Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Katz, Ethan
2001.
Bias in Conditional and Unconditional Fixed Effects Logit Estimation.
Political Analysis,
Vol. 9,
Issue. 4,
p.
379.
Oneal, John R.
and
Russett, Bruce
2001.
Clear and Clean: The Fixed Effects of the Liberal Peace.
International Organization,
Vol. 55,
Issue. 2,
p.
469.
Mansfield, Edward D.
Milner, Helen V.
and
Rosendorff, B. Peter
2002.
Why Democracies Cooperate More: Electoral Control and International Trade Agreements.
International Organization,
Vol. 56,
Issue. 3,
p.
477.
Mansfield, Edward D.
and
Snyder, Jack
2002.
Democratic Transitions, Institutional Strength, and War.
International Organization,
Vol. 56,
Issue. 2,
p.
297.
JERVIS, ROBERT
2002.
Theories of War in an Era of Leading-Power PeacePresidential Address, American Political Science Association, 2001.
American Political Science Review,
Vol. 96,
Issue. 1,
p.
1.
Desch, Michael C.
2002.
Democracy and Victory: Why Regime Type Hardly Matters.
International Security,
Vol. 27,
Issue. 2,
p.
5.
Leblang, David
and
Chan, Steve
2003.
Explaining Wars Fought by Established Democracies: Do Institutional Constraints Matter?.
Political Research Quarterly,
Vol. 56,
Issue. 4,
p.
385.
Reuveny, Rafael
and
Li, Quan
2003.
Economic Openness, Democracy, and Income Inequality.
Comparative Political Studies,
Vol. 36,
Issue. 5,
p.
575.
Gartzke, Erik
and
Li, Quan
2003.
Measure for Measure: Concept Operationalization and the Trade Interdependence-Conflict Debate.
Journal of Peace Research,
Vol. 40,
Issue. 5,
p.
553.
Li, Quan
and
Resnick, Adam
2003.
Reversal of Fortunes: Democratic Institutions and Foreign Direct Investment Inflows to Developing Countries.
International Organization,
Vol. 57,
Issue. 1,
p.
175.
Lee Ray, James
2003.
Explaining Interstate Conflict and War: What Should Be Controlled for?.
Conflict Management and Peace Science,
Vol. 20,
Issue. 2,
p.
1.
Hanson, Stephen E.
and
Kopstein, Jeffrey S.
2005.
Regime Type and Diffusion in Comparative Politics Methodology.
Canadian Journal of Political Science,
Vol. 38,
Issue. 1,
p.
69.
Oneal, John R.
and
Russett, Bruce
2005.
Rule of Three, Let It Be? When More Really Is Better.
Conflict Management and Peace Science,
Vol. 22,
Issue. 4,
p.
293.
Pickering, Jeffrey
and
Kisangani, Emizet F.
2005.
Democracy and Diversionary Military Intervention: Reassessing Regime Type and the Diversionary Hypothesis.
International Studies Quarterly,
Vol. 49,
Issue. 1,
p.
23.
Sobek, David
2005.
Machiavelli's Legacy: Domestic Politics and International Conflict.
International Studies Quarterly,
Vol. 49,
Issue. 2,
p.
179.
Kittel, Bernhard
2005.
Een Gekke Methodologie? Over de Grenzen van Macrokwantitatief Sociaal-Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek.
Sociologie,
Vol. 1,
Issue. 1,
p.
5.
Moul, William
2005.
Counting the Seven Weeks War: Dyads, Disputes and Balances of Power.
Canadian Journal of Political Science,
Vol. 38,
Issue. 1,
p.
153.
Kittel, Bernhard
2006.
A Crazy Methodology?.
International Sociology,
Vol. 21,
Issue. 5,
p.
647.
Holzinger, Katharina
2006.
Methodological Pitfalls of Convergence Analysis.
European Union Politics,
Vol. 7,
Issue. 2,
p.
271.
Lagazio, Monica
and
Marwala, Tshilidzi
2006.
Assessing Different Bayesian Neural Network Models for Militarized Interstate Dispute.
Social Science Computer Review,
Vol. 24,
Issue. 1,
p.
119.