skip to main content
article

Implementation experience with MANET routing protocols

Authors Info & Claims
Published:01 November 2002Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

This paper outlines our experience with the implementation and deployment of two MANET routing protocols on a five node, four hop, network. The work was prompted by the lack of published results concerning the issues associated with the implementation of MANET routing protocols on actual wireless networks, as opposed to results of simulation experiments. We examined implementations of two distance vector MANET routing protocols and found a number of problems with both protocols during the course of our experiments. The most significant was that neither protocol could provide a stable route over any multi-hop network connection. The route discovery process of both protocols is fooled by the transient availability of network links to nodes that were more than one hop away. Packets transmitted over a fading channel cause the routing protocol to conclude incorrectly that there is a new one hop neighbor that could provide a lower metric (hop count) route to even more distant nodes. This can occur even when nodes are stationary, mobility resulted in even less route stability. We implemented a simple signal strength based neighbor selection procedure to test our assertion that fading channels and unreliable network links were the cause of the failure of the routing protocols. The result was that neighbor discovery and the filtering for neighbors with which nodes could communicate reliably enables the creation of reliable multihop routes. Based on our experiences, we outline several recommendations for future work in MANET research.

References

  1. R. K. Ahuja, T. L. Magnanti, and J. B. Orlin. Network Flows, theory, Algorithms, and Applications. Prentice-Hall, 1993. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. S. H. Bae, S.-J. Lee, and M. Gerla. Unicast performance analysis of the ODMRP in a mobile ad-hoc network testbed. In Proceedings of IEEE ICCCN'2000, Las Vegas, USA, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. P. Basu and T. D. C. Little. Task-based self-organisation in large smart spaces: issues and challenges. In DARPA/NIST/NSF Workshop on Research: Issues in Smart Computing Environment, Atlanta, USA, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. P. Bhagvat, C. Bisdjikian, P. Kermani, and M. Naghshineh. Smart connectivity for smart spaces. In DARPA/NIST/NSF Workshop on Research: Issues in Smart Computing Environment, Atlanta, USA, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. J. Broch, D. A. Maltz, D. B. Johnson, Y.-C. Hu, and J. Jetcheva. A performance comparison of multi-hop wireless ad-hoc network routing protocols. In Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE Internation Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (MOBICOM'98), Dallas, Texas, Oct. 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. M. S. Corson and V. Park. An internet MANET encapsulation protocol (IMEP) specification. Internet Draft: draft-ietf-manet-imep-spec-00.txt, Nov. 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. S. R. Das, R. Castaneda, and J. Yan. Simulation based performance evaluation of mobile, ad hoc network routing protocols. In Proceedings of Seventh International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks (ICCCN'98), 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. S. R. Das, C. Perkins, and E. M. Royer. Performance comparison of two on-demand routing protocols for ad-hoc networks. In Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM'200, Tel-Aviv, Israel, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. R. Dube, C. D. Rais, K.-Y. Wang, and S. K. Tripathi. Signal stability based adaptive routing (SSA) for ad-hoc mobile networks. IEEE Personal Communications, 4(2):36--45, Feb. 1997.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. K. Fall and K. Varadhan. The VINT project. ns notes and documentation. http://www.isi.edu/nsnam/ns/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. J. J. Garcia-Luna-Aceves, D. Beyer, and T. Frivold. Wireless internet gateways (WINGS). In Proceedings IEEE Milcom'97, Monterey, CA, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. M. Gerla, G. Pei, and S. J. Lee. Wireless, mobile ad-hoc routing. In IEEE/ACM FOCUS, New Brunswick, USA, May 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. H. Hashemi. The indoor radio propagation channel. Proceedings of the IEEE, 81(7), July 1993.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. Libpcap: User-level packet capture library. ftp://ftp.ee.lbl.gov/libpcap-0.4.tar.Z, Feb. 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. F. Lilieblad, O. Mattsson, P. Nylund, D. Ouchterlony, and A. Roxenhag. MAD-HOC AODV Implementation. Telecommunications Systems Lab, Technical Report. http://fl.ssvl.kth.se/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. D. A. Maltz, J. Broch, J. Jetcheva, and D. B. Johnson. The effects of on-demand behavior in routing protocols for multi-hop wireless ad-hoc networks. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications special issue on mobile and wireless networks, Aug. 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. D. A. Maltz, J. Broch, and D. B. Johnson. Experiences designing and building a multi-hop wireless ad-hoc network testbed. Technical Report, CMU-CS-99-11, Mar. 1999.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. D. A. Maltz, J. Broch, and D. B. Johnson. Lessons from a full-scale multihop wireless ad hoc network testbed. IEEE Personal Communications, 8(1), Feb. 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Merit Network Inc. Multi-threaded routing toolkit. MRT Programmers Guide. http://www.merit.edu/mrt/mrt_doc/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. C. Perkins and P. Bhagvat. Highly dynamic destination-sequenced distance-vector routing (DSDV) for mobile computers. ACM Computer Communications Review, pages 234--244, Oct. 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. C. E. Perkins, E. M. Royer, and S. R. Das. Ad hoc on-demand distance vector (AODV) routing. draft-ietf-manet-aodv-06.txt, July 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. R. Ramanathan and R. Hain. An ad hoc wireless testbed for scalable, adaptive QoS support. In Proceedings of IEEE WCNC'2000, Chicago, IL, USA, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. T. S. Rappaport. Wireless Communications: Principles and Practice. Prentice-Hall, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. E. M. Royer and C. Perkins. An implementation study of the AODV routing protocol. In Proceedings of the IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference, Chicago, IL, Sept. 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. E. M. Royer and C.-K. Toh. A review of current routing protocols for ad-hoc mobile wireless networks. IEEE Personal Communications, 6(2):46--55, Apr. 1999.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. C.-K. Toh. Associativity-based routing for ad-hoc mobile networks. Wireless Personal Communications Journal, 4(2), Dec. 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. C.-K. Toh and M. Delawar. Implementation and evaluation of an adaptive routing protocol for infrastructureless mobile networks. In IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks (ICCCN'2000), Las Vegas, USA, Oct. 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. M. Weiser. The computer for the 21st century. Scientific American, 265(3):94--104, Sept. 1991. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. S.-C. M. Woo and S. Singh. Longest life routing protocol (LLRP) for ad hoc networks with highly mobile nodes. In Proceedings of IEEE WCNC'2000, Chicago, IL, USA, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Implementation experience with MANET routing protocols

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in

          Full Access

          • Published in

            cover image ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review
            ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review  Volume 32, Issue 5
            November 2002
            87 pages
            ISSN:0146-4833
            DOI:10.1145/774749
            Issue’s Table of Contents

            Copyright © 2002 Authors

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 1 November 2002

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • article

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader