Eur. J. Entomol. 109 (2): 207-216, 2012 | DOI: 10.14411/eje.2012.027

Correlations between landscape attributes and ecological traits of Lepidoptera communities in olive groves

Stefano SCALERCIO1, Pietro BRANDMAYR3, Nino IANNOTTA1, Ruggero PETACCHI2, Luigi BOCCACCIO2
1 CRA Centro di Ricerca per l'Olivicoltura e l'Industria Olearia, Contrada Li Rocchi, Rende, Cosenza, Italy; e-mail: stefano.scalercio@entecra.it
2 Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Piazza Martiri della LibertL 33, Pisa, Italy
3 UniversitL della Calabria, Via Pietro Bucci, Rende, Cosenza, Italy

The effects of landscape attributes on Lepidoptera communities were studied in an agricultural area in Calabria (S-Italy). The association between a set of community descriptors and landscape metrics was determined using a multi-scale approach. Lepidoptera were sampled using yellow sticky traps in 10 olive groves. The landscape in 5 concentric areas, with radii from 250 to 1250 m, around each sampling site was analyzed. The composition and configuration of the landscape were calculated both at the landscape and class level based on the main classes of land use. The following life-history traits of Lepidoptera were considered: (i) dispersal ability of adults, (ii) habitat preferences and (iii) diet breadth of larvae. An index of community vulnerability was calculated by combining life-history traits and species diversity. There were no significant correlations between any of the landscape metrics and species richness or between species richness and abundance of natural or semi-natural habitats. However, life-history traits were significantly correlated with some landscape metrics, depending on the spatial scale. Most notably, landscape diversity is positively correlated with community vulnerability. The presence of sensitive species in olive orchards, but not species richness per se, is associated with the presence of natural and semi-natural habitats in the surrounding agricultural landscape. In conclusion, responses of communities to landscape changes are more likely to be revealed by an analysis of ecological traits, than species richness. In particular, the vulnerability index, used in this joint analysis of the main ecological traits, seems to be an effective descriptor of the relationships between communities and landscape.

Keywords: Landscape ecology, Lepidoptera, biodiversity, ecological traits, conservation

Received: August 26, 2011; Revised: December 12, 2011; Accepted: December 12, 2011; Published: April 5, 2012  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
SCALERCIO, S., BRANDMAYR, P., IANNOTTA, N., PETACCHI, R., & BOCCACCIO, L. (2012). Correlations between landscape attributes and ecological traits of Lepidoptera communities in olive groves. EJE109(2), 207-216. doi: 10.14411/eje.2012.027
Download citation

