Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T11:14:44.363Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Political System Transparency and Monetary Commitment Regimes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2003

J. Lawrence Broz
Get access

Abstract

Central bank independence (CBI) and fixed exchange rates are alternative monetary commitments that differ in transparency. While CBI is opaque and difficult to monitor, a commitment to a fixed exchange rate is easily observed. Political systems also vary in terms of transparency. I argue that the transparency of monetary commitments and the transparency of political systems are substitutes. Where political decision making is opaque (autocracies), governments must look to a commitment that is more transparent and constrained (fixed exchange rates) than the government itself. The transparency of the monetary commitment substitutes for the transparency of the political system to engender low inflation. Where the political process is transparent (democracies), a formal commitment to CBI can produce lower inflation because private agents and the political opposition are free to detect and punish government interference with the central bank. Statistical results indicate that (1) autocracies are more likely to adopt exchange-rate pegs than democracies, and (2) CBI is effective in limiting inflation in nations with high levels of political transparency.

Type
Research Article
Information
International Organization , Volume 56 , Issue 4 , Autumn 2002 , pp. 861 - 887
Copyright
Copyright © The IO Foundation 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aghevli, Brian, Khan, Moshsin, and Montiel, Peter. 1991. Exchange Rate Policy in Developing Countries: Some Analytical Issues. International Monetary Fund Occasional Paper 78. Washington, D.C.: International Monetary Fund.Google Scholar
Alesina, Alberto, and Summers, Lawrence H.. 1993. Central Bank Independence and Macroeconomic Performance: Some Comparative Evidence. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 25 (2):151–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auerbach, Robert D. 1985. Politics and the Federal Reserve. Contemporary Policy Issues 3 (5):43–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banks, Arthur S. 1994. Cross-National Time-Series Data Archive. Center for Social Analysis, State University of New York at Binghamton.Google Scholar
Beck, Thorsten, Demirgüa-Kunt, Asli, and Levine, Ross. 1999. A New Database on Financial Development and Structure. Working Paper. Washington, D.C.: Development Research Group, The World Bank.Google Scholar
Beck, Thorsten, Clarke, George, Groff, Alberto, Keefer, Philip, and Walsh, Patrick. 2000. New Tools and New Tests in Comparative Political Economy: The Database of Political Institutions. Working Paper. Washington, D.C.: Development Research Group, The World Bank.Google Scholar
Bernhard, William. 1998. Exchange Rate Stability and Political Accountability in the European Monetary System. Working Paper in International Political Economy No. 206. Chapel Hill, N.C.: Duke University.Google Scholar
Bernhard, William. 1998a. A Political Explanation for Variation in Central Bank Independence. American Political Science Review 92 (2):311–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernhard, William, and Leblang, David. 2002. Political Parties and Monetary Commitments. International Organization 56 (4):803–30.Google Scholar
Bernhard, William, Broz, J. Lawrence, and Clark, William Roberts. 2002. The Political Economy of Monetary Institutions. International Organization 56 (4):693–723.Google Scholar
Blackburn, Keith, and Christensen, Michael. 1989. Monetary Policy and Policy Credibility: Theories and Evidence. Journal of Economic Literature 27 (1): 1–45.Google Scholar
Bordo, Michael D., and Schwartz, Anna J.. 1997. Why Clashes Between Internal and External Stability Goals End in Currency Crises, 1797–1994. NBER Working Paper 5710. Cambridge, Mass.: NBER.Google Scholar
Bruno, Michael, di Tella, Guido, Dornbusch, Rudiger, and Fischer, Stanley, eds. 1988. Inflation Stabilization: The Experience of Israel, Argentina, Brazil, Bolivia and Mexico. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Canavan, Chris, and Tommasi, Mariano. 1997. On the Credibility of Alternative Exchange-Rate Regimes. Journal of Development Economics 54 (1): 101–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CollinsSusan, M. Susan, M. 1996. On Becoming More Flexible: Exchange-Rate Regimes in Latin America and the Caribbean. Journal of Development Economics 51 (1): 117–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, Richard. 1971. Currency Devaluation in Developing Countries. Princeton Essays in International Finance No. 86. Princeton, N.J.: International Finance Section, Princeton University.Google Scholar
