Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Open Access

Peer-reviewed

Research Article

Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System Applied QSAR with Quantum Chemical Descriptors for Predicting Radical Scavenging Activities of Carotenoids

  • Changho Jhin,

    Affiliation Department of Food and Nutrition, Research Institute of Human Ecology, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea

    ⨯
  • Keum Taek Hwang

    keum@snu.ac.kr

    Affiliation Department of Food and Nutrition, Research Institute of Human Ecology, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea

    ⨯

Abstract

One of the physiological characteristics of carotenoids is their radical scavenging activity. In this study, the relationship between radical scavenging activities and quantum chemical descriptors of carotenoids was determined. Adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) applied quantitative structure-activity relationship models (QSAR) were also developed for predicting and comparing radical scavenging activities of carotenoids. Semi-empirical PM6 and PM7 quantum chemical calculations were done by MOPAC. Ionisation energies of neutral and monovalent cationic carotenoids and the product of chemical potentials of neutral and monovalent cationic carotenoids were significantly correlated with the radical scavenging activities, and consequently these descriptors were used as independent variables for the QSAR study. The ANFIS applied QSAR models were developed with two triangular-shaped input membership functions made for each of the independent variables and optimised by a backpropagation method. High prediction efficiencies were achieved by the ANFIS applied QSAR. The R-square values of the developed QSAR models with the variables calculated by PM6 and PM7 methods were 0.921 and 0.902, respectively. The results of this study demonstrated reliabilities of the selected quantum chemical descriptors and the significance of QSAR models.

Citation: Jhin C, Hwang KT (2015) Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System Applied QSAR with Quantum Chemical Descriptors for Predicting Radical Scavenging Activities of Carotenoids. PLoS ONE 10(10): e0140154. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0140154

Editor: Rafael Vazquez-Duhalt, Center for Nanosciences and Nanotechnology, MEXICO

Received: June 24, 2015; Accepted: September 22, 2015; Published: October 16, 2015

Copyright: © 2015 Jhin, Hwang. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited

Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper.

Funding: The authors have no support or funding to report.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

Carotenoids are natural pigments that have various physiological activities such as conversion to vitamin A and immunological activities [1–3]. One of the important physiological activities of carotenoids is their radical scavenging activity [4–7]. The radical scavenging activity of carotenoids, mainly contributed by conjugated polyene structures of carotenoids [8], is related with direct quenching of singlet oxygen and radical species [9,10]. On the other hand, quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) studies regarding antioxidant activities and radical scavenging activities of natural products have been conducted to understand radical scavenging mechanisms and to predict the activities [11–13]. The quantum chemical descriptors (such as ionisation energy, electrophilicity, highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) and lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) energies, etc.) have been used as independent variables in QSAR studies, because the quantum chemical descriptors characterise electronic and geometric properties of molecules which affect activities of the molecules [14]. There have been QSAR studies on antioxidant activities of carotenoids [15,16]; however, correlation between various quantum chemical descriptors and antioxidant activities of carotenoids have not been reported. Since quantum chemical descriptors represent physicochemical properties of molecules, QSAR models for antioxidant activities of carotenoids could be developed by using their quantum chemical descriptors.

The relationship between radical scavenging activity and quantum chemical descriptors was studied previously [12,14,17–19]. The relationship between quantum chemical descriptors and the radical scavenging activities can be explained theoretically. Radical species could be scavenged by single electron transfer from a radical scavenger [20]. In a physicochemical manner, it is considered that compounds with low ionisation energy tend to be good radical scavengers because electron transfer from the HOMO of a radical scavenger to the single occupied molecular orbital (SOMO) of a radical is occurred more easily on the compounds with a lower ionisation energy compared to the compounds with a higher ionisation energy [14]. In case of nucleophilic radical species, the radical scavenging reaction is attributed to the interaction between SOMO of a radical and the LUMO of a radical scavenger [21,22]. According to Koopmans’ theorem [23], the energy level of LUMO is a negative electron affinity; therefore, a compound with a higher electron affinity tends to be attacked easily by a nucleophilic radical. The energy level of the SOMO of radical is dropped by interaction with the LUMO of a radical scavenger, followed by single electron transfer from HOMO of radical scavenger to the SOMO of radical to scavenge it. The low HOMO-LUMO gap allows electron transfer from HOMO more easily. Since the concept of chemical hardness is based on the HOMO-LUMO gap [24], compounds with low chemical hardness tend to have high radical scavenging activity [13,14]. In addition, the driving force for electron transfer is chemical potential (negative electronegativity), which is the slope of the energy versus number of electron curve [25]. In this manner, the chemical potential indicates the rate and the direction of chemical reactions including the radical scavenging activity.

Linear regression method is usually applied to develop QSAR models in several studies [13,15–17,26]; however, the interaction effect between independent variables and nonlinear relationships could not be interpreted easily by the linear regression method. Adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) is an artificial neural network (ANN) applied fuzzy inference system. ANFIS is an empirical method that defines rules by training and backpropagation processes, and multivariate nonlinear relationship could be solved by fuzzy if-then rules [27]. Thus, in this study, ANFIS applied QSAR models were developed with quantum chemical descriptors for predicting and analysing antioxidant activities of carotenoids.

Materials and Methods

Data set

Total three data sets of radical scavenging activities of carotenoids were adapted from previous studies. The first trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity(TEAC) data set by Müller et al. [4] was constituted of 17 carotenoids (Fig 1), and the second data set by Miller et al. [5] was constituted of 8 carotenoids. A DPPH radical scavenging activity data set was adapted from the report by Jiménez-Escrig et al. [28].

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 1. Carotenoid structures presented by Müller et al. [4].

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0140154.g001

Molecular structure preparation

The structures of all-trans α-carotene, antheraxanthin, astaxanthin, β-carotene, β-cryptoxanthin, canthaxanthin, capsanthin, echinenone, lutein, lycopene, neoxanthin, neurosporene, phytoene, phytofluene, rubixanthin, violaxanthin and zeaxanthin were obtained from ZINC database [29] as mol2 format and converted into MOPAC input format by Openbabel [30].

Quantum chemical calculations

Semi-empirical PM6 [31] and PM7 [32] quantum chemical calculations were done by MOPAC2012 [33]. The heat of formation of structurally optimised carotenoid molecules was retrieved from MOPAC output files. The quantum chemical properties of ionisation energy (I), electron affinity (A), chemical hardness (η), electronegativity (χ), chemical potential (μ) and electrophilicity (ω) were calculated as following equations: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) where E(N) is energy of neutral carotenoid molecule, E(N – 1) is energy of monovalent carotenoid cation, and E(N + 1) is energy of monovalent anion.

Likewise of the quantum chemical properties of neutral carotenoid molecules, the ionisation energy (Icat), electron affinity (Acat), chemical hardness (ηcat), electronegativity (χcat), chemical potential (μcat) and electrophilicity (ωcat) of monovalent cationic carotenoid molecules were calculated. To analyse cross-level effects between neutral and cationic carotenoid molecules, the cross-product terms of quantum chemical property values of neutral carotenoid molecules and those of cationic carotenoid molecules were calculated and abbreviated as ionisation energy (Icross), electron affinity (Across), chemical hardness (ηcross), electronegativity (χcross), chemical potential (μcross) and electrophilicity (ωcross).

Quantitative structure-activity relationship

Correlation analysis.

Prior to developing QSAR models, Pearson’s correlation analysis between quantum chemical properties and antioxidant activities of carotenoids was done by using GNU R (http://cran.r-project.org/). Quantum chemical properties highly correlated with antioxidant activities were selected as independent variables for QSAR models.

Adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system.

In order to develop QSAR models, ANFIS was applied using Matlab 8.2 (Mathworks, Natick, MA, USA). From the correlation analysis, I, Icat and μcross were chosen as independent variables for QSAR models. Each independent variable was standardised to be adjusted to the same scale by following equation: (6) where is standardised value of the sample, xi is original value of the sample, is the mean of each variable, and N is the number of the samples in the data set.

Two triangular-shaped membership functions were applied for each independent variable, 8 if-then rules and 8 linear type output functions were applied for ANFIS. To train and optimise ANFIS models, back-propagation method was used. The structure of ANFIS is illustrated on Fig 2. To validate constructed QSAR models, 1000 times of bootstrap resampling validation procedure were applied. To measure prediction efficiency, mean absolute error (MAE) was calculated as follows: (7) where is predicted value resulted from QSAR model and yi is experimental value from the literature.

