Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T08:31:39.604Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Assessment of Bank of England and National Institute Inflation Forecast Uncertainties

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 March 2020

Kenneth F. Wallis
Kenneth F. Wallis*
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, University of Warwick, CoventryCV4 7AL
*
e-mail: K.F.Wallis@warwick.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In February 1996 the Bank of England and the National Institute of Economic and Social Research significantly increased the amount of information they published about the uncertainty surrounding their central projections of inflation. In effect, and in different ways, they each began to publish a density forecast of inflation, that is, an estimate of the probability distribution of possible outcomes for future inflation. The Bank represented this graphically, as a set of forecast intervals covering 10, 20, 30, …, 90 per cent of the probability distribution, coloured red, of lighter shades for the outer bands. This was done for inflation forecasts up to eight quarters ahead, and since the distribution becomes increasingly dispersed and the intervals ‘fan out’ as the forecast horizon increases, the chart became known as the ‘fan chart’ (or, rather more informally, and noting its red colour, the ‘rivers of blood’). The National Institute represented the distribution as a histogram, in the form of a table reporting the probabilities of inflation falling in various ranges. These intervals, or ‘bins’ of the histogram, have changed from time to time; those used currently are: less than 1.5 per cent, 1.5 to 2.0 per cent, 2.0 to 2.5 per cent, and so on. The forecasts refer to the fourth quarters of the current and following years, and from the beginning have included not only inflation but also real GDP growth. Fan charts for real GDP growth first appeared in the Bank's Inflation Report in November 1997.

Type
Articles
Information
National Institute Economic Review , Volume 189 , July 2004 , pp. 64 - 71
Copyright
Copyright © 2004 National Institute of Economic and Social Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This article evaluates the density forecasts of inflation published by the Bank of England and the National Institute of Economic and Social Research. It extends the analysis of the Bank of England's fan charts in an earlier article by considering data up to 2003, quarter 4, and by correcting some technical details in the light of information published on the Bank's website in Summer 2003. National Institute forecasts are also considered, although there are fewer comparable observations. Both groups' central point forecasts are found to be unbiased, but their density forecasts substantially overstated forecast uncertainty.

∗

The comments and assistance of Michael Clements and Tim Taylor are gratefully acknowledged.

References

Blix, M. and Sellin, P. (1998), ‘Uncertainty bands for inflation forecasts’, Working Paper No.65, Sveriges Riksbank, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Bray, M. and Goodhart, C.A.E. (2002), ‘“You might as well be hung for a sheep as a lamb”: the loss function of an agent’, Discussion Paper 418, Financial Markets Group, London School of Economics.Google Scholar
Britton, E., Fisher, P.G. and Whitley, J.D. (1998), ‘The Inflation Report projections: understanding the fan chart’, Bank of England Quarterly Bulletin, 38, pp. 30–37.Google Scholar
Clements, M.P. (1997), ‘Evaluating the rationality of fixed-event forecasts’, Journal of Forecasting, 16, pp. 225–239.3.0.CO;2-L>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clements, M.P. (2004), ‘Evaluating the Bank of England density forecasts of inflation’, Economic Journal (forthcoming).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, M. (1977), ‘Nobel lecture: inflation and unemployment’, Journal of Political Economy, 85, pp. 451–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
John, S. (1982), ‘The three-parameter two-piece normal family of distributions and its fitting’, Communications in Statistics—Theory and Methods, 11, pp. 879–885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, N.L., Kotz, S. and Balakrishnan, N. (1994), Continuous Univariate Distributions, 2nd ed., vol 1, New York, Wiley.Google Scholar
Pagan, A.R. (2003), ‘Report on modelling and forecasting at the Bank of England’, Bank of England Quarterly Bulletin, 43, pp. 60–88.Google Scholar
Wallis, K.F. (1999), ‘Asymmetric density forecasts of inflation and the Bank of England's fan chart’, National Institute Economic Review, 167, pp. 106–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallis, K.F. (2003), ‘Chi-squared tests of interval and density forecasts, and the Bank of England's fan charts’, International Journal of Forecasting, 19, pp. 165–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar