Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Marketing implementation: The implications of marketing paradigm weakness for the strategy execution process

  • Marketing in the 21st Century
  • Published:
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Reviewing the marketing strategy implementation issue in an era of a weaker marketing paradigm contrasts traditional sequential flow models of implementation with the “strategy formulation/implementation dichotomy” and leads to the emergence of a processual view of implementation. The processual view clarifies the underlying behavioral and organizational factors that build strategy implementation capabilities. These underlying factors are at risk from a weaker marketing paradigm. The weakening of the marketing paradigm is discussed in terms of the downsizing and disappearance of the marketing function, but more fundamentally in the loss of strategic influence for marketing in the face of competing management paradigms such as the “lean enterprise” and “lean thinking.” The conclusion is that the impact on implementation capabilities is being felt first in companies where the marketing paradigm has been traditionally weak, but that this may be prototypical for other companies in the longer term. A number of important areas for conceptual and empirical attention are indentified.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Achrol, Ravi S. 1991. “Evolution of the Marketing Organization: New Forms for Turbulent Environments.”Journal of Marketing 55 (4): 77–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, Chris. 1985.Strategy, Change and Defensive Routines. New York: Ballinger, Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, Paul N. and Torger Reve. 1990. “Transmitting Signals to Consumers for Competitive Advantage.”Business Horizons, July–August, pp. 58–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonoma, Thomas V. 1985.The Marketing Edge: Making Marketing Strategies Work. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1992. “The Instant CEO.”Across the Board, October, pp. 16–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • — and Victoria L. Crittenden. 1988. “Managing Marketing Implementation.”Sloan Management Review, Winter, pp. 7–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourgeois, L. and D. Brodwin 1984. “Strategic Implementation: Five Approaches to an Elusive Phenomenon.”Strategic Management Journal 5: 241–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bower, Joseph L. 1970.Managing the Resource Allocation Process: A Study of Corporate Planning and Investment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, John Seeley. 1991. “Research That Reinvents the Organization.”Harvard Business Review, January/February, pp. 102–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Stephen. 1995.Postmodern Marketing. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cespedes, Frank V. 1991.Organizing and Implementing the Marketing Effort. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1993. “Coordinating Sales and Marketing in Consumer Goods Firms.”Journal of Consumer Marketing 10: 37–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1994. “Industrial Marketing: Managing New Requirements.”Sloan Management Review 35: 45–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1995.Concurrent Marketing: Integrating Product, Sales and Service. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, E. Raymond Corey, and V. K. Rangan. 1988. “Gray Markets: Causes and Cures.”Harvard Business Review July/August, pp. 75–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • — and Nigel F. Piercy. 1996. “Implementing Marketing Strategy.”Journal of Marketing Management 12: 135–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corey, E. Raymond and Stephen H. Star. 1971.Organizing Strategy: A Marketing Approach. Boston: Harvard Business School, Division of Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cravens, David W., Gordon Greenley, Nigel F. Piercy, and Stanley F. Slater. 1997. “Integrating Contemporary Strategic Management Perspectives.”Long Range Planning 30: 493–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —, Nigel F. Piercy, and Shannon H. Shipp. 1996. “New Organizational Forms for Competing in Highly Dynamic Environments: The Network Paradigm.”British Journal of Management 7: 203–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Czinkota, Michael R. 1997. “Russia’s Transition to a Market Economy: Learning About Business.”Journal of International Marketing 5 (4): 73–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, George S. 1992. “Marketing’s Contribution to the Strategy Dialogue.”Journal of Marketing 20 (4): 323–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1994. “The Capabilities of Market-Driven Organizations.”Journal of Marketing 58 (October): 37–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deming, W. Edwards. 1986.Quality, Productivity and Competitive Position. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deshpande, Rohit, John Farley, and Frederick Webster. 1997.Factors Affecting Organizational Performance: A Five-Country Comparison. MSI Report No. 97-108. Boston: Marketing Science Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, Peter 1997. “Go For Robust Growth.”Marketing Business, April, p. 53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farley, John U. 1997. “Looking Ahead at the Marketplace; It’s Global and It’s Changing.” InReflections on the Futures of Marketing, Eds. Donald R. Lehmann and Katherine E. Jocz. Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute, 15–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, J. and R. Kazanjian. 1986.Strategy Implementation: Structure, Systems and Process. 2d ed. St. Paul, MN: West.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garvin, David A. 1993. “Building a Learning Organization.”Harvard Business Review, July–August, pp. 78–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giles, William D. 1991. “Making Strategy Work.”Long Range Planning 24: 75–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ginsberg, Ari and Eric Abrahamson. 1991. “Champions of Change and Strategic Shifts: The Role of Internal and External Change Advocates.”Journal of Management Studies 28: 173–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greyser, Stephen A. 1997. “Janus and Marketing: The Past, Present, and Prospective Future of Marketing.” InReflections on the Futures of Marketing. Eds. Donald R. Lehmann and Katherine E. Jocz. Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute, 3–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gronroos, Christian. 1983.Strategic Marketing and Management in the Service Sector. Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gummesson, Evert. 1991. “Marketing-Orientation Revisited: The Crucial Role of the Part-Time Marketer.”European Journal of Marketing 25 (2): 60–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gustin, Carl. 1997. “A Conversation With Carl Gustin.”Insights From MSI, Fall, pp. 6–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guth, William D. and Ian C. MacMillan. 1986. “Strategy Implementation Versus Middle Management Self-Interest.”Strategic Management Journal 7: 313–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamel, Gary and C. K. Prahalad. 1989. “Strategic Intent.”Harvard Business Review, May–June, pp. 63–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammer, Michael and James Champy. 1993.Re-engineering the Corporation: A Manifesto for a Business Revolution. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, Stuart L. 1992. “An Integrative Framework for Strategy-Making Processes.”Academy of Management Review 17: 327–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartline, Michael D. and O. C. Ferrell 1994.Service Quality Implementation: The Effects of Organizational Socialization and Managerial Actions on Customer-Contact Employee Behavior Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs, John M. and Donald F. Heany. 1977. “Coupling Strategy to Operating Plans.”Harvard Business Review, May–June, pp. 119–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoch, Stephen J. and John Deighton. 1989. “Managing What Consumers Learn From Experience.”Journal of Marketing 53 (2): 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — and Young-Won Ha. 1986. “Consumer learning: Advertising and the Ambiguity of Product Experience.”Journal of Consumer Research 13 (October): 221–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooley, Graham J., John Saunders, and Nigel Piercy. 1998.Marketing Strategy and Competitive Positioning. Hemel Hempstead, UK: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • The H R Challey Group. 1996.The Customer Selected World Class Sales Organizations: Executive Report. Dayton, OH: The H R Challey Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jick, Todd D. 1992. “Customer-Supplier Partnerships: Human Resources as Bridge Builders.”Human Resource Management 29: 435–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohli, Ajay K. and Bernard J. Jaworski. 1990. “Market Orientation: The Construct, Research Propositions, and Managerial Implications.”Journal of Marketing 54: 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kordupleski, Raymond E., Roland T. Rust, and Anthony J. Zahorik. 1993. “Why Improving Quality Doesn’t Improve Quality (or Whatever Happened to Marketing).”California Management Review 35 (3): 82–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, Barbara and James G. March. 1988. “Organizational Learning.”Annual Review of Sociology 14: 317–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, Roger. 1993. “Changing the Mind of the Corporation.”Harvard Business Review, November–December, pp. 81–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, Henry. 1987. “Crafting Strategy.”Harvard Business Review, September–October, pp. 66–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, Alan. 1996. “Stemming the Sea Change.”Marketing Business, November, pp. 24–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, Neil A. and Nigel F. Piercy. 1996. “Competitive Advantage, Quality Strategy and the Role of Marketing.”British Journal of Management 7: 231–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, N. 1975.Constructive Control. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohno, Taiichi. 1988.The Toyota Production System: Beyond Large-Scale Production. Portland, OR: Productivity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neal, Charles R. 1989. “JIT Procurement and Relationship Marketing.”Industrial Marketing Management 18 (1): 55–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parasuraman, A., Valerie Zeithaml, and Leonard L. Berry. 1985. “A Conceptual Model of Service Quality and Its Implications for Future Research.”Journal of Marketing 49 (Fall): 41–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, Jeffrey. 1992.Managing With Power: Politics and Influence in Organizations. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piercy, Nigel F. 1985.Marketing Organization: An Analysis of Information Processing, Power and Politics. London: Unwin Hyman.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1986. “The Role and Function of the Chief Marketing Executive and the Marketing Department.”Journal of Marketing Management 1: 265–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1987. “The Marketing Budgeting Process.”Journal of Marketing 51: 45–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1997.Market-Led Strategic Change: Transforming the Process of Going to Marketing. Oxford, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • — and David W. Cravens. 1995. “The Network Paradigm and the Marketing Organization: Developing a New Management Agenda.”European Journal of Marketing 29: 35–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — and William D. Giles. 1991. “The Logic of Being Illogical in Strategic Marketing Planning.”Journal of Marketing Management 5: 19–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Lloyd C. Harris, Linda D. Peters, and Nikala Lane. 1997. “Marketing Management, Market Strategy and Strategic Management: Domain Realignment and Redefinition.”Journal of Strategic Marketing 5 (1): 50–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • — and Neil A. Morgan. 1991. “Internal Marketing—The Missing Half of the Marketing Programme.”Long Range Planning 24: 82–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — and —. 1993.“Strategic and Operational Market Segmentation: A Managerial Analysis.”Journal of Strategic Marketing 1:123–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — and —. 1994. “The Marketing Planning Process: Behavioral Problem Compared to Analytical Techniques in Explaining Marketing Plan Credibility.”Journal of Business Research 29:167–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — and —. 1995. “Customer Satisfaction Measurement and Management: A Processual Analysis.”Journal of Marketing Management 11:817–834.

    Google Scholar 

  • — and —. 1997. “The Impact of Lean Thinking and the Lean Enterprise on Marketing: Threat or Synergy?”Journal of Marketing Management 13:679–694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, Michael E. 1996. “What Is Strategy?”Harvard Business Review, November–December, pp. 61–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, J. Brian. 1981. “Formulating Strategy One Step At a Time.”Journal of Business Strategy 1:42–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reichheld, Frederick F. and W. Earl Sasser. 1990. “Zero Defections: Quality Comes to Services.”Harvard Business Review September–October, pp. 105–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, David M. 1990. “Where Planning Fails in Practice.”Long Range Planning 23:85–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruekert, Robert W. and Orville Walker. 1987. “Marketing’s Interaction With Other Functional Units: A Conceptual Framework and Empirical Evidence.”Journal of Marketing 51:1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheth, Jagdish. 1997. Keynote address, Academy of Marketing Science Conference, Coral Gables, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skivington, James E. and Richard L. Daft. 1991. “A Study of Organizational ‘Framework’ and Process Modalities for the Implementation of Business-Level Strategic Decisions.”Journal of Management Studies 28(1):45–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slater, Stanley F. and John C. Narver. 1994.Market Oriented Isn’t Enough: Build A Learning Organization. Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slywotzky, Adrian. 1996.Value Migration. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spreng, Richard A, Scott B. Mackenzie, and Richard W. Olshavsky. 1996. “A Re-Examination of the Determinants of Consumer Satisfaction.”Journal of Marketing 60 (3):15–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stalk, George and Thomas M. Hout. 1990.Competing Against Time: How Time-Based Competition Is Reshaping Global Markets. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Philip Evans, and Lawrence E. Schulman. 1992. “Competing on Capabilities: The New Rules of Corporate Strategy.”Harvard Business Review 70 (2):57–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Maanan, John. 1978. “People Processing: Strategies of Organizational Socialization.”Organizational Dynamics 7:18–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, Frederick W. 1992. “The Changing Role of Marketing in the Corporation.”Journal of Marketing 56 (October):1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1997. “The Future Role of Marketing in the Organization.” InReflections on the Futures of Marketing Eds. Donald R. Lehmann and Katherine E. Jocz. Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Womack, James P. and Daniel T. Jones. 1994. “From Lean Production to the Lean Enterprise.”Harvard Business Review, March–April, 93–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • — and —. 1996a. “Beyond Toyota: How to Root Out Waste and Pursue Perfection.”Harvard Business Review, September–October, pp. 140–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • — and —. 1996b.Lean Thinking: Banish Waste and Create Wealth in Your Corporation. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • — and Daniel Roos. 1990.The Machine That Changed the World. New York: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaltman, Gerald, Karen Le Masters, and Michael Heffring. 1982.Theory Construction in Marketing. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK

    Nigel F. Piercy

Authors
  1. Nigel F. Piercy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Nigel F. Piercy, Ph.D., is Sir Julian Hodge Chair in Marketing and Strategy with Cardiff Business School, at Cardiff University in the United Kingdom, and has held visiting positions at Texas Christian University, the University of California-Berkeley, and the Athens Laboratory for Business Administration. He has published widely in the area of marketing strategy and implementation in the international literature and has had articles published in theJournal of Marketing, theJournal of the Academy of Marketing Science, theJournal of International Marketing, and theJournal of World Business. He has published eight books, most recently the executive textMarket-Led Strategic Change: Transforming the Process of Going to Market (Oxford, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Piercy, N.F. Marketing implementation: The implications of marketing paradigm weakness for the strategy execution process. J. of the Acad. Mark. Sci. 26, 222–236 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070398263004

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070398263004

Keywords

Search

Navigation