Skip to main content
Log in

Composition and ethanol production potential of cotton gin residues

  • Published:
Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cotton gin residue (CGR) collected from five cotton gins was fractionated and characterized for summative composition. The major fractions of the CGR varied widely between cotton gins and consisted of clean lint (5–12%), hulls (16–48%), seeds (6–24%), motes (16–24%), and leaves (14–30%). The summative composition varied within and between cotton gins and consisted of ash (7.9–14.6%), acid-insoluble material (18–26%), xylan (4–15%), and cellulose (20–38%). Overlimed steam-exploded cotton gin waste was readily fermented to ethanol by Escherichia coli KO11. Ethanol yields were feedstock and severity dependent and ranged from 58 to 92.5% of the theoretical yields. The highest ethanol yield was 191 L (50 gal)/t, and the lowest was 120 L (32 gal)/t.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jeoh, T. and Agblevor, F. A. (2001), Biomass Bioenergy 21, 109–120.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Jeoh, T. (1999), MS thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Beck, R. S. and Clements, D. L. (1982), in Proceedings of the Symposium on Cotton Gin Trash Utilization Alternatives, Texas Agricultural Experiment Service, Lubock, TX, pp. 163–181.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brink, D. L. (1981), in Proceedings of the Symposium Cotton Gin Trash Utilization Alternatives, University of California Cooperative Extension, Hanford, CA, pp. 2027.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Griffin, A. C. Jr. (1974), Paper no. 74-3038, 1974 Annual Meeting of American Society of Agricultural Engineers, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK.

  6. Schacht, O. B. and LePori, W. A. (1978), Paper no. 78-3544, 1978 Winter Meeting of American Society of Agricultural Engineers, Chicago, IL.

  7. Shepherd, J. V. (1972), Agriculture Handbook, USDA Handbook No. 422, The Agricultural Research Service (ARS), Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  8. ASTM (1998), in Annual Book of ASTM Standards, ASTM Method E 1756-95, vol. 11.05, American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  9. ASTM (1998), in Annual Book of ASTM Standards, ASTM Method E 1755-95, vol. 11.05, American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  10. ASTM (1998), in Annual Book of ASTM Standards, ASTM Method E 1690-95, vol. 11.05, American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  11. ASTM (1998), in Annual Book of ASTM Standards, ASTM Method E 1721-95, vol. 11.05, American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  12. ASTM (1998), in Annual Book of ASTM Standards, ASTM Method E 1821-96, vol. 11.05, American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Overend, R. P. and Chornet, E. (1987), Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 321, 523–536.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Asghari, A., Bothast, R. J., Doran, J. B., and Ingram, L. O. (1996), J. Ind. Microbiol. 16, 42–47.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Wiselogel, A. E., Agblevor, F. A., Johnson, D. K., Deutch, S., Fennell, J. A., and Sanderson, M. A. (1996), Bioresour. Technol. 56 (1), 103–110.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Fengel, D. and Wegener, G. (1989), Wood, Chemistry, Ultrastructure, Reactions, Chapter 3, Walter de Gruyter, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Milne, T. A., Chum, H. L., Agblevor, F., and Johnson, D. K. (1992), Biomass and Bioenergy 2(1–6), 341–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hui, Y.H., ed. (1996), in Bailey’s Industrial Oil and Fat Products, Fifth Edition, Edible Oil and Fat Products: Oils and Oilseeds, Chapter 4, Wiley Interscience, New York, NY, p. 159.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Agblevor, F. A., Evans, R. J., and Johnson, K. D. (1994), J. Anal. Appl. Pyrol. 30, 125–144.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Buhner, J. (2000), MS thesis, Technical University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Foster A. Agblevor.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Agblevor, F.A., Batz, S. & Trumbo, J. Composition and ethanol production potential of cotton gin residues. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 105, 219–230 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1385/ABAB:105:1-3:219

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1385/ABAB:105:1-3:219

Index entries

Navigation