Skip to main content
Log in

Cold spray nozzle mach number limitation

  • Published:
Journal of Thermal Spray Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The classic one-dimensional isentropic flow approach is used along with a two-dimensional axisymmetric numerical model to show that the exit Mach number of a cold spray nozzle should be limited due to two factors. To show this, the two-dimensional model is validated with experimental data. Although both models show that the stagnation temperature is an important limiting factor, the one-dimensional approach fails to show how important the shock-particle interactions are at limiting the nozzle Mach number. It is concluded that for an air nozzle spraying solid powder particles, the nozzle Mach number should be set between 1.5 and 3 to limit the negative effects of the high stagnation temperature and of the shock-particle interactions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A.P. Alkhimov, A.N. Papyrin, V.F. Dosarev, N.I. Nesterovich, and M.M. Shuspanov: U.S. Patent 5 302 414, 1994.

  2. A.O. Tokarev: “Structure of Aluminum Powder Coatings Prepared by Cold Gas-Dynamic Spraying,” Met. Sci. Heat Treat., 1996, 38(3–4), pp. 136–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. A.P. Alkhimov, V.F. Kosarev, and A.N. Papyring: “A Method of Cold Gas Dynamic Deposition,” Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1990, 315(5), pp. 1062–65.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. A.H. Shapiro, The Dynamics and Thermodynamics of Compressible Fluid Flow, Ronald Press, New York, 1953.

    Google Scholar 

  5. R.C. Dykhuizen and M.F. Smith: “Gas Dynamic Principles of Cold Spray,” J. Therm. Spray Technol., 1998, 7(2), pp. 205–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. D.L. Gilmore, R.C. Dykhuizen, R.A. Neiser, T.J. Roemer, and M.F. Smith: “Particle Velocity and Deposition Efficiency in the Cold Spray Process,” J. Therm. Spray Technol., 1999, 8(4), pp. 576–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. V. Shukla, G.S. Elliott, and B.H. Kear: “Nanopowder Deposition by Supersonic Rectangular Jet Impingement,” J. Therm. Spray Technol., 2000, 9(3), pp. 394–98.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. J. Karthikeyan, C.M. Kay, J. Lindeman, R.S. Lima, and C.C. Berndt: “Cold Spray Processing of Titanium Powder” in Proceedings of the First International Thermal Spray Conference, C.C. Berndt, ed., ASM International, Materials Park, OH, 2000, pp. 255–62.

    Google Scholar 

  9. R.N. Cox and L.F. Crabtree: Elements of Hypersonic Aerodynamics, Academic, New York, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J.K. Vennard and R.L. Street: Elementary Fluid Mechanics, Wiley, New York, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  11. C.B. Henderson: “Drag Coefficients of Spheres in Continuum and Rarefied Flows,” AIAA J., 1976, 14, pp. 707–08.

    Google Scholar 

  12. R.P. Benedict: Fundamentals of Temperature, Pressure and Flow Measurements, Wiley, New York, 1984, pp. 339–73.

    Google Scholar 

  13. B. Jodoin, P. Proulx, and Y. Mercadier: “Numerical Study of Supersonic Direct Current Plasma Nozzle Flow,” AIAA J., 1998, 36(4), pp. 578–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jodoin, B. Cold spray nozzle mach number limitation. J Therm Spray Tech 11, 496–507 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1361/105996302770348628

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1361/105996302770348628

Keywords

Navigation