skip to main content
research-article

Promotion analysis in multi-dimensional space

Published:01 August 2009Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Promotion is one of the key ingredients in marketing. It is often desirable to find merit in an object (e.g., product, person, organization, or service) and promote it in an appropriate community. In this paper, we propose a novel functionality, called promotion analysis through ranking, for promoting a given object by leveraging highly ranked results. Since the object may not be highly ranked in the global space, our goal is to discover promotive subspaces in which the object becomes prominent. To achieve this goal, the notion of promotiveness is formulated. We show that this functionality is practical and useful in a wide variety of applications such as business intelligence. However, computing promotive subspaces is challenging due to the explosion of search space and high aggregation cost. For efficient computation, we propose a PromoRank framework, and develop three efficient optimization techniques, namely subspace pruning, object pruning, and promotion cube, which are seamlessly integrated into the framework. Our empirical evaluation on two real data sets confirms the effectiveness of promotion analysis, and that our proposed algorithms significantly outperform baseline solutions.

References

  1. DBLP. http://www.informatik.uni-trier.de/~ley/db/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. NBA data set, http://www.basketballreference.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. TPC-H. http://www.tpc.org/tpch/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. N. Bansal, S. Guha, and N. Koudas. Ad-hoc aggregations of ranked lists in the presence of hierarchies. In SIGMOD, pages 67--78, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. K. S. Beyer and R. Ramakrishnan. Bottom-up computation of sparse and iceberg cubes. In SIGMOD, pages 359--370, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. C. Borgs, J. T. Chayes, N. Immorlica, K. Jain, O. Etesami, and M. Mahdian. Dynamics of bid optimization in online advertisement auctions. In WWW, pages 531--540, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. S. Chaudhuri, G. Das, V. Hristidis, and G. Weikum. Probabilistic ranking of database query results. In VLDB, pages 888--899, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. G. Das, V. Hristidis, N. Kapoor, and S. Sudarshan. Ordering the attributes of query results. In SIGMOD, pages 395--406, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. R. Fagin, A. Lotem, and M. Naor. Optimal aggregation algorithms for middleware. In PODS, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. J. Gray, S. Chaudhuri, A. Bosworth, A. Layman, D. Reichart, M. Venkatrao, F. Pellow, and H. Pirahesh. Data cube: A relational aggregation operator generalizing group-by, cross-tab, and sub totals. Data Min. Knowl. Discov., 1(1):29--53, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. I. F. Ilyas, G. Beskales, and M. A. Soliman. A survey of top-k query processing techniques in relational database systems. ACM Comput. Surv., 40(4), 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. J. M. Kleinberg, C. H. Papadimitriou, and P. Raghavan. A microeconomic view of data mining. Data Min. Knowl. Discov., 2(4):311--324, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. P. Kotler and K. Keller. Marketing Management. Prentice Hall, March 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. R. Kuehl. Design of Experiments: Statistical Principles of Research Design and Analysis. Duxbury Press, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. C. Li, B. C. Ooi, A. K. H. Tung, and S. Wang. Dada: a data cube for dominant relationship analysis. In SIGMOD, pages 659--670, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. M. Miah, G. Das, V. Hristidis, and H. Mannila. Standing out in a crowd: Selecting attributes for maximum visibility. In ICDE, pages 356--365, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Z. Shao, J. Han, and D. Xin. Mm-cubing: Computing iceberg cubes by factorizing the lattice space. In SSDBM, pages 213--222, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. J. S. Vitter and M. Wang. Approximate computation of multidimensional aggregates of sparse data using wavelets. In SIGMOD, pages 193--204, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. T. Wu, D. Xin, and J. Han. Arcube: supporting ranking aggregate queries in partially materialized data cubes. In SIGMOD Conference, pages 79--92, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Promotion analysis in multi-dimensional space

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in

          Full Access

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader