Skip to main content
Log in

Reflections on relationship marketing in consumer markets

  • Special Issue On Relationship Marketing
  • Published:
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Conclusion

The article by S&P is a landmark in the evolution of relationship marketing concepts. Much of what has been done in the past has addressed narrow aspects of relationship marketing or else has taken for granted the meaning of marketing relationships. S&P set the agenda for future work and give us many provocative ideas for pursuing relationship marketing topics. Their synthesis and integration of ideas from disparate literatures and their proposal for the underlying motivation for entering marketing relationships do much to delineate the direction researchers should take in the future. Before we go too far down any one path, however, we should redouble our efforts to specify exactly what is a marketing relationship. Then we would have the foundation to follow the path so eloquently forged by Jagdish Sheth and Atul Parvatiyar.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bagozzi, Richard P. 1974. “What is a Marketing Relationship?”Der Markt 51: 64–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— 1992. “The Self-Regulation of Attitudes, Intentions, and Behavior.”Social Psychology Quarterly 55: 128–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, Lawrence C. 1990.Reciprocity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. 1990.Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Girard, R. 1961.Mensonge Romantique et Vérité Romanesque [Romantic Lie and Fable-Like Truth]. Paris: Grasset.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gollwitzer, Peter M. 1990. “Action Phases and Mind Sets.” InHandbook of Motivation and Cognition Vol. 2. Eds. E. T. Higgins and R. M. Sorrention. New York: Guilford, 53–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gouldner, Alvin. 1960. “The Norm of Reciprocity.”American Sociological Review 25: 161–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kant, Immanuel. 1963.Lectures on Ethics. Translated by L. Infield. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L. 1984.Essays on Moral Development Vol. 2.The Psychology of Moral Development. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheth, Jagdish and Atul Parvatiyar. 1995. “Relationship Marketing in Consumer Markets: Antecedents and Consequences.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 23 (4): 255–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

He was formerly on the faculties of Stanford University, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and the University of California, Berkeley. His Ph.D. is from Northwestern University. He is currently doing research on the theory of action, volitional processes, and emotional behavior in marketing.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bagozzi, R.P. Reflections on relationship marketing in consumer markets. JAMS 23, 272–277 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1177/009207039502300406

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/009207039502300406

Keywords

Navigation