skip to main content
article
Free Access

Imprecise information and uncertainty in information systems

Published:01 April 1990Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Information systems exist to model, store, and retrieve all types of data. Problems arise when some of the data are missing or imprecisely known or when an attribute is not applicable to a particular object. A consistent and useful treatment of such exceptions is necessary. The approach taken here is to allow any attribute value to be a regular precise value, a string denoting that the value is missing, a string denoting that the attribute is not applicable, or an imprecise value. The imprecise values introduce uncertainty into query evaluation, since it is no longer obvious which objects should be retrieved. To handle the uncertainty, two set of objects are retrieved in response to every query: the set of objects that are known to satisfy with complete certainty and the set that possibly satisfies the query with various degrees of uncertainty. Two methods of estimating this uncertainty, based on information theory, are proposed. The measure of uncertainty is used to rank objects for presentation to a user.

References

  1. 1 CARDELLI, L. A semantics of multiple inheritance. In Semantics of Data Types. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 173, Springer, New York, 1984. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 2 CODD, E. F. Understanding relations. ACM SIGMOD 7 (1975), 23-28.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. 3 CODD, E.F. Extending the database relational model to capture more meaning. A CM Trans. Database Syst. 4, 4 (Dec. 1979), 394-434. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. 4 CODD, E.F. Missing information (applicable and inapplicable) in relational systems. SIGMOD Rec. 15, 4 (Dec. 1986). Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. 5 DATE, C.J. Null values in databases, in Proceedings of the 2nd British National Conference on Databases (1982).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. 6 GRAHNE, G. Dependency satisfaction in databases with incomplete information. In Proceedings of the lOth International Conference on Very Large Data Bases (1981), 37-45. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. 7 GRAHNE, G. Horn tables--An efficient tool for handling incomplete information in databases. In Proceedings of the 8th A CM SIGA CT-SIGMOD-SIGART Symposium on Principles o{ Database Systems (1989), 75-82. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. 8 GRAY, M. Views and imprecise information in databases. Ph.D. thesis, Cambridge Univ., Cambridge, England (Nov. 1982).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. 9 HARPER, D. J. ET AL. MINSTREL-ODM: A basic office data model. In{. Process. Manage. 22, 2 (1986), 83-107. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. 10 HOUGAARD, P., AND MCALPINE, G. A graphical user interface for an office filing and retrieval facility. In Proceedings of ESPRIT Technical Week (1985).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. 11 IMELINSKI, T., AND LIPSKI, W. On representing incomplete information in a relational database. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases (1981), 388-397.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. 12 IMELINSKI, T., AND LIPSK{, W. Incomplete information in relational databases. J. ACM 31, 4 (1984), 701-791. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. 13 LEVESQUE, H. A formal treatment of incomplete knowledge bases. Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Computer Science, Univ. of Toronto, 1981. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. 14 LEVESQUE, H. The interaction with incomplete knowledge bases: A formal treatment. In Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (Vancouver, B.C., 1981).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. 15 LEVESQUE, H. The logic of incomplete knowledge bases. In On Conceptual Modelling: Perspectives from Arti{icial Intelligence, Databases, and Programming Languages, M. L. Brodie, J. Mylopoulos, and J. Schmidt, Eds. Springer, New York, 1984.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. 16 LIPSKI, W. On semantic issues connected with incomplete information databases. ACM Trans. Database Syst. 4, 3 (Sept. 1979), 262-296. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. 17 MORRISSEY, J.M. A treatment of imprecise data and uncertainty in information systems. Ph.D. thesis, National Univ. of Ireland, Aug. 1987.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. 18 SHAFER, G. A Mathematical Theory of Evidence. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J., 1976.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. 19 SHORTLIFFE, E. H., AND BUCHANAN, B.G. A model of inexact reasoning in medicine. Math. Biosci. 23 (1975), 351-379.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. 20 SMEATON, A.F. Using parsing of natural langauge as a part of document retrieval. Ph.D. thesis, National Univ. of Ireland, 1987.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. 21 ULLMAN, J. Universal relation interfaces for database systems. In Information Processing "83, R. E. A. Mason, Ed. Elsevier Science, B.V. (North Holland), Amsterdam, 1983.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. 22 VAN RIJSBERGEN, C.J. A non-classical logic for information retrieval. Comput. J. 29, 6 (1986), 481-485.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. 23 VASSlUOU, Y. Null values in database management: A denotational semantics approach. In Proceedings of the 1979 A CM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data (Boston, 1979). Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. 24 VASSILIOU, V. A formal treatment of imperfect information in database management. Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of Toronto, Sept. 1980. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. 25 WILLIAMS, M. H., AND NICHOLSON, S.A. An approach to handling incomplete information in databases. Comput. J. 31, 2 (1988), 133-140. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. 26 WINSLETT, M. A model based approach to updating databases with incomplete information. ACM Trans. Database Syst. 13, 2 (1988), 167-196. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. 27 ZADEH, L. Fuzzy sets. In{. Control 8 (1965), 338-353.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. 28 ZADEH, L. Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility. In Fuzzy Sets and Systems, North- Holland, Amsterdam, 1978.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. 29 ZADEH, L. Commonsense knowledge representation based on fuzzy logic. Comput. 16, 10 (1983), 61-65.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. 30 ZANIOLO, C. Database relations with null values. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 28 (1984), 142-166.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. 31 ZLOOF, M.M. Query-By-Example: A database language. IBM Syst. J. 16 (1977), 324-343.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Imprecise information and uncertainty in information systems

                Recommendations

                Reviews

                Karen Sparck-Jones

                Awkward database queries are those for which values are imprecise (with respect to domain or range) or unknown, or attributes are inapplicable. Being able to deal satisfactorily with data distinctions of this kind is important for real applications. Morrissey claims that this approach is an advance on earlier work in offering both an appropriate and coherent semantics for query evaluation covering the different cases and an operational measure of uncertainty for ordering retrieved data that do not precisely satisfy the query. The form of data representation and method of query evaluation for different simple and complex types of query are described in detail, showing how first precise and then imprecise data sets are retrieved. The members of the second set can in turn be ranked by their degree of uncertainty, using information-theoretic measures based on either self-information or entropy. The paper is clearly written and well illustrated by examples. The way the different kinds of data are retrieved looks convincing. Unfortunately the treatment of uncertainty, though implemented for a prototype office information system, has not been seriously tested. Such testing is clearly essential, as approaches of the kind presented all tend to look plausible but need to be subjected to the hard reality of actual hairy data to demonstrate their solidity. The paper is nevertheless an interesting start and, as it gives a clear and detailed account of the author's work, a useful introduction to the area.

                Access critical reviews of Computing literature here

                Become a reviewer for Computing Reviews.

                Comments

                Login options

                Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

                Sign in

                Full Access

                • Published in

                  cover image ACM Transactions on Information Systems
                  ACM Transactions on Information Systems  Volume 8, Issue 2
                  Apr. 1990
                  104 pages
                  ISSN:1046-8188
                  EISSN:1558-2868
                  DOI:10.1145/96105
                  Issue’s Table of Contents

                  Copyright © 1990 ACM

                  Publisher

                  Association for Computing Machinery

                  New York, NY, United States

                  Publication History

                  • Published: 1 April 1990
                  Published in tois Volume 8, Issue 2

                  Permissions

                  Request permissions about this article.

                  Request Permissions

                  Check for updates

                  Qualifiers

                  • article

                PDF Format

                View or Download as a PDF file.

                PDF

                eReader

                View online with eReader.

                eReader