Skip to main content
Log in

Personality and ad-evoked feelings: The case for extraversion and neuroticism

  • Published:
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Feeling responses to advertisements have been identified as important advertising effects. Considerable intersubject variance has been noted across those ad-evoked feelings. Conceptual models have proposed individual differences, including personality, as antecedents of adevoked feelings. In the psychology literature,extraversion andneuroticism have been shown to predict positive and negative affect, respectively. The current research proposes and tests relationships between extraversion and neuroticism and specific, transient feeling responses to ads. Additionally, the single traitaffect intensity, an alternative construal of individual differences in affective predispositions, is measured and compared with extraversion and neuroticism. Extraversion and neuroticism appear to be preferable, theoretically grounded predictors of adevoked feelings and consequent consumer attitudes. These findings should advance advertising managers’ understandings of differences across consumers in fundamental patterns of feeling responses to advertising.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aaker, David A. and Douglas M. Stayman. 1989. “What Mediates the Emotional Response to Advertising? The Case of Warmth.” InCognitive and Affective Responses to Advertising. Eds. Pat Cafferata and Alice M. Tybout. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 287–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aaker, David A., Douglas M. Stayman, and Michael R. Hagerty. 1986. “Warmth in Advertising: Measurement, Impact, and Sequence Effects.”Journal of Consumer Research 12 (March): 365–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aaker, David A., Douglas M. Stayman, and Richard Vezina. 1988. “Identifying Feelings Elicited by Advertising.”Psychology and Marketing 5 (Spring): 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abeele, Piet Vanden and Douglas L. MacLachlan. 1994. “Process Tracing of Emotional Responses to TV Ads: Revisiting the Warmth Monitor.”Journal of Consumer Research 20 (March): 586–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, Stacey Menzel and Patricia F. Kennedy. 1994. “Death by Nostalgia: A Diagnosis of Context-Specific Cases.” InAdvances in Consumer Research, vol. 21. Eds. Chris T. Allen and Deborah Roedder John. Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research, 169–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batra, Rajeev and Michael L. Ray. 1986. “Affective Responses Mediating Acceptance of Advertising.”Journal of Consumer Research 13 (September): 234–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Steven P. and Douglas M. Stayman. 1992. “Antecedents and Consequences of Attitude Toward the Ad: A Meta-Analysis.”Journal of Consumer Research 19 (June): 34–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bullock, Wesley A. and Kirby Gilliiland. 1993. “Eysenck’s Arousal Theory of Intraversion-Extraversion: A Converging Measures Investigation.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 64:113–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke, Marian Chapman and Julie A. Edell. 1989. “The Impact of Feelings on Ad-Based Affect and Cognition.”Journal of Marketing Research 26 (February): 69–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, Colin and Chris McConville. 1993. “Affect Intensity: Factor or Artifact?”Personality and Individual Differences 14 (1): 135–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa, Paul T., Jr. and Robert R. McCrae. 1980. “Influence of Extraversion and Neuroticism on Subjective Well-Being: Happy and Unhappy People.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 38:668–678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ————— and —————. 1992.Revised NEO Personality Inventory and NEO Five-Factor Inventory Professional Manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Digman, John M. 1990. “Personality Structure: Emergence of the Five-Factor Model.” InAnnual Review of Psychology, vol. 41. Eds. Mark R. Rosenzweig and Lyman W. Porter. Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews, 417–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edell, Julie A. and Marian Chapman Burke. 1987. “The Power of Feelings in Understanding Advertising Effects.”Journal of Consumer Research 14 (December): 421–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, Hans J. 1967.The Biological Basis of Personality. Springfield, IL: C. C. Thomas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Funder, David C. 1991. “Global Traits: A Neo-Allportian Approach to Personality.”Psychological Science 2 (1): 31–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, Lewis R. 1993. The Structure of Phenotypic Personality Traits.American Psychologist 48 (January): 26–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, Marvin E. and Gerald J. Gorn. 1987. “Happy and Sad TV Programs: How They Affect Reactions to Commercials.”Journal of Consumer Research 14 (December): 387–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodstein, Ronald C., Julie A. Edell, and Marian Chapman Moore. 1990. “When Are Feelings Generated? Assessing the Presence and Reliability of Feelings Based on Storyboards and Animatics.” InEmotion in Advertising: Theoretical and Practical Explorations. Eds. Stuart J. Agres, Julie A. Edell, and Tony M. Dubitski. Westport, CT: Quorum Books, 175–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holbrook, Morris B. and Rajeev Batra. 1987. “Assessing the Role of Emotions as Mediators of Consumer Responses to Advertising.”Journal of Consumer Research 14 (December): 404–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, Randy J. and Ed Diener. 1987. “Affect Intensity as an Individual Difference Characteristic: A Review.”Journal of Research in Personality 21:1–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, Randy J., Ed Diener, and Robert A. Emmons. 1986. “Affect Intensity and Reactions to Daily Life Events.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51:803–814.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, Randy J. and Timothy Ketelaar. 1991. “Personality and Susceptibility to Positive and Negative Emotional States.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 61:132–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loehlin, John C. 1992.Genes and Environment in Personality Development. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • London International Advertising Awards. 1990.1990 Television Winners [Video]. New York: London International Advertising Awards.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lutz, Richard J. 1985. “Affective and Cognitive Antecedents of Attitude Toward the Ad: A Conceptual Framework.” InPsychological Processes and Advertising Effects: Theory Research and Application. Eds. Linda F. Alwitt and Andrew A. Mitchell. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 45–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie, Scott B. and Richard J. Lutz. 1989. “An Empirical Examination of the Structural Antecedents of Attitude Toward the Ad in an Advertising Pretesting Context.”Journal of Marketing 53 (April): 48–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marketing Science Institute. 1991. “Tears, Cheers, and Fears” [Video]. Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCrae, Robert R., ed. 1992. “The Five-Factor Model: Issues and Applications” [Special issue].Journal of Personality 60 (June).

  • Moore, David J., William D. Harris, and Hong C. Chen. 1995. “Affect Intensity: An Individual Difference Response to Advertising Appeals.”Journal of Consumer Research 22 (September): 154–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riche, M. F. 1990. “Psychographics for the 1990s.”American Demographics, July, 25–31.

  • Saucier, Gerard. 1994. “Mini-Markers: A Brief Version of Goldberg’s Unipolar Big-Five Markers.”Journal of Personality Assessment 63 (3): 506–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stayman, Douglas M. and David A. Aaker. 1988. “Are All the Effects of Ad-Induced Feelings Mediated by Aad ?”Journal of Consumer Research 15 (December): 368–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, David and Lee Anna Clark. 1992. “On Traits and Temperament: General and Specific Factors of Emotional Experience and Their Relation to the Five-Factor Model.”Journal of Personality 60 (June): 441–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, David, Lee Anna Clark, and Greg Carey. 1988. “Positive and Negative Affectivity and Their Relation to Anxiety and Depressive Disorders.”Journal of Abnormal Psychology 97:346–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, David and Auke Tellegen. 1985. “Toward a Consensual Structure of Mood.”Psychological Bulletin 98 (2): 219–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinfurt, Kevin P., Fred B. Bryant, and Paul R. Yarnold. 1994. “The Factor Structure of the Affect Intensity Measure: In Search of a Measurement Model.”Journal of Research in Personality 28:314–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins, Jerry S. 1968. “Personality Structure.” InAnnual Review of Psychology, vol. 19. Eds. Paul R. Farnsworth, Mark R. Rosenzweig, and Judith T. Polefka. Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews, 293–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, D. G. 1989. “Neuroticism and Extraversion in Different Factors of the Affect Intensity Measure.”Personality and Individual Differences 10 (10): 1095–1100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

He received his Ph.D. in marketing from the University of Massachusetts at Amherst in 1994. His research has been published inPsychological Reports andAdvances in Consumer Research.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mooradian, T.A. Personality and ad-evoked feelings: The case for extraversion and neuroticism. JAMS 24, 99–109 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070396242001

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070396242001

Keywords

Navigation