Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-27T17:40:07.470Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Failures: Diffusion, Learning, and Policy Abandonment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2021

Craig Volden*
Affiliation:
University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
*
Craig Volden, University of Virginia, 235 McCormick Rd., Garrett Hall, #203, Charlottesville, VA 22904-4893, USA. Email: volden@virginia.edu

Abstract

Studies of the diffusion of policies tend to focus on innovations that successfully spread across governments. Implicit in such diffusion is the abandonment of the previous policy. Yet little is known about whether governments abandon policies that have failed elsewhere, as would be consistent with states acting as policy laboratories not only for policy successes but also for failures. This article focuses on the possible abandonment of failing welfare-to-work policies in the formative years (1997–2002) of the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program across the 50 U.S. states. Using a dyad-based event history analysis, I find that, if both states in a pairing have a policy and one state's policy fails (in employing welfare recipients, reducing welfare rolls, or reducing overall poverty rates), then the other state is much more likely to abandon that failing policy. Moreover, such learning from the other state's experience is more common when the states are ideologically similar to one another and when the legislature in the potentially learning state is more professional.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bailey, Michael A., and Rom, Mark Carl. 2004. “A Wider Race? Interstate Competition across Health and Welfare Programs.” Journal of Politics 66 (2): 326–47..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balla, Steven J. 2001. “Interstate Professional Associations and the Diffusion of Policy Innovations.” American Politics Research 29 (3): 221–45..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bardach, Eugene. 1976. “Policy Termination as a Political Process.” Policy Sciences 7:123–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, Nathaniel, Katz, Jonathan N., and Tucker, Richard. 1998. “Taking Time Seriously: Time-Series-Cross-Section Analysis with a Binary Dependent Variable.” American Journal of Political Science 42 (4): 1260–88..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, Frances Stokes, and Berry, William D.. 1990. “State Lottery Adoptions as Policy Innovations: An Event History Analysis.” American Political Science Review 84:395415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, William D., Ringquist, Evan J., Fording, Richard C., and Hanson, Russell L.. 1998. “Measuring Citizen and Government Ideology in the American States, 1960–93.” American Journal of Political Science 42 (1): 327–48..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boehmke, Frederick J. 2009. “Policy Emulation or Policy Convergence? Potential Ambiguities in the Dyadic Event History Approach to State Policy Emulation.” Journal of Politics 71 (3): 1125–40..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M., and Zorn, Christopher. 2002. “Duration Models for Repeated Events.” Journal of Politics 64 (4): 1069–94..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, Sarah. 2005. “Interdependent and Domestic Foundations of Policy Change: The Diffusion of Pension Privatization around the World.” International Studies Quarterly 49 (2): 273–94..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Case, Anne C., Hines, James R. Jr., and Rosen, Harvey S.. 1993. “Budget Spillovers and Fiscal Policy Interdependence: Evidence from the States.” Journal of Public Economics 52 (3): 285307..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeJong, Gordon F., Graefe, Deborah Roempke, Irving, Shelley K., and Pierre, Tanja St.. 2006. “Measuring State TANF Policy Variations and Change after Reform.” Social Science Quarterly 87 (4): 755–81..Google Scholar
Durr, Robert A. J. 2001. “Why Do Policy Makers Stick to Inefficient Decisions?Public Choice 107:221–34.Google Scholar
Fellowes, Matthew C., and Rowe, Gretchen. 2004. “Politics and the New American Welfare States.” American Journal of Political Science 48 (2): 362–73..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernandez, Raquel, and Rodrik, Dani. 1991. “Resistance to Reform: Status Quo Bias in the Presence of Individual-Specific Uncertainty.” American Economic Review 81 (5): 1146–55..Google Scholar
Geva-May, Iris. 2004. “Riding the Wave of Opportunity: Termination in Public Policy.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 14 (3): 309–33..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilardi, Fabrizio. 2010. “Who Learns from What in Policy Diffusion Processes?American Journal of Political Science 54 (3): 650–66..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilardi, Fabrizio, and Fuglister, Katharina. 2008. “Empirical Modeling of Policy Diffusion in Federal States: The Dyadic Approach.” Swiss Political Science Review 14 (3): 413–50..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossback, Lawrence J., Nicholson-Crotty, Sean, and Peterson, David A.. 2004. “Ideology and Learning in Policy Diffusion.” American Politics Research 32 (5): 521–45..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grupp, Fred W. Jr., and Richards, Alan R.. 1975. “Variations in Elite Perceptions of American States as Referents for Public Policy Making.” American Political Science Review 69 (3): 850–58..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrington, Joseph E. Jr. 1993. “Economic Policy, Economic Performance, and Elections.” American Economic Review 83 (1): 2742..Google Scholar
