Skip to main content
Log in

Characterization of blasted austenitic stainless steel and its corrosion resistance

  • Reviewed Papers
  • Published:
Journal of Thermal Spray Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is known that the corrosion resistance of stainless steel is deteriorated by blasting, but the reason for this deterioration is not clear. A blasted austenitic stainless steel plate (JIS-SUS304) has been characterized with comparison to the scraped and non-blasted specimens. The surface roughness of the blasted specimen is larger than that of materials finished with #180 paper. A martensite phase is formed in the surface layer of both blasted and scraped specimens. Compressive residual stress is generated in the blasted specimen and the maximum residual stress is formed at 50–100 µm from the surface. The corrosion potentials of the blasted specimen and subsequently solution treated specimen are lower than that of the non-blasted specimen. The passivation current densities of the blasted specimens are higher those of the non-blasted specimen. The blasted specimen and the subsequently solution treated specimen exhibit rust in 5% sodium chloride (NaCl) solution, while the non-blasted specimen and ground specimen do not rust in the solution. It is concluded that the deterioration of corrosion resistance of austenitic stainless steel through blasting is caused by the roughed morphology of the surface.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anon.: “Hot Rolled Stainless Steel Plates, Sheets and Strip,” JIS G4304, 1999 (in Japanese).

  2. Anon.: “Methods of Neutral Salt Spray Testing,” JIS Z2371, 1994 (in Japanese).

  3. K. Kon and T. Hisamatsu: “Stress Corrosion Cracking and (100) Faceting Dissolution of Pure Al-Cu Single Crystals,” Boshoku Gijutsu (Corrosion Engineering), 1977, 26, pp. 565–71 (in Japanese).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. N. Ohtani: “Stress Corrosion Cracking,” Boshoku Gijutsu (Corrosion Engineering), 1977, 26, pp. 655–61 (in Japanese).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. R.B. Mears and R.H. Brown: “Causes of Corrosion Currents,” Ind. Eng. Chem. 1941, 33, pp. 1001–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. K. Tosha and K. Lida: “Affected Layer Produced by Grit Blasting for Austenitic Stainless Steel,” Int. J. Japan Soc. Prec. Eng., 1995, 29(1), pp. 46–47.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. J. Chen, T. Tersaki, T. Akiyama, and K. Kishitake: “Effect of Layer Removal Methods on Residual Stress Estimated by Inherent Strain Method,” Quart. J. Jpn. Weld. Soc., 1996, 14(4), pp. 762–67 (in Japanese).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Anon.: “Test Methods for Abrasion Resistance of Anodic Oxide Coatings on Aluminium and Aluminium Alloys-Part 1: Wheel Wear Test,” JIS H8682-11999 (in Japanese).

  9. T. Tersaki, S. Chen, T. Akiyama, and K. Kishitake: “Non-Destructive Method for Estimating Residual Stress Distribution in Component Due to Shot Peening,” Trans. Jpn. Soc. Mech. Eng., 1998, 64(618), pp. 353–59 (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  10. R. Lagneborg: “The Martensite Transformation in 18% Cr-8% Ni Steels,” Acta Metall., 1964, 12, pp. 823–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. F. Lecroisey and A. Pineau: “Martensitic Transformations Induced by Plastic Deformation in the Fe-Ni-Cr-C System,” Metall. Trans., 1972, 3, pp. 387–96.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. T. Maekawa, N. Nakajima, and M. Kagawa: “Effect of Cold Working on Anodic Behavior of Stainless Steel in Sulfuric Acid Solution,” J. Jpn. Inst. Met., 1965, 29(3), pp. 248–52 (in Japanese).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Otsubo, F., Kishitake, K., Akiyama, T. et al. Characterization of blasted austenitic stainless steel and its corrosion resistance. J Therm Spray Tech 12, 555–559 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1361/105996303772082305

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1361/105996303772082305

Keywords

Navigation