skip to main content
article

Making Scents: aromatic output for HCI

Published:01 January 2004Publication History
First page image

References

  1. Aggleton, J.P., and Waskett, L. The ability of odors to serve as state-dependent cues for real-world memories: Can Viking smells aid the recall of Viking experiences? British Journal of Psychology 90 (1999), pp. 1-7.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Brewster, Stephen A., Wright, Peter C., and Edwards, Alastair D.N. A detailed investigation into the effectiveness of earcons. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Auditory Display (Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe, NM, 1992), Addison-Wesley, 1992, pp. 471-498.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Buxton, W. There's more to interaction than meets the eye: Some issues in manual input. In Norman, D. A. and Draper, S. W. (eds.), User Centered System Design: New Perspectives on Human-Computer Interaction, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, 1986, pp. 319-337. Available at http://billbuxton.com/eye.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Crowther, Bosley. How does it smell? "Scent of Mystery" intrudes another question of quality in films. New York Times (Feb. 28, 1960), Section 2, p. 9.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Engen, T. and Pfaffman, C. Absolute judgment of odor intensity. Journal of Experimental Psychology 58 (1959), pp. 23-26.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Engen, T. and Pfaffman, C. Absolute judgment of odor quality. Journal of Experimental Psychology 59 (1960), pp. 214-219.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. European Telecommunications Standard Institute. Guidelines for Unimodal Symbols: Olfaction. In Human Factors (HF); Guidelines on the multimodality of icons, symbols and pictograms (ETSI EG 202 048, version 1.1.1, Section 5.1.4), August 2002. Available at http://docbox.etsi.org/EC_Files/EC_Files/eg_202048v010101p.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Jacob, S., McClintock, M.K., Zelano, B., and Ober, C. Paternally inherited HLA alleles are associated with women's choice of male odor. Nature Genetics (DOI: 10.1038/ng830), 2002, pp. 175-179.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Kaye, Joseph N. Symbolic Olfactory Display. Master's thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2001. Available at www.media.mit.edu/~jofish/thesis/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Lawless, Harry T. Olfactory psychophysics. In Beauchamp & Bartoshuk (eds.), Tasting and Smelling, Handbook of Perception and Cognition, 2nd ed., 1997, pp. 125-174.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Platt, C., You've got smell! Wired (Nov. 7, 1999). Available at http://wired.com/wired/archive/7.11/digiscent_pr.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Rheingold, Howard. Virtual Reality. Chapter Two. Summit Books, New York, 1991. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Stevens J.C., Cain, W.S., and Burke, R.J. Variability of olfactory thresholds. Chemical Senses 13 (1988), pp. 643-653.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Strong, Robert, and Gaver, Bill. Feather, scent and shaker: Supporting simple intimacy. In Videos, Demos and Short Papers of CSCW '96. Boston, MA, 1996, pp. 29-30.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Thomke, Stefan, and Nimgade, Ashok. Bush Boake Allen. HBS Case Study #9-601-061, Nov. 6, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Tillotson, Jenny. Interactive Olfactory Surfaces. The Wellness Collection-A Science Fashion Story. Ph.D. thesis, School of Fashion and Textiles Research, Royal College of Art, London, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Turin, Luca. A spectroscopic mechanism for primary olfactory reception. Chemical Senses 21 (1996), pp. 773-791.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Weiser, Mark, and Brown, John Seely. The Coming Age of Calm Technology. Available at www.ubiq.com/hypertext/weiser/acmfuture2/endnote.htmGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Yanagida, Yasuyuki, Kawato, Shinjiro, Noma, Haruo, Akira, Tomono, and Tetsutani, Nobuji. A nose-tracked, personal olfactory display. ACM SIGGRAPH Sketches & Applications, San Diego, CA, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Zybura, Martin, and Eskeland, Gunnar A. Olfaction for Virtual Reality. Quarter Project, Industrial Engineering 543, University of Washington, Winter 1999. Available at hitl.washington.edu/people/tfurness/courses/inde543/reports/3doc/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Making Scents: aromatic output for HCI

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in

            Full Access

            • Published in

              cover image Interactions
              Interactions  Volume 11, Issue 1
              Making scents: aromatic output for HCI
              January + February 2004
              64 pages
              ISSN:1072-5520
              EISSN:1558-3449
              DOI:10.1145/962342
              Issue’s Table of Contents

              Copyright © 2004 ACM

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 1 January 2004

              Permissions

              Request permissions about this article.

              Request Permissions

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • article

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader

            HTML Format

            View this article in HTML Format .

            View HTML Format