Abstract
In this study, the reinforcing potential of cellulose “microfibres” obtained from bleached softwood kraft pulp was demonstrated in a matrix of polyvinyl alcohol (PVA). Microfibres are defined as fibres of cellulose of 0.1–1 μm in diameter, with a corresponding minimum length of 5–50 μm. Films cast with these microfibres in PVA showed a doubling of tensile strength and a 2.5-fold increase in stiffness with 5% microfibre loading. The theoretical stiffness of a microfibre was calculated as 69 GPa. The study also demonstrated that the strength of the composite was greater at 5% microfibre loading compared to 10% loading. Comparative studies with microcrystalline cellulose showed that the minimum aspect ratio of the reinforcing agent is more criticalthan its crystallinity in providing reinforcement in the composite.
References
Bird, R.B., Armstrong, R.C., Hassager, O. Dynamics of Polymeric Liquids, Fluid Mechanics, Vol. 1. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1977.Search in Google Scholar
Chakraborty, A., Sain, M., Kortschot, M. (2005) Cellulose microfibrils: a novel method of preparation using high shear refining and cryocrushing. Holzforschung59:102–107.10.1515/HF.2005.016Search in Google Scholar
Dinand, E., Chanzy, H., Vignon, M.R. (1999) Suspensions of cellulose microfibrils from sugar beet pulp. Food Hydrocolloids13:275–283.10.1016/S0268-005X(98)00084-8Search in Google Scholar
Dufresne, A., Cavaillé, J.-Y., Vignon, M.R. (1997) Mechanical behavior of sheets prepared from sugar beet cellulose microfibrils. J. Appl. Polym. Sci.64:1185–1194.10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19970509)64:6<1185::AID-APP19>3.0.CO;2-VSearch in Google Scholar
Dufresne, A., Dupeyre, D., Vignon, M.R. (2000) Cellulose microfibrils from potato tuber cells: processing and characterization of starch-cellulose. J. Appl. Polym. Sci.76:2080–2092.10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(20000628)76:14<2080::AID-APP12>3.0.CO;2-USearch in Google Scholar
Favier, V., Chanzy, H., Cavaillé, J.Y. (1995) Polymer nanocomposites reinforced by cellulose whiskers. Macromolecules28:6365–6367.10.1021/ma00122a053Search in Google Scholar
Grunert, M., Winter, W.T. (2002) Nanocomposites of cellulose acetate butyrate reinforced with cellulose nanocrystals. J. Polym. Environ.10:27–30.10.1023/A:1021065905986Search in Google Scholar
Herrick, F.W., Casebier, R.L., Hamilton, J.K., Sandberg, K.R. (1983) Microfibrillated cellulose: morphology and accessibility. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. Appl. Polym. Symp.37:797–813.Search in Google Scholar
Hull, D. An Introduction to Composite Materials, 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1996.Search in Google Scholar
Morin, A., Dufresne, A. (2002) Nanocomposites of chitin whiskers from riftia tubes and poly(caprolactone). Macromolecules35:2190–2199.10.1021/ma011493aSearch in Google Scholar
Piggott, M. Load Bearing Fibre Composites, 2nd ed. Kluwer Academic Publisher, Norwell, MA, 2002.Search in Google Scholar
Taniguchi, T. (1996) Microfibrillation of natural fibrous materials. J. Soc. Mater. Sci. Jpn.45:472–473.Search in Google Scholar
Turbak, A.F., Snyder, F.W., Sandberg, K.R. (1983) Microfibrillated cellulose, a new cellulose product: properties, uses, and commercial potential. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. Appl. Polym. Symp.37:815–827.Search in Google Scholar
Utracki, L., Simha, R. (1963) Corresponding state relations for the viscosity of moderately concentrated polymer solutions. J. Polym. Sci. A1:1089–1098.10.1002/pol.1963.100010401Search in Google Scholar
©2006 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin New York
