Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Risk Stratification According to the Prognostic Nutritional Index for Predicting Postoperative Complications After Lung Cancer Surgery

  • Thoracic Oncology
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The prognostic nutritional index (PNI), an immune nutritional marker based on serum albumin levels and total lymphocyte count, predicts postoperative complications in various types of malignancies. However, the clinical significance of the PNI for postoperative complications following lung cancer surgery is uncertain.

Methods

Patients with resected non-small cell lung cancer (n = 515) were retrospectively analyzed and the relationship between the preoperative PNI and postoperative complications was evaluated.

Results

Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that a preoperative low PNI was a significant independent predictor of postoperative complications of Clavien–Dindo Grade ≥ II (odds ratio: 1.06 per unit decrease, 95.0% confidence interval 1.01–1.11). Patients were divided into three groups according to the preoperative PNI: normal (≥ 50; n = 324), mildly low (< 50, ≥ 45; n = 134), and severely low (< 45; n = 57). The incidence of postoperative complications of Grade ≥ II and Grade ≥ III in the normal, mildly low, and severely low PNI groups was 22.2, 39.6, and 42.1% and 7.1, 16.4, and 22.8%, respectively. The incidence of postoperative complications of Grade ≥ II and Grade ≥ III was significantly higher in the mildly low and severely low PNI groups than in the normal PNI group (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). The incidence of air leak, pneumonia, and extrapulmonary infection, but not arrhythmia, was significantly higher in the mildly low and severely low PNI groups than in the normal PNI group.

Conclusions

The PNI could be a useful marker to predict the risk of postoperative complications after lung cancer surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015;65:87–108.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Brunelli A, Drosos P, Dinesh P, Ismail H, Bassi V. The severity of complications is associated with postoperative costs after lung resection. Ann Thorac Surg. 2017;103:1641–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Shiono S, Yoshida J, Nishimura M, Hagiwara M, Hishida T, Nitadori J, Nagai K. Risk factors of postoperative respiratory infections in lung cancer surgery. J Thorac Oncol. 2007;2:34–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Berry MF, Hanna J, Tong BC, Burfeind WR Jr., Harpole DH, D’Amico TA, Onitis MW. Risk factors for morbidity after lobectomy for lung cancer in elderly patients. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;88:1093–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Fernandez FG, Kosinski AS, Burfeind W, et al. The society of thoracic surgeons lung cancer resection risk model: higher quality data and superior outcomes. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;102:370–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Rivera C, Bernard A, Falcoz PE, et al. Characterization and prediction of prolonged air leak after pulmonary resection: a nationwide study setting up the index of prolonged air leak. Ann Thorac Surg. 2011;92:1062–8; discussion 68.

  7. Iwata T, Nagato K, Nakajima T, Suzuki H, Yoshida S, Yoshino I. Risk factors predictive of atrial fibrillation after lung cancer surgery. Surg Today. 2016;46:877–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mason DP, Subramanian S, Nowicki ER, Grab JD, Murthy SC, Rice TW, Blackstone EH. Impact of smoking cessation before resection of lung cancer: a Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database study. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;88:362–70; discussion 70–1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Licker MJ, Widikker I, Robert J, et al. Operative mortality and respiratory complications after lung resection for cancer: impact of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and time trends. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006;81:1830–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Shiono S, Abiko M, Sato T. Postoperative complications in elderly patients after lung cancer surgery. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2013;16:819–23.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Nojiri T, Inoue M, Shintani Y, Takeuchi Y, Maeda H, Hamasaki T, Okumura M. B-type natriuretic peptide-guided risk assessment for postoperative complications in lung cancer surgery. World J Surg. 2015;39:1092–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Onodera T, Goseki N, Kosaki G. Prognostic nutritional index in gastrointestinal surgery of malnourished cancer patients. Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi. 1984;85:1001–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Yang Y, Gao P, Song Y, et al. The prognostic nutritional index is a predictive indicator of prognosis and postoperative complications in gastric cancer: a meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016;42:1176–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Tokunaga R, Sakamoto Y, Nakagawa S, et al. Prognostic nutritional index predicts severe complications, recurrence, and poor prognosis in patients with colorectal cancer undergoing primary tumor resection. Dis Colon Rectum. 2015;58:1048–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kanda M, Fujii T, Kodera Y, Nagai S, Takeda S, Nakao A. Nutritional predictors of postoperative outcome in pancreatic cancer. Br J Surg. 2011;98:268–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Shimizu K, Okita R, Saisho S, Maeda A, Nojima Y, Nakata M. Preoperative neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio and prognostic nutritional index predict survival in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. World J Surg Oncol. 2015;13:291.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Qiu C, Qu X, Shen H, Zheng C, Zhu L, Meng L, Du J. Evaluation of prognostic nutritional index in patients undergoing radical surgery with nonsmall cell lung cancer. Nutr Cancer. 2015;67:741–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Mori S, Usami N, Fukumoto K, et al. The significance of the prognostic nutritional index in patients with completely resected non-small cell lung cancer. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0136897.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Okada S, Shimada J, Kato D, Tsunezuka H, Teramukai S, Inoue M. Clinical significance of prognostic nutritional index after surgical treatment in lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2017;104:296–302.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Goldstraw P, Crowley J, Chansky K, et al. The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: proposals for the revision of the TNM stage groupings in the forthcoming (seventh) edition of the TNM Classification of malignant tumours. J Thorac Oncol. 2007;2:706–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6,336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205–13.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Katayama H, Kurokawa Y, Nakamura K, et al. Extended Clavien–Dindo classification of surgical complications: Japan Clinical Oncology Group postoperative complications criteria. Surg Today. 2016;46:668–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Inoue H, Nishiyama N, Mizuguchi S, Nagano K, Izumi N, Komatsu H, Suehiro S Clinical value of exogenous factor XIII for prolonged air leak following pulmonary lobectomy: a case control study. BMC Surg. 2014;14:109.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Aghdaii N, Ferasatkish R, Mohammadzadeh Jouryabi A, Hamidi SH. Significance of preoperative total lymphocyte count as a prognostic criterion in adult cardiac surgery. Anesth Pain Med. 2014;4:e20331.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Okada S, Shimada J, Kato D, Tsunezuka H, Inoue M. Prolonged air leak following lobectomy can be predicted in lung cancer patients. Surg Today. 2017;47:973–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Isowa N, Hasegawa S, Bando T, Wada H. Preoperative risk factors for prolonged air leak following lobectomy or segmentectomy for primary lung cancer. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2002;21:951.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Busch E, Verazin G, Antkowiak JG, Driscoll D, Takita H. Pulmonary complications in patients undergoing thoracotomy for lung carcinoma. Chest. 1994;105:760–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Irvin TT, Hunt TK. Effect of malnutrition on colonic healing. Ann Surg. 1974;180:765–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Wensveen FM, Valentic S, Sestan M, Wensveen TT, Polic B. Interactions between adipose tissue and the immune system in health and malnutrition. Semin Immunol. 2015;27:322–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Endo S, Ikeda N, Kondo T, et al. Model of lung cancer surgery risk derived from a Japanese nationwide web-based database of 78 594 patients during 2014-2015. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017;52:1182–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Editage (www.editage.jp) for English language editing.

Funding

None.

Disclosures

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masayoshi Inoue MD, PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Okada, S., Shimada, J., Teramukai, S. et al. Risk Stratification According to the Prognostic Nutritional Index for Predicting Postoperative Complications After Lung Cancer Surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 25, 1254–1261 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-018-6368-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-018-6368-y

Keywords

Navigation