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 2. Developed adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) structure.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0140154.g002

Results and Discussion

Correlation analysis

The molecular structures and the list of carotenoids adapted from the study of Müller et al. [4] are illustrated in Fig 1, and their calculated quantum chemical properties by PM6 method are presented in Table 1. The quantum chemical descriptors of monovalent cationic carotenoid molecules were also calculated because both of the neutral and monovalent cationic carotenoid molecules exist at the same time during the radical scavenging reaction [34,35]. In addition, the cross-product terms should be calculated and introduced including interaction effects between neutral and cationic carotenoid molecules on QSAR models.

thumbnail
Download:
Table 1. Molecular quantum chemical properties of carotenoids calculated by PM6 semi-empirical quantum chemistry method (kcal/mol).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0140154.t001

Pearson’s correlation coefficients between TEAC values of carotenoids from Müller et al. [4] and quantum chemical properties calculated by PM6 and PM7 methods are presented in Table 2. The correlations analysed by both of the PM6 and PM7 methods showed identical tendencies. The negative correlation between the TEAC and calculated I value could be explained in physicochemical manner. Due to conjugation of double bonds on the long carbon chain skeleton of carotenoids, carotenoids oxidise easily via electron transfer mechanism [6–8,36]. Since electron transfer is a main mechanism of antioxidant activity of carotenoids, carotenoids with lower I are expected to have higher antioxidant capacity compared to carotenoids with higher I. Not only the I, but also the Icat had a significant correlation with the TEAC. This result postulates a radical scavenging mechanism of carotenoids that two electrons of a single carotenoid molecule transfer to radical species to scavenge them. Previous studies also reported that carotenoids undergo sequential loss of two electrons in oxidation reaction [34,35,37]. For the reason that the I was lower than the Icat (Table 1) and the I was more significantly correlated with the TEAC compared to the Icat (Table 2), electron transfer process from neutral carotenoid molecule to radical occurs more favourably than that from monovalent carotenoid cation.

thumbnail
Download:
Table 2. Pearson’s correlation coefficients between radical scavenging activities and quantum chemical descriptors of carotenoids calculated by PM6 and PM7 methods.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0140154.t002

Also, a significantly high correlation between μcross (-χcross) and TEAC values (p<0.001) could be noted, but lower significances were observed in the cases of μ and μcation (Table 2). This result postulates that antioxidant activities of carotenoids were mainly contributed by both of the neutral and cationic carotenoid molecules rather than either of them. Since the chemical potential (negative electronegativity) is a thermodynamic property derived by differentiating the energy with respect to the number of electrons [25], it indicates the direction of chemical reactions as a partial free energy. Thus, a positive relationship was observed between the chemical potential and the TEAC. The postulated mechanism of radical scavenging activities of carotenoids with limited information from correlation analysis is related with the sequential donation of two electrons to radical species. Chemical potential, μ, as a driving force for electron transfer [25] is responsible for first electron transfer reaction and μcat is responsible for the second electron transfer reaction to radical species. The electron transfer occurs not only between the carotenoids and radical species, but also between the neutral and cationic carotenoids [35,38]. The significant relationship between μcross and the TEAC was supposed to be caused by the interaction effect between the neutral and cationic carotenoids. In this physicochemical manner, the quantum chemical descriptor of chemical potential could be applied on QSAR studies. Worachartcheewan et al. [11] introduced chemical potential to predict radical scavenging activities of curcuminoids, and Pasha et al. [17] developed QSAR model for radical scavenging activities of flavonoids with electronegativity as a dependent variable.

From the result of correlation analysis, I, Icat, and μcross were selected as dependent variables for developing QSAR models, for reason that these properties had a significant correlation with antioxidant activities of carotenoids. Most of previous QSAR studies developed the prediction models by linear regression [13,15,17,18,26]. However, traditional QSAR models by linear regression analysis ignore the interaction effects between dependent variables, thus this ignorance may have effects on the prediction efficiency of the model. The ANN applied techniques could be an alternative to conventional linear regression model. ANN based models are constructed and adjusted by empirical training process. It is useful to solve and analyse the problems which could not be solved easily with traditional linear regression analysis. Especially, ANN-based modelling is useful to analyse multivariate nonlinear relationship [39]. For this reason, a higher prediction efficiency could be achieved by applying empirical training-based ANN modelling technique on predicting bioactivities of molecules [40]. In this study, ANFIS, an ANN-based system, was used to achieve high prediction efficiency of QSAR models. At first, the ANFIS applied QSAR models were developed using a data set from Müller et al. [4]. The predicted TEAC values by the developed QSAR models were presented in Table 3. Because carotenoids were limited to a variety of naturally occurred and commercially available ones, data sets with a relatively small sample size were available to be analysed. Bootstrap validation is an appropriate method to validate models with a small sample size [41,42]. Thus, in this study, MAE and q-square values of developed models were estimated by the bootstrap method. Both of the QSAR models with quantum chemical properties calculated by the PM6 and PM7 semi-empirical methods had high prediction efficiencies (Table 3 and Fig 3).

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 3. Scatter plot between the experimental TEAC of carotenoids reported by Müller et al. [4] and the predicted TEAC based on the quantum chemical descriptors calculated by PM6 (A) and PM7 (B) methods.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0140154.g003

thumbnail
Download:
Table 3. Experimental and predicted TEAC of carotenoids.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0140154.t003

To verify the reliabilities of the selected quantum chemical properties (i.e., I, Icat, and μcross) and the design of developed QSAR models, QSAR models were developed with radical scavenging activity data sets from other previous studies. The TEAC values of 8 carotenoid species were adapted from Miller et al. [5] and the EC50 data of 6 carotenoid species were adapted from Jiménez-Escrig et al. [28]. The results from correlation analysis of these data sets are presented in Table 4. The I, Icat, and μcross of carotenoids calculated by both of the PM6 and PM7 were significantly correlated with the TEAC values from Miller et al. at p-value below 0.001. Although statistical significances were low on the correlation between experimental EC50 and quantum chemical properties of carotenoids due to a small sample size of the data set by Jiménez-Escrig et al. (n = 6), positive correlations were observed between EC50 and selected quantum chemical properties of carotenoids. A previous QSAR study regarding on radical scavenging activities of carotenoids by Soffers et al. [15] reported a positive relationship between the ionisation energies and the TEAC values using single data set constituted of 9 carotenoids. In addition to the previous study, this positive tendency was also verified using several number of data sets in this study. Kleinová et al. [16] also constructed a QSAR model for electrochemical redox potentials of carotenoids using polarizability as an independent variable. Since the polarizability was closely correlated with ionisation energy [43], the use of polarizability as an independent variable seemed adequate. However, based on electrochemical properties of carotenoids, the results from the previous study could not be directly interpreted to radical scavenging activities of carotenoids. In the present study, the reliabilities of selected quantum chemical properties for predicting radical scavenging activities and the prediction efficiency of ANFIS applied QSAR models were confirmed by applying various data sets (Figs 4 and 5).

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 4. Scatter plot between the experimental TEAC of carotenoids reported by Miller et al. [5] and the predicted TEAC based on the quantum chemical descriptors calculated by PM6 (A) and PM7 (B) methods.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0140154.g004

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 5. Scatter plot between the experimental EC50 of carotenoids reported by Jiménez-Escrig et al. [20] and the predicted TEAC based on the quantum chemical descriptors calculated by PM6 (A) and PM7 (B) methods.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0140154.g005

thumbnail
Download:
Table 4. Pearson’s correlation coefficients between radical scavenging activities and quantum chemical descriptors of carotenoids calculated by PM6 and PM7 methods.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0140154.t004

Conclusions

Ionisation energies and chemical potentials of neutral and monovalent cationic carotenoid molecules were demonstrated as descriptors that describe the radical scavenging activities of carotenoids. Although some of the previous studies reported a significant relationship between quantum chemical descriptors and radical scavenging activities of phytochemicals [13,15,18], however, any report that analyses the radical scavenging activities of carotenoids quantitatively has not been found. In addition, in this study, molecular properties of cation molecules were calculated for QSAR models as well as neutral molecules. These characteristics could be used in computer-aided drug design (CADD) and cheminformatics areas for predicting and analysing molecular activities. Applying ANFIS on QSAR, high prediction efficiencies were also achieved. The results from this study suggest that the ANFIS could be a practical approach for developing QSAR models. Although the small sample sizes of data sets might weaken the significance of QSAR models, consistent tendencies, which were observed on various data sets, could demonstrate the reliabilities of selected quantum chemical descriptors and the significance of QSAR models.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: CJ KTH. Performed the experiments: CJ. Analyzed the data: CJ. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: CJ KTH. Wrote the paper: CJ KTH.

References

  1. 1. Faivre B, Grégoire A, Préault M, Cézilly F, Sorci G. Immune activation rapidly mirrored in a secondary sexual trait. Science. 2003;300: 103–103. pmid:12677062
  2. 2. Blount JD, Metcalfe NB, Birkhead TR, Surai PF. Carotenoid modulation of immune function and sexual attractiveness in zebra finches. Science. 2003;300: 125–127. pmid:12677066
  3. 3. Schwartz JL, Sloane D, Shklar G. Prevention and inhibition of oral cancer in the hamster buccal pouch model associated with carotenoid immune enhancement. Tumor Biol. 1989;10: 297–309.
  4. 4. Müller L, Fröhlich K, Böhm V. Comparative antioxidant activities of carotenoids measured by ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP), ABTS bleaching assay (αTEAC), DPPH assay and peroxyl radical scavenging assay. Food Chem. 2011;129: 139–148.
  5. 5. Miller NJ, Sampson J, Candeias LP, Bramley PM, Rice-Evans CA. Antioxidant activities of carotenes and xanthophylls. FEBS Lett. 1996;384: 240–242. pmid:8617362
  6. 6. El-Agamey A, Lowe GM, McGarvey DJ, Mortensen A, Phillip DM, Truscott TG, et al. Carotenoid radical chemistry and antioxidant/pro-oxidant properties. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2004;430: 37–48. pmid:15325910
  7. 7. Stahl W, Sies H. Antioxidant activity of carotenoids. Mol Aspects Med. 2003;24: 345–351. pmid:14585305
  8. 8. Britton G. Structure and properties of carotenoids in relation to function. FASEB J Off Publ Fed Am Soc Exp Biol. 1995;9: 1551–1558.
  9. 9. Cantrell A, McGarvey DJ, George Truscott T, Rancan F, Böhm F. Singlet oxygen quenching by dietary carotenoids in a model membrane environment. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2003;412: 47–54. pmid:12646267
  10. 10. Krinsky NI, Deneke SM. Interaction of oxygen and oxy-radicals with carotenoids. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1982;69: 205–210. pmid:6285060
  11. 11. Worachartcheewan A, Nantasenamat C, Isarankura-Na-Ayudhya C, Prachayasittikul S, Prachayasittikul V. Predicting the free radical scavenging activity of curcumin derivatives. Chemom Intell Lab Syst. 2011;109: 207–216.
  12. 12. Jhin C, Hwang KT. Prediction of radical scavenging activities of anthocyanins applying adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) with quantum chemical descriptors. Int J Mol Sci. 2014;15: 14715–14727. pmid:25153627
  13. 13. Kontogiorgis AC, Pontiki AE, Hadjipavlou-Litina D. A review on quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSARs) of natural and synthetic antioxidants compounds. Mini Rev Med Chem. 2005;5: 563–574. pmid:15974934
  14. 14. Karelson M, Lobanov VS, Katritzky AR. Quantum-chemical descriptors in QSAR/QSPR studies. Chem Rev. 1996;96: 1027–1044. pmid:11848779
  15. 15. Soffers AEMF, van Haandel MJH, Boersma MG, Tyrakowska B, Laane C, Rietjens IMCM. Antioxidant activities of carotenoids: quantitative relationships between theoretical calculations and experimental literature data. Free Radic Res. 1999;30: 233–240. pmid:10711793
  16. 16. Kleinová M, Hewitt M, Brezová V, Madden JC, Cronin MTD, Valko M. Antioxidant properties of carotenoids: QSAR prediction of their redox potentials. Gen Physiol Biophys. 2007;26: 97–103. pmid:17660583
  17. 17. Pasha FA, Cho SJ, Beg Y, Tripathi YB. Quantum chemical QSAR study of flavones and their radical-scavenging activity. Med Chem Res. 2008;16: 408–417.
  18. 18. Sarkar A, Middya TR, Jana AD. A QSAR study of radical scavenging antioxidant activity of a series of flavonoids using DFT based quantum chemical descriptors–the importance of group frontier electron density. J Mol Model. 2011;18: 2621–2631. pmid:22080306
  19. 19. Vasil’ev RF, Kancheva VD, Fedorova GF, Batovska DI, Trofimov AV. Antioxidant activity of chalcones: The chemiluminescence determination of the reactivity and the quantum chemical calculation of the energies and structures of reagents and intermediates. Kinet Catal. 2010;51: 507–515.
  20. 20. Prior RL, Wu X, Schaich K. Standardized methods for the determination of antioxidant capacity and phenolics in foods and dietary supplements. J Agric Food Chem. 2005;53: 4290–4302. pmid:15884874
  21. 21. Poblet JM, Canadell E, Sordo T. Concerning the orientation in free radical additions to olefins. Can J Chem. 1983;61: 2068–2069.
  22. 22. Park SU, Chung SK, Newcomb M. Acceptor, donor, and captodative stabilization in transition states of 5-hexen-1-yl radical cyclizations. J Am Chem Soc. 1986;108: 240–244.
  23. 23. Koopmans T. Über die Zuordnung von Wellenfunktionen und Eigenwerten zu den Einzelnen Elektronen Eines Atoms. Physica. 1934;1: 104–113.
  24. 24. Parr RG, Pearson RG. Absolute hardness: companion parameter to absolute electronegativity. J Am Chem Soc. 1983;105: 7512–7516.
  25. 25. Parr RG, Donnelly RA, Levy M, Palke WE. Electronegativity: the density functional viewpoint. J Chem Phys. 1978;68: 3801–3807.
  26. 26. Amić D, Lučić B. Reliability of bond dissociation enthalpy calculated by the PM6 method and experimental TEAC values in antiradical QSAR of flavonoids. Bioorg Med Chem. 2010;18: 28–35. pmid:19944611
  27. 27. Jang J-SR. ANFIS: adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference system. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern. 1993;23: 665–685.
  28. 28. Jiménez-Escrig A, Jiménez-Jiménez I, Sánchez-Moreno C, Saura-Calixto F. Evaluation of free radical scavenging of dietary carotenoids by the stable radical 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl. J Sci Food Agric. 2000;80: 1686–1690.
  29. 29. Irwin JJ, Shoichet BK. ZINC-a free database of commercially available compounds for virtual screening. J Chem Inf Model. 2005;45: 177–182. pmid:15667143
  30. 30. O’Boyle NM, Banck M, James CA, Morley C, Vandermeersch T, Hutchison GR. Open babel: an open chemical toolbox. J Cheminformatics. 2011;3: 33.
  31. 31. Stewart JJ. Optimization of parameters for semiempirical methods V: modification of NDDO approximations and application to 70 elements. J Mol Model. 2007;13: 1173–1213. pmid:17828561
  32. 32. Stewart JJ. Optimization of parameters for semiempirical methods VI: more modifications to the NDDO approximations and re-optimization of parameters. J Mol Model. 2013;19: 1–32. pmid:23187683
  33. 33. Stewart JJP. MOPAC 2012, Colorado Springs, CO: Stewart Computational Chemistry, USA. 2014.
    • 34. Mairanovsky VG, Engovatov AA, Ioffe NT, Samokhvalov GI. Electron-donor and electron-acceptor properties of carotenoids: electrochemical study of carotenes. J Electroanal Chem Interfacial Electrochem. 1975;66: 123–137.
    • 35. Jeevarajan JA, Kispert LD. Electrochemical oxidation of carotenoids containing donor/acceptor substituents. J Electroanal Chem. 1996;411: 57–66.
    • 36. Mortensen A, Skibsted LH, Truscott TG. The Interaction of Dietary Carotenoids with Radical Species. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2001;385: 13–19. pmid:11361009
    • 37. Jeevarajan AS, Khaled M, Kispert LD. Simultaneous electrochemical and electron paramagnetic resonance studies of carotenoids: effect of electron donating and accepting substituents. J Phys Chem. 1994;98: 7777–7781.
    • 38. Edge R, Land EJ, McGarvey D, Mulroy L, Truscott TG. Relative One-Electron Reduction Potentials of Carotenoid Radical Cations and the Interactions of Carotenoids with the Vitamin E Radical Cation. J Am Chem Soc. 1998;120: 4087–4090.
    • 39. Gemperline PJ, Long JR, Gregoriou VG. Nonlinear multivariate calibration using principal components regression and artificial neural networks. Anal Chem. 1991;63: 2313–2323.
    • 40. Agatonovic-Kustrin S, Beresford R. Basic concepts of artificial neural network (ANN) modeling and its application in pharmaceutical research. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2000;22: 717–727. pmid:10815714
    • 41. Braga-Neto UM, Dougherty ER. Is cross-validation valid for small-sample microarray classification? Bioinformatics. 2004;20: 374–380. pmid:14960464
    • 42. Kiralj R, Ferreira MMC. Basic validation procedures for regression models in QSAR and QSPR studies: theory and application. J Braz Chem Soc. 2009;20: 770–787.
    • 43. Beg H, De SP, Ash S, Das D, Misra A. Polarizability, chemical hardness and ionization potential as descriptors to understand the mechanism of double proton transfer in acetamide dimer. Comput Theor Chem. 2013;1005: 1–8.