Cottarelli, Carlo, and Giannini, Curzio. 1998. Inflation, Credibility, and the Role of the International Monetary Fund. Paper on Policy Analysis and Assessment of the International Monetary Fund 12. Washington, D.C.: International Monetary Fund.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cukierman, Alex, Webb, Steven B., and Neyapti, Bilin. 1992. Measuring the Independence of Central Banks and its Effects on Policy Outcomes. World Bank Economic Review 6 (3):353–98.Google Scholar
Cukierman, Alex, Edwards, Sebastian, and Tabellini, Guido. 1992. Seigniorage and Political Instability. American Economic Review 82 (3):537–55.Google Scholar
Debelle, Guy, and Fischer, Stanley. 1994. How Independent Should the Central Bank Be? In Goals, Guidelines, and Constraints Facing Monetary Policymakers, edited by Fuhrer, Jeffrey C., 195–221. Boston, Mass.: Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.Google Scholar
de Haan, Jakob, and Kooi, Willem. 2000. Does Central Bank Independence Really Matter? New Evidence for Developing Countries Using a New Indicator. Journal of Banking & Finance 24 (4):643–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edison, Hali J., and Melvin, Michael. 1990. The Determinants and Implications of the Choice of Exchange-Rate System. In Monetary Policy for a Volatile Global Economy, edited by Haraf, William S. and Willett, Thomas D., 1–50. Washington, D.C.: AEI Press.Google Scholar
Edwards, Sebastian. 1996. The Determinants of the Choice Between Fixed and Flexible Exchange-Rate Regimes. NBER Working Paper 5756. Cambridge, Mass.: NBER.Google Scholar
Edwards, Sebastian, and Savastano, Miguel A.. 1999. Exchange Rates in Emerging Economies: What Do We Know? What Do We Need to Know? NBER Working Paper 7228. Cambridge, Mass.: NBER.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eichengreen, Barry. 1994. International Monetary Arrangements for the 21st Century. Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Eijffinger, Sylvester C. W., and de Haan, Jakob. 1996. The Political Economy of Central Bank Independence. Special Papers in International Economics 19. Princeton, N.J.: International Finance Section, Department of Economics, Princeton University.Google Scholar
Faust, Jon. 1996. Whom Can We Trust to Run the Fed: Theoretical Support for the Founders' Views. Journal of Monetary Economics 37 (2):267–83.Google Scholar
Fearon, James D. 1994. Domestic Political Audiences and the Escalation of International Disputes. American Political Science Review 88 (3):577–92.Google Scholar
Fischer, Stanley. 1990. Rules versus Discretion in Monetary Policy. In Handbook of Monetary Economics, edited by Friedman, Benjamin M. and Hahn, Frank H., Vol. 2, 1155–84. Amsterdam: North-Holland.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, Stanley. 1994. Modern Central Banking. In The Future of Central Banking, edited by Capie, Forrest, Goodhart, Charles, Fischer, Stanley, and Schnadt, Norbert, 262–308. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Flood, Robert, and Isard, Peter. 1989. Monetary Policy Strategies. IMF Staff Papers 36 (3):612–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forder, James. 1996. On the Assessment and Implementation of ‘Institutional’ Remedies. Oxford Economic Papers 48 (1):39–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankel, Jeffrey A. 1995. Monetary Regime Choice for a Semi-Open Economy. In Capital Controls, Exchange Rates and Monetary Policy in the World Economy, edited by Edwards, Sebastian, 35–69. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankel, Jeffrey, Schmukler, Sergio, and Serven, Luis. 2000. Verifiability and the Vanishing Intermediate Exchange-Rate Regime. NBER Working Paper 7901. Cambridge, Mass.: NBER.Google Scholar
Franzese, Robert J. 1999. Partially Independent Central Banks, Politically Responsive Governments, and Inflation. American Journal of Political Science. 43 (3):681–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freedom House. 1999. Freedom in the World: Country Ratings. Available from ⟨http:freedomhouse.org⟩. Accessed 7 July 1999.Google Scholar
Frieden, Jeffry A., Ghezzi, Piero, and Stein, Ernesto. 2001. Politics and Exchange Rates: A Cross-Country Approach to Latin America. In The Currency Game: Exchange Rate Politics in Latin America, edited by Frieden, Jeffry and Stein, Ernesto, 21–63. Baltimore, Md.: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Frieden, Jeffry A. 2002. Real Sources of European Currency Policy: Sectoral Interests and European Monetary Integration. International Organization 56 (4):831–61.Google Scholar
