Figures
Abstract
Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) based fiber tractography (FT) is the most popular approach for investigating white matter tracts in vivo, despite its inability to reconstruct fiber pathways in regions with “crossing fibers.” Recently, constrained spherical deconvolution (CSD) has been developed to mitigate the adverse effects of “crossing fibers” on DTI based FT. Notwithstanding the methodological benefit, the clinical relevance of CSD based FT for the assessment of white matter abnormalities remains unclear. In this work, we evaluated the applicability of a hybrid framework, in which CSD based FT is combined with conventional DTI metrics to assess white matter abnormalities in 25 patients with early Alzheimer’s disease. Both CSD and DTI based FT were used to reconstruct two white matter tracts: one with regions of “crossing fibers,” i.e., the superior longitudinal fasciculus (SLF) and one which contains only one fiber orientation, i.e. the midsagittal section of the corpus callosum (CC). The DTI metrics, fractional anisotropy (FA) and mean diffusivity (MD), obtained from these tracts were related to memory function. Our results show that in the tract with “crossing fibers” the relation between FA/MD and memory was stronger with CSD than with DTI based FT. By contrast, in the fiber bundle where one fiber population predominates, the relation between FA/MD and memory was comparable between both tractography methods. Importantly, these associations were most pronounced after adjustment for the planar diffusion coefficient, a measure reflecting the degree of fiber organization complexity. These findings indicate that compared to conventionally applied DTI based FT, CSD based FT combined with DTI metrics can increase the sensitivity to detect functionally significant white matter abnormalities in tracts with complex white matter architecture.
Citation: Reijmer YD, Leemans A, Heringa SM, Wielaard I, Jeurissen B, Koek HL, et al. (2012) Improved Sensitivity to Cerebral White Matter Abnormalities in Alzheimer’s Disease with Spherical Deconvolution Based Tractography. PLoS ONE 7(8): e44074. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0044074
Editor: Wang Zhan, University of Maryland, College Park, United States of America
Received: March 16, 2012; Accepted: July 30, 2012; Published: August 31, 2012
Copyright: © Reijmer et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Funding: The research of GJB is supported by a high potential grant from Utrecht University and VIDI grant 91711384 from ZonMw, The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development. The research of AL is supported by the project Care4Me (Cooperative Advanced REsearch for Medical Efficiency) in the framework of the EU research programme ITEA (Information Technology for European Advancement). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) based fiber tractography (FT) is currently the most widely used method to reconstruct fiber pathways in the brain, despite its well known limitations in regions with complex white matter architecture [1]–[3]. The common second-rank diffusion tensor model, however, is based on the assumption of Gaussian diffusion, which may not be valid in white matter voxels that contain so-called “crossing fibers” [4], i.e. complex fiber bundle architecture within a single voxel including two or more crossing, interdigitating or “kissing” fiber populations, or one fiber population with a bending or splaying architecture.
In the past decade, several advanced approaches for characterizing the intra-voxel diffusion profile have been developed to overcome the limitations of the second-rank diffusion tensor model [5]–[11]. One of these techniques, constrained spherical deconvolution (CSD) [9], is especially promising as it can offer a reliable reconstruction of multiple fiber orientation distributions within clinically feasible MR acquisition settings [8]. Notwithstanding the promising outlook, the CSD model has not yet been applied quantitatively to clinical populations due to the lack of robust diffusion metrics that can describe the underlying microstructure unambiguously.
We hypothesize that if CSD based FT is more accurate in reconstructing fiber bundle trajectories in regions with “crossing fibers”, it should be more sensitive to microstructural abnormalities underlying cognitive dysfunction than DTI based FT in these tracts. In tracts without “crossing fiber” regions, both methods should perform equally. To test this hypothesis we used a hybrid framework, in which CSD based FT is combined with conventional DTI metrics to assess white matter abnormalities in patients with early Alzheimer’s disease (AD). This allowed us to examine the microstructural properties of specific white matter pathways in relation to memory performance, while overcoming the well-known limitations of DTI based FT in regions with “crossing fibers”. We evaluated this CSD-DTI framework for two white matter tracts: one specifically selected because it contains many regions of “crossing fibers”, i.e. the superior longitudinal fasciculus (SLF) and one with only one fiber orientation, i.e. the midsagittal section of the corpus callosum (CC). Diffusion measures in these tracts have been previously shown to be altered in patients with AD compared to controls using tract based analyses [12] and to the AD-associated impairments in memory function [13].
In this paper, we examined whether CSD based FT combined with DTI metrics can increase the sensitivity to detect functionally significant white matter abnormalities in tracts with complex white matter architecture compared to conventionally applied DTI based FT.
Methods
1. Ethic Statement
The medical ethics committee for research in humans of the University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands has approved this research. Informed written consent was obtained from all participants. All clinical investigation has been conducted according to the principles expressed in the Declaration of Helsinki. Exclusion criteria were a history of stroke in the last 2 years, a history of stroke with subsequent cognitive deterioration, schizophrenia or other psychotic disorders, major depression, alcohol abuse, brain tumor, epilepsy or encephalitis. Incapacitated patients with a severe stage of AD, indicated by a clinical dementia rating score >1 [14] or a MMSE score <20 [15] were also excluded. The clinical dementia rating score was determined by the patients’ doctor and the diagnosis (Alzheimer/a-MCI) was established at a multidisciplinary meeting.
2. Participants
Twenty five patients (mean age 80.0±5.0 years, 48% male), 19 with early stage AD and 6 with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (a-MCI) were recruited via a memory clinic at the University Medical Center Utrecht. Probable or possible AD was diagnosed according to the National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke and the Alzheimer Disease and Related Disorders Association (NINCDS-ADRDA) criteria [16]. A-MCI was diagnosed according to the Petersen criteria [17]. Exclusion criteria were a history of stroke in the last 2 years, a history of stroke with subsequent cognitive deterioration, schizophrenia or other psychotic disorders, major depression, alcohol abuse, brain tumor, epilepsy or encephalitis. Incapacitated patients with a severe stage of AD, indicated by a clinical dementia rating score >1 [14] or a MMSE score <20 [15], were also excluded.
3. Data acquisition
MRI data were collected using a Philips 3.0 Tesla scanner (Intera, Philips, Best, the Netherlands). Diffusion MRI data were obtained using a single-shot spin echo EPI sequence with the following parameters: field of view = 220×220×120 mm3, 2.5 mm slice thickness (without gap), 48 slices, repetition time 6638 ms, echo time 73 ms, flip angle 90 degree, acquisition matrix 88×88 (in plane resolution of 2.5 mm) and reconstructed at 128×128, 45 isotropically distributed diffusion-sensitizing gradients with a b-value of 1200 s/mm2, and one b = 0 s/mm2 image [18]. The acquisition time was 5.32 min. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) within all WM voxels (FA>0.2) of the b = 0 s/mm2 image was on average 33.5 with a standard deviation of 11.7 [19].
4. Image processing
The DTI data sets were corrected for eddy current induced geometric distortions and subject motion by realigning the diffusion-weighted images (DWIs) to the b = 0 s/mm2 image with Elastix [20]. In this procedure, the diffusion gradients were adjusted with the proper b-matrix rotation as described by Leemans and Jones [21]. The diffusion tensor model was fitted using the RESTORE approach [22]. The DTI scans were transformed rigidly to MNI space in the motion–distortion correction procedure by using a single interpolation step (concatenation of transformation matrices) to maximize the uniformity of brain angulation across subjects [23].
5. Tractography
Standard deterministic streamline DTI [24] and standard CSD [25] based tractography were performed with the ExploreDTI software package (www.exploredti.com). We reconstructed the SLF and the CC using both FT methods with a uniform seed point resolution of 2 mm3 and a maximum deflection angle of 30 degrees. For the DTI based FT an FA threshold of 0.2 was applied. Analogously, the applied termination threshold for CSD based FT was a fiber orientation distribution (FOD) value of 0.1 (the harmonic degree of the estimated FOD coefficients was limited to 6) [8]. For this study we selected fiber tracts that were previously shown to be affected in MCI and AD [12], [13], [26] and either have a complex fiber architecture with crossing fibers or a single fiber population without crossing fibers. The SLF contains a relatively large number of voxels with multiple fiber orientations due to the crossing of the corona radiata and/or laterally projecting fibers of the CC and is therefore particularly susceptible to tracking errors caused by the second-rank diffusion tensor model [25]. By contrast, the midsagittal section of the CC contains mainly voxels with one fiber population and is expected to be less vulnerable to tracking errors.
The SLF, including SLF II, III and the arcuate fasciculus [27], was reconstructed from the left hemisphere (all participants were right handed) based on a standardized atlas of white matter tracts [28]. For reconstruction of the SLF, a multiple region of interest (ROI) selection approach was used. In total, three “AND” ROIs were placed, two on a coronal and one on a sagittal slice (see Figure 1). In this ROI protocol, previously defined anatomical landmarks for slice selection and ROI placement were used to reduce subjectivity in fiber tracking [28]. High intra- and inter-rater reliability of manually segmenting fiber bundles has been demonstrated in previous studies (e.g. [29]–[31]).
The SLF was selected using a multiple region of interest (ROI) approach. Two “AND” ROIs (shown in yellow) were placed on a coronal slice and one on a sagittal slice. Reconstruction was based on a standardized atlas of white matter tracts [28].
The CC was reconstructed as described previously [32]. In summary, only the midsagittal segment of the CC was selected to exclude regions of “crossing fibers” from the more laterally projecting pathways of the CC that intersect the corticospinal fiber trajectories (Figure 2). Note that as all data were analyzed in MNI space, the midsagittal slice could be determined reliably in all subjects.
The CC was selected using a multiple region of interest (ROI) approach. The median ROI was placed on the midsaggital plane in MNI space, and the two segment-selecting ROIs were drawn two voxels (4 mm) to either side of the midsagittal plane.
Diffusion parameters: fractional anisotropy (FA), mean diffusivity (MD), radial diffusivity (DR), axial diffusivity (DA), and the normalized planar diffusion coefficient (λ2−λ3/λ1) [33] were obtained for each tract. The planar diffusion coefficient was used to quantify the degree of fiber complexity in regions with “crossing fibers” [33], [34]. The planar diffusion coefficient ranges from zero to one and is relatively high in voxels where the tensor has a disc-like shape (i.e. the first and second eigenvalue are almost equal and larger than the third eigenvalue). This is typically the case when two fiber populations “cross” or “kiss” [34]–[37] (Figures 3, 4, and 5). It is important to note, that although the planar diffusion coefficient and FA or MD are both an index of the tensor shape, they are not directly related: the FA can be similar in voxels with linear or planar diffusion [38]. By contrast, the planar diffusion coefficient provides a geometric description of the tensor and hence is more specific to the fiber configuration [34].
a) two crossing fiber populations in voxels in the superior longitudinal fasciculus. b) one fiber population in the corpus callosum.
Sub-regions of the SLF marked on a directionally encoded color map (top row) and planar diffusion coefficient encoded (Cp) map (bottom row). The planar diffusion coefficient ranges from zero to one and is relatively high in voxels were the tensor has a disc-like shape, which is typically the case when two fiber populations “cross”. The white line marks a sub- region of the SLF containing voxels with relatively few “crossing fibers”, which is reflected by a Cp close to zero. By contrast, the more anterior sub-region of the SLF, marked in yellow, contains relatively many voxels with “crossing fibers”, due to crossing with the cortico-spinal tract and/or laterally projecting fibers of the corpus callosum. This is reflected by a Cp closer to one.
The superior longitudinal fasciculus (SLF) and medial segment of the corpus callosum (CC) color coded according to the value of the planar diffusion coefficient (Cp) (for interpretation of the color coding see also fig. 3). The figure shows regions with “crossing fibers” reflected by a Cp close to one (green) and regions with relatively few “crossing fibers” reflected by a Cp close to zero (red). a) the SLF shows many regions with “crossing fibers” due to crossing with the cortico-spinal tract and/or laterally projecting fibers of the corpus callosum (CC) in frontal regions, and with the inferior longitudinal fasciculus in temporal regions. b) In the midsagittal segment of the CC one fiber population predominates.
6. Cognitive testing
All patients underwent a standardized cognitive assessment including a test assessing verbal memory: the Raven’s Auditory Verbal Learning Task (RAVLT) [39]. Because deficits in learning and memory are the main cognitive symptoms of (early) AD, we selected memory performance as the primary functional measure of disease severity. Immediate and delayed recall scores of the RAVLT were transformed into z-scores and averaged to obtain one composite memory score.
7. Statistical analyses
Differences in configurational tract characteristics (volume, length) after DTI and CSD based FT were analyzed with paired-samples T-test. The composite memory score and diffusion measures were all normally distributed. The relation between mean DTI metrics (FA, MD, DA and DR) and memory performance was evaluated using linear regression analysis adjusted for age, sex, and level of education. Differences in the relation between DTI metrics and memory obtained with DTI- versus CSD-based FT was calculated using Steiger’s Z-statistic for dependent correlations [40].
Because crossing fibers affect the tensor estimation [35], [41], [42], the relation between DTI metrics and cognition cannot be reliably assessed in regions with “crossing fibers”. We therefore adjusted for the degree of “crossing fibers” in a second model, by including the planar diffusion coefficient of the diffusion tensor model [33], reflecting the degree of fiber complexity, as a covariate. As such, we limited the adverse effect of “crossing fibers” on the relation between DTI metrics (i.e. FA, MD, DR, DA) and cognition. This modulating effect is expected to be most pronounced in combination with CSD based FT in tracts with crossing fibers, since more voxels with “crossing fibers” will be included using this method.
To examine the possibility that the relation between diffusion measures and memory performance is affected by tract volume [43], we ran a separate model with age, sex, education level and estimated tract volume as covariates.
Results
1. CSD vs. DTI Based FT
Figure 6 shows the SLF of four representative patients reconstructed with DTI and CSD based FT. In all patients, the tract volume of the SLF was larger with CSD than DTI based FT (mean tract volume ± SD (cm3) CSD: 19.88±5.25; DTI: 10.10±2.78; p<0.001). In 75% of the patients the tract length was longer with CSD compared to DTI based FT (mean tract length ± SD (mm) CSD: 109.2±10.9; DTI: 98.3±13.6; p<0.001). The approximate tract volume of the CC segment was also larger for all patients with CSD compared to DTI based FT (mean tract volume ± SD (cm3) CSD: 9.59±0.98; DTI: 7.03±0.94; p<0.001).
Segmentation of the SLF in four patients reconstructed with DTI (yellow) and CSD (red) based fiber tractography (FT). Delineation of the SLF resulted in larger and longer pathways with CSD compared to DTI based FT. With the DTI method, fibers of the SLF were more likely to terminate at crossings between the SLF and the cortico-spinal tract in frontal regions and between the SLF and the inferior longitudinal fasciculus in temporal regions.
2. Association between DTI Metrics of the SLF and Memory Performance with CSD and DTI Based FT
For the SLF, lower FA values of the SLF were associated with worse memory performance for both FT methods, but this association was only statistically significant for CSD based FT (standardized regression coefficient (95% CI) DTI: 0.39 (0.01; 0.78); p = 0.054, CSD: 0.41 (0.02; 0.81); p = 0.042) (Table 1, model 1). MD was not significantly associated with cognitive performance. Additional adjustment for the planar diffusion coefficient, reflecting the degree of fiber organization complexity, did not change the results for the DTI based method (Table 1, model 2). By contrast, the relation between the FA of the SLF and memory performance in combination with CSD based FT became stronger after adjustment for the planar diffusion coefficient (0.53 (0.14; 0.92); p = 0.010). The modulating effect was even more pronounced for the MD: the regression coefficient became three times as large after adjustment of the planar diffusion coefficient (−0.55 (−1.07; −.02); p = 0.044). Post hoc analyses showed that memory performance was related with DR but not with DA measures (DR: −.55 (−.0; −.11); p = 0.018, DA: −0.22 (−0.92; 0.48); p = 0.511). Adjustment for tract volume did not change these relations significantly (data not shown). Importantly, the relation between DTI parameters and memory was significantly stronger for CSD- compared to DTI based FT, for MD (Z = 4.38; p<0.0001), DR (Z = 4.18; p<0.0001), and DA (Z = 2.02; p = 0.02), but not FA (Z = 1.55; p = 0.06) (Tabel I, model 2). Correlation plots of the adjusted and unadjusted data are presented in Figure S1 and S2 respectively.
3. Association between DTI Metrics of the CC and Memory Performance with CSD and DTI Based FT
We also assessed the relation between diffusion parameters and cognitive performance in a tract without “crossing fibers”: the midsagittal segment of the CC. The FA of the CC was not significantly associated with memory performance with either tractography method, whereas a trend was observed for an association between memory and mean MD (DTI:−0.40 (−0.80; 0.002); p = 0.051, CSD: −0.37 (−0.78; 0.04); p = 0.074) (Table 2, model 1). After adjustment of the planar diffusion coefficient, the relation between the FA, MD and memory performance became stronger. However, the regression coefficients remained comparable between both tractography methods (all p<0.05; Table 2, model 2). Post hoc analyses showed that memory performance was related with DR and not with DA measures, with comparable regression coefficients with DTI and CSD based FT (−0.51 and −0.50 respectively). Again, adjustment for tract volume did not change the results significantly (data not shown).
Discussion
This is the first report on the application of CSD based FT to detect white matter abnormalities in patients with (early) AD. Our results indicate that 1) CSD based FT in combination with DTI metrics significantly increased the sensitivity to detect a relation between white matter abnormalities and memory performance in a tract with “crossing fibers” (SLF); and 2) the relation between DTI metrics and memory was comparable between both FT methods in a tract without “crossing fibers” (midsagittal section of the CC).
In line with our expectations, fibers of the SLF were more likely to terminate in regions with “crossing fibers” with DTI-based FT. By contrast, with CSD based FT the SLF continued beyond these crossings to more temporal and dorsal frontal regions, which is in line with descriptions from autopsy studies [27], [44] and with previous papers using spherical deconvolution based FT [45]. Our results extend these findings by showing that improvement of fiber tract segmentation increases the sensitivity to white matter abnormalities within the tract.
The adverse effects of “crossing fibers” on the interpretation of diffusion measures such as MD and FA have been previously demonstrated (e.g. [35], [41], [42]), but their impact on the detection of white matter abnormalities is not known. A number of studies have found contra-intuitive results in regions with “crossing fibers”, such as the centrum semiovale, demonstrating increased FA values in patients compared to controls [46], [47] and a negative correlation between FA and cognitive function [48], [49]. These unexpected findings may result from degeneration of one pathway, with relatively sparing of the crossing pathway. For example in AD, late-myelinating white matter tracts such as the SLF have been shown to degenerate at an earlier stage than tracts that myelinate early in life [50], [51]. This is supported by results from a recent study showing an increased mode of anisotropy in patients with MCI compared to controls only in areas where the SLF intersects the projection pathways [46].
Voxels with “crossing fibers” are more likely to be included with CSD based FT. We therefore used the planar diffusion coefficient as a covariate to overcome the confounding effects of these “crossing fibers” on the diffusion metrics in relation to cognition. If two fiber populations within a voxel “cross” or “kiss”, the shape of the diffusion tensor becomes more planar (disc-like). As a result, a voxel with intact crossing fibers can have a similar FA value compared to a voxel with a degenerating non-crossing fiber population. However, the planar diffusion coefficient between these voxels will be different [38]. Our results showed that co-varying for the planar diffusion coefficient effectively increased the strength of the relation between DTI metrics in the SLF and memory performance. As expected, this modulation was most pronounced in combination with CSD based FT. Adjusting for the planar diffusion coefficient also increased the association between DTI metrics and memory in the CC, despite the lack of any interdigitating fiber pathways. Possibly, this finding can be explained by the presence of residual partial volume effects between the dorsal part of the CC and the adjacent cingulum bundles. Partial volume effects also affect the tensor estimation and the measures derived from it [34], [35] and may therefore confound the relation between DTI metrics and cognition in the same way.
The effects of DTI metrics on cognitive performance were more prominent for DR than for DA, suggesting that the observed association is more likely driven by myelodegeneration than by a loss of axonal integrity [52]. However, it should be noted that many more cellular characteristics, such as hydration, cell packing density and fiber diameter could cause the observed changes in diffusion measures [53]–[55] and that the interpretation of these diffusivity measures can be far from trivial [41].
Our study has a number of limitations. One is the modest sample size, which may have decreased our sensitivity to detect a relation between structure and function. Still, we were able to replicate previously observed associations between diffusion measures and AD severity [56], [57]. Second, FT based segmentation is laborious and time consuming. However, the advantage over automated voxel based or atlas based analyses is that it is less sensitive to individual anatomical differences, imperfect registration, and smoothing errors [58]–[60]. Moreover, averaging of the diffusion metrics along a fiber bundle reduces the variance in diffusion measures and thereby increases the power to detect more subtle WM changes. On the other hand, very localized changes along a fiber bundle, for instance, only in the structure’s anterior part, may not be picked up when the anterior and posterior parts are combined. To limit the number of comparisons we focused in the present study on two major tracts, but future studies should demonstrate whether these findings extend to other fiber pathways containing complex and simple white matter architecture known to be affected in AD [61] or other neurological diseases.
Finally, the use of the planar diffusion coefficient as a quantitative measure to characterize “crossing fibers” may be valid in cases were two fiber bundles intersect or overlap, but may not be directly applicable in regions where three or more fiber bundles intersect. Although previous work reported that no more than two fiber populations could be observed in the SLF [62], there is still no consensus on the prevalence of multiple fiber populations [4]. In this context, future studies are needed to investigate this issue in detail and more specific measures for “crossing fibers” need to be developed to improve the sensitivity for detecting white matter abnormalities in clinical populations and to make the interpretation of structure-function relationships less ambiguous.
Conclusion
Since DTI based FT fails in regions with “crossing fibers”, more accurate methods to characterize the microstructural properties of fiber pathways are in need. Here we showed that CSD based FT combined with standard DTI metrics increases the sensitivity to detect functionally significant white matter abnormalities in a tract with “crossing fibers” in patients with early AD compared to DTI based FT. The use of a hybrid CSD-DTI framework is therefore a promising tool to detect functionally significant white matter changes in regions with complex white matter architecture.
Supporting Information
Figure S1.
Adjusted correlations between diffusion parameters of the SLF and memory performance. Top row: the relation between FA/MD and memory with DTI based fiber tractography. Bottom row: the relation between FA/MD and memory with CSD based fiber tractography. FA/MD and memory are expressed as standardized residuals after adjusting for age, sex, level of education, and the planar diffusion coefficient (Table 1, model 2).
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0044074.s001
(TIF)
Figure S2.
Unadjusted correlations between diffusion parameters and memory performance. Top row: the raw FA values of the SLF (left) and medial segment of the CC (right) with DTI based fiber tractography. Bottom row: the FA of the SLF (left) and medial segment of the CC (right) with CSD based fiber tractography.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0044074.s002
(TIF)
Author Contributions
Conceived and designed the experiments: YDR AL HLK GJB. Performed the experiments: YDR IW. Analyzed the data: YDR. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: AL BJ. Wrote the paper: YDR AL SMH IW BJ HLK GJB.
References
- 1. Basser PJ, Mattiello J, LeBihan D (1994) MR diffusion tensor spectroscopy and imaging. Biophys J 66: 259–267.
- 2. Mori S, van Zijl PC (2002) Fiber tracking: principles and strategies - a technical review. NMR Biomed 15: 468–480.
- 3. Tournier JD, Mori S, Leemans A (2011) Diffusion tensor imaging and beyond. Magn Reson Med 65: 1532–1556.
- 4.
Jeurissen B, Leemans A, Tournier JD, Jones DK, Sijbers J (2012) Investigating the prevalence of complex fiber configurations in white matter tissue with diffusion magnetic resonance imaging. Hum Brain Mapp: in press.
- 5. Anderson AW (2005) Measurement of fiber orientation distributions using high angular resolution diffusion imaging. Magn Reson Med 54: 1194–1206.
- 6. Descoteaux M, Angelino E, Fitzgibbons S, Deriche R (2007) Regularized, fast, and robust analytical Q-ball imaging. Magn Reson Med 58: 497–510.
- 7. Jansons KM, Alexander DC (2003) Persistent Angular Structure: new insights from diffusion MRI data. Dummy version. Inf Process Med Imaging 18: 672–683.
- 8. Tournier JD, Calamante F, Gadian DG, Connelly A (2004) Direct estimation of the fiber orientation density function from diffusion-weighted MRI data using spherical deconvolution. Neuroimage 23: 1176–1185.
- 9. Tournier JD, Calamante F, Connelly A (2007) Robust determination of the fibre orientation distribution in diffusion MRI: non-negativity constrained super-resolved spherical deconvolution. Neuroimage 35: 1459–1472.
- 10. Tuch DS, Reese TG, Wiegell MR, Makris N, Belliveau JW, Van Wedeen J (2002) High angular resolution diffusion imaging reveals intravoxel white matter fiber heterogeneity. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 48: 577–582.
- 11. Tuch DS (2004) Q-ball imaging. Magn Reson Med 52: 1358–1372.
- 12. Pievani M, Agosta F, Pagani E, Canu E, Sala S, et al. (2010) Assessment of white matter tract damage in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease. Hum Brain Mapp 31: 1862–1875.
- 13. Kavcic V, Ni H, Zhu T, Zhong J, Duffy CJ (2008) White matter integrity linked to functional impairments in aging and early Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement 4: 381–389.
- 14. Morris JC (1993) The Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR): current version and scoring rules. Neurology 43: 2412–2414.
- 15. Tombaugh TN, McIntyre NJ (1992) The mini-mental state examination: a comprehensive review. J Am Geriatr Soc 40: 922–935.
- 16. McKhann G, Drachman D, Folstein M, Katzman R, Price D, et al. (1984) Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: report of the NINCDS-ADRDA Work Group under the auspices of Department of Health and Human Services Task Force on Alzheimer’s Disease. Neurology 34: 939–944.
- 17. Petersen RC, Smith GE, Waring SC, Ivnik RJ, Tangalos EG, et al. (1999) Mild cognitive impairment: clinical characterization and outcome. Arch Neurol 56: 303–308.
- 18. Jones DK, Leemans A (2011) Diffusion tensor imaging. Methods Mol Biol 711: 127–144.
- 19.
Chang LC, Walker L, Pierpaoli C (2012) Informed RESTORE: A method for robust estimation of diffusion tensor from low redundancy datasets in the presence of physiological noise artifacts. Magn Reson Med: in press.
- 20. Klein S, Staring M, Murphy K, Viergever MA, Pluim JPW (2010) Elastix: A toolbox for intensity-based medical image registration. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 29: 196–205.
- 21. Leemans A, Jones DK (2009) The B-matrix must be rotated when correcting for subject motion in DTI data. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 61: 1336–1349.
- 22. Chang LC, Jones DK, Pierpaoli C (2005) RESTORE: robust estimation of tensors by outlier rejection. Magn Reson Med 53: 1088–1095.
- 23. Rohde GK, Barnett AS, Basser PJ, Marenco S, Pierpaoli C (2004) Comprehensive Approach for Correction of Motion and Distortion in Diffusion-Weighted MRI. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 51: 103–114.
- 24. Basser PJ, Pajevic S, Pierpaoli C, Duda J, Aldroubi A (2000) In vivo fiber tractography using DT-MRI data. Magn Reson Med 44: 625–632.
- 25. Jeurissen B, Leemans A, Jones DK, Tournier JD, Sijbers J (2011) Probabilistic fiber tracking using the residual bootstrap with constrained spherical deconvolution. Hum Brain Mapp 32: 461–479.
- 26. Di Paola M, Spalletta G, Caltagirone C (2010) In vivo structural neuroanatomy of corpus callosum in Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment using different MRI techniques: a review. J Alzheimers Dis 20: 67–95.
- 27. Makris N, Kennedy DN, McInerney S, Sorensen AG, Wang R, et al. (2005) Segmentation of subcomponents within the superior longitudinal fascicle in humans: a quantitative, in vivo, DT-MRI study. Cereb Cortex 15: 854–869.
- 28. Catani M, Thiebaut de Schotten M (2008) A diffusion tensor imaging tractography atlas for virtual in vivo dissections. Cortex 44: 1105–1132.
- 29. Ciccarelli O, Parker GJ, Toosy AT, Wheeler-Kingshott CA, Barker GJ, et al. (2003) From diffusion tractography to quantitative white matter tract measures: a reproducibility study. Neuroimage 18: 348–359.
- 30. Malykhin N, Concha L, Seres P, Beaulieu C, Coupland NJ (2008) Diffusion tensor imaging tractography and reliability analysis for limbic and paralimbic white matter tracts. Psychiatry Res 164: 132–142.
- 31. Danielian LE, Iwata NK, Thomasson DM, Floeter MK (2010) Reliability of fiber tracking measurements in diffusion tensor imaging for longitudinal study. Neuroimage 49: 1572–1580.
- 32. Caeyenberghs K, Leemans A, Coxon J, Leunissen I, Drijkoningen D, et al. (2011) Bimanual coordination and corpus callosum microstructure in young adults with traumatic brain injury: A diffusion tensor imaging study. Journal of Neurotrauma 28: 897–913.
- 33. Westin CF, Maier SE, Mamata H, Nabavi A, Jolesz FA, et al. (2002) Processing and visualization for diffusion tensor MRI. Med Image Anal 6: 93–108.
- 34. Ennis DB, Kindlmann G (2006) Orthogonal tensor invariants and the analysis of diffusion tensor magnetic resonance images. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 55: 136–146.
- 35. Alexander AL, Hasan KM, Lazar M, Tsuruda JS, Parker DL (2001) Analysis of partial volume effects in diffusion-tensor MRI. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 45: 770–780.
- 36. Alexander DC, Barker GJ, Arridge SR (2002) Detection and modeling of non-Gaussian apparent diffusion coefficient profiles in human brain data. Magn Reson Med 48: 331–340.
- 37. Wiegell MR, Larsson HBW, Wedeen VJ (2000) Fiber crossing in human brain depicted with diffusion tensor MR imaging. Radiology 217: 897–903.
- 38.
Leemans A (2011) Visualization of diffusion MRI data. In: Jones DK editor. Diffusion MRI. New York: Oxford University Press. 354–379.
- 39. Van der Elst W, van Boxtel MP, van Breukelen GJ, Jolles J (2005) Rey’s verbal learning test: normative data for 1855 healthy participants aged 24–81 years and the influence of age, sex, education, and mode of presentation. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 11: 290–302.
- 40. Steiger JH (1980) Tests for comparing elements of a correlation matrix. Psychological Bulletin 87: 245–251.
- 41. Wheeler-Kingshott CA, Cercignani M (2009) About “axial” and “radial” diffusivities. Magn Reson Med 61: 1255–1260.
- 42. Vos SB, Jones DK, Jeurissen B, Viergever MA, Leemans A (2011) The influence of complex white matter architecture on the mean diffusivity in diffusion tensor MRI of the human brain. Neuroimage 59: 2208–2216.
- 43. Vos SB, Jones DK, Viergever MA, Leemans A (2011) Partial volume effect as a hidden covariate in DTI analyses. Neuroimage 55: 1566–1576.
- 44. Burgel U, Amunts K, Hoemke L, Mohlberg H, Gilsbach JM, et al. (2006) White matter fiber tracts of the human brain: three-dimensional mapping at microscopic resolution, topography and intersubject variability. Neuroimage 29: 1092–1105.
- 45. Thiebaut de Schotten M, Dell’acqua F, Forkel SJ, Simmons A, Vergani F, et al. (2011) A lateralized brain network for visuospatial attention. Nat Neurosci 14: 1245–1246.
- 46. Douaud G, Jbabdi S, Behrens TE, Menke RA, Gass A, et al. (2011) DTI measures in crossing-fibre areas: Increased diffusion anisotropy reveals early white matter alteration in MCI and mild Alzheimer’s disease. Neuroimage 55: 880–890.
- 47. Pierpaoli C, Barnett A, Pajevic S, Chen R, Penix L, et al. (2001) Water diffusion changes in wallerian degeneration and their dependence on white matter architecture. Neuroimage 13: 1174–1185.
- 48. Serra L, Cercignani M, Lenzi D, Perri R, Fadda L, et al. (2010) Grey and white matter changes at different stages of Alzheimer’s disease. J Alzheimers Dis 19: 147–159.
- 49. Tuch DS, Salat DH, Wisco JJ, Zaleta AK, Hevelone ND, et al. (2005) Choice reaction time performance correlates with diffusion anisotropy in white matter pathways supporting visuospatial attention. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 102: 12212–12217.
- 50. Reisberg B, Franssen EH, Hasan SM, Monteiro I, Boksay I, et al. (1999) Retrogenesis: Clinical, physiologic, and pathologic mechanisms in brain aging, Alzheimer’s and other dementing processes. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience 249: III28–III36.
- 51. Stricker NH, Schweinsburg BC, ano-Wood L, Wierenga CE, Bangen KJ, et al. (2009) Decreased white matter integrity in late-myelinating fiber pathways in Alzheimer’s disease supports retrogenesis. Neuroimage 45: 10–16.
- 52. Song SK, Sun SW, Ramsbottom MJ, Chang C, Russell J, et al. (2002) Dysmyelination revealed through MRI as increased radial (but unchanged axial) diffusion of water. Neuroimage 17: 1429–1436.
- 53. Barkovich AJ (2000) Concepts of myelin and myelination in neuroradiology. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 21: 1099–1109.
- 54. Shimony JS, McKinstry RC, Akbudak E, Aronovitz JA, Snyder AZ, et al. (1999) Quantitative diffusion-tensor anisotropy brain MR imaging: normative human data and anatomic analysis. Radiology 212: 770–784.
- 55. Virta A, Barnett A, Pierpaoli C (1999) Visualizing and characterizing white matter fiber structure and architecture in the human pyramidal tract using diffusion tensor MRI. Magn Reson Imaging 17: 1121–1133.
- 56. Bosch B, Arenaza-Urquijo EM, Rami L, Sala-Llonch R, Junqué C, et al. (2012) Multiple DTI index analysis in normal aging, amnestic MCI and AD. Relationship with neuropsychological performance. Neurobiol Aging 33: 61–74.
- 57. Liu Y, Spulber G, Lehtimäki KK, Könönen M, Hallikainen I, et al. (2011) Diffusion tensor imaging and Tract-Based Spatial Statistics in Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment. Neurobiol Aging 32: 1558–1571.
- 58. Van Hecke W, Sijbers J, D’Agostino E, Maes F, De Backer S, et al. (2008) On the construction of an inter-subject diffusion tensor magnetic resonance atlas of the healthy human brain. Neuroimage 43: 69–80.
- 59. Van Hecke W, Leemans A, De Backer S, Jeurissen B, Parizel PM, et al. (2010) Comparing isotropic and anisotropic smoothing for voxel-based DTI analyses: A simulation study. Hum Brain Mapp 31: 98–114.
- 60. Van Hecke W, Leemans A, Sage CA, Emsell L, Veraart J, et al. (2011) The effect of template selection on diffusion tensor voxel-based analysis results. Neuroimage 55: 566–573.
- 61. Mielke MM, Kozauer NA, Chan KCG, George M, Toroney J, et al. (2009) Regionally-specific diffusion tensor imaging in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease. Neuroimage 46: 47–55.
- 62. Behrens TEJ, Berg HJ, Jbabdi S, Rushworth MFS, Woolrich MW (2007) Probabilistic diffusion tractography with multiple fibre orientations: What can we gain? Neuroimage 34: 144–155.