skip to main content
research-article

ClaimBuster: the first-ever end-to-end fact-checking system

Published:01 August 2017Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Our society is struggling with an unprecedented amount of falsehoods, hyperboles, and half-truths. Politicians and organizations repeatedly make the same false claims. Fake news floods the cyberspace and even allegedly influenced the 2016 election. In fighting false information, the number of active fact-checking organizations has grown from 44 in 2014 to 114 in early 2017. 1 Fact-checkers vet claims by investigating relevant data and documents and publish their verdicts. For instance, PolitiFact.com, one of the earliest and most popular fact-checking projects, gives factual claims truthfulness ratings such as True, Mostly True, Half true, Mostly False, False, and even "Pants on Fire". In the U.S., the election year made fact-checking a part of household terminology. For example, during the first presidential debate on September 26, 2016, NPR.org's live fact-checking website drew 7.4 million page views and delivered its biggest traffic day ever.

References

  1. F. Arslan. Detecting real-time check-worthy factual claims in tweets related to U.S. politics. Master's thesis, University of Texas at Arlington, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. FullFact.org. The State of Automated Factchecking. Full Fact, August, 2016. https://fullfact.org/blog/2016/aug/automated-factchecking/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. N. Hassan, B. Adair, J. T. Hamilton, C. Li, M. Tremayne, J. Yang, and C. Yu. The quest to automate fact-checking. In Computation+Journalism Symposium, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. N. Hassan, C. Li, and M. Tremayne. Detecting check-worthy factual claims in presidential debates. In CIKM, pages 1835--1838, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. N. Hassan, M. Tremayne, F. Arslan, and C. Li. Comparing automated factual claim detection against judgments of journalism organizations. In Computation+Journalism Symposium, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. M. Heilman and N. A. Smith. Question generation via overgenerating transformations and ranking. Technical report, CMU-LTI-09-013, Carnegie Mellon University, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. M. Joseph. Speaker identification in live events using Twitter. Master's thesis, University of Texas at Arlington, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. V. Rus, M. C. Lintean, R. Banjade, N. B. Niraula, and D. Stefanescu. Semilar: The semantic similarity toolkit. In ACL, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. ClaimBuster: the first-ever end-to-end fact-checking system
      Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      • Published in

        cover image Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment
        Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment  Volume 10, Issue 12
        August 2017
        427 pages
        ISSN:2150-8097
        Issue’s Table of Contents

        Publisher

        VLDB Endowment

        Publication History

        • Published: 1 August 2017
        Published in pvldb Volume 10, Issue 12

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader