Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T20:58:39.989Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Issue Networks, Information, and Interest Group Alliances: The Case of Wisconsin Welfare Politics, 1993-99

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2021

Michael T. Heaney
Michael T. Heaney*
Affiliation:
University of Chicago
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Interest group scholars have long emphasized the importance of group alliances in the policymaking process. But little is known about how groups choose specific alliance partners; that is, who works with whom? Social embeddedness theory suggests that the social location of groups in issue networks affects the information available to them about potential partners and the desirability of particular alliances. To test this hypothesis, I use data from interviews with representatives of 57 interest groups and 46 other significant political actors involved in Wisconsin's 1993-99 welfare policy debate to model alliance formation with two-stage conditional maximum likelihood regression (2SCML). I find substantial support for my social embeddedness hypotheses that alliance formation is encouraged by previous network interaction, contact with mutual third parties, and having a central position in a network. In short, the placement of groups in networks serves to facilitate alliances among some pairs of groups and to cut off potential connections among others.

Type
Research Article
Information
State Politics & Policy Quarterly , Volume 4 , Issue 3 , Fall 2004 , pp. 237 - 270
Copyright
Copyright © Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alvarez, R. Michael. 1997. Information and Elections. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Axelrod, Robert, and Keohane, Robert O.. 1985. “Achieving Cooperation under Anarchy: Strategies and Institutions.” World Politics 38:226–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumgartner, Frank R., and Leech, Beth L.. 1998. Basic Interests: The Importance of Groups in Politics and in Political Science. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumgartner, Frank R., and Jones, Bryan D.. 1993. Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Berry, Jeffrey M. 1999. The New Liberalism: The Rising Power of Citizen Groups. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Berry, Jeffrey M., and Aarons, David F.. 2003. A Voice for Nonprofits. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Bonacich, Phillip. 1987. “Power and Centrality: A Family of Measures.” American Journal of Sociology 92:1170–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brewer, Devon D. 2000. “Forgetting in the Recall-Based Elicitation of Personal and Social Networks.” Social Networks 22:29–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Browne, William P. 1990. “Organized Interests and Their Issue Niches: A Search for Pluralism in a Policy Domain.” Journal of Politics 52:477–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burt, Ronald S. 1976. “Positions in Networks.” Social Forces 55:93–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burt, Ronald S. 1992. Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Burt, Ronald S., and Knez, Marc. 1995. “Kinds of Third-Party Effects on Trust.” Rationality and Society 7:255–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, Daniel P., Esterling, Kevin M., and Lazer, David M. J.. 1998. “The Strength of Weak Ties in Lobbying Networks.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 10:417–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, Daniel P., Esterling, Kevin M., and Lazer, David M. J.. 2003. “The Strength of Strong Ties: A Model of Contact-Making in Policy Networks with Evidence from U.S. Health Politics.” Rationality and Society 15:411–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, Daniel P., Esterling, Kevin M., and Lazer, David M. J.. 2004. “Friends, Brokers, and Transitivity: Who Informs Whom in Washington Politics.” Journal of Politics 66:224–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, William D., and Skogstad, Grace. 1990. Policy Communities and Pubic Policy in Canada. Toronto, ON: Copp Clark Pitman.Google Scholar
Corbett, Thomas J. 1995. “Welfare Reform in Wisconsin: The Rhetoric and the Reality.” In The Politics of Welfare Reform, eds. Thompson, Lyke and Norris, Donald. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Danziger, Sheldon H., Sandefur, Gary D., and Weinberg, Daniel H.. 1994. Confronting Poverty: Prescriptions for Change. New York and Cambridge, MA: Russell Sage Foundation and Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
DeParle, Jason. 1998. “Wisconsin Welfare Experiment: Easy to Say, Not So Easy to Do,” The New York Times, 18 October, 1.1.Google Scholar
DeParle, Jason. 1999a. “As Benefits Expire, the Experts Worry,” The New York Times, 10 October, 1.Google Scholar
DeParle, Jason. 1999b. “Bold Effort Leaves Much Unchanged for the Poor: Life after Welfare,” The New York Times, 30 December, A.1.Google Scholar
Dykman, Peter J. 1997. Index Bulletin of the Proceedings of the Wisconsin Legislature, 1995-96 Session, Period Ending December 31, 1996. Madison, WI: Legislative Reference Bureau.Google Scholar
Efron, Bradley, and Tibshirani, Robert J.. 1993. An Introduction to the Bootstrap. New York: Chapman & Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esterling, Kevin M. 1999. “Coalitions of Coalitions: Interest Group Internal Deliberation and Policy Alliances.” Presented at the American Politics Workshop, University of Chicago, Chicago.Google Scholar
Feld, Scott L., and Carter, William C.. 2002. “Detecting Measurement Bias in Respondent Reports of Personal Networks.” Social Networks 24:365–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernandez, Roberto M., and Gould, Roger V.. 1994. “A Dilemma of State Power: Brokerage and Influence in the National Health Policy Domain.” American Journal of Sociology 99:1455–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleishman, John A. 1988. “The Effects of Decision Framing and Others' Behavior on Cooperation in a Social Dilemma.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 32:162–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gais, Thomas L., Peterson, Mark A., and Walker, Jack L.. 1984. “Interest Groups, Iron Triangles, and Representative Institutions in American National Government.” British Journal of Political Science 14:161–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gans, Herbert J. 1995. The War Against the Poor: The Underclass and Antipoverty Policy. New York: BasicBooks.Google Scholar
Granovetter, Mark. 1973. “The Strength of Weak Ties.” American Journal of Sociology 76:1360–80.Google Scholar
Granovetter, Mark. 1985. “Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness.” American Journal of Sociology 91:481–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, Virginia, and Lowery, David. 1996. The Population Ecology of Interest Representation: Lobbying Communities in the American States. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, Virginia, and Lowery, David. 1998. “To Lobby Alone or in a Flock: Foraging Behavior among Organized Interests.” American Politics Quarterly 26:5–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gulati, Ranjay, and Gargiulo, Martin. 1999. “Where Do Interorganizational Networks Come From?” American Journal of Sociology 104:1439–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, John Mark. 1985. “The Political Economy of Group Membership.” American Political Science Review 79:79–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, John Mark. 1991. Gaining Access: Congress and the Farm Lobby, 1919-1981. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Heaney, Michael T. 2003. “Coalitions and Interest Group Influence over Health Care Policy.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
Heclo, Hugh. 1978. “Issue Networks and the Executive Establishment.” In The New American Political System, ed. King, Anthony. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.Google Scholar
Heinz, John P., Laumann, Edward O., Nelson, Robert L., and Salisbury, Robert H.. 1993. The Hollow Core: Private Interests in National Policy Making. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hojnacki, Marie. 1997. “Interest Groups' Decisions to Join Alliances or Work Alone.” American Journal of Political Science 41:61–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hojnacki, Marie. 1998. “Organized Interests' Advocacy Behavior in Alliances.” Political Research Quarterly 51:437–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hojnacki, Marie, and Kimball, David C.. 1998. “Organized Interests and the Decision of Whom to Lobby in Congress.” American Political Science Review 92 (December): 775–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holbrook, Thomas M., and Dunk, Emily Van. 1993. “Electoral Competition in the American States.” American Political Science Review 87:955–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holland, Paul W., and Leinhardt, Samuel. 1973. “The Structural Implications of Measurement Error in Sociometry.” Journal of Mathematical Sociology 3:85–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hula, Kevin W. 1999. Lobbying Together: Interest Group Coalitions in Legislative Politics. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Kingdon, John W. 1984. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Knoke, David. 1999. Personal e-mail. 18 October.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kollman, Ken. 1997. “Inviting Friends to Lobby: Interest Groups, Ideological Bias, and Congressional Committees.” American Journal of Political Science 41:519–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krackhardt, David. 1987. “QAP Partialling as a Test of Spuriousness.” Social Networks 9:171–86.Google Scholar
Krackhardt, David. 1988. “Predicting with Networks: Nonparametric Multiple Regression Analysis of Dyadic Data.” Social Networks 10:359–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laumann, Edward O. 1999. Personal e-mail. 30 October.Google Scholar
