Skip to main content
Log in

Chaos theory and the dynamics of marketing systems

  • Published:
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Chaos theory is not well understood or appreciated in marketing, yet it offers a way of improving understanding of marketing systems. A brief introduction to chaos theory is given. Its relevance to marketing is then illustrated through a discussion of different types of marketing models that can result in complex dynamics, including chaos. Next, techniques for detecting the presence of chaos in the behavior of real systems are reviewed. Finally, the implications of chaos theory for marketing theory and practice are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, Peter M. and Michele Sanglier. 1978. “Dynamic Model of Urban Growth.”Journal of Social and Biological Structures 1 (July): 265–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, Peter M. and Michele Sanglier. 1979. “A Dynamic Model of Growth in a Central Place System.”Geographical Analysis 11 (July): 256–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arthur, W. Brian. 1990. “Positive Feedbacks in the Economy.”Scientific American 263 (February): 80–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod, Robert. 1984.The Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, William A. and Seungmook S. Choi. 1989. “A Comparison between the Conventional Econometric Approach to Structural Inference and the Nonparametric Chaotic Attractor Approach.” InEconomic Complexity: Chaos Sunspots, Bubbles and Nonlinearity. Eds. William A. Barnett, John Geweke, and Karl Shell. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 141–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaumont, John R., Marcus Clarke, and Alan G. Wilson. 1981. “The Dynamics of Urban Spatial Structure: Some Exploratory Results Using Difference Equations and Bifurcation Theory.”Environment and Planning A 13 (December): 1473–1483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benhabib, Jess and Richard H. Day. 1981. “Rational Choice and Erratic Behavior.”Review of Economic Studies 48 (July): 459–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, William S., John L. Graham, and Michael H. Jones. 1984. “Volatility of Derived Demand in Industrial Markets and Its Management Implications.”Journal of Marketing 48 (Fall): 95–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, William C., Lyman E. Ostlund, and Robert A. Westbrook. 1985. “Spatial Models in an Intrabrand Context.”Journal of Marketing 49 (Summer): 106–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowersox, Donald J., Omar K. Helferich, Edward J. Marien, Peter Gilmour, Michael L. Lawrence, Fred W. Morgan, and Richard T. Rogers. 1972.Dynamic Simulation of Physical Distribution systems. East Lansing: Michigan State University, Division of Research, Graduate School of Business Administration.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brock, William A. 1986. “Distinguishing Random and Deterministic Systems.”Journal of Economic Theory 40 (October): 168–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brock, William A. and Chera L. Sayers. 1988. “Is the Business Cycle Characterized by Deterministic Chaos?”Journal of Monetary Economics 22 (July): 71–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, David K. and Harvey Rose. 1983.Order in Chaos. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, Glen R. 1988.Ecological Models of Organizations. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiarella, Carl. 1988. “The Cobweb Model: Its Instability and the Onset of Chaos.”Economic Modelling 5 (October): 377–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, Martin and Alan G. Wilson. 1983. “The Dynamics of Urban Spatial Structure: Progress and Problems.”Journal of Regional Science 23 (February): 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, Lee G. and Maseo Nakanishi. 1988.Market-share Analysis: Evaluating Competitive Marketing Effectiveness. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, Richard H. 1982. “Irregular Growth Cycles.”American Economic Review 72 (June): 406–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————— 1983a. “Adaptive Economics.” InCites and Regions as Nonlinear Decision Systems. Ed. Richard W. Crosby. Boulder, Co: Westview, 29–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————— 1983b. “The Emergence of Chaos from Classical Economic Growth.”Quarterly Journal of Economics 97 (2): 201–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day, Richard H. and Jean-Luc Walter. 1989. “Economic Growth in the Very Long Run: On the Multiple-phase Interaction of Population, Technology, and Social Infrastructure.” InEconomic Complexity: Chaos, Sunspots, Bubbles and Nonlinearity. Eds. William A. Barnett, John Geweke, and Karl Shell. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 253–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feigenbaum, Mitchell J. 1979. “Universal Metric Properties of Nonlinear Transformation.”Journal of Statistical Physics 21 (June): 669–706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ————— 1983. “Universal Behavior of Nonlinear Systems.”Physica D, Nonlinear Phenomena 7 (May): 16–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forrester, Jay W. 1961.Industrial Dynamics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————— 1980. “System Dynamics—Future Opportunities.” InSystem Dynamics: TIMS Studies in the Management Sciences. Eds. Augusto A. Legasto Jr., Jay W. Forrester, and James M. Lyneis. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 7–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gautschi, David A., Jr. 1981. “Specification of Patronage Models for Retail Center Choice.”Journal of Marketing Research 18 (May): 162–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gleick, James. 1987.Chaos: Making a New Science. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, Theodore J. 1991. “Notes on Forecasting a Chaotic Series Using Regression.”Technological Forecasting and Social Change 39 (July): 337–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, Theodore J. and David Greenspan. 1988. “Chaos and Fractals: New Tools for Technological and Social Forecasting.”Technological Forecasting and Social Change 34 (August): 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grandmont, Jean-Michel and Pierre Malgrange. 1986. “Nonlinear Economic Dynamics: Introduction.”Journal of Economic Theory 40 (October): 3–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, Mark and Roland Soong. 1986. “Threshold Models of Interpersonal Effects in Consumer Demand.”Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 7 (March): 83–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grassberger, Peter and Itamar Procaccia. 1983. “Measuring the strangeness of Strange Attractors.”Physics D, Nonlinear Phenomena 9 (October): 189–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guckenheimer, John, George Oster, and A. Ipaktchi. 1977. “The Dynamics of Density Dependent Population Models.”Journal of Mathematical Biology 4 (2): 101–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, Brian and Alan G. Wilson. 1978. “Equilibrium Values and Dynamics of Attractiveness Terms in Production-constrained Spatial-interaction Models.”Environment and Planning 10 (April): 371–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hibbert, D. Brynn and Ian F. Wilkinson. 1991. “Modelling the Evolution of Marketing Systems Using Genetic Algorithms.” Paper presented at the 7th Industrial Marketing and Purchasing Conference, University of Uppsala, Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinich, Melvin J. and Douglas M. Patterson. 1989. “Evidence of Nonlinearity in the Trade-by-Trade Stock Market Return Generating Process.” InEconomic Complexity: Chaos, Sunspots, Bubbles and Nonlinearity. Eds. William A. Barnett, John Geweke, and Karl Shell. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 383–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, John H. and John H. Miller. 1991. “Artificial Adaptive Agents in Economic Theory.”American Economic Review 81 (May): 365–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huff, David L. 1964. “Defining and Estimating a Trading Area.”Journal of Marketing 28 (July): 34–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotler, Philip. 1984.Marketing Management Analysis Planning and Control. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambkin, Mary and George S. Day. 1989. “Evolutionary Processes in Competitive Markets: Beyond the Product Life Cycle.”Journal of Marketing 53 (July): 4–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundquist, Stig, Norman H. Marsh, and Mario P. Tosi. 1988.Order and Chaos in Nonlinear Physical Systems. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahajan, Vijay, Eitan Muller, and Frank M. Bass. 1990. “New Product Diffusion Models in Marketing: A Review and Directions for Research.”Journal of Marketing 54 (January): 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May, Robert M. 1976. “Simple Mathematical Models with Very Complicated Dynamics.”Nature 261 (June 10): 459–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ————— 1990. “Chaos and Some of Its Implications in the Biological Sciences.” Paper presented at the International Conference on Chaos in Australia. Kensington, Australia: University of New South Wales.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medio, Alfredo. 1991. “Discrete and Continuous-Time Models of Chaotic Dynamics in Economics.”Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 2 (June): 99–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Medio, Alfredo and Giampaolo Gallo. 1993.Chaotic Dynamics: Theory and Applications to Economics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naert, Philippe and Marcel Weverbergh. 1981. “On the Prediction Power of Market Share Attraction Models.”Journal of Marketing Research 18 (May): 146–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, Richard R. and Sidney G. Winter. 1982.An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, Nancy A. 1993. “Efficient? Chaotic? What Is the New Finance?”Harvard Business Review 71 (March-April): 50–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peschel, Manfred and Werner Mende. 1986.The Predator-Prey Model. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preismeyer, H. Richard and Kibak Batik. 1989. “Discovering the Patterns of Chaos.”Planning Review 17 (November–December): 14–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prigogine, Ilya and Isabelle Stengers. 1984.Order Out of Chaos. London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redmond, William H. 1991. “When Technologies Compete: The Role of Externalities in Nonlinear Market Response.”Journal of Product Innovation Management 8 (September): 170–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossiter, John R. and Larry Percy. 1987.Advertising and Promotion Management. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruthven, Russell. 1993. “Adapting to Complexity.”Scientific American 268 (January): 130–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stutzer, Michael. 1980. “Chaotic Dynamics and Bifurcations in a Macro Model.”Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 2 (November): 353–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, Gary. 1992. “Chaos Hits Wall St.—The Theory That Is.”Business Week (November 2): 58–60.