Giavazzi, Francesco, and Pagnano, Marco. 1988. The Advantage of Tying One's Hands: EMS Discipline and Central Bank Credibility. European Economic Review 32 (5):1055–75.Google Scholar
Ghosh, Atish R., Gulde, Anne-Marie, Ostry, Jonathan D., and Wolf, Holger C.. 1997. Does the Nominal Exchange-Rate Regime Matter? NBER Working Paper 5874. Cambridge, Mass.: NBER.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldfajn, Ilan, and Valdés, Rodrigo. 1999. The Aftermath of Appreciations. Quarterly Journal of Economics 114 (1):229–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gurr, Ted Robert, Jaggers, Keith, and Moore, Will. 1990. The Transformation of the Western State: The Growth of Democracy, Autocracy, and State Power Since 1800. Studies in Comparative International Development 25 (1):73–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallerberg, Mark. 2002. Veto Players and the Choice of Monetary Institutions. International Organization 56 (4):775–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Havrilesky, Thomas. 1990. The Influence of the Federal Advisory Council on Monetary Policy. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 22 (1):37–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Havrilesky, Thomas. 1995. The Pressures on American Monetary Policy. Second edition. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herrendorf, Berthold. 1999. Transparency, Reputation, and Credibility under Floating and Pegged Exchange Rates. Journal of International Economics 49 (1):31–50.Google Scholar
IMF. 1998. International Financial Statistics. Washington, D.C.: IMF.Google Scholar
IMF. Various Years. Annual Report on Exchange Arrangements and Exchange Restrictions. Washington D.C.: IMF.Google Scholar
Jensen, Henrik. 1997. Credibility of Optimal Monetary Delegation. American Economic Review 87 (5):911–20.Google Scholar
Keefer, Philip, and Stasavage, David. 2002. Checks and Balances, Private Information, and the Credibility of Monetary Commitments. International Organization 56 (4):751–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kettl, Donald F. 1986. Leadership at the Fed. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
King, Gary, Tomz, Michael, and Wittenberg, Jason. 2000. Making the Most of Statistical Analyses: Improving Interpretation and Presentation. American Journal of Political Science 44 (2):347–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lohmann, Susanne. 1992. Optimal Commitment in Monetary Policy: Credibility versus Flexibility. American Economic Review 82 (1):273–86.Google Scholar
Lohmann, Susanne. 1998. Federalism and Central Bank Independence: The Politics of German Monetary Policy, 1957–92. World Politics 50 (3):401–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCallum, Bennett T. 1995. Two Fallacies Concerning Central Bank Independence. American Economic Review 85 (2):207–11.Google Scholar
Mishkin, Frederic S. 1999. International Experiences with Different Monetary Policy Regimes. NBER Working Paper 6965. Cambridge, Mass.: NBER.Google Scholar
Obstfeld, Maurice, and Rogoff, Kenneth. 1995. The Mirage of Fixed Exchange Rates. Journal of Economic Perspectives 9 (4):73–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, Mancur. 1993. Dictatorship, Democracy, and Development. American Political Science Review 87 (3):567–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posen, Adam. S. 1995. Declarations are Not Enough: Financial Sector Sources of Central Bank Independence. NBER Macroeconomic Annual 10:253–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quinn, Dennis. 1997. The Correlates of Change in International Financial Regulation. American Political Science Review 91 (3):531–51.Google Scholar
Romer, David. 1993. Openness and Inflation: Theory and Evidence. Quarterly Journal of Economics 108 (4):869–903.Google Scholar
Shepsle, Kenneth. 1978. The Giant Jigsaw Puzzle: Democratic Committee Assignments in the Modern House. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Tomz, Michael, Wittenberg, Jason, and King, Gary. 1998. CLARIFY: Software for Interpreting and Presenting Statistical Results. Version 1.2. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University.Google Scholar
Walsh, Carl E. 1995. Optimal Contracts for Central Bankers. American Economic Review 85 (1): 150–67.Google Scholar
Wittman, Donald. 1989. Why Democracies Produce Efficient Results. Journal of Political Economy 97 (6): 1395–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Bank. 1997. World Development Indicators. Washington, D.C.: IBRD, World Bank.Google Scholar
Woolley, John T. 1984. Monetary Politics: The Federal Reserve and the Politics of Monetary Policy. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar