, 24(2), 6-7, 1994. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Johnson, D. G., Computer Ethics, 34rd Edition : Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 2001.Google Scholar
- Martin, C. Diane and Hilary J. Holz, Non-Apologetic Computer Ethics Education: A Strategy for Integrating Social Impact and Ethics into the Computer Science Curriculum, http://www.southernct.edu/organizations/rccs/resources/teaching/teaching_mono/martin_holz/martin_holz_intro.html, (accessed 8/16/2001).Google Scholar
- Moskal, B. M., "Scoring rubrics: What, when and how?", Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 7 (3), 2000, {Available Online: http://ericae.net/pare/getvn.asp?v=7&n=3}.Google Scholar
- Moskal, B., Knecht, R. & Pavelich, M., "The Design Report Rubric: Assessing the Impact of Program Design on the Learning Process, " Journal for the Art of Teaching: Assessment of Learning, 8 (1), 18-33, 2001.Google Scholar
- Moskal, B. M. & J. A. Leydens, "Scoring Rubric Development: Validity and Reliability", Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 7 (10), 2000. {Available online: http://ericae.net/pare/getvn.asp?v=7&n=10}.Google Scholar
- http://www.infosec.jmu.edu/computerethics/ National Colloquium for Information System Security Education: Computer Ethics Education. James Madison University, (accessed 8/16/2001).Google Scholar
- Siponena, Mikko T., and Jorma Kajavab, Computer Ethics --- the Most Vital Social Aspect of Computing: Some Themes and Issues Concerning Moral and Ethical Problems of IT, IRIS 20, Oslo, Norway, June 1997. http://www.ifi.uio.no/iris20/proceedings/12.htm#E19E179, (accessed 8/16/2001).Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Grading essays in computer ethics: rubrics considered helpful
Recommendations
Grading essays in computer ethics: rubrics considered helpful
SIGCSE '02: Proceedings of the 33rd SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science educationComputer ethics courses differ from technical courses in the manner in which they are taught and assessed. A common assignment in a computer ethics course is to write an essay that addresses a technical dilemma. Computer science faculty typically do not ...
Moral luck and computer ethics: Gauguin in cyberspace
I argue that the problem of `moral luck' is an unjustly neglected topic within Computer Ethics. This is unfortunate given that the very nature of computer technology, its `logical malleability', leads to ever greater levels of complexity, unreliability ...
Comments