References

  1. ALTIERI M.A. 1999: The ecological role of biodiversity in agroecosystems. Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 74: 19-31 Go to original source...
  2. AVIRON S., JEANNERET P., SCHUPBACK B. & HERZOG F. 2007: Effects of agri-environmental measures, site and landscape conditions on butterfly diversity of Swiss grassland. Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 122: 295-304 Go to original source...
  3. BALLETTO E. & KUDRNA O. 1985: Some aspects of the conservation of butterflies in Italy, with recommendations for a future strategy (Lepidoptera, Hesperiidae and Papilionoidea). Boll. Soc. Entomol. Ital. 117: 39-59
  4. BARBARO L. & VAN HALDER I. 2009: Linking bird, carabid beetle and butterfly life-history traits to habitat fragmentation in mosaic landscapes. Ecography 32: 321-333 Go to original source...
  5. BENES J., KURAS T. & KONVICKA M. 2000: Assemblages of mountainous day-active Lepidoptera in the Hruby Jesenik Mts, Czech Republic. Biologia 55: 153-161
  6. BENTON T.G., VICKERY J.A. & WILSON J.D. 2003: Farmland biodiversity: is habitat heterogeneity the key? Trends Ecol. Evol. 18: 182-188 Go to original source...
  7. BERGMAN K.-O., ASKLING J., EKBERG O., IGNEL H., WAHLMAN H. & MILBERG P. 2004: Landscape effects on butterfly assemblages in an agricultural region. Ecography 27: 619-628 Go to original source...
  8. BERIO E. 1985: Fauna d'Italia. Lepidoptera Noctuidae. I. GeneralitL Hadeninae Cucullinae. Calderini Editore, Bologna, Italy, 1030 pp
  9. BERIO E. 1991: Lepidoptera Noctuidae. II. Sezione Quadrifide. Calderini Editore, Bologna, 734 pp
  10. BERTACCINI E., FIUMI G. & PROVERA P. 1995: Bombici e Sfingi d'Italia (Lepidoptera, Heterocera). Vol. 1. Natura-Giuliano Russo Editore, Bologna, 248 pp
  11. BERTACCINI E., FIUMI G. & PROVERA P. 1997: Bombici e Sfingi d'Italia (Lepidoptera, Heterocera). Vol. 2. Natura-Giuliano Russo Editore, Bologna, 256 pp
  12. BOCCACCIO L. & PETACCHI R. 2009: Landscape effects on the complex of Bactrocera oleae parasitoids and implications for conservation biological control. Biocontrol 54: 607-616 Go to original source...
  13. BRUSSAARD L., DE RUITER P.C. & BROWN G.G. 2007: Soil biodiversity for agricultural sustainability. Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 121: 233-244 Go to original source...
  14. BULLOCK J.M., PYWELL R.F., BURKE M.J.W. & WALKER K.J. 2001: Restoration of biodiversity enhances agricultural production. Ecol. Lett. 4: 185-189 Go to original source...
  15. CARLSON A. 2000: The effect of habitat loss on a deciduous forest specialist species: the white-backed whoodpecker (Dendrocopos leucotos). Forest Ecol. Manag. 131: 215-221 Go to original source...
  16. CLOUGH Y., KRUESS A., KLEIJN D. & TSCHARNTKE T. 2005: Spider diversity in cereal fields: comparing factors at local, landscape and regional scales. J. Biogeogr. 32: 2007-2014 Go to original source...
  17. COLLINGE S.K. & PALMER T.M. 2002: The influences of patch shape and boundary contrast on insect response to fragmentation in California grasslands. Landsc. Ecol. 2002: 647-656 Go to original source...
  18. COLWELL R.K. 2005: EstimateS: Statistical Estimation of Species Richness and Shared Species from Samples. Version 7.5. http://viceroy.eeb.uconn.edu/estimates. Accessed 20 February 2008
  19. DEVICTOR V., ROMAIN J. & JIGUET F. 2008: Distribution of specialist and generalist species along spatial gradients of habitat disturbance and fragmentation. Oikos 117: 507-514 Go to original source...
  20. DIEKOTTER T., BILLETER R. & CRIST T.O. 2008: Effects of landscape connectivity on the spatial distribution of insect diversity in agricultural mosaic landscapes. Basic Appl. Ecol. 9: 298-307 Go to original source...
  21. DOVER J. & SETTELE J. 2009: The influences of landscape structure on butterfly distribution and movement: a review. J. Insect Conserv. 13: 3-27 Go to original source...
  22. ESRI 2003: ArcGIS 8. Redlands, CA, USA FIEDLER A.K., LANDIS D.A. & WRATTEN S.D. 2008: Maximising ecosystem services from conservation biological control: the role of habitat management. Biol. Control 45: 254-271 Go to original source...
  23. FRANZEN M. & JOHANNESSON M. 2007: Predicting extinction risk of butterflies and moths (Macrolepidoptera) from distribution patterns and species characteristics. J. Insect Conserv. 11: 367-390 Go to original source...
  24. GRILL A., KNOFLACH B., CLEARY D.F.R. & KATI V. 2005: Butterfly, spider, and plant communities in different land-use types in Sardinia, Italy. Biodivers. Conserv. 14: 1281-1300 Go to original source...
  25. HAMBACK P.A., SUMMERVILLE K.S., STEFFAN-DEWENTER I., KRAUSS J., ENGLUND G. & CRIST O.T. 2007: Habitat specialisation, body size, and family identity explain lepidopteran density-area relationships in a cross-continental comparison. P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104: 8368-8373 Go to original source...
  26. HAUSMANN A. 2001: The Geometrid Moths of Europe. Vol. 1 (Introduction; Archiearinae, Orthostixinae, Desmobathrinae, Alsophilinae, Geometrinae). Apollo Books, Stenstrup, 282 pp
  27. HAUSMANN A. 2004: The Geometrid Moths of Europe. Vol. 2 (Sterrhinae). Apollo Books, Stenstrup, 600 pp
  28. HAWLENA D. & BOUSKILA A. 2006: Land management practices for combating desertification cause replacement of desert lizards. J. Appl. Ecol. 43: 701-709 Go to original source...
  29. HOLZSCHUH A., STEFFAN-DEWENTER I. & TSCHARNTKE T. 2008: Agricultural landscapes with organic crops support higher pollinator diversity. Oikos 117: 354-361 Go to original source...
  30. HUNTER M.D. 2002: Landscape structure, habitat fragmentation, and the ecology of insects. Agr. Forest Entomol. 4: 159-166 Go to original source...
  31. JACKSON L.E., PASCUAL U. & HODGKIN T. 2007: Utilizing and conserving agrobiodiversity in agricultural landscapes. Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 121: 196-210 Go to original source...
  32. JULLIARD R., JIGUET F. & COUVET D. 2003: Common birds facing global changes: what makes a species at risk? Glob. Change Biol. 10: 148-154 Go to original source...
  33. KOLB A. & DIEKMANN M. 2005: Effects of life-history traits on responses of plant species to forest fragmentation. Conserv. Biol. 19: 929-938 Go to original source...
  34. KRAUSS J., KLEIN A.M., STEFFAN-DEWENTER I. & TSCHARNTKE T. 2004: Effects of habitat area, isolation, and landscape diversity on plant species richness of calcareous grasslands. Biodivers. Conserv. 13: 1427-1439 Go to original source...
  35. KRAUSS J., STEFFAN-DEWENTER I. & TSCHARNTKE T. 2003: How does landscape context contribute to effects of habitat fragmentation on diversity and population density of butterflies? J. Biogeogr. 30: 889-900 Go to original source...
  36. KRUESS A. 2003: Effects of landscape structure and habitat type on a plant-herbivore-parasitoid community. Ecography 26: 283-290 Go to original source...
  37. MAGURRAN A.E. 1988: Ecological Diversity and its Measurement. Croom Helm, London, 192 pp Go to original source...
  38. MCGARIGAL K., CUSHMAN S.A., NEEL M.C. & ENE E. 2002: FRAGSTATS: Spatial Pattern Analysis Program for Categorical Maps. Computer software program produced by the authors at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst. www.umass.edu/landeco/research/fragstats/fragstats.html. Accessed 1 February 2009
  39. MENNECHEZ G., SCHTICKZELLE N. & BAGUETTE M. 2003: Metapopulation dynamics of the bog fritillary butterfly: comparison of demographic parameters and dispersal between a continuous and a highly fragmented landscape. Landsc. Ecol. 18: 279-291 Go to original source...
  40. MIRONOV V. 2003: The Geometrid Moths of Europe. Vol. 4 (Larentiinae II: Perizomini and Eupitheciini). Apollo Books, Stenstrup, 464 pp Go to original source...
  41. MUNDAY P.L. 2004: Habitat loss, resource specialisation and extinction on coral reefs. Glob. Change Biol. 10: 1642-1647 Go to original source...
  42. MUSTERS C.J.M., VAN ALEBEEK F., GEERS R.H.E.M., KOREVAAR H., VISSER A. & DE SNOO G.R. 2009: Development of biodiversity in field margins recently taken out of production and adjacent ditch banks in arable areas. Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 129: 131-139 Go to original source...
  43. NAVEH Z. & WHITTAKER R.H. 1980: Structural and floristic diversity of shrublands and woodlands in Northern Israel and other Mediterranean areas. Plant Ecol. 41: 171-190 Go to original source...
  44. PARENZAN P. 1994: Contributi alla conoscenza della Lepidotterofauna dell'Italia meridionale. XVII. Geometridae. Entomologica 28: 99-246
  45. POLLARD E. & YATES T.J. 1993: Monitoring Butterflies for Ecology and Conservation. Chapmann & Hall, London, 274 pp
  46. POLUS E., VANDEWOESTIJNE S., CHOUTT J. & BAGUETTE M. 2007: Tracking the effects of one century of habitat loss and fragmentation on calcareous grassland butterfly communities. Biodivers. Conserv. 16: 3423-3436 Go to original source...
  47. ROLAND J., KEYGHOBADI N. & FOWNES S. 2000: Alpine Parnassius butterfly dispersal: effects of landscape and population size. Ecology 81: 1642-1653 Go to original source...
  48. ROSCHEWITZ I., HUCKER M., TSCHARNTKE T. & THIES C. 2005: The influence of landscape context and farming practices on parasitism of cereal aphids. Agr. Ecosyst. Environ.108: 218-227 Go to original source...
  49. ROSSI J.-P. & VAN HALDER I. 2010: Towards indicators of butterfly biodiversity based on a multiscale landscape description. Ecol. Indicators 10: 452-458 Go to original source...
  50. RUNDLOF M. & SMITH H.G. 2006: The effect of organic farming on butterfly diversity depends on landscape context. J. Appl. Ecol. 43: 1121-1127 Go to original source...
  51. SCALERCIO S., PIZZOLOTTO R. & BRANDMAYR P. 2007a: Multiscale analysis of butterfly diversity in a Mediterranean mountain landscape: mapping and evaluation of community vulnerability. Biodivers. Conserv. 16: 3463-3479 Go to original source...
  52. SCALERCIO S., IANNOTTA N. & BRANDMAYR P. 2007b: The role of semi-natural and abandoned vegetation patches in sustaining lepidopteran diversity in an organic olive orchard. Bull. Insectol. 60: 13-22
  53. SCHTICKZELLE N., MENNECHEZ G. & BAGUETTE M. 2006: Dispersal depression with habitat fragmentation in the bog fritillary butterfly. Ecology 87: 1057-1065 Go to original source...
  54. SHREEVE T.G., DENNIS R.L.H., ROY D.B. & MOSS D. 2001: An ecological classification of British butterflies: Ecological attributes and biotope occupancy. J. Insect Conserv. 5: 145-161 Go to original source...
  55. SIMON S., DEFRANCE H. & SAUPHANOR B. 2007: Effect of codling moth management on orchard arthropods. Agr. Ecosyst. Environ.122: 340-348 Go to original source...
  56. STEFANESCU C., HERRANDO S. & PARAMO F. 2004: Butterfly species richness in the north-west Mediterranean Basin: the role of natural and human-induced factors. J. Biogeogr. 31: 905-915 Go to original source...
  57. SUMMERVILLE K.S. & CRIST T.O. 2004: Contrasting effects of habitat quantity and quality on moth communities in fragmented landscapes. Ecography 27: 3-12 Go to original source...
  58. THIES C., STEFFAN-DEWENTER I. & TSCHARNTKE T. 2003: Effects of landscape context on herbivory and parasitism at different spatial scales. Oikos 101: 18-25 Go to original source...
  59. THOMAS C.D., JORDANO D., LEWIS O.T., HILL J.K., SUTCLIFFE O.L. & THOMAS J.A. 1998: Butterfly distributional patterns, processes, and conservation. In Mace G.M., Balmford A. & Ginsberg J.R. (eds): Conservation in a Changing World. Cambridge University Press, pp. 107-138
  60. THUILLER W., LAVOREL S. & ARAUJO M.B. 2005: Niche properties and geographical extent as predictors of species sensitivity to climate change. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 14: 347-357 Go to original source...
  61. TSCHARNTKE T., SEKERCIOGLU C.H., DIETSCH T.V., SODHI N.S., HOEHN P. & TYLIANAKIS J.M. 2008: Landscape constraints on functional diversity of birds and insects in tropical agroecosystems. Ecology 89: 944-951 Go to original source...
  62. TSCHARNTKE T., KLEIN A.M., KRUESS A., STEFFAN-DEWENTER I. & THIES C. 2005: Landscape perspectives on agricultural intensification and biodiversity - ecosystem service management. Ecol. Lett. 8: 857-874 Go to original source...
  63. USHER M.B. & KEILLER S.W.J. 1998: The macrolepidoptera of farm woodlands: determinants of diversity and community structure. Biodivers. Conserv. 7: 725-748 Go to original source...
  64. VAN SWAAY C., WARREN M. & LOIS G. 2006: Biotope use and trends of European Butterflies. J. Insect Conserv. 10: 189-209 Go to original source...
  65. VARGAS J.M., GUERRERO J.C. & REAL R. 2004: Effects of natural phenomena and human activity on the species richness of endemic and non-endemic Heteroptera in the Canary Islands. Anim. Biodivers. Conserv. 27: 57-66
  66. WARREN M.S., HILL J.K. & THOMAS J.A. 2001: Rapid responses of British butterflies to opposing forces of climate and habitat change. Nature 414: 65-69 Go to original source...
  67. WESTPHAL C., STEFFAN-DEWENTER I. & TSCHARNTKE T. 2006: Bumblebees experience landscapes at different spatial scales: possible implications for coexistence. Oecologia 149: 289-300 Go to original source...
  68. WILSON R.J., GUTIERREZ D., GUTIERREZ J. & MONSERRAT V.J. 2007: An elevational shift in butterfly species richness and composition accompanying recent climate change. Glob. Change Biol. 13: 1873-1887 Go to original source...
  69. ZALLER J., MOSER D., DRAPELA T., SCHMOGER C. & FRANK T. 2008: Effect of within-field and landscape factors on insect damage in winter oilseed rape. Agr. Ecosyst. Environ.123: 233-238 Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.