Skip to content
BY 4.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter December 31, 2021

Plant growth-promoting properties of bacterial endophytes isolated from roots of Thymus vulgaris L. and investigate their role as biofertilizers to enhance the essential oil contents

  • Mahmoud Soliman Abdel-Hamid , Amr Fouda EMAIL logo , Hesham Kamal Abo El-Ela , Abbas A. El-Ghamry and Saad El-Din Hassan EMAIL logo
From the journal Biomolecular Concepts

Abstract

The main objective of the current study was to improve the essential oil contents of Thymus vulgaris L. using bio-inoculation with bacterial endophytes. Therefore, out of fourteen endophytic bacterial isolates obtained from roots of T. vulgaris, five isolates were selected based on the highest nitrogen-fixation and phosphate solubilization activity and identified as: Bacillus haynesii T9r, Citrobacter farmeri T10r, Bacillus licheniformis T11r, Bacillus velezensis T12r, and Bacillus velezensis T13r. These five strains have been recorded as ammonia, hydrogen cyanide (HCN), siderophores, and indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) producers. These strains have the efficacy to fix-nitrogen by reduction of acetylene with values of 82.133±1.4–346.6±1.4 n-mole-C2H4/ml/24 h. The IAA, gibberellic acid, abscisic acid, benzyl, kinten, and ziaten production were confirmed using HPLC. Two strains of T11r and T13r showed the highest plant growth-promoting properties and were selected for bio-inoculation of T. vulgaris individually or in a consortium with different mineral fertilization doses (0, 50, 75, and 100%) under field conditions. The highest growth performance was attained with the endophytic consortium (T11r+T13r) in the presence of 100% mineral fertilization. The GC-MS analysis of thyme oil contents showed the presence of 23 various compounds with varying percentages and the thymol fraction represented the highest percentages (39.1%) in the presence of the bacterial consortium.

Introduction

Thymus vulgaris L. or thyme (Family: Lamiaceae) is a flowering plant and is considered indigenous in Northern Africa, the Mediterranean, and various parts of Asia. Thyme plants are widely cultivated in Africa, for instance: Morocco, Egypt, Libya, Algeria, Cameroon, Tunisia, South Africa, and Nigeria [1]. The thyme plant is a common flavoring agent which has various importance in herbal medicine for the treatment of fever, cough, cold, diabetes, and chest infections. Also, it can be used to treat digestive disorders, calmative for throat infections due to its antibiotic, antiseptic, and antifungal characteristics [2]. Moreover, the thyme plant has been successfully displayed in the treatment of several intestinal infections including ascarids, hookworms, pathogenic Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, uni- and multi-cellular fungi [3]. The importance of thyme plants is mainly related to their essential oils, which have antiviral, antimicrobial, and antioxidant activities along with their carminative actions [4]. According to European Pharmacopoeia, the minimum essential oil contents in the thyme plant is 12 ml kg−1, and it contains mainly six chemotypes, geraniol, γ-terpineol, linalool, thymol, carvacrol, and thujan-4-ol [5]. Therefore, these findings raise the great necessity to improve the development and growth of the thyme plants for their essential oil contents.

Recently, the endophytic microbes and their metabolites have been integrated into various biomedical and biotechnological applications [6, 7]. Bacterial endophytes are considered the major endophytic group consisting of approximately 200 genera belonging to 16 phyla, and most of them associated with Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, and Firmicutes [8]. Although the existence of the bacterial endophytes in plants is variable and in some cases, it is in transit, it has the efficacy to make various physiological and biochemical changes that regulate plant growth and performance under different environmental conditions [9]. Bacterial endophytes act as plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) that can modulate plant growth through different mechanisms such as the production of phytohormones (indole-3-acetic acid, gibberellic acid, cytokinin, etc.), secretion of lytic enzymes, phosphate solubilization, nitrogen fixation, siderophores production, hydrogen cyanide (HCN), and ammonia production [10, 11, 12]. Moreover, bacterial endophytes can promote plant growth through the production of ACC deaminase enzymes that control the amount of ethylene in plants and increase the resistance of the plant to phytopathogens [9]. Interestingly, the presence of bacterial endophytes increases the resistance of the plant to various biotic and abiotic stresses [13]. Recently, various bacterial endophytes are used to regulate the growth of different plants such as rice, canola, tomato, mung bean, Vica faba, black pepper, Phaseolus vulgaris, and groundnut, to name of few [7, 11, 14].

The involvement of PGPB in the various bio-fertilizing systems started in the 1950s and now occupies approximately 5% of the fertilizer market, the majority of components of them are nitrogen-fixing bacteria [15]. The advantages of biofertilizers containing PGPB to agricultural sectors are improving soil fertility, providing plants with essential nutrition, enhancing the plant resistance against both biotic and abiotic stresses [15]. The main challenge of PGPB utilization for agronomic practice is the low efficiency of PGPB isolated from certain plant species to improve plant growth and performance in a wide range of other plant species [16]. Another complexity is the low stability of plant colonizing with PGPB under different environmental conditions along with the host plant specificity [17]. Therefore, the highest activity of PGPB can be achieved when these bacteria are applied to the same isolated plant and under the same conditions.

The main purpose of the current study is to improve the growth of T. vulgaris as oil-producing plants using bacterial endophytes. To accomplish this, bacterial endophytes were isolated from the healthy root of T. vulgaris collected from North Sinai. Five bacterial endophytes were selected based on their high potency for nitrogen fixation and phosphate solubilization. The plant growth-promoting properties of selected bacterial isolates include quantitative nitrogen fixation (using acetylene reduction), quantitative phosphate solubilization, ammonia production, hydrolytic enzyme activity, siderophores and HCN production, and synthesis of various phytohormones (IAA, gibberellic acid, abscisic acid, benzyl, kinten, and ziaten) were investigated. Finally, a field experiment was conducted to evaluate the effect of an individual or a consortium of the most two potent strains (based on higher plant growth-promoting properties) on the growth performance and essential oil contents of T. vulgaris in presence of different concentrations of mineral fertilization (0, 50, 75, and 100%).

Material and method

Plant sample collection

The root of the medicinal plant Thymus vulgaris L. (family Lamiaceae) was collected from Balouza Research Station, North Sinai, Egypt (31°00’20.6”N 32°33’46.1”E). Four individual plants were collected per site. The collected plant samples were kept in sterile polyethylene bags and transported to the laboratory on the same day and subjected to isolation procedures within a short period of collection [18]. The plant identification was tentatively recorded in the field with help of a local Balouza Research Station agricultural engineer, and the botanical identification was carried out at the herbarium unit of Desert Research Center.

Isolation of endophytic bacterial strains

The collected roots samples of T. vulgaris were subjected to surface sterilization as follows: the plant samples were washed with tap water to exclude the soil debris and epiphytes adhered. After that, the plant samples were washed with sterilized distilled water for 60 sec. followed by 2.5% sodium hypochlorite for four min. and ethyl alcohol (70%, v/v) for 30 sec. Finally, the surface-sterilized plant samples were immersed in sterilized distilled water for 60 sec. To check the successful surface sterilization, approximately one ml of final distilled water was streaked onto Czapek Dox agar, nutrient agar, and starch nitrate agar for the growth of fungi, bacteria, and actinomycetes respectively. The success of surface sterilization was checked by the absence of microbial growth on the surface of the previous inoculated media after an appropriate incubation period [19].

The sterilized roots were cut into small fragments (5mm) under aseptic conditions. Approximately twenty fragments (20 fragments per sterilized root) were loaded on the surface of four nutrient agar Petri dishes (8 cm, 5 fragment/plate) supplemented with 25 μg ml−1 nystatin (as antifungal). The loaded plates are incubated at 30 ± 2°C and checked daily for bacterial growth. The appeared bacterial colonies from sterilized fragments were picked-up and re-streaked on the same media to confirm the purity. The purified colonies were inoculated into nutrient agar slants and kept at 4°C for further investigation. All obtained endophytic bacterial isolates were subjected to primary identification based on morphological, physiological, and biochemical tests according to standard keys [20, 21].

Selection of the most potent endophytic bacterial stains

The selection of the most potent endophytic bacterial isolates was achieved based on their efficacy in qualitatively fixing nitrogen and solubilizing phosphate. The endophytic bacterial isolates were inoculated on nitrogen-deficient Jensen’s agar medium (containing g L-1: sucrose, 20; K2PO4, 1; MgSO4, 0.5; NaCl, 0.5; Fe2SO4, 0.1; Na2MoO4.2H2O, 0.005; CaCO3, 2; Agar, 15; 1.0 L distilled H2O) supplemented with bromothymol blue as an indicator. The positive nitrogen-fixing endophytic bacterial isolates were selected based on their efficacy to change media color to blue color [22].

The primary screening to investigate the efficacy of endophytic bacterial strains to phosphate solubilization was achieved using Pikovskaya agar media (containing g L−1: glucose, 10; Ca3(PO4)2, 5; (NH4)2SO4, 0.5; NaCl, 0.2; MgSO4·7H2O, 0.1; KCl, 0.2; FeSO4·7H2O, 0.002; yeast extract, 0,5; MnSO4·2H2O, 0.002; agar, 15; 1.0 L distilled H2O). Briefly, the endophytic bacterial isolate was inoculated as a spot on the center of the Pikovskaya agar plate and incubated at 35 ± 2°C for 48 h. The positive isolates for phosphate solubilizing were recorded as the diameter of the clear zone formed around each bacterial growth [23]. The experiment was achieved in triplicates.

Identification of the most potent endophytic bacterial isolates

The endophytic bacterial isolates that showed a positive result for nitrogen fixation and phosphate solubilization (T9r, T10r, T11r, T12r, and T13r) were subjected to molecular identification based on amplification and sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene. The genomic DNA was extracted according to the modified method [24]. Briefly, a separate bacterial colony was picked up by a sterile toothpick and suspended in 50 μl of sterilized deionized water. The cell suspension was put in a water bath for 10 min at 97°C, after that, the suspension was centrifuged for 10 min at 15000 rpm to recover the upper layer that contains the DNA. The intensity of DNA in the collected layer was calculated by measuring its absorbance at 260 nm by UV-spectrophotometer. A bacterial universal primers 27f (5’-AGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG-3’) and 1492r (5’-GGTTACCTTGTTACGACTT-3’) were used to PCR amplification of the 16S rDNA fragment. The PCR tube containing PCR buffer (1 x), MgCl2 (0.5 mM), Tag DNA polymerase (2.5 U, QIAGEN Inc.), Deoxynucleoside triphosphate (dNTP, 0.25 mM), universal primer (0.5 μM), and bacterial DNA (5 ng/μl). The PCR cycling conditions were 94°C for three minutes, followed by 30 cycles at 94°C for 30 seconds, 55°C for 30 seconds, 72°C for 60 seconds, and final extension at 72°C for ten minutes. The forward and reverse sequencing for PCR products was achieved using Applied Biosystems 3730xl DNA Analyzer technology at Sigma company, Cairo, Egypt.

The obtained sequences were analyzed using BLAST as compared with those deposited in the GenBank database. Multiple sequence alignment was performed using ClustalX 1.8 software package and a phylogenetic tree was constructed by the neighbor-joining method using MEGA (Version 6.1) software. The confidence level of each branch (1000 repeats) was tested by bootstrap analysis [25].

Characterization of bacterial endophytes as plant growth-promoting

Quantitative nitrogen fixation using acetylene reduction assay

The efficacy of five selected endophytic bacterial strains to fixing nitrogen was investigated quantitatively through detecting the nitrogenase activity by the acetylene reduction method. In this method, each endophytic bacterial strain was inoculated in a test tube closed by a rubber stopper and containing 10 ml of nitrogen-free Jensen’s semi-solid medium and incubated for 72 h at 33 ± 2°C. After that, approximately, one ml of acetylene gas was injected into the air of the headspace and incubated for 24 h at 33 ± 2°C. At the end of the incubation period, one ml of gas sample existing in the tube headspace was assayed for ethylene production (C2H4) using Hewlett-Packard 5890 gas chromatography Series 2 plus [26, 27]. The nitrogenase activity was assessed as a mol n of C2H4/ml/24 h. The experiment was performed in triplicate.

Quantitative phosphate solubilizing assay

The phosphate solubilizations were analyzed quantitatively by measuring pH values and P concentration at interval times (2 – 10 days). Briefly, Pikovskaya’s broth medium supplemented with 0.5% Ca3(PO4)2 was inoculated with endophytic bacterial strain and incubated at 33 ± 2°C for 10 days on a rotary shaker at 180 rpm. Five ml samples were taken daily and centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 10 min. The phosphomolybdate method was used for the determination of available soluble phosphate in the culture supernatant using a spectrophotometer (Jenway 6305 UV) measuring at O.D. 700 nm. The concentration of P was calculated from the slope of the standard curve of P. Also, the pH of the broth medium was measured daily with a digital pH meter [13].

Ammonia production

The ability of endophytic bacterial strains for producing ammonia was assessed in peptone water broth. Each bacterial strain was inoculated into tubes containing 10 ml peptone water and incubated at 33 ± 2°C for 48 h. At the end of the incubation period, approximately 0.5 ml of Nessler’s reagent was added to the culture broth media. The development of yellow color was recorded as +, ++, +++ based on the color intensity [28].

Extracellular Enzymatic Activities

The production of extracellular enzymes (amylase, gelatinase, cellulase, and catalase) of the endophytic bacterial strains was investigated by inoculating the isolates in a mineral salt (MS) agar media (containing g L-1: NaNO3, 5; KH2PO4, 1; K2HPO4, 2; MgSO4·7H2O, 0.5; KCl, 0.1; CaCl2, 0.01; FeSO4·7H2O, 0.02; agar, 15; distilled H2O, 1L) supplemented with specific additives, depending on the enzyme being tested. The MS agar media without bacterial inoculation was running with the experiment as a negative control. After incubation at 33 ± 2°C for 24 h, specific reagents were added and the size of the clear zone (mm) surrounding the bacterial colony was measured, indicating extracellular enzymatic activities. All assays were performed in triplicates.

For amylolytic and cellulolytic activities, the bacterial strains were inoculated onto MS agar medium supplemented with 1% soluble starch and 1% carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) respectively. After an incubation period, the plates were flooded with 1% iodine.

For gelatinase activity, the MS agar medium containing 1% gelatin was used to determine the proteolytic activity of the bacteria. After an incubation period, gelatin degradation was checked using acidic mercuric chloride as an indicator [19].

For chitinase, the bacterial endophytes were spotted on MS agar media containing 1% of colloidal chitin formed according to Wen et al. [29]. The positive chitinase results were recorded as the diameter of the clear zone around bacterial growth.

For catalase activity, the pure bacterial colony from young culture (18–24h.) was put into a glass slide and mixed with a few drops of 3% H2O2. The appearance of oxygen bubbles indicates the presence of catalase activity [30].

Siderophore production

Secretion of siderophore was qualitatively analyzed using king’s B agar medium (containing g L−1: proteose peptone, 20; K2HPO4, 1.5; MgSO4, 1.5; Agar, 15, 1.0 L distilled H2O; pH, 7.2 ± 0.2) supplemented with chrome azurol S (CAS), Fe3+ solution, and hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide (HDTMA) as an indicator. The indicator preparation was achieved as follows: 60.5 mg of CAS was dissolved in 50 ml distilled H2O, followed by mixing with 10 ml of Fe3+ solution (1 mmol L−1 dissolved in 10 mmol L−1 of HCl). Under the stirring condition, the previous mixture was dropped wisely added to the HDTMA solution (72.9 mg of HDTMA dissolved in 40 ml distilled H2O). The prepared indicator was added to King’s B media with a ratio of 1:15. The fresh bacterial culture was spotted onto a king’s B agar plate and incubated at 28°C for 72 h. The appearance of an orange halo around the endophytic bacterial growth indicates a positive siderophore production [14].

HCN production

The purified endophytic bacterial isolate was tested for HCN production through inoculation on king’s B agar medium amended with glycine [31]. After that, a Whatman No. 1 filter paper was soaked in a solution of (2% sodium carbonate mixed with 0.05% picric acid solution) and put on the lid of inoculated king’s B petri dish. The plates were sealed with parafilm and incubated at 28 ± 2°C for 48 h. The change in the color of the filter paper from deep yellow to reddish-brown color indicates a positive result for HCN production.

IAA production

The most potent endophytic bacterial isolates were screened for qualitative IAA production. Briefly, the bacterial isolates are inoculated into nutrient broth media amended with different concentrations of tryptophan (0, 1, 2, and 5 mg ml−1) and incubated at 33± 2°C for 15 days. At the end of the incubation period, the inoculated culture was centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 30 min. After that, two ml of the obtained supernatant was mixed with 2 drops of orthophosphoric acid and 4 ml of Salkowski’s reagent (300 ml concentrated Sulfuric acid: 500 ml distilled water: 15 ml 0.5 M FeCl3). The development of pink color indicates successful IAA production. The intensity of the formed color was measured at 530 nm using a T60 UV-visible spectrophotometer [32]. The amount of IAA was estimated via a standard IAA graph to detect the best tryptophan concentration for IAA production.

For quantitative IAA assay, the endophytic bacterial isolates were inoculated into nutrient broth media supplemented with 5 mg ml−1 of tryptophan (the best concentration of tryptophan for IAA production based on the qualitative assay) and incubated at 33 ± 2°C for 14 days. Approximately two ml of inoculated culture was withdrawn after the 2nd day up to the 14th day with 2 days interval and centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 30 minutes. One ml of the supernatant was mixed with 1 drop of orthophosphoric acid and 2 ml of Salkowski’s reagent. The intensity of development of pink color was measured at 530 nm using a T60 UV-visible spectrophotometer. The amount of IAA produced was estimated by the standard IAA graph to detect the best days for IAA production.

Detection of other phytohormones.

The efficacy of bacterial isolates to secrete acid and alkali side of phytohormones (IAA, gibberellic acid (GA3), abscisic acid (ABA), benzyl, kinten, and ziaten) were evaluated by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). The bacterial isolates were grown in Ashby’s broth medium (containing g L−1: mannitol, 10; sucrose, 5; K2HPO4, 0.5; NaCl, 0.2; MgSO4·7H2O, 0.2; CaCO3, 0.5; CaSO4, 0.1; FeCl3, 0.001; MnSO4·2H2O, 0.001; Na2.MoO4.2H2O, 0.002; 1.0 L distilled H2O) and incubated at 30±2°C for 7 days. Then the ability of the growing cultures to produce phytohormones is well detected quantitatively by HPLC as previously reported [33].

Field experiment

The seeds of Thymus vulgaris (local species) were purchased from the farm of the Faculty of Pharmacy, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt. The bacterial isolates T11r and T13r were selected as the most potent based on previous plant growth-promoting activities to investigate their efficacy on the growth trail and oil content of T. vulgaris under filed experiment conditions. The experiment was carried out at Alqantra Sharq Research Station, North Sinai, Egypt (GPS: 31°00’21.6” N and 32°33‘48.1” E) using a completely randomized design that contains four blocks, each block containing four plots based on different treatments. The texture and chemical constituents of soil used in the field experiment are recorded in table 1. Before the experiment, the soil was well-milled and thoroughly mixed with organic fertilizer (20 m3/feddan). Moreover, the mineral fertilization (MF) is designated as calcium super-phosphate (containing 15.5% P2O5), calcium ammonium nitrate (containing 33.3% N), and Potassium sulfate (containing 48% K2O) were added twice, immediately after planting and after 65 days. The mineral fertilization doses were added as follows: 100%, 75%, 50%, and 0.0% with amounts (150, 112.5, 75 and 0 kg/feddan) for calcium ammonium nitrate, (300, 225, 150 and 0 kg/feddan) for calcium ammonium nitrate, and (100, 75, 50 and 0 kg/feddan) for Potassium sulphate according to standard of Egyptian Agriculture Ministry. The addition of plant growth-promoting bacteria as biofertilizers (BF) was applied as follows: immerse plant seeds in bacterial culture for one hour before planting, the bacterial cell was suspended in saline solution and added to soil beside the plant root at 65 and 140 days of planting. The following treatment was conducted: A1: seeds planting on soil with 100% MF without BF; A2: seeds planting on soil with 75% MF without BF; A3: seeds planting on soil with 50% MF without BF; A4: seeds planting on soil with 0.0% MF without BF; A5: seeds treated with BF T11r and planting on soil with 100% MF; A6: seeds treated with BF T11r and planting on soil with 75% MF; A7: seeds treated with BF T11r and planting on soil with 50% MF; A8: seeds treated with BF T11r and planting on soil with 0.0% MF; A9: seeds treated with BF T13r and planting on soil with 100% MF; A10: seeds treated with BF T13r and planting on soil with 75% MF; A11: seeds treated with BF T13r and planting on soil with 50% MF; A12: seeds treated with BF T13r and planting on soil with 0.0% MF; A13: seeds treated with consortium BF (T11r+T13r) and planting on soil with 100% MF; A14: seeds treated with consortium BF (T11r+T13r) and planting on soil with 75% MF; A15: seeds treated with consortium BF (T11r+T13r) and planting on soil with 50% MF; A16: seeds treated with consortium BF (T11r+T13r) and planting on soil with 0.0% MF. All treatments were achieved in triplicates. The plant was harvested two times, at 65 days and 140 days.

Table 1

Physical and chemical characters of soil used in the current study in a field experiment.

Soil analysis

Characters measurements
Physical characters
Coarse sand (%) 56.58
Fine Sand (%) 31.04
Silt (%) 7.93
Clay (%) 4.45
Soil texture Loamy sand
Chemical characters
pH 7.86
EC (Ds/m) 0.29
O.M. (%) 0.59
O.C. (%) 0.34
T.N. (%) 0.3
C/N ratio 11.3
Soluble Cations (meq L−1)
Ca++ 4.9
Mg++ 2.2
Na+ 8.3
K+ 0.9
Soluble anions (meq L−1)
HCO3 3.1
Cl 6.7
SO4− − 5.7

Growth and Vegetative Parameters Measurement

The plant height after two harvests of 65 and 140 days was measured by cm. The shoots of 65 and 140-day-old thymus plants were separated from the plants and measured to detect the fresh weight. The collected shoots have dried in an oven at 70°C until constant weight, then, the dry weights of the shoots were measured.

Oil extraction

The extraction of oil was achieved for 100 g of T. vulgaris dry weight (collected from first and second harvest) using the oil distillation method according to British Pharmacopoeia [34]. Briefly, 100 g of the dry weight of the plant was added to a conical flask (1.0 L) and mixed with a sufficient water amount (4 – 5 times of dry weight). A proper oil trap connected to a condenser was attached to the conical flask followed by the addition of water to fill the trap. After that, the flask undergoes heating using an electric hot plate. The distillation process was continued for approximately 2.0–2.5 hours till separate the essential oil from water and no further increase in the content of oil was observed. The amount of the obtained essential oil was calculated in proportion to the plant dry weight used.

Oil Fraction by Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis (GC-MS)

The GC-MS system (Agilent Technologies) was equipped with gas chromatography (7890B) and a mass spectrometer detector (5977A) at Central Laboratories Network, National Research Centre, Cairo, Egypt. Samples were diluted with hexane (1:19, v/v). The GC was equipped with an HP-5MS column (30 m x 0.25 mm internal diameter and 0.25 μm film thickness). Analyses were carried out using helium as the carrier gas at a flow rate of 1.0 ml/min at a split ratio of 1:10, injection volume of 1 μl, and the following temperature program: 40°C for 1 min; rising at 4°C /min to 150°C and held for 6 min; rising at 4°C/min to 210°C and held for 1 min. The injector and detector were held at 280°C and 220°C, respectively. Mass spectra were obtained by electron ionization (EI) at 70 eV; using a spectral range of m/z 50–550 and solvent delay 5 min. Identification of different constituents was determined by comparing the spectrum fragmentation pattern with those stored in Wiley and NIST Mass Spectral Library data.