  • Wilkinson, Ian F. 1988. “The Dynamics of Channel Structure and the Structure of Dynamics.” Paper presented at the Winter Educators’ Conference of the American Marketing Association, San Diego.

  • ————— 1990. “Toward a Theory of Structural Change and Evolution in Marketing Channels.”Journal of Macromarketing 10 (Fall): 18–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, Alan G. 1981Geography and the Environment: Systems Analytic Methods. London: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, Alan, Jack B. Swift, Harry L. Swinney, and John A. Vastano. 1985. “Determining Lyapunov Exponents from a Time Series.”Physica D, Nonlinear Phenomena 16 (July): 285–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

He arrived from London University to take the chair of Analytical Chemistry in 1987 with a background in physical chemistry. His interest in chaos stems from work on fractals—those wiggly shapes that appear to be so ubiquitous in nature. A chance meeting with Professor Wilkinson allowed him to use his computing skills in an unusual (for him) area of research.

He has been a visiting professor at various U.S. and European universities, including the University of California at Berkeley, the University of Cincinnati, Temple University, and the Stockholm School of Economics. His research focuses on the dynamics of Marketing systems, interfirm relations, and international marketing. His work has been published in journals such as theJournal of the Academy of Market Science, Journal of Macromarketing, Industrial Marketing Management, Journal of Applied Psychology, and theEuropean Journal of Marketing.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hibbert, B., Wilkinson, I.F. Chaos theory and the dynamics of marketing systems. JAMS 22, 218–233 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070394223003

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070394223003

Keywords

Navigation