Laumann, Edward O., and Knoke, David. 1987. The Organizational State: Social Choice in National Policy Domains. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Lee, Lung-Fei. 1981. “Simultaneous Equations Models with Discrete and Censored Dependent Variables.” In Structural Analysis of Discrete Data with Econometric Applications, eds. Manski, Charles F. and McFadden, Daniel. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Leamer, Edward E. 1978. Specification Searches: Ad Hoc Inference with Nonexperimental Data. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Maddala, G. S. 1983. Limited Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsden, Peter V. 1990. “Network Data and Measurement.” Annual Review of Sociology 16:435–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, Susan E. 1997. What Money Can't Buy: Family Income and Children's Life Chances. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Mead, Lawrence M. 1986. Beyond Entitlement: The Social Obligations of Citizenship. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Melvin, Thomas. 1995. Bulletin of the Proceedings of the Wisconsin Legislature, Part 3, Assembly, Period Ending December 31, 1994. Madison, WI: Chief Clerk of the Assembly.Google Scholar
Miller, Stephen R. 1998. Index Bulletin of the Proceedings of the Wisconsin Legislature, 1997-98 Session, Period Ending December 31, 1998. Madison, WI: Legislative Reference Bureau.Google Scholar
Murray, Charles. 1994. Losing Ground: American Social Policy, 1950-1980. 10th Anniversary Edition. New York: BasicBooks.Google Scholar
Nicholson-Crotty, Sean, and Meier, Kenneth J.. 2002. “Size Doesn't Matter: In Defense of Single-State Studies.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly 2:411–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nownes, Anthony J. 2000. “Policy Conflict and the Structure of Interest Communities.” American Politics Quarterly 28:309–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, Mancur. 1971. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Padgett, John F., and Ansell, Christopher. 1993. “Robust Action and the Rise of the Medici, 1400-1434.” American Journal of Sociology 98:1259–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, Samuel C. 1996. “Legislative Politics in the States.” In Politics in the American States: A Comparative Analysis, eds. Gray, Virginia and Jacob, Herbert. 6th ed. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.Google Scholar
Peterson, Paul E., and Rom, Mark. 1990. Welfare Magnets. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Piven, Frances Fox, and Cloward, Richard A.. 1993. Regulating the Poor: The Functions of Public Welfare. Updated ed. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Podolny, Joel M. 1993. “A Status-Based Model of Market Competition.” American Journal of Sociology 98:829–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Podolny, Joel M. 1994. “Market Uncertainty and the Social Character of Economic Exchange.” Administrative Science Quarterly 39:458–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rasmusen, Eric. 1989. Games and Information: An Introduction to Game Theory. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Rivers, Douglas, and Vuong, Quang H.. 1988. “Limited Information Estimators and Exogeneity Tests for Simultaneous Probit Models.” Journal of Econometrics 39:347–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salisbury, Robert H. 1990. “The Paradox of Interest Groups in Washington—More Groups, Less Clout.” In The New American Political System, ed. King, Anthony. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.Google Scholar
Sanders, Charles R. 1997. Assembly Bulletin of the Proceedings of the Wisconsin Legislature, 1995-96 Session, Period Ending December 31, 1996. Madison, WI: Chief Clerk of the Assembly.Google Scholar
Schneider, Donald J. 1995. Bulletin of the Proceedings of the Wisconsin Legislature, 1993-94 Session, Part 1, Senate, Period Ending December 31, 1994. Madison, WI: Chief Clerk of the Senate.Google Scholar
Schneider, Donald J. 1997. Senate Bulletin of the Proceedings of the Wisconsin Legislature, 1995-96 Session, Period Ending December 31, 1996. Madison, WI: Chief Clerk of the Assembly.Google Scholar
Teles, Steven M. 1996. Whose Welfare? AFDC and Elite Politics. Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas Press.Google Scholar
Thatcher, Mark. 1998. “The Development of Policy Network Analyses: From Modest Origins to Overarching Frameworks.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 10:389–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theobald, H. Rupert. 1995. Bulletin of the Proceedings of the Wisconsin Legislature, 1993-94 Session, Part 4, Index, Period Ending December 31, 1994. Madison, WI: Legislative Reference Bureau.Google Scholar
Thompson, Steven K., and Seber, George A.. 1996. Adaptive Sampling. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Thompson, Tommy G. 1996. Veto Message to the Wisconsin State Assembly. Madison, WI: Office of the Governor.Google Scholar
United States Census Bureau. 2002. Statistical Abstract of the United States. Washington, DC: United States Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Williamson, Oliver E. 1975. Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, William Julis. 1987. The Truly Disadvantaged: The Inner City, the Underclass, and Public Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Wisconsin Ethics Board. 1995. Principal's Statement of Lobbying Activities and Expenditures, 1995-96 Legislative Session. Madison, WI: Wisconsin Ethics Board.Google Scholar
Wisconsin Ethics Board. 1999. Directory of Registered Lobbying Organizations, 1999-2000 Legislative Session. Madison, WI: Wisconsin Ethics Board. Note: The same series of directories was consulted for the 1993-94, 1995-96, and 1997-98 Legislative Sessions (Wisconsin Ethics Board 1994, 1996, 1998).Google Scholar