Statistical analysis

Split plot design was designed as a layout for the experiment with three replicates for each treatment. Data were analyzed statistically by a statistical program Sigma Plot v14. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used as a tool for calculating the mean difference comparison between the treatments and afterward by Tukey’s test (honestly significant difference) at p ≤ 0.05. Hierarchical two-way cluster analysis was conducted on the data matrix of oil content percentages using the centered method of the standardized data.

Results and discussion

Isolation of bacterial endophytes that inhabit the roots of Thymus vulgaris L.

Thymus vulgaris L. plant has medicinal and pharmacological importance including antibacterial, antifungal, antioxidant, antiviral, anti-inflammatory, and insecticidal activities [4]. The endophytic bacteria that inhabit Thymus tissues may be contributed to the biological activities of this plant; however, few investigations on the microbial communities of Thymus vulgaris have been recorded. In the current study, fourteen bacterial isolates designated as T1r to T14r were obtained from the sterilized root of T. vulgaris L. which was collected from Balouza Research Station, North Sinai, Egypt. The obtained endophytic bacterial species were subjected to primary identification based on morphological, physiological, and biochemical tests according to the standard keys. Data showed that the bacterial species were belonging to two phyla, proteobacteria (35.7%) and Firmicutes (64.2%). The proteobacterial species contains alpha (one isolate, T7r), beta (two isolates, T1r and T4r), and gamma (two isolates, T10r and T14r), and were identified as Agrobacterium sp., Burkholderia sp., Burkholderia sp., Citrobacter sp., and Acinetobacter sp., respectively. Whereas most species of Firmicutes were corresponding to Bacillus spp. (6 isolates designated as T3r, T8r, T9r, T11r, T12r, and T13r) and Brevibacillus spp. (three isolates designated as T2r, T5r, and T6r). Similarly, 117 endophytic bacterial isolates were obtained from leaves, stems, and roots of medicinal plant T. vulgaris collected from North Sinai, Egypt [35]. These 117 isolates were belonging to Firmicutes, proteobacteria, and Actinobacteria. In the recent study, the endophytic bacterial community isolated from the medicinal plant Pulicaria incisa were belonging to proteobacteria (α, β, and γ) and Firmicutes with percentages of 33.3% and 66.6%, respectively [32].

Selection of the most potent bacterial isolates

Phosphorus and nitrogen are the main nutrients for enhancement of the plant growth. In most cases, these elements are not available for plants [36]. Endophytic bacteria along with nitrogen-fixing and phosphate solubilizing bacteria facilitate nutrient requirement are widely used as biofertilizers [37]. Therefore, in the current study, the selection of the most potent bacterial isolates to be used as a biofertilizer was achieved based on higher nitrogen fixation and phosphate solubilization. Data represented in Table 2 showed that T3r and T8r to T13r had the ability of nitrogen-fixing with varying degrees according to the appearance of blue color on nitrogen-deficient Jensen’s agar medium. The highest color intensity was recorded for isolates T9r, T10r, T11r, T12r, and T13r. The obtained data are compatible with those recorded by Abdelshafy and co-authors who reported that approximately 84% of the bacterial endophytes isolated from the tissues of T. vulgaris had the ability for fixing nitrogen when grown on Ashby’s media [35].

Table 2

Nitrogen fixation and phosphate solubilization activities of bacterial endophytes isolated from the root of T. vulgaris L.

Endophytic bacterial strain Nitrogen fixation Phosphate solubilization (mm) Endophytic bacterial strain Nitrogen fixation Phosphate solubilization (mm)
T1r 0 T8r + 0c
T2r 0 T9r ++ 5.1±0.4b
T3r + 0 T10r ++ 0c
T4r 0 T11r ++ 7.5±0.3a
T5r 0 T12r ++ 4.5±0.2b
T6r 0 T13r ++ 8.9±0.2a
T7r 0 T14r 0c
  1. Values within the same column with different letters are significantly different (p ≤ 0.05), values are means ± SE (n = 3).

  2. −, +, ++ denotes negative, moderate, and high nitrogen fixation based on color change.

Moreover, the bacterial isolates T9r, T11r, T12r, and T13r showed varied efficacy of phosphate solubilization designated as diameters of clear zone formed around bacterial growth on Pikovskaya agar media. Endophytic bacterial isolates T11r and T13r exhibited the highest phosphate solubilizing activity with clear zones of 7.5±0.3 mm and 8.9±0.2 mm, respectively. Similarly, among 13 endophytic bacterial strains isolated from medicinal plants Fagonia mollis and Achillea fragrantissima collected from Saint Katherine Protectorate, South Sinai, Egypt, only 9 strains exhibit phosphate solubilizing activity on Pikovskaya agar media with a diameter of clear zone ranging from 7.6 ± 0.3 mm to 9.6 ± 0.3 mm [38]. Based on the obtained data, the endophytic bacterial strains T9r, T10r, T11r, T12r, and T13r were selected for identification and further investigation on their efficacy as plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria.

Identification of the most potent endophytic bacterial isolates

Five bacterial isolates were selected based on their efficacy for nitrogen fixation and phosphate solubilization and were identified using PCR amplification and sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene. The sequence analysis of strain T9r showed a similarity of 99.7% with the sequence of Bacillus haynesii, whereas the sequence of strains T10r and T11r showed 99.3% and 98.7% similarity percentages with Citrobacter farmeri and Bacillus licheniformis, respectively. Strains T12r and T13r showed 99.9% similarity percentages with the sequence of Bacillus velezensis (Table 3, Fig. 1). Moreover, the outgroup of Gram-positive and Gram-negative endophytic bacterial isolates was represented in Figures S1 and S2. Based on sequence analysis, Bacillus spp. were the most predominant endophytic bacteria isolated from medicinal plant T. vulgaris L. Hanna and co-workers reported that Bacillus spp. are the most endophytic bacterial strain isolated from annual and perennial plants collected from North Sinai, Egypt [39]. Consistent with our data, Bacillus spp. were widely distributed among the endophytic bacteria strains isolated from medicinal plants such as Digitalis purpurae, Leonurus heterophyllus, Pinellia ternata, Taxus yunnanensis, Achillea fragrantissima, Thymus vulgaris, and Pulicaria incisa [32, 35, 38, 40].

Table 3

Molecular identification based on 16S rRNA sequencing of the most potent bacterial endophytes isolated from T. vulgaris L., and the quantitative evaluation of their nitrogen fixation and phosphate solubilization activities.

Bacterial endophytes code/ GenBank accession number Homolog Sequences (%) NCBI accession number Nitrogen fixation (nitrogenase n-mole C2 H4/ ml/24h) Ammonia production
T9r/ MZ617379 Bacillus haynesii (99.7%) NR157609 82.133±1.4d +
T10r/ LC603783 Citrobacter farmeri (99.3%) NR024861 88.067±1.4d +
T11r/ LC589065 Bacillus licheniformis (98.7%) NR118996 322.4±2.1b ++
T12r/ LC603784 Bacillus velezensis (99.9%) NR075005 130.167±2.1c ++
T13r/ LC89066 Bacillus velezensis (99.9%) NR075005 346.6±1.4a +++
  1. Values within the same column with different letters are significantly different (p ≤ 0.05), values are means ± SE (n = 3).

  2. −, +, ++ denotes negative, moderate, and high production

Figure 1 Phylogenetic tree of 16S rRNA sequences for the most potent endophytic bacterial strains isolated from roots of T. vulgaris. The obtained sequences were compared with those retrieved from NCBI. The analysis was achieved by MEGA 6.1 using the neighbor-joining method with bootstrap value (1000 replicates).
Figure 1

Phylogenetic tree of 16S rRNA sequences for the most potent endophytic bacterial strains isolated from roots of T. vulgaris. The obtained sequences were compared with those retrieved from NCBI. The analysis was achieved by MEGA 6.1 using the neighbor-joining method with bootstrap value (1000 replicates).

Recently, endophytic Bacillus haynesii was isolated from Ocimum tenuiflorum and exhibits high antagonistic actions against different phytopathogenic fungi [41]. Also, Bacillus velezensis is identified as a novel endophytic Bacillus strain with high biological and plant growth-promoting activity as reported previously [42]. To the best of our knowledge, the obtained strains in this study were recorded for the first time as endophytic bacterial strains isolated from T. vulgaris.

In-vitro characterization of bacterial endophytes as plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria

Quantitative nitrogen fixation using acetylene reduction assay

Nitrogen element (N) is considered the main component of enzymes, proteins, nucleic acids, and chlorophyll. Therefore, it is a fundamental element for adequate plant growth and hence increases the yield through its contribution within several routes affecting plant physiological and biochemical functions [43]. For example, certain bacterial endophytes have the ability to provide plants with their required nitrogen through the process of nitrogen fixation. From these bacteria, one group are identified as diazotrophic bacterial endophytes, they are considered the critical source for the input of nitrogen into the agricultural implements, and candidates as a promising alternative source for chemical fertilizers [44]. In the current study, besides qualitative nitrogen fixation (Table 2), the quantitative nitrogen fixation efficacy of endophytic bacterial strains through reduction of acetylene was investigated. Data in Table 3 revealed that all selected bacterial endophytes have the ability to produce nitrogenase through the reduction of acetylene with a varied degree. Bacillus licheniformis T11r and Bacillus velezensis T13r showed the highest nitrogen fixation with amounts of 322.4±2.1 and 346.6±1.4 n-mole C2H4/ ml/24h, respectively. The lowest activity was recorded for Bacillus haynesii T9r with an amount of 82.133±1.4 n-mole C2H4/ ml/24h. Similarly, out of 250 endophytic bacterial strains isolated from stems, mature seeds, roots, and leaves of rice, only 21 bacterial strains were positive for the acetylene reduction test with varied nitrogenase activity ranging from 7.6 to 225.9 n-mol C2H4/h/mg/protein [45].

Quantitative phosphate solubilizing assay

Approximately, 95 to 99% of phosphorus levels in soils are unavailable for plant uptake because they present either as immobilized or precipitated, or insoluble forms. This leads to an increase in applying chemical phosphorus fertilization and harmfully affects the environment and soils [46]. Bacterial endophytes can increase the availability of phosphorus for plant uptake by various mechanisms, for instance, chelation, producing organic acids, exopolysaccharide secretion, ion exchange, and synthesis of different phosphate solubilizing enzymes such as phytase, phosphatase, and C-P lyase [9]. In the current study, the most potent endophytic bacteria showed varied phosphate solubilizing activity through detecting the amount of soluble phosphate in Pikovskaya’s broth medium supplemented with Ca3(PO4)2 that was measured by the phosphomolybdate method. Analysis of variance showed that the highest P amount was liberated after nine days with values of 123.9 ± 2.8, 149.5 ± 0.9, 149.5 ± 1.01, and 159.5 ± 0.9 μg ml−1 for bacterial endophytes Bacillus haynesii T9r, Bacillus licheniformis T11r, Bacillus velezensis T12r, and Bacillus velezensis T13r, respectively (Fig. 2A). The lowest P secretion was recorded for bacterial isolate Citrobacter farmeri T10r and these data were compatible with preliminary screening (Table 2). The pH value of Pikovskaya’s inoculated broth media was decreased with time increase as compared with control. In the present study, the medium pH was decreased from 6.6 on the first day to reach 4.5 on the ninth day as compared with control (pH=7.1 on the first day and reach 6.8 on the ninth day) (Fig 2B). The reduction in pH values was acidified in the medium and hence the Ca2+ is replaced by H+ and liberates the phosphate ions [47]. Various organic acids such as malic, gluconic, citric, oxalic, salicylic, fumaric, and tartaric acid are the main ones involved in phosphate solubilization [9]. Among selected endophytic bacterial strains, the strains Bacillus licheniformis T11r and Bacillus velezensis T13r possess the highest activity for phosphate solubilization.

Figure 2 Quantitative phosphate solubilizing assay in Pikovskaya’s broth medium supplemented with Ca3(PO4)2. A is denotes the amount of liberated phosphorus (µg ml−1) at interval times; B is denotes the pH values of Pikovskaya’s media at interval times. Values within the same time interval with different letters are significantly different (p ≤ 0.05), values are means ± SE (n = 3).
Figure 2

Quantitative phosphate solubilizing assay in Pikovskaya’s broth medium supplemented with Ca3(PO4)2. A is denotes the amount of liberated phosphorus (µg ml−1) at interval times; B is denotes the pH values of Pikovskaya’s media at interval times. Values within the same time interval with different letters are significantly different (p ≤ 0.05), values are means ± SE (n = 3).

Ammonia production

Bacterial endophytes can enhance plant growth through the production of ammonia, which significantly improves the shoot and root growth; moreover, ammonia enhances the growth of plants by the formation of different biomolecules containing nitrogen [48]. In the current study, all bacterial endophytes differed in their efficacy to produce ammonia through a color change of inoculated peptone water broth media after adding Nessler’s reagent. Data showed the highest color change was recorded for the bacterial isolate of T13r followed by T11r and T12r (Table 3). Among 52 bacterial endophytes isolated from roots, stems, and leaves of Clerodendrum colebrookianum, 51 isolates (98%) exhibited ammonia production [28]. Endophytic bacteria possibly produce ammonia from different routes such as the hydrolysis of amino acids containing nitrogen or through deamination of by-products resulting from the breakdown of various macromolecules, or from the breakdown of urea to produce CO2 and NH4 [32, 49].

Extracellular Enzymatic Activities

Data represented in Table 4 showed that all selected bacterial isolates were positive for protease and chitinase, whereas Bacillus licheniformis T11r, Bacillus velezensis T12r, and Bacillus velezensis T13r were positive for amylase. Moreover, out of the 5 most potent endophytic bacterial isolates, four isolates designated as T9r, T11r, T12r, and T13r are cellulase and catalase producers. In general, the highest activity for enzymes production was recorded for endophytic bacterial isolate Bacillus velezensis T13r with clear zones of 19.0±1.53, 35.0±0.6, 35.7±1.5, and 24.0±0.7 mm for amylase, cellulase, protease, and chitinase, respectively. The bacterial isolate Citrobacter farmeri T10r showed the lowest protease and chitinase enzymes activity with a clear zone of 19.7±1.2 and 17.5±1.7 mm, respectively. In a similar study, out of 52 endophytic bacterial isolates, 45 isolates (86.5%), 44 isolates (84.6%), and 47 isolates (90.3%) were positive for cellulase, amylase, and protease, respectively [28].

Table 4

Plant growth-promoting activities including enzyme activity, siderophores, and HCN production of the most potent selected endophytic bacterial isolates.

Bacterial strain Enzyme activity (mm)
Siderophores HCN
Amylase Cellulase Protease Chitinase Catalase
T9r 0.0 ± 0.0c 31.3±0.9b 35.0±0.6a 16.0 ± 1.5d + + ++
T10r 0.0 ± 0.0c 0.0 ± 0.0c 19.7±1.2c 17.5±1.7cd +
T11r 16.0±1.73b 32.7±0.9ab 28.3±1.2b 20.0±1.4b + + +++
T12r 16.7±1.45b 31.3±0.8b 35.6±1.5a 19.6±1.6c + + +
T13r 19.0±1.53a 35.0±0.6a 35.7±1.5a 24.0±0.7a + + +++
  1. Values within the same row with different letters are significantly different (p ≤ 0.05), values are means ± SE (n = 3).

  2. −, +, ++ denotes negative, moderate, and high production

The ability of bacterial endophytes to penetrate the cells of their host can be related to their efficacy to secrete various extracellular lytic enzymes. Moreover, these lytic enzymes protect plant hosts from the attack by phytopathogenic fungi [50]. It has been reported that the endophytic bacterial strains characterized by catalase production are more resistant to different mechanical, environmental, and chemical stresses [30]. This phenomenon can be attributed to the catalase enzyme which is responsible for the scavenging of free radicals raised due to exposure to biotic and abiotic stresses. Also, the chitinase enzyme has a critical role in the hydrolysis of chitin which is the main component of the fungal cell wall, and hence protects the plant from infection by phytopathogenic fungi [7].

Microbes with amylase, cellulase, and protease enzymes activity have different advantages including organic matter degradation, plant growth promotion, and plant protection from diseases caused by soil-borne pathogens [51]. Amylase enzymes are considered the major industrial enzyme group represented by 25–30% of the total market enzyme [52]. Bacterial cellulase enzymes are not only important for depolymerization of cellulose, which is the major component in the plant cell but also assists and facilitate bacterial penetration to plant host [53, 54]. Also, protease enzymes secreted by bacterial endophytes have primary importance to suppress phytopathogens injury and protect the plant from nematodes infection. The protease enzyme secreted by endophytic bacterial strain Bacillus cereus BCM2 showed high activity against Meloidogyne incognita (plant-parasitic nematodes) through the degradation of chemical components of nematodes cuticle and their eggshells [55]. The finding that Bacillus spp. are considered the highest endophytic strains producing various lytic enzymes has been previously reported [13, 28], and these data are in harmony with the current study. Based on enzymatic activity, bacterial endophytes can provide the plant with their requirement of nutrients and protect their host from phytopathogen infection by secretion of different lytic enzymes [28].

Siderophores

Siderophores are defined as secondary metabolites with a low molecular weight that has the ability to iron-chelating from complex substance. Siderophores are synthesized by different endophytic bacterial species and promote plant growth through the availability of Fe3+ for iron-deficient plants [56]. In the current study, four bacterial strains of the selected most potent isolates can synthesize siderophores by forming an orange halo around the bacterial growth on king’s B agar medium (Table 4). Similarly, out of five endophytic bacterial strains isolated from Cassia tora L. root, only three isolates produced siderophores [57]. Brígido and co-author reported that although the few bacterial endophytes isolated from chickpea root can be produced siderophores, most of them are isolated from a plant collected from soil contaminated with manganese [58]. Besides the critical role of siderophores in the high scavenging of insoluble iron, siderophores secreted by various bacterial species can bind with other non-iron metals, and hence reduce the toxicity of these metals in the environment [59]. Accordingly, bio-inoculation of metal-sensitive plants with siderophore-producer bacterial endophytes could possibly acclimate plants within metal contaminated soils.

HCN production

Various plant-associated microbes can produce volatile substances as secondary metabolites known as hydrogen cyanide (HCN). This volatile substance has a crucial role in suppressive the growth of plant pathogenic microbes [60]. In the current study, all selected bacterial endophytes have the capacity to change the color of filter paper from deep yellow to reddish-brown with varying degrees. The highest bacterial strains producing HCN were Bacillus licheniformis T11r and Bacillus velezensis T13r, followed by Bacillus haynesii T9r (Table 4). As shown, the highest producing strain was Bacillus spp. which is compatible with a previous study [28]. In addition to the capacity of HCN to suppress phytopathogen, it is also used to control nematodes infection [61]. The endophytic bacterial strains that produce HCN along with siderophores are considered a good candidate in biocontrol investigation as previously mentioned [62].

IAA production

The main feature of plant growth-promoting microbes is their potency in the synthesis of various phytohormones such as indole-3-acetic acid (IAA). Various processes involved in plant growth such as cell division, stem elongation, geotropisms, root development and hence nutrient uptake, biomass production, apical dominance, phototropism, and cell differentiation are regulated by secretion of IAA [63, 64]. In the current study, the efficacy of isolated endophytic bacterial strains to produce IAA was assessed after 15 days of incubation in the presence and absence of tryptophan (0, 1, 2, and 5 mg ml−1) as the precursor for IAA. Data analysis showed that the ability of various endophytic bacterial strains for the synthesis of IAA in absence of tryptophane was non-significant compared with control. At tryptophane of 1 and 2 mg ml−1, the bacterial strains T9r, T10r, T11r, and T13r produced IAA with values of (16.9 ± 1.1, 14.1 ± 0.3, 28.7 ± 1.9, and 48.3 ± 1.5 mg ml−1) and (20.3 ± 0.2, 16.4 ± 0.7, 43.2 ± 2.9, and 50.4 ± 1.9 mg ml−1), respectively. These values are significant (p ≤ 0.001) different as compared with control (2.8 ± 0.4 and 3.8 ± 0.5 mg ml−1) and those produced by endophytic strain T12r (2.1 ± 0.3 and 4.1 ± 0.1 mg ml−1) (Fig. 3A). The concentration of IAA was increased by increasing tryptophan concentration. At 5 mg ml−1 tryptophan, the concentration of IAA was increased to reach 29.6 ± 1.3, 18.1 ± 0.6, 74.2 ± 1.8, 16.2 ± 0.8, and 81.8 ± 1.9 mg ml−1 for strains T9r, T10r, T11r, T12r, and T13r, respectively (Fig. 3A). It was reported that 48 out of 52 endophytic bacterial strains isolated from the roots of medicinal plant Clerodendrum colebrookianum showed efficacy to produce IAA in nutrient broth media supplemented with 2 mg ml−1 tryptophan [28]. The authors reported that the highest production was recorded for isolates Bacillus sp. BPSAC3 and Bacillus sp. BPSAC6 with values of 78.4 and 80.6 mg ml−1. Besides the importance of IAA for plant growth, the secretion of this phytohormone displays a crucial key in the relationship between plant and endophytic microbes [65].

Figure 3 Indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) production by the most endophytic bacterial strains isolated from T. vulgaris. A is denotes the qualitative IAA assay at different tryptophan concentrations (0, 1, 2, and 5 mg ml−1), B is denoted the quantitative IAA assay in broth media amended with 5 mg ml−1 tryptophan at various time courses (2 to 14 days). Values with different letters are significantly different (p ≤ 0.05), values are means ± SE (n = 3).
Figure 3

Indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) production by the most endophytic bacterial strains isolated from T. vulgaris. A is denotes the qualitative IAA assay at different tryptophan concentrations (0, 1, 2, and 5 mg ml−1), B is denoted the quantitative IAA assay in broth media amended with 5 mg ml−1 tryptophan at various time courses (2 to 14 days). Values with different letters are significantly different (p ≤ 0.05), values are means ± SE (n = 3).

Based on the qualitative screening, the best concentration of tryptophan used for quantitative screening at interval times was 5 mg ml−1. Data represented in Figure (3B) showed that the productivity was time-dependent, increased by increasing incubation times. The highest IAA production was still recorded for bacterial strains T11r and T13r with amounts of 75.6 ± 3.7 and 80.8 ± 3.9 mg ml−1 after 14 days, respectively. The high IAA production can be attributed to the enzymes responsible for the conversion of tryptophan [66]. Previous studies that harmony with the current investigation showed that the production of IAA by bacterial and fungal endophytic strains is dependent on the concentration of tryptophan in liquid media and incubation times [13, 19, 67].

Detection of phytohormones using HPLC.

The secreted acidic (GA3, IAA, and ABA) and alkaline (Benzyl, Kinten, and Ziaten) plant hormones were quantified for the selected bacterial endophytes (T9r, T10r, T11r, T12r, and T13r) using HPLC (Table 5). For gibberellic acid (GA3), the bacterial isolates Bacillus licheniformis T11r and Bacillus velezensis T13r exhibited the highest productivity with values of 7.08±0.15 and 6.597±0.69 mg/100 ml, respectively. Whereas the lowest production was recorded for bacterial isolate Bacillus haynesii T9r with a value of 2.31±0.05 mg/100 ml. On the other hand, the highest production of IAA was recorded for endophytic bacterial isolates T11r and T13 followed by T10r, and these data are compatible with a qualitative and quantitative assay using Salkowski’s reagent. In a similar study, among four endophytic bacterial strains isolated from Zingiber officinale and identified as Bacillus sp. ZoB1, Pseudomonas sp. ZoB2, Stenotrophomonas sp. ZoB3, and Staphylococcus sp. ZoB4, only one strain ZoB2 has the efficacy to produce IAA and confirmed their productivity by HPLC [68]. Abscisic acid (ABA) has a critical role in ameliorating the various stresses and enhancing plant adaptation [69]. Moreover, under normal conditions, ABA at adequate concentration has an important role in the development and growth of the plant [70]. In the current study, all selected bacterial isolates have the potency to secrete ABA at low concertation ranging between 0.02±0.004 to 0.03±0.003 mg/100 ml. The HPLC analysis showed the activity of selected endophytic bacteria to secrete other phytohormones including benzyl adenine, kinten, and ziaten. The isolates T10r, T11r, and T13r still possess high activity in phytohormones production. Compatible with our study, the HPLC analysis for ethyl acetate extract of Bacillus sp. BPSAC6 isolated from roots of medicinal plant Clerodendrum colebrookianum exhibit varied activity for production of IAA, kinten, and benzyl adenine with values of 31.2, 12.3, and 3,24 μg ml−1, respectively [28]. Based on plant growth-promoting traits of selected five endophytes bacterial strains, two strains designated as T11r and T13r were selected to investigate their activity on the growth and oil content of T. vulgaris under field conditions.

Table 5

Detection and quantification of various phytohormones (GA3, IAA, ABA, benzyl adenine, kinten, and ziaten) produced by the most potent endophytic bacterial strains using HPLC analysis.

Isolates codes Acid side mg/100 ml Alkaline side mg/100 ml

GA3 IAA ABA Benzyl adenine Kinten Ziaten
T9r 2.31±0.05c 0.7±0.12b 0.02±0.006a 0.15±0.06c 0.15±0.06b 0.2±0.05d
T10r 4.21±0.06b 1.86±0.19a 0.03±0.003a 0.28±0.09b 0.43±0.07a 0.94±0.06a
T11r 7.08±0.15a 2.06±0.08a 0.02±0.005a 0.21±0.05b 0.3±0.07a 0.48 ± 0.02c
T12r 2.61±0.09c 0.79±0.08b 0.02±0.004a 0.12±0.04c 0.16±0.07b 0.35±0.03cd
T13r 6.59±0.69a 1.93±0.09a 0.02±0.004a 0.3±0.1a 0.19±0.06b 0.6 ±0.01b
  1. Values within the same row with different letters are significantly different (p ≤ 0.05), values are means ± SE (n = 3).

Field experiment

Effect of bacterial inoculation and mineral fertilization treatment on T. vulgaris growth

The improvement of medicinal and agronomical plants for integrating into various life sectors is being an important challenge to cope with the overpopulation growth [71, 72]. Bacterial endophytes can enhance plant growth by various direct and indirect mechanisms, such as the production of phytohormones, phosphate solubilization, nitrogen fixation, ammonia production, secretion of lytic enzymes, production of siderophores and HCN, and protect the plant against phytopathogens [9, 35]. In the current study, all selected bacterial endophytes exhibited various plant growth-promoting traits with varying degrees. The two bacterial endophytic strains Bacillus licheniformis T11r and Bacillus velezensis T13r possess the highest activity as plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Therefore, it can be used as biofertilizers to enhance T. vulgaris growth performance and the oil content and quality. The efficacy of the two most potent bacterial strains T11r and T13r and their consortium as bio-inoculants or biofertilizers (in presence and absence of different concentrations of mineral fertilization) on the growth performance of T. vulgaris was investigated at two stages, after 65 days and 140 days under field conditions. The height of T vulgaris in the absence of bacterial endophytes (control) was (10.0±0.8 cm and 12.7±0.9 cm) after 65 and 140 days in the absence of mineral fertilization (A4), this height was significantly increased to (28.7±0.8 cm and 39.7±0.9 cm) after adding 100% mineral fertilization (A1). On the other hand, the fresh weight and dry weight of the control (A4) was (13.0±0.8 g and 21.3±0.9 g) and (3.6±0.2 g and 6.1±0.3 g) after 65 and 140 days, respectively, and these weights were increased after adding 100% mineral fertilization (A1) to (31.7±0.8 g and 57.3±0.9 g) and (9.6±0.2 g and 16.2±0.3 g), respectively. Hence, the addition of mineral fertilization positively increased the growth parameters of T. vulgaris. These positive impacts were increased in the presence of bacterial endophytes (Bacillus licheniformis T11r and Bacillus velezensis T13r) individually or in a consortium (Table 6). For instance, the maximum plant heights (42.3±0.8 cm and 55.9±0.9 cm) were recorded for seeds treated with Bacillus licheniformis T11r (A5) in the presence of 100% mineral fertilization followed by those treated by the bacterial consortium in presence of 100% mineral fertilization (38.9±0.8 cm and 55.7 ±0.9 cm). On the other hand, the maximum fresh and dry weights of shoots were reported for seeds treated by the bacterial consortium (A13) followed by seeds treated by Bacillus velezensis T13r (A9) and those treated by Bacillus licheniformis T11r (A5) (Table 6). Based on the obtained results, it can be concluded that the presence of bacterial endophytes promotes plant growth in the presence of mineral fertilization as compared with control. The potency of two selected endophytic strains to improve plant growth can be attributed to their plant growth-promoting properties and hence increase the availability of nutrients required for plant growth as reported previously [73]. Ullah and co-authors reported that the enhancement of plant morphological and physiological properties (root and shoot length, number of root tips responsible for nutrient uptake, plant biomass, and chlorophyll contents) due to microbial endophytes treatment are mainly because of their efficacy in producing phytohormones and phosphate solubilization [74]. Recently, the endophytic bacterial strains Bacillus cereus strain PI-8 and Bacillus subtilis strain PI-10 isolated from Pulicaria incisa leaves enhanced the morphological characteristics (plant heights, fresh shoots, and roots weight, and dry shoots and roots weight) of Zea mays compared with control (un-inoculated plants) [32]. Similarly, out of three bacterial endophytes, one strain identified as Bacillus sp. strain BPSAC6 exhibited high efficacy to improve the root length, height of shoots, and weight of tomato plants after 45 and 60 days after planting as compared with control (un-inoculated seeds) [28].

Table 6

Effect of bacterial inoculation of Bacillus licheniformis T11r and Bacillus velezensis T13r on the growth and oil content of T. vulgaris under different concentrations of mineral fertilization.

Treatment* Plant height (cm) Shoot fresh weight (g) Shoot dry weight (g) Oil content (ml)/100 gm dry weight

65 days 140 days 65 days 140 days 65 days 140 days
A1 28.7±0.8e 39.7±0.9e 71.7±0.8d 107.3±0.9b 49.6±0.2a 66.2±0.3b 2.13a
A2 22.7±0.8f 33.5±0.9g 66.7±0.8e 98.0±0.9c 47.7±0.2b 63.8±0.3c 1.57b
A3 17.3±0.8h 26.1±0.9h 60.3±0.8f 86.7±0.9d 45.8±0.2c 60.5±0.3d 1.13b
A4 10.0±0.8i 12.7±0.9i 53.0±0.8h 71.3±0.9f 43.6±0.2d 56.1±0.3e 0.35c
A5 42.3±0.8a 55.9±0.9a 97.0±0.8a 110.3±0.9ab 50.9±0.2a 67.9±0.3ab 2.27a
A6 34.7±0.8c 43.1±0.9d 69.7±0.8d 100.0±0.9c 48.4±0.2a 64.8±0.3c 2.12a
A7 27.0±0.8e 32.7±0.9g 65.3±0.8e 88.0±0.9d 47.4±0.2b 61.0±0.3d 1.28b
A8 20.3±0.8g 24.5±0.9h 58.7±0.8g 78.0±0.9e 45.4±0.2c 57.9±0.3e 0.51c
A9 33.0±0.8cd 51.6±0.9b 80.0±0.8b 111.3±0.9a 51.0±0.2a 67.6±0.3ab 2.31a
A10 26.9±0.8e 42.3±0.9d 72.3±0.8c 101.7±0.9c 49.0±0.2a 64.4±0.3c 2.16a
A11 23.1±0.8f 31.6±0.9g 67.7±0.8e 88.3±0.9d 47.4±0.2b 60.6±0.3d 1.29b
A12 20.0±0.8g 24.0±0.9h 61.0±0.8f 77.3±0.9e 45.7±0.2c 57.7±0.3e 0.52c
A13 38.9±0.8b 55.7±0.9a 83.0±0.8b 113.6±0.9a 52.1±0.2a 68.3±0.3a 2.39a
A14 31.4±0.8d 46.2±0.9c 74.6±0.8c 101.0±0.9c 49.8±0.2a 65.2±0.3bc 2.18a
A15 26.9±0.8e 35.8±0.9f 69.6±0.8d 89.5±0.9d 48.3±0.2ab 61.8±0.3d 1.31b
A16 20.2±0.8g 26.0±0.9h 62.1±0.8f 78.6±0.9e 46.2±0.2bc 58.6±0.3e 0.54c
  1. Values within the same column with different letters are significantly different (p ≤ 0.05), values are means ± SE (n = 3).

  2. *

    Description of various treatment (A1 – A16) are listed in the material and method section.

Effect of bacterial inoculation and mineral fertilization treatment on oil content and fractions using GC-MS analysis

The oil content of T. vulgaris due to different treatments was analyzed using GC-MS. The obtained results revealed that the thymus plants inoculated with the mixture of endophytic bacterial strain B. licheniformins T11r and B. velezensis T13r mostly gave the highest oil volume in comparison to that individually inoculated in the presence and absence of chemical fertilizer ratios, which gave slightly lower oil content. Data of oil extraction showed that the treatment of T vulgaris with bacterial endophytes have plant growth-promoting properties are stimulate and improvement the oil contents as compared with those untreated. Data showed that the amount of oil/100 g dry weight (mixture of first and second harvest) of T. vulgaris treated with T11r, T13r and consortium (T11r+T13r) were (2.27, 2.12, 1.28, 0.51 ml), (2.31, 2.16, 1.29, 0.52 ml), and (2.39, 2.18, 1.31, 0.54 ml) in presence of 100, 75, 50, and 0% mineral fertilization respectively (Table 6). Whereas the amount of oil in the untreated plant was 2.13, 1.57, 1.13, 0.34 ml in presence of various concentrations of mineral fertilization (100, 75, 50, 0% respectively) (Table 6). Hence, the bacterial endophytes have the efficacy to improve oil contents even though the absence of mineral fertilization. The obtained results are in harmony with those recorded that the dry weight, fresh weight, and content of oils in T. vulgaris were the highest in soil fortified with phosphate solubilizing bacteria plus manure, Nitroxin biofertilizer, and phosphate at full doses [75]. The effect of biofertilizations, mineral fertilizations, and/or organic fertilization on the oil contents was previously reported [76, 77].

The GC is considered the main technique used for the separation of volatile and semi-volatile compounds in herbs and identifying each one. The attachment of MS with GC apparatus enables the fragmentation of each separated compound and compared these fragments with available database and identified it without using markers [78, 79]. In the current study, the GC-MS analysis was achieved for sixteen different treatments of T. vulgaris to investigate the effects of bacterial endophytes in the presence and absence of mineral fertilization on thyme contents (Fig. 4). GC-MS data analysis showed that the thyme herb oil samples containing twenty-three (23) different compounds were identified based on retention times and authentic substances. The identification of these 23 compounds and their concentrations in each treatment were represented in Table 7 and Figure 5. The major components of thyme oil were α-Thujene, Sabinene, β-Myrcene, α-Terpinene, o-Cymene, γ-Terpinene, Terpinen-4-ol, α-Terpineol, Caryophyllene, and Thymol (Table 7) with varied contents according to treatments. Most of these fractions, especially Thymol, have medicinal and biotechnological importance [80, 81]. The obtained data are compatible with that recorded by Al-Asmari and co-authors [82], who showed that the GC-MS analysis of T. vulgaris oil contains 24 various compounds and is identified based on their retention time. Moreover, the major compounds recorded in the current study are matched with those recorded in various published studies [82, 83].

Figure 4 Total Ion Chromatograms (TIC) of GC-MS analyses of oils extracted from T. vulgaris plants treated or not with bacterial endophytes (T11r, T13r, and their consortium) under different mineral fertilization doses. The description of symbols A1 to A16 was recorded in the material and method section.
Figure 4

Total Ion Chromatograms (TIC) of GC-MS analyses of oils extracted from T. vulgaris plants treated or not with bacterial endophytes (T11r, T13r, and their consortium) under different mineral fertilization doses. The description of symbols A1 to A16 was recorded in the material and method section.

Table 7

List of compounds and their percentages existing in the extracted oil from T. vulgaris plant treated or not with bacterial endophytes (T11r, T13r, and their consortium) under different mineral fertilization doses.

Peak No. compound Different treatment/ percentages of oil contents (%)

Control T11r T13r T11r+T13r

0% MF 50% MF 75% MF 100% MF 0% MF 50% MF 75% MF 100% MF 0% MF 50% MF 75% MF 100% MF 0% MF 50% MF 75% MF 100% MF
1 α-Thujene 2.93 2.95 2.85 2.92 2.60 2.58 2.54 2.57 3.49 2.58 2.90 2.72 2.90 2.74 2.70 2.65
2 α-Pinene 0.84 0.84 0.80 0.81 0.74 0.75 0.74 0.76 1.00 0.73 0.84 0.77 0.84 0.79 0.79 0.72
3 Sabinene 1.25 1.28 1.25 1.24 1.09 1.07 1.04 1.08 1.52 1.24 1.60 1.45 1.57 1.44 1.41 1.26
4 β-Myrcene 1.46 1.44 1.42 1.43 1.24 1.22 1.23 1.20 1.49 1.20 1.41 1.33 1.38 1.32 1.25 1.21
5 α-Terpinene 8.38 8.38 8.37 8.28 7.14 7.20 7.05 7.11 7.42 6.36 5.89 5.96 5.93 5.93 5.96 6.20
6 o-Cymene 4.23 4.20 4.13 4.14 3.64 3.57 3.57 3.57 4.77 4.15 4.36 4.19 4.32 4.17 4.09 3.95
7 Cyclohexanol, 1-methyl-4-(1-methylethenyl)-, acetate 1.98 2.00 1.72 1.98 1.84 1.78 1.85 1.81 1.69 1.87 1.69 1.72 1.78 1.77 1.72 1.66
8 γ-Terpinene 23.29 23.26 23.5 23.50 20.62 20.69 20.48 20.67 22.2 20.61 18.06 18.39 17.97 18.18 18.28 19.19
9 Cyclohexene, 1-methyl-4-(1-methylethylidene)- 1.60 1.61 1.59 1.58 1.28 1.27 1.27 1.27 0.98 0.93 0.92 0.91 0.89 0.91 0.90 0.95
10 Bicyclo[3.1.0] hexan-2-ol, 2-methyl-5-(1-methylethyl)-, (1-α,2-β,5-α)- 3.36 3.28 3.34 3.30 6.76 6.71 6.76 6.75 8.50 8.71 8.94 8.63 9.00 8.72 8.65 8.26
11 2-Cyclohexen-1-ol, 1-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl)-,cis- 0.73 0.74 0.74 0.73 0.68 0.64 0.66 0.66 0.48 0.46 0.56 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.47
12 Terpinen-4-ol 13.32 13.26 13.31 13.21 11.18 11.01 11.13 11.08 7.91 8.49 8.86 8.72 8.80 8.68 8.70 8.27
13 α-Terpineol 4.95 4.74 4.92 4.80 4.85 4.83 4.95 4.74 1.64 4.56 5.21 4.99 5.23 5.06 4.69 4.54
14 Thymol 29.85 30.11 30.58 30.6 35.01 35.26 35.29 35.31 33.31 36.7 37.81 38.16 37.94 38.02 38.87 39.10
15 Caryophyllene 1.16 1.14 1.13 1.13 1.01 0.99 0.99 0.98 0.63 0.71 0.81 0.85 0.80 0.86 0.85 0.94
16 Aromandendrene 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.00 0.19 0.18 0.17 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.00
17 1,3,6-Octatriene, 3,7-dimethyl-, (E)- 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
18 Linalyl acetate 0.10 0.30 0.00 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
19 Caryophyllene oxide 0.10 0.10 0.15 0.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
20 tau-Cadinol 0.11 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
21 Terpineol 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
22 2-β-PINENE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
23 2,5-Diethylphenol 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.74 0.72 0.00 0.71 0.00 0.92 0.64 0.62
Figure 5 Percentages of oil fractions based on GC-MS analysis in the presence and absence of mineral fertilization (0, 50, 75, and 100%) and bacterial inoculation. C is a control (presence of mineral fertilization and absence of endophytic bacteria; T11r is B. licheniformins; T13r is B. velezensis; BC is an endophytic bacterial consortium (T11r+T13r). The description of each peak number is listed in Table 7.
Figure 5

Percentages of oil fractions based on GC-MS analysis in the presence and absence of mineral fertilization (0, 50, 75, and 100%) and bacterial inoculation. C is a control (presence of mineral fertilization and absence of endophytic bacteria; T11r is B. licheniformins; T13r is B. velezensis; BC is an endophytic bacterial consortium (T11r+T13r). The description of each peak number is listed in Table 7.

Our data recorded that the thymol compounds are the highest value (39.1%) when the plants were treated with a full dose of mineral fertilizers with the consortium of endophytic bacteria (B. licheniformins T11r and B. velezensis T13r), whereas the lowest value (29.85%) was recorded in plants which un-treated with chemical or bacterial fertilizations. In all cases, uninoculated thyme plants gave the lowest thymol compound value. Two-way cluster analysis showed that the different treatments were clustered in two groups. The first group included the control untreated plant in presence of various concentrations of mineral fertilization (0. 50, 75, and 100%), whereas the second group included all other bacterial inoculated plants under mineral fertilization range of 0–100%. However, cluster analysis discriminated against plants inoculated with B. licheniformins T11r than other groups (Fig. 6 and S3).

Figure 6 Two-way cluster analysis to group the different treatments into a number of clusters based on the observed values of the compounds and their percentages existing in the extracted oil from T. vulgaris plant treated or not with bacterial endophytes (T11r, T13r, and their consortium) under different mineral fertilization doses. The description of each peak number is listed in Table 7.
Figure 6

Two-way cluster analysis to group the different treatments into a number of clusters based on the observed values of the compounds and their percentages existing in the extracted oil from T. vulgaris plant treated or not with bacterial endophytes (T11r, T13r, and their consortium) under different mineral fertilization doses. The description of each peak number is listed in Table 7.

It is clear that cooperation between both bacterial endophytes and mineral fertilizers activated biosynthesis reactions of thyme plants resulting from the highest value of the main component. This result agrees with Sharaf EL-Din et al, [84], who reported that the use of biofertilization can improve the biosynthesis of different constituents in thyme plants. Moreover, the application of plant growth-promoting bacteria increases the morphological characteristics and oil contents of Ocimum basilicum L. as compared with un-treated plants [85]. Based on obtained data, can be concluded that the plant growth-promoting bacterial endophytes as biofertilizers could serve as a potential treatment to increase the growth, yield, and oil fractions of the thymol plant. Further, the activity of thymol contents to incorporate into various biomedical applications will be assessed in-vitro and in-vivo. The ecological roles of these bacterial endophyte need to be studied in the future because they might be important in supporting plant survival in different regions. The benefits derived from the plant– endophytic bacteria interaction should be considered at genetic levels below the species. Overall, the bacterial endophytes of T. vulgaris might depend on several environmental factors that may structure their communities, more research is required to identify the functional and ecological significance of these bacterial endophytes. Some of the species identified have been described potential characteristics to promote plant growth. Therefore, a better understanding of this complex network of interactions between the plant and bacterial endophytes would help to enhance productivity and sustainability.

Conclusion

In the current study, seven bacterial endophytes were isolated from the collected roots of T. vulgaris and showed varied qualitative activities for phosphate solubilization and nitrogen fixation. Five endophytic strains identified as Bacillus haynesii T9r, Citrobacter farmeri T10r, Bacillus licheniformis T11r, Bacillus velezensis T12r, and Bacillus velezensis T13r were selected as the most potent strains. These strains showed varied plant growth-promoting properties including acetylene reduction (nitrogenase), phosphate solubilization (in ranging of 123.9±2.8 − 159.5±0.9 μg ml−1), various hydrolytic enzyme activity, siderophores and HCN production, and the synthesis of different phytohormones. The strains Bacillus licheniformis T11r and Bacillus velezensis T13r were further selected based on the highest plant growth-promoting activity to be used as bioinoculant for T. vulgaris under different mineral fertilization doses (0, 50, 75, and 100%). Data analysis showed that the growth characteristics (plant heights, fresh and dry weight of shoots) of inoculated thyme plants with the bacterial consortium (T11r + T13r) in presence of 100% mineral fertilization were high as compared with single endophytic strains and control. Moreover, the GC-MS analysis for thyme oil revealed that the presence of 23 various compounds, and the maximum percentages were recorded for the bacterial consortium in presence of 100% mineral fertilization. This study provides an efficient method to improve the oil contents of the thyme plant using plant growth-promoting bacterial endophytes. However, the biomedical activity of various oil fractions obtained in the current study has been proposed for further investigation. This study needs more investigation to show the efficacy of the obtained plant growth-promoting bacterial endophytes on the oil contents and growth performance of others agronomical plants under different environmental conditions. Also, the association between bacterial endophytes and plants needs more study.

  1. Author Contribution: Amr Fouda and Saad El-Din Hassan: Conceptualization, Data curing, Formal analysis, Investigation, methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Validation, Visualization, Writing an original draft, Writing -review and editing; Mahmoud Soliman Abdel-Hamid: Data curing, Formal analysis, methodology, Resources, Software, Validation, Visualization, Writing original draft; Hesham Kamal Abo El-Ela and Abbas Ahmed El-Ghamry: Conceptualization, Data curing, Investigation, Resources, Validation, Visualization, Writing an original draft.

  2. Conflict of Interest: Authors state no conflict of interest.

  3. Data Availability Statement: The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

1 Kuete V. Chapter 28: Thymus vulgaris. In: Kuete V, editor. Medicinal Spices and Vegetables from Africa. Academic Press; 2017. pp. 599–609.10.1016/B978-0-12-809286-6.00028-5Search in Google Scholar

2 Ekoh SN, Akubugwo EI, Ude VC, Edwin N. Anti-hyperglycemic and anti-hyperlipidemic effect of spices (Thymus vulgaris, Murraya koenigii, Ocimum gratissimum and Piper guineense) in alloxan-induced diabetic rats. Int J Biosci. 2014;4:179–87.Search in Google Scholar

3 Prasanth Reddy V, Ravi Vital K, Varsha P, Satyam S. Review on Thymus vulgaris traditional uses and pharmacological properties. Med Aromat Plants 2014;3(164):2167-0412.1000164.Search in Google Scholar

4 Mandal S, DebMandal M, Chapter 94 - Thyme (Thymus vulgaris L.) Oils. In Essential Oils in Food Preservation, Flavor and Safety, Preedy, V. R., Ed. Academic Press: San Diego, 2016; pp 825–834.10.1016/B978-0-12-416641-7.00094-8Search in Google Scholar

5 Commission EP, Medicines ED. Healthcare, European pharmacopoeia. Volume 1. Council of Europe; 2010.Search in Google Scholar

6 Salem SS, El-Belely EF, Niedbała G, Alnoman MM, Hassan SE, Eid AM, et al. Bactericidal and In-Vitro Cytotoxic Efficacy of Silver Nanoparticles (Ag-NPs) Fabricated by Endophytic Actinomycetes and Their Use as Coating for the Textile Fabrics. Nanomaterials (Basel). 2020 Oct;10(10):E2082.10.3390/nano10102082Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

7 de Almeida Lopes KB, Carpentieri-Pipolo V, Oro TH, Stefani Pagliosa E, Degrassi G. Culturable endophytic bacterial communities associated with field-grown soybean. J Appl Microbiol. 2016 Mar;120(3):740–55.10.1111/jam.13046Search in Google Scholar PubMed

8 Golinska P, Wypij M, Agarkar G, Rathod D, Dahm H, Rai M. Endophytic actinobacteria of medicinal plants: diversity and bioactivity. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek. 2015 Aug;108(2):267–89.10.1007/s10482-015-0502-7Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

9 Eid AM, Fouda A, Abdel-Rahman MA, Salem SS, Elsaied A, Oelmüller R, et al. Harnessing Bacterial Endophytes for Promotion of Plant Growth and Biotechnological Applications: an Overview. Plants. 2021 May;10(5):935.10.3390/plants10050935Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

10 Santoyo G, Moreno-Hagelsieb G, Orozco-Mosqueda MC, Glick BR. Plant growth-promoting bacterial endophytes. Microbiol Res. 2016 Feb;183:92–9.10.1016/j.micres.2015.11.008Search in Google Scholar PubMed

11 Ismail MA, Amin MA, Eid AM, Hassan SE, Mahgoub HA, Lashin I, et al. Comparative Study between Exogenously Applied Plant Growth Hormones versus Metabolites of Microbial Endophytes as Plant Growth-Promoting for Phaseolus vulgaris L. Cells. 2021 Apr;10(5):1059.10.3390/cells10051059Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

12 Khalil AM, Hassan SE, Alsharif SM, Eid AM, Ewais EE, Azab E, et al. Isolation and Characterization of Fungal Endophytes Isolated from Medicinal Plant Ephedra pachyclada as Plant Growth-Promoting. Biomolecules. 2021 Jan;11(2):140.10.3390/biom11020140Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

13 Mahgoub HA, Fouda A, Eid AM, Ewais EE, Hassan SE. Biotechnological application of plant growth-promoting endophytic bacteria isolated from halophytic plants to ameliorate salinity tolerance of Vicia faba L. Plant Biotechnol Rep. 2021;15(6):819–43.10.1007/s11816-021-00716-ySearch in Google Scholar

14 Kotasthane AS, Agrawal T, Zaidi NW, Singh US. Identification of siderophore producing and cynogenic fluorescent Pseudomonas and a simple confrontation assay to identify potential bio-control agent for collar rot of chickpea. 3 Biotech 2017;7(2):137.10.1007/s13205-017-0761-2Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

15 Timmusk S, Behers L, Muthoni J, Muraya A, Aronsson AC. Perspectives and Challenges of Microbial Application for Crop Improvement. Front Plant Sci. 2017 Feb;8(49):49.10.3389/fpls.2017.00049Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

16 Vejan P, Abdullah R, Khadiran T, Ismail S, Nasrulhaq Boyce A. Role of Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria in Agricultural Sustainability-A Review. Molecules. 2016 Apr;21(5):E573.10.3390/molecules21050573Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

17 Dessaux Y, Grandclément C, Faure D. Engineering the Rhizosphere. Trends Plant Sci. 2016 Mar;21(3):266–78.10.1016/j.tplants.2016.01.002Search in Google Scholar PubMed

18 Fouda A, Hassan SE, Abdo AM, El-Gamal MS. Antimicrobial, Antioxidant and Larvicidal Activities of Spherical Silver Nanoparticles Synthesized by Endophytic Streptomyces spp. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2020 Jun;195(2):707–24.10.1007/s12011-019-01883-4Search in Google Scholar PubMed

19 Fouda AH, Hassan SE, Eid AM, Ewais EE. Biotechnological applications of fungal endophytes associated with medicinal plant Asclepias sinaica (Bioss.). Ann Agric Sci. 2015;60(1):95–104.10.1016/j.aoas.2015.04.001Search in Google Scholar

20 Garrity GM, Bell JA, Lilburn T. Phylum XIV. Proteobacteria phyl. nov. In: Brenner DJ, Krieg NR, Staley JT, Garrity GM (eds), Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, 2nd edn, vol. 2 (The Proteobacteria), part B (The Gammaproteobacteria). New York, NY, USA: Springer; 2005.Search in Google Scholar

21 De Vos P, Garrity GM, Jones D, Krieg NR, Ludwig W, Rainey FA, et al., editors. The Firmicutes. 2nd ed. Vol. 3, Bergey’s manual of systematic bacteriology. New York, NY, USA: Springer; 2011.Search in Google Scholar

22 Ahmad F, Ahmad I, Khan MS. Screening of free-living rhizospheric bacteria for their multiple plant growth promoting activities. Microbiol Res. 2008;163(2):173–81.10.1016/j.micres.2006.04.001Search in Google Scholar PubMed

23 Jasim B, John Jimtha C, Jyothis M, Radhakrishnan EK. Plant growth promoting potential of endophytic bacteria isolated from Piper nigrum. Plant Growth Regul. 2013;71(1):1–11.10.1007/s10725-013-9802-ySearch in Google Scholar

24 Miller DN, Bryant JE, Madsen EL, Ghiorse WC. Evaluation and optimization of DNA extraction and purification procedures for soil and sediment samples. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1999 Nov;65(11):4715–24.10.1128/AEM.65.11.4715-4724.1999Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

25 El-Belely EF, Farag MM, Said HA, Amin AS, Azab E, Gobouri AA, et al. Green Synthesis of Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles (ZnONPs) Using Arthrospira platensis (Class: Cyanophyceae) and Evaluation of their Biomedical Activities. Nanomaterials (Basel). 2021 Jan;11(1):E95.10.3390/nano11010095Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

26 Kifle MH, Laing MD. Isolation and Screening of Bacteria for Their Diazotrophic Potential and Their Influence on Growth Promotion of Maize Seedlings in Greenhouses. Front Plant Sci. 2016 Jan;6(1225):1225.10.3389/fpls.2015.01225Search in Google Scholar

27 Muangthong A, Youpensuk S, Rerkasem B. Isolation and Characterisation of Endophytic Nitrogen Fixing Bacteria in Sugarcane. Trop Life Sci Res. 2015 Apr;26(1):41–51.Search in Google Scholar

28 Passari AK, Mishra VK, Leo VV, Gupta VK, Singh BP. Phytohormone production endowed with antagonistic potential and plant growth promoting abilities of culturable endophytic bacteria isolated from Clerodendrum colebrookianum Walp. Microbiol Res. 2016 Dec;193:57–73.10.1016/j.micres.2016.09.006Search in Google Scholar

29 Wen CM, Tseng CS, Cheng CY, Li YK. Purification, characterization and cloning of a chitinase from Bacillus sp. NCTU2. Biotechnol Appl Biochem. 2002 Jun;35(3):213–9.10.1042/BA20020001Search in Google Scholar

30 Kumar A, Kumar A, Devi S, Patil S, Payal C, Negi S. Isolation, screening and characterization of bacteria from Rhizospheric soils for different plant growth promotion (PGP) activities: an in vitro study. Recent Research in Science and Technology 2012;4:(1).Search in Google Scholar

31 Geetha K, Enkatesham EV, Amballa H, Hadraiah BB. Solation, screening and characterization of plant growth promoting bacteria and their effect on Vigna radita(L.) R.Wilczek. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2014;3:799–809.Search in Google Scholar

32 Fouda A, Eid AM, Elsaied A, El-Belely EF, Barghoth MG, Azab E, et al. Plant Growth-Promoting Endophytic Bacterial Community Inhabiting the Leaves of Pulicaria incisa (Lam.) DC Inherent to Arid Regions. Plants (Basel, Switzerland 2021;10:(1).10.3390/plants10010076Search in Google Scholar

33 Rizzolo A, Baldo C, Polesello A. Application of high-performance liquid chromatography to the analysis of niacin and biotin in Italian almond cultivars. J Chromatogr A. 1991;553:187–92.10.1016/S0021-9673(01)88487-9Search in Google Scholar

34 Pharmacopoeia B. Determination of volatile oil in drugs. The Pharmaceutical Press. 17 Bloomsburg, Square. W.C.I. London; 1963. pp. 112–25.Search in Google Scholar

35 Abdelshafy Mohamad OA, Ma JB, Liu YH, Zhang D, Hua S, Bhute S, et al. Beneficial Endophytic Bacterial Populations Associated With Medicinal Plant Thymus vulgaris Alleviate Salt Stress and Confer Resistance to Fusarium oxysporum. Front Plant Sci. 2020 Feb;11(47):47.10.3389/fpls.2020.00047Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

36 Kalayu G. Phosphate Solubilizing Microorganisms: Promising Approach as Biofertilizers. Int J Agron. 2019;2019:4917256.10.1155/2019/4917256Search in Google Scholar

37 Ha TQ, Chu TT. Selection of nitrogen fixation and phosphate solubilizing bacteria from cultivating soil samples of Hung Yen province in Vietnam. J Vietnam Environ. 2020;12(2):162–8.10.13141/jve.vol12.no2.pp162-168Search in Google Scholar

38 Alkahtani MD, Fouda A, Attia KA, Al-Otaibi F, Eid AM, Ewais EE, et al. Isolation and Characterization of Plant Growth Promoting Endophytic Bacteria from Desert Plants and Their Application as Bioinoculants for Sustainable Agriculture. Agronomy (Basel). 2020;10(9):1325.10.3390/agronomy10091325Search in Google Scholar

39 Hanna AL, Youssef HH, Amer WM, Monib M, Fayez M, Hegazi NA. Diversity of bacteria nesting the plant cover of north Sinai deserts, Egypt. J Adv Res. 2013 Jan;4(1):13–26.10.1016/j.jare.2011.11.003Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

40 Miller KI, Qing C, Sze DM, Roufogalis BD, Neilan BA. Culturable endophytes of medicinal plants and the genetic basis for their bioactivity. Microb Ecol. 2012 Aug;64(2):431–49.10.1007/s00248-012-0044-8Search in Google Scholar PubMed

41 Pramod KS, Pramod KS, Shailendra S, Abhay Raj G, Amrita G, Udai BS, et al. Endophytic bacilli from medicinal-aromatic perennial Holy basil (Ocimum tenuiflorum L.) modulate plant growth promotion and induced systemic resistance against Rhizoctonia solani in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Biological control 2020:150:104353.10.1016/j.biocontrol.2020.104353Search in Google Scholar

42 Wang C, Zhao D, Qi G, Mao Z, Hu X, Du B, et al. Effects of Bacillus velezensis FKM10 for Promoting the Growth of Malus hupehensis Rehd. and Inhibiting Fusarium verticillioides. Front Microbiol. 2020 Jan;10(2889):2889.10.3389/fmicb.2019.02889Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

43 Leghari SJ, Wahocho NA, Laghari GM. HafeezLaghari, A.; MustafaBhabhan, G.; HussainTalpur, K.; Bhutto, T. A.; Wahocho, S. A.; Lashari, A. A., Role of nitrogen for plant growth and development: a review. Adv Environ Biol. 2016;10:209.Search in Google Scholar

44 Puri A, Padda KP, Chanway CP. Nitrogen-fixation by endophytic bacteria in agricultural crops: recent advances. Nitrogen in agriculture. IntechOpen. London: GBR; 2018. pp. 73–94.10.5772/intechopen.71988Search in Google Scholar

45 Rangjaroen C, Rerkasem B, Teaumroong N, Noisangiam R, Lumyong S. Promoting plant growth in a commercial rice cultivar by endophytic diazotrophic bacteria isolated from rice landraces. Ann Microbiol. 2015;65(1):253–66.10.1007/s13213-014-0857-4Search in Google Scholar

46 Gouda S, Kerry RG, Das G, Paramithiotis S, Shin HS, Patra JK. Revitalization of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria for sustainable development in agriculture. Microbiol Res. 2018 Jan;206:131–40.10.1016/j.micres.2017.08.016Search in Google Scholar PubMed

47 Alori ET, Glick BR, Babalola OO. Microbial Phosphorus Solubilization and Its Potential for Use in Sustainable Agriculture. Front Microbiol. 2017 Jun;8(971):971.10.3389/fmicb.2017.00971Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

48 Afzal I, Iqrar I, Shinwari ZK, Yasmin A. Plant growth-promoting potential of endophytic bacteria isolated from roots of wild Dodonaea viscosa L. Plant Growth Regul. 2017;81(3):399–408.10.1007/s10725-016-0216-5Search in Google Scholar

49 Lovell R, Harvey DG. A preliminary study of ammonia production by Corynebacterium renale and some other pathogenic bacteria. J Gen Microbiol. 1950 Sep;4(3):493–500.10.1099/00221287-4-3-493Search in Google Scholar PubMed

50 Castro RA, Quecine MC, Lacava PT, Batista BD, Luvizotto DM, Marcon J, et al. Isolation and enzyme bioprospection of endophytic bacteria associated with plants of Brazilian mangrove ecosystem. Springerplus. 2014 Jul;3(1):382.10.1186/2193-1801-3-382Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

51 Kavamura VN, Santos SN, Silva JL, Parma MM, Ávila LA, Visconti A, et al. Screening of Brazilian cacti rhizobacteria for plant growth promotion under drought. Microbiol Res. 2013 May;168(4):183–91.10.1016/j.micres.2012.12.002Search in Google Scholar PubMed

52 Azad MA, Bae JH, Kim JS, Lim JK, Song KS, Shin BS, et al. Isolation and characterization of a novel thermostable alpha-amylase from Korean pine seeds. N Biotechnol. 2009 Oct;26(3–4):143–9.10.1016/j.nbt.2009.09.006Search in Google Scholar PubMed

53 Li Xh, Yang Hj, Roy B, Wang D, Yue Wf, Jiang Lj, et al. The most stirring technology in future: cellulase enzyme and biomass utilization. Afr J Biotechnol. 2009;8(11):2418–22.Search in Google Scholar

54 Hassan SE. Plant growth-promoting activities for bacterial and fungal endophytes isolated from medicinal plant of Teucrium polium L. J Adv Res. 2017 Nov;8(6):687–95.10.1016/j.jare.2017.09.001Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

55 Hu H, Gao Y, Li X, Chen S, Yan S, Tian X. Identification and Nematicidal Characterization of Proteases Secreted by Endophytic Bacteria Bacillus cereus BCM2. Phytopathology. 2020 Feb;110(2):336–44.10.1094/PHYTO-05-19-0164-RSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

56 Maheshwari R, Bhutani N, Suneja P. Screening and characterization of siderophore producing endophytic bacteria from Cicer arietinum and Pisum sativum plants. J Appl Biol Biotechnol. 2019;7(5):7–14.10.7324/JABB.2019.70502Search in Google Scholar

57 Kumar V, Kumar A, Pandey KD, Roy BK. Isolation and characterization of bacterial endophytes from the roots of Cassia tora L. Ann Microbiol. 2015;65(3):1391–9.10.1007/s13213-014-0977-xSearch in Google Scholar

58 Brígido C, Singh S, Menéndez E, Tavares MJ, Glick BR, Félix MD, et al. Diversity and Functionality of Culturable Endophytic Bacterial Communities in Chickpea Plants. Plants. 2019 Feb;8(2):E42.10.3390/plants8020042Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

59 Schalk IJ, Hannauer M, Braud A. New roles for bacterial siderophores in metal transport and tolerance. Environ Microbiol. 2011 Nov;13(11):2844–54.10.1111/j.1462-2920.2011.02556.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

60 Rezzonico F, Zala M, Keel C, Duffy B, Moënne-Loccoz Y, Défago G. Is the ability of biocontrol fluorescent pseudomonads to produce the antifungal metabolite 2,4-diacetylphloroglucinol really synonymous with higher plant protection? New Phytol. 2007;173(4):861–72.10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01955.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

61 Babalola OO. Beneficial bacteria of agricultural importance. Biotechnol Lett. 2010 Nov;32(11):1559–70.10.1007/s10529-010-0347-0Search in Google Scholar PubMed

62 Rijavec T, Lapanje A. Cyanogenic Pseudomonas spp. strains are concentrated in the rhizosphere of alpine pioneer plants. Microbiol Res. 2017 Jan;194:20–8.10.1016/j.micres.2016.09.001Search in Google Scholar PubMed

63 Remans R, Beebe S, Blair M, Manrique G, Tovar E, Rao I, et al. Physiological and genetic analysis of root responsiveness to auxin-producing plant growth-promoting bacteria in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Plant Soil. 2008;302(1):149–61.10.1007/s11104-007-9462-7Search in Google Scholar

64 Soundar Raju C, Aslam A, Thangadurai D, Sangeetha J, Kathiravan K, Shajahan A. Indole acetic acid (IAA) producing endophytic bacteria on direct somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration of Exacum travancoricum Bedd. Vegetos. 2020;33(4):690–702.10.1007/s42535-020-00159-wSearch in Google Scholar

65 Khan Chowdhury MD, Jeon J, Ok Rim S, Park YH, Kyu Lee S, Bae H. Composition, diversity and bioactivity of culturable bacterial endophytes in mountain-cultivated ginseng in Korea. Sci Rep. 2017 Aug;7(1):10098.10.1038/s41598-017-10280-7Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

66 Taghavi S, Garafola C, Monchy S, Newman L, Hoffman A, Weyens N, et al. Genome survey and characterization of endophytic bacteria exhibiting a beneficial effect on growth and development of poplar trees. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009 Feb;75(3):748–57.10.1128/AEM.02239-08Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

67 Dawwam GE, Elbeltagy A, Emara HM, Abbas IH, Hassan MM. Beneficial effect of plant growth promoting bacteria isolated from the roots of potato plant. Ann Agric Sci. 2013;58(2):195–201.10.1016/j.aoas.2013.07.007Search in Google Scholar

68 Jasim B, Joseph AA, John CJ, Mathew J, Radhakrishnan EK. Isolation and characterization of plant growth promoting endophytic bacteria from the rhizome of Zingiber officinale. 3 Biotech. 2014 Apr;4(2):197–20410.1007/s13205-013-0143-3Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

69 Egamberdieva D, Wirth SJ, Alqarawi AA, Abd Allah EF, Hashem A. Phytohormones and Beneficial Microbes: Essential Components for Plants to Balance Stress and Fitness. Front Microbiol. 2017 Oct;8:2104–2104.10.3389/fmicb.2017.02104Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

70 Sah SK, Reddy KR, Li J. Abscisic Acid and Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Crop Plants. Front Plant Sci. 2016 May;7(571):571.10.3389/fpls.2016.00571Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

71 Badawy AA, Abdelfattah NA, Salem SS, Awad MF, Fouda A. Efficacy Assessment of Biosynthesized Copper Oxide Nanoparticles (CuO-NPs) on Stored Grain Insects and Their Impacts on Morphological and Physiological Traits of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Plant. Biology (Basel). 2021 Mar;10(3):233.10.3390/biology10030233Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

72 Fouda A, Hassan SE, Saied E, Hamza MF. Photocatalytic degradation of real textile and tannery effluent using biosynthesized magnesium oxide nanoparticles (MgO-NPs), heavy metal adsorption, phytotoxicity, and antimicrobial activity. J Environ Chem Eng. 2021;9(4):105346.10.1016/j.jece.2021.105346Search in Google Scholar

73 Puri A, Padda KP, Chanway CP. Evidence of nitrogen fixation and growth promotion in canola (Brassica napus L.) by an endophytic diazotroph Paenibacillus polymyxa P2b-2R. Biol Fertil Soils. 2016;52(1):119–25.10.1007/s00374-015-1051-ySearch in Google Scholar

74 Ullah I, Khan AR, Park GS, Lim JH, Waqas M, Lee IJ, et al. Analysis of phytohormones and phosphate solubilization in Photorhabdus spp. Food Sci Biotechnol. 2013;22(1):25–31.10.1007/s10068-013-0044-6Search in Google Scholar

75 Yadegari M, Farahani GH, Mosadeghzad Z. Biofertilizers effects on quantitative and qualitative yield of Thyme (Thymus vulgaris). Afr J Agric Res. 2012;7(34):4716–23.10.5897/AJAR11.2347Search in Google Scholar

76 Gharib F, Moussa L, Massoud O. Effect of compost and bio-fertilizers on growth, yield and essential oil of sweet marjoram (Majorana hortensis) plant. ISSN OnlineMFA. 2008;10:1560–8530.Search in Google Scholar

77 El-Wahab A, Ellabban H, Moghith W. Combined effect of organic and biofertilizer on herb yield and essential oil production of Origanum vulgare L. plants under sandy soil conditions. J. Agric. Res. Kafr El-sheikh Univ. 2016;42:144–1592016.Search in Google Scholar

78 Fouda A, Hassan SE, Abdel-Rahman MA, Farag MM, Shehaldeen A, Mohamed AA, et al. Catalytic degradation of wastewater from the textile and tannery industries by green synthesized hematite (α-Fe2O3) and magnesium oxide (MgO) nanoparticles. Current Research in Biotechnology. 2021;3:29–41.10.1016/j.crbiot.2021.01.004Search in Google Scholar

79 Fouda A, Hassan SE, Saied E, Azab MS. An eco-friendly approach to textile and tannery wastewater treatment using maghemite nanoparticles (γ-Fe2O3-NPs) fabricated by Penicillium expansum strain (K-w). J Environ Chem Eng. 2021;9(1):104693.10.1016/j.jece.2020.104693Search in Google Scholar

80 Satyal P, Murray BL, McFeeters RL, Setzer WN. Essential Oil Characterization of Thymus vulgaris from Various Geographical Locations. Foods. 2016 Oct;5(4):70.10.3390/foods5040070Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

81 Lee JH, Lee K, Lee DH, Shin SY, Yong Y, Lee YH. Anti-invasive effect of β-myrcene, a component of the essential oil from Pinus koraiensis cones, in metastatic MDA-MB-231 human breast cancer cells. J Korean Soc Appl Biol Chem. 2015;58(4):563–9.10.1007/s13765-015-0081-3Search in Google Scholar

82 Al-Asmari AK, Athar MT, Al-Faraidy AA, Almuhaiza MS. Chemical composition of essential oil of Thymus vulgaris collected from Saudi Arabian market. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed. 2017;7(2):147–50.10.1016/j.apjtb.2016.11.023Search in Google Scholar

83 Mancini E, Senatore F, Del Monte D, De Martino L, Grulova D, Scognamiglio M, et al. Studies on Chemical Composition, Antimicrobial and Antioxidant Activities of Five Thymus vulgaris L. Essential Oils. Molecules. 2015 Jul;20(7):12016–28.10.3390/molecules200712016Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

84 Sharaf El-Din MN, Ahmed HA, Shalan MM, Hussien HM; The Effect of Organic and Bio-Fertilization on Vegetative Growth and Yield of Thyme. Thymus vulgaris, L. Journal of Plant Production. 2019;10(12):1175–85.10.21608/jpp.2019.82564Search in Google Scholar

85 Ahmad SK, Hammam KA, Amer AA. Effect of bio-fertilization and some plant extracts on the growth, yeild and chemical constituents of basil plant. Journal of Plant Production. 2014;5(2):193–210.10.21608/jpp.2014.53504Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2021-11-26
Accepted: 2021-12-19
Published Online: 2021-12-31

© 2021 Mahmoud Soliman Abdel-Hamid et al., published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Downloaded on 6.6.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/bmc-2021-0019/html
Scroll to top button