Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The impact of direct marketing appeals on charitable marketing effectiveness

  • Published:
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Building on behavioral decision research, this article provides guidelines to charitable marketing managers regarding the effect of charitable direct marketing appeals on donor decision judgments. Several charitable direct mail appeals (factors) were empirically tested simultaneously in a factorial experimental design involving 18,144 potential donors to determine how donor decision strategies influenced choice judgments about whether to give and estimation judgments about how much to give. The results indicate that suggested anchors and framing influence response rate (choice) but not size of gift. Reference information (factual/statistical and narrative/experiential) influences size of gift (estimation) but not response rate. Implications for charitable marketing managers are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andreoni, James. 1990. “Impure Altruism and Donations to Public Goods: A Theory of Warm-Glow Giving.”The Economic Journal 100 (June): 464–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, Kenneth J. 1974. “Gifts and Exchanges.”Philosophy and Public Affairs 1 (Summer): 343–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, Gary S. 1974. “A Theory of Social Interactions.”Journal of Political Economy 82 (6): 1063–1093.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belk, Russel. 1979. “Gift-Giving Behavior.” InResearch in Marketing. Ed. Jagdish Sheth. Greenwich, CT: JAI, 95–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biswas, Abhijit and Scot Burton. 1993. “Consumer Perceptions of Tensile Price Claims in Advertisements: An Assessment of Claim Types Across Different Discount Levels.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 21 (Summer): 217–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boskin, M. J. and Martin S. Feldstein. 1977. “Effects of the Charitable Deduction on Contributions by Low Income and Middle Income Households: Evidence From the National Survey on Philanthropy.”Review of Economic Statistics 59 (August): 351–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brockner, Joel, Beth Guzzi, Julie Kane, Ellen Levine, and Kate Shaplen. 1984. “Organizational Fundraising: Further Evidence on the Effect of Legitimizing Small Donations.”Journal of Consumer Research 11 (June): 611–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheal, David. 1987. “Showing Them You Love Them: Gift Giving and the Dialectic of Intimacy.”Sociological Review 35 (1): 150–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawes, R. M., Faust, D., and Meehl, P.E. 1989. “Clinical versus Actuarial Judgment.”Science 243: 1668–1674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeJong, William and Arvo J. Oopik. 1992. “Effect of Legitimizing Small Contributions and Labeling Potential Donors as ‘Helpers’ on Responses to a Direct Mail Solicitation for Charity.”Psychological Reports 71 (December): 923–928.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Della Bitta, Albert J., Kent B. Monroe, and John M. McGinnis. 1981. “Consumer Perceptions of Comparative Price Advertisements.”Journal of Marketing Research 18 (November): 416–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dillard, James P. 1991. “The Current Status of Research on Sequential-Request Compliance Techniques.”Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 17 (June): 283–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Einhorn, Hillel and Robin Hogarth. 1981. “Behavioral Decision Theory: Processes of Judgment and Choice.”Annual Review of Psychology 32: 53–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folkes, Valerie S. 1988. “The Availability Heuristic and Perceived Risk.”Journal of Consumer Research 15 (June): 13–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, Cynthia, Robert E. Hite, and Paul L. Sauer. 1988. “Increasing Contributions in Solicitation Campaigns: The Use of Large and Small Anchorpoints.”Journal of Consumer Research 15 (September): 284–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaeth, Gary J., Irvin P. Levin, Deborah A. Cours, and Susan Combs. 1990. “Framing of Attribute Information in Product Description.” InAdvances in Consumer Research, Vol. 17. Eds. Marvin E. Goldberg, Gerald Gorn, and Richard W. Pollay. Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research, 147–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garner, Thesia I. and Janet Wagner. 1991. “Economic Dimensions of Household Gift Giving.”Journal of Consumer Research 18 (December): 368–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isen, Alice M. 1993. “Positive Affect and Decision Making.” InHandbook of Emotions. Eds. Michael Lewis and Jeannette Haviland. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Eric J. and J. Edward Russo. 1984. “Product Familiarity and Learning New Information.”Journal of Consumer Research 11 (June): 542–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, Daniel and Amos Tversky. 1979. “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk.”Econometrica 47 (March): 263–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ————— and —————. 1982. “Variants of Uncertainty.” InJudgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Eds. Daniel Kahneman, Paul Slovic, and Amos Tversky. New York: Cambridge University Press, 509–520.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————— and —————. 1984. “Choices, Values, and Frames.”American Psychologist 39 (April): 341–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalyanaram, Gurumurthy and John D. C. Little. 1994. “An Empirical Analysis of Latitude of Price Acceptance in Consumer Package Goods.”Journal of Consumer Research 21 (December): 408–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanouse, David E. 1984. “Explaining Negativity Biases in Evaluation and Choice Behavior: Theory and Research.” InAdvances in Consumer Research, Vol. 11. Ed. Thomas C. Kinnear. Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research, 703–708.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keiser, Stephen K. and James R. Krum. 1976. “Consumer Perceptions of Retail Advertising With Overstated Price Savings.”Journal of Retailing 52 (Fall): 27–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi, Ariel S. and John B. Pryor. 1987. “The Effects of Imagining Outcomes versus Imagining Reasons.”Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 40 (October): 219–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, Irwin and Gary J. Gaeth. 1988. “How Consumers Are Affected by the Framing of Attribute Information Before and After Consuming the Product.”Journal of Consumer Research 15 (December): 374–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, Herschell Gordon. 1992. “Fifty of the Easiest Ways to Begin an Effective Sales Letter.”Direct Marketing (October): 16–19.

  • Lichtenstein, Donald R., Peter H. Bloch, and William C. Black. 1988. “Correlates of Price Acceptability.”Journal of Consumer Research 15 (September): 243–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maheswaran, Durairaj and Joan Meyers-Levy. 1990. “The Influence of Message Framing and Issue Involvement.”Journal of Marketing Research 27 (August): 361–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyerowitz, Beth E. and Shelly Chaiken. 1987. “The Effect of Message Framing on Breast Self-Examination Attitudes, Intentions, and Behavior.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 52 (3): 500–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milne, George R. and Mary Ellen Gordon. 1993. “Direct Mail Privacy-Efficiency Trade-offs Within an Implied Social Contract Framework.”Journal of Public Policy & Marketing 12 (Fall): 206–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monroe, Kent B. and Susan M. Petroshius. 1981. “Buyers’ Perceptions of Price: An Update of the Evidence.” InPerspectives in Consumer Behavior, Third Ed. Eds. H. Kassarjian and T. S. Robertson. Glenview, IL: Scott-Foresman, 43–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne, John W., James R. Bettman, and Eric J. Johnson. 1992. “Behavioral Decision Research: A Constructive Processing Perspective.”Annual Review of Psychology 43: 87–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —————, —————, Eloise Coupey, and Eric J. Johnson. 1992. “A Constructive Process View of Decision Making: Multiple Strategies in Judgment and Choice.”Acta Psychologica 80: 107–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollard, P. 1982. “Human Reasoning: Some Possible Effects of Availability.”Cognition 12 (July): 65–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reece, William S. 1979. “Charitable Contributions: New Evidence on Household Behavior.”American Economic Review 69 (March): 142–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reingen, Peter H. 1978. “On Inducing Compliance With Requests.”Journal of Consumer Research 5 (September): 96–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ————— 1982. “Test of a List Procedure for Inducing Compliance With a Request to Donate Money.”Journal of Applied Psychology 67 (February): 110–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schibrowsky, John A. and James W. Peltier. 1995. “Decision Frames and Direct Marketing Offers: A Field Study in a Fundraising Context.”Journal of Direct Marketing 9 (Winter): 8–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmittlein, David C. and Robert A. Peterson. 1994. “Customer Base Analysis: An Industrial Purchase Process Application.”Marketing Science 13 (Winter): 41–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, Sandra L. 1992. “Framing and Conflict: Aspiration Level Contingency, the Status Quo, and Current Theories of Risky Choice.”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 18 (5): 1040–1057.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzwald, Joseph, Aharon Bizman, and Moshe Raz. 1983. “The Foot-in-the-Door Paradigm: Effects of Second Request Size on Donation Probability and Donor Generosity.”Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 9 (September): 443–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherif, C. W., M. Sherif, and R. W. Nebergall. 1965.Attitude and Attitude Change. Philadelphia: Saunders.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Gerald E. and Lawrence H. Wortzel. 1993.Prior Knowledge and the Effect of Message Frames in Advertising. Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, Bob. 1992.Successful Direct Marketing Methods, Fourth Ed. Lincolnwood, IL: NTC Business Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Switzer, Fred S., III and Janet A. Sniezek. 1991. “Judgment Processes in Motivation: Anchoring and Adjustment Effects on Judgment and Behavior.”Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 49: 209–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, Amos and Daniel Kahneman. 1973. “Availability: A Heuristic for Judging Frequency and Probability.”Cognitive Psychology 5 (September): 207–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ————— and —————. 1974. “Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.”Science 185: 1124–1131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ————— and —————. 1981. “The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice.”Science 211: 453–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ————— and —————. 1986. “Rational Choice and the Framing of Decisions.”Journal of Business 59: S251-S278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ————— and —————. 1992. “Loss Aversion in Riskless Choice: A Reference Dependent Model.”Quarterly Journal of Economics 106 (November): 1039–1061.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —————, S. Sattath, and Paul Slovic. 1988. “Contingent Weighting in Judgment and Choice.”Psychological Review 95: 371–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urbany, Joel E., William O. Bearden, and Dan C. Weilbaker. 1988. “The Effect of Plausible and Exaggerated Reference Prices on Consumer Perceptions and Price Search.”Journal of Consumer Research 15 (June): 95–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weyant, James M. and Stephen L. Smith. 1987. “Getting More by Asking for Less: The Effects of Request Size on Donations of Charity.”Journal of Applied Social Psychology 17 (April): 392–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. the Carroll School of Management, Boston College, USA

    Gerald E. Smith (assistant professor of marketing)

  2. School of Management, Boston University, USA

    Paul D. Berger (professor of marketing and chairman of the marketing department)

Authors
  1. Gerald E. Smith
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Paul D. Berger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

He received his D.B.A. from Boston University, M.B.A. from Harvard University, and B.A. from Brandeis University. His research interests include managerial pricing, marketing communication strategies, and customer value. His work has been published in theCalifornia Management Review, Sloan Management Review, Pricing Strategy and Practice, Journal of Retailing, Journal of Marketing Communication, Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, andJournal of Promotion Management, among others.

He earned his S.B., S.M., and Ph.D. degrees from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Sloan School of Management. He is coauthor ofDirect Marketing Management (Prentice Hall) andCases in Business Statistics (Allyn & Bacon). He has published a variety of articles in journals such asManagement Science, Journal of Marketing Research, Journal of Direct Marketing, Harvard Business Review, Sloan Management Review, Journal of Business Forecasting, American Statistician, andJournal of Finance.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Smith, G.E., Berger, P.D. The impact of direct marketing appeals on charitable marketing effectiveness. JAMS 24, 219–231 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070396243003

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070396243003

Keywords

Search

Navigation