Keiser, Lael R., Mueser, Peter R., and Choi, Seung-Whan. 2004. “Race, Bureaucratic Discretion, and the Implementation of Welfare Reform.” American Journal of Political Science 48 (2): 314–27..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, David E. 2002. “The Politics of Agency Termination: Confronting the Myth of Agency Immortality.” Journal of Politics 64 (1): 89107..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lichter, Daniel T., and Jayakody, Rukamalie. 2002. “Welfare Reform: How Do We Measure Success?Annual Review of Sociology 28:117–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowry, William R. 2005. “Policy Reversal and Changing Politics: State Governments and Dam Removals.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 5(4): 394419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
May, Peter J. 1992. “Policy Learning and Failure.” Journal of Public Policy 12 (4): 331–54..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meseguer, Covadonga. 2006a. “Learning and Economic Policy Choices.” European Journal of Political Economy 22:156–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meseguer, Covadonga. 2006b. “Rational Learning and Bounded Learning in the Diffusion of Policy Innovations.” Rationality and Society 18 (1): 3566..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyers, Marcia K., Riccucci, Norma M., and Lurie, Irene. 2001. “Achieving Goal Complexity in Complex Environments: The Case of Welfare Reform.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 11:165201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mintrom, Michael. 1997. “Policy Entrepreneurs and the Diffusion of Innovation.” American Journal of Political Science 41 (3): 738–70..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mooney, Christopher Z. 2001. “Modeling Regional Effects on State Policy Diffusion.” Political Research Quarterly 54 (1): 103–24..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, Paul E., and Rom, Mark C.. 1990. Welfare Magnets: A New Case for a National Standard. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Rogers, Everett M. 2003. Diffusion of Innovations. 5th ed. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Rom, Mark Carl. 2006. “Taking the Brandeis Metaphor Seriously: Policy Experimentation within a Federal System.” Promoting the General Welfare: New Perspectives on Government Performance, eds. Gerber, Alan S. and Patashnik, Eric M.. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution, 256–81.Google Scholar
Shipan, Charles R., and Volden, Craig. 2006. “Bottom-Up Federalism: The Diffusion of Antismoking Policies from U.S. Cities to States.” American Journal of Political Science 50 (4): 825–43..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shipan, Charles R., and Volden, Craig. 2008. “The Mechanisms of Policy Diffusion.” American Journal of Political Science 52 (4): 840–57..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shipan, Charles R., and Volden, Craig. 2014. “When the Smoke Clears: Expertise, Learning, and Policy Diffusion.” Journal of Public Policy 34 (3): 357–87..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soss, Joe, Schram, Sanford F., Vartanian, Thomas P., and O'Brien, Erin. 2001. “Setting the Terms of Relief: Explaining State Policy Choices in the Devolution Revolution.” American Journal of Political Science 45 (2): 378–95..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Squire, Peverill. 1992. “Legislative Professionalism and Membership Diversity in State Legislatures.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 17 (1): 6979..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Urban Institute. 2000. Assessing the New Federalism State Database. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.Google Scholar
Volden, Craig. 2002. “The Politics of Competitive Federalism: A Race to the Bottom in Welfare Benefits?American Journal of Political Science 46 (2): 352–63..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Volden, Craig. 2006. “States as Policy Laboratories: Emulating Success in the Children's Health Insurance Program.” American Journal of Political Science 50 (2): 294312..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Volden, Craig, and Cohen, Michael. 2010. The Politics of Policy Diffusion: Welfare Reform in the U.S. States. Typescript. Columbus: The Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Volden, Craig, Ting, Michael M., and Carpenter, Daniel P.. 2008. “A Formal Model of Learning and Policy Diffusion.” American Political Science Review 102 (3): 319–32..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, Jack L. 1969. “The Diffusion of Innovations among the American States.” American Political Science Review 63:880–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weyland, Kurt Gerhard. 2006. Bounded Rationality and Policy Diffusion: Social Sector Reform in Latin America. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar