skip to main content
10.1145/964696.964705acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesuistConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

TiltText: using tilt for text input to mobile phones

Published:02 November 2003Publication History

ABSTRACT

TiltText, a new technique for entering text into a mobile phone is described. The standard 12-button text entry keypad of a mobile phone forces ambiguity when the 26- letter Roman alphabet is mapped in the traditional manner onto keys 2-9. The TiltText technique uses the orientation of the phone to resolve this ambiguity, by tilting the phone in one of four directions to choose which character on a particular key to enter. We first discuss implementation strategies, and then present the results of a controlled experiment comparing TiltText to MultiTap, the most common text entry technique. The experiment included 10 participants who each entered a total of 640 phrases of text chosen from a standard corpus, over a period of about five hours. The results show that text entry speed including correction for errors using TiltText was 23% faster than MultiTap by the end of the experiment, despite a higher error rate for TiltText. TiltText is thus amongst the fastest known language-independent techniques for entering text into mobile phones.

References

  1. 1. Accot, J., & Zhai, S. (1997). Beyond Fitts' Law: Models for trajectory-based HCI tasks. ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. p. 295-302. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. 2. Accot, J., & Zhai, S. (2002). More than dotting the i's - foundations for crossing-based interfaces. ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. p. 73-80. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. 3. Bartlett, J. (2000). Rock 'n' Scroll is here to stay. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, May/June 2000. p. 40-45. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. 4. Fishkin, K., Gujar, A., Harrison, B., Moran, T., & Want, R. (2000). Embodied user interfaces for really direct manipulation. Communications of the ACM, 43(9). p. 75-80. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. 5. Harrison, B., Fishkin, K., Gujar, A., Mochon, C., & Want, R. (1998). Squeeze me, hold me, tilt me! An exploration of manipulative user interfaces. ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. p. 17-24. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. 6. Hinckley, K., & Horvitz, E. (2001). Toward more sensitive mobile phones. ACM UIST Symposium on User Interface Sofware and Technology. p. 191-192. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. 7. Hinckley, K., Pierce, J., Sinclair, M., & Horvitz, E. (2000). Sensing techniques for mobile interaction. ACM UIST Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. p. 91-100. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. 8. MacKenzie, I.S. (2002). KSPC (keystrokes per character) as a characteristic of text entry techniques. Fourth International Symposium on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices. p. 195-210. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. 9. MacKenzie, I.S., Kober, H., Smith, D., Jones, T., & Skepner, E. (2001). LetterWise: Prefix-based disambiguation for mobile text input. ACM UIST Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. p. 111-120. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. 10. Partridge, K., Chatterjee, S., Sazawal, V., Borriello, G., & Want, R. (2002). TiltType: accelerometer-supported text entry for very small devices. ACM UIST Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. p. 201-204. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. 11. Poulton, E.C., Bias in quantifying judgements. 1989, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. 12. Rekimoto, J. (1996). Tilting operations for small screen interfaces. ACM UIST Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. p. 167-168. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. 13. Sazawal, V., Want, R., & Borriello, G. (2002). The Unigesture Approach. One-Handed Text Entry for Small Devices. Mobile HCI. p. 256-270. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. 14. Silfverberg, M., I. Scott MacKenzie, & Korhonen, P. (2000). Predicting text entry speeds on mobile phones. ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. p. 9-16. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. 15. Soukoreff, W., & MacKenzie, I.S. (2002). Text entry for mobile computing: Models and methods, theory and practice. Human-Computer Interaction, 17. p. 147-198.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. TiltText: using tilt for text input to mobile phones

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            UIST '03: Proceedings of the 16th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology
            November 2003
            220 pages
            ISBN:1581136366
            DOI:10.1145/964696

            Copyright © 2003 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 2 November 2003

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • Article

            Acceptance Rates

            UIST '03 Paper Acceptance Rate25of116submissions,22%Overall Acceptance Rate842of3,967submissions,21%

            Upcoming Conference

            UIST '24

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader