Skip to content
BY 4.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter December 21, 2021

Evaluating efficacy of different UV-stabilizers/absorbers in reducing UV-degradation of lignin

  • Saeid Nikafshar and Mojgan Nejad ORCID logo EMAIL logo
From the journal Holzforschung

Abstract

Susceptibility of wood to UV degradation decreases the service life of wood products outdoors. Organic UV absorbers (UVAs) and hindered amine light stabilizers (HALSs), as well as inorganic UVAs, are added to coatings to improve the UV stability of coated-wood products. Although about 85% of UV radiation is absorbed by lignin in the wood, it is unclear which UV stabilizers can minimize lignin degradation. In this study, the photodegradation of softwood organosolv lignin was monitored over 35 days of UV exposure. Changes in lignin properties were assessed using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), gel permeation chromatography (GPC), and phosphorus-31 nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (31P NMR). It was found that the aromatic rings of lignin underwent significant degradation, resulting in increased glass transition temperature and molecular weight of lignin. Subsequently, 18 different additives were mixed with lignin and exposed to UV irradiation. The analysis of samples before and after UV exposure with FTIR revealed that inorganic UVAs (cerium oxide and zinc oxide) and a mixture of organic UVAs and HALSs (T-479/T-292, T-5248, and T-5333) were the most effective additives in reducing lignin degradation. This study can help coating scientists to formulate more durable transparent exterior wood coatings.

1 Introduction

Wood products used outdoors are susceptible to photodegradation (Evans 2012), which usually causes yellowing, discoloration, loss of gloss, increased roughness, and diminished mechanical and physical properties (Hon 1984; Nejad and Cooper 2011; Turkulin and Sell 1997). Wood is mainly composed of three compounds: cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin; these compounds have different sensitivities to UV light during photodegradation. Lignin is a macromolecule in wood that acts as a binder in holding cellulosic fibers (Hayoz et al. 2003); it is composed of various arrangements of three monolignols: guaiacyl, syringyl, and p-hydroxyphenyl units (Sakakibara and Sano 2000).

Cellulose and hemicellulose only absorb 5–20% of UV light, while lignin absorbs about 80–95% of the UV light due to the presence of chromophores and aromatic rings, making it more prone to decomposition by photooxidation reactions (Davidson 1996; Hayoz et al. 2003). During UV irradiation, three chemical reactions occur in lignin, 1) dehydrogenation, 2) dehydroxymethylation, and 3) demethoxylation (Kutz 2018). The formation of free radicals triggers the UV degradation process, followed by the oxidation of phenolic hydroxyl groups in lignin (Müller et al. 2003; Williams 2005). Free phenolic radicals are generated immediately under UV irradiation. This way, the radicals delocalization favors the formation of o- and p-quinonoid structures after demethylation and cleavage of the side chain (Hon and Shiraishi 2000). As shown in Scheme 1, the newly formed carbonyl groups in o- and p-quinonoid are considered chromophoric groups that cause significant color changes on the wood surface (Hon and Shiraishi 2000).

Scheme 1: 
Formation of o- and p-quinonoid structures resulting from UV degradation of lignin (Hon 2001).
Scheme 1:

Formation of o- and p-quinonoid structures resulting from UV degradation of lignin (Hon 2001).

In addition to lignin, extractives are also susceptible to UV degradation. Extractives types and contents significantly affect the color, odor, and biological durability of the wood (Umezawa 2000). Similar to lignin, extractives will also undergo structural changes after UV exposure contributing to wood discoloration (Abe 1994; Chang et al. 1999; Funaoka et al. 1963; Pandey 2005a,b).

UV radiation (295–400 nm) provides sufficient energy to dissociate lignin moieties that have carbonyl, biphenyl, or ring-conjugated structures. It was shown that violet light (380–430 nm) extends photodegradation into the wood beyond the area affected by UV light since larger wavelengths penetrate deeper into the wood than UV light (Kataoka et al. 2006).

In addition to UV light, water also plays a vital role during the photodegradation of wood, including carrying the radicals formed on the wood surface to deeper layers in the wood, forming hydroperoxide that can initiate chain scission reactions in polymeric wood compounds. Kalnins (1966) reported that oxygen is necessary for free radical initiation, and phenoxy radicals are formed during lignin photodegradation can react with oxygen to form O-quinoid structures after demethylation. Hon also stated that the reaction of oxygen to form hydroperoxide is an essential part of the photodegradation process (Hon et al. 1982).

Researchers have explored many ways to improve weathering performance of wood. Treating wood surfaces with chromic acid is a well-known method that stabilizes wood by oxidizing phenolic sub-units at the surface, making them more resistant to photodegradation (Chang et al. 2007; Evans and Schmalzl 1989). However, concern about chromium compounds’ potential adverse health effects limited the commercialization of chromic acid treatment for wood (Schmalzl and Evans 2003). Chemical modification has also been widely used to enhance the weathering stability of wood. Chemically treated wood with butylenes, butylene oxide, and methyl isocyanate, benzoyl chloride, as well as acetylation showed better weathering performance (Evans et al. 2002; Feist et al. 2007; Rowell et al. 1981). Additionally, 1,3-dimethylol-4,5-dihydroxyethyleneurea (mDMDHEU) was used to treat scots pine wood and reported to significantly improved the weathering stability of the wood (Xie et al. 2008). One of the most common ways to increase the photostability of wood while maintaining its esthetic appeal is to use transparent coatings such as epoxy, polyurethane, alkyd, and acrylic, containing UV stabilizers and/or nano-pigments (Forsthuber and Grüll 2010; Nikafshar et al. 2017; Saha et al. 2013; Saiter et al. 1995; Van den Bulcke et al. 2006).

Organic UV stabilizers are categorized into two groups: 1) UV absorbers (UVAs) and 2) hindered amine light stabilizers (HALSs). UVAs like 2-(2-hydroxyphenyl)-benzotriazoles (BTZ) filter out the vulnerable wavelengths of the light before they reach the wood surface; therefore, decreasing the rate of radical formation due to their high absorbance profile in the UV region (typically 300–350 nm) (Schaller et al. 2008). The most common UVAs have primary photophysical properties, including a high absorbance profile in the UV range and high photochemical stability (Decker et al. 1995). HALS (a common derivative of 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine), also known as a radical scavenger, inhibiting the photo-oxidative degradation of polymers (Klemchuk et al. 1990). It was shown that a combination of organic UVA and HALS improved the transparent wood coating performance (Morris and McFarling 2006).

On the other hand, inorganic UVAs are based on metal oxide particles like ZnO or TiO2, which are applied to scatter or absorb light. Using nanosized pigments can protect both coating and the substrate (wood) while preserving transparency in the visible spectrum (Nkeuwa et al. 2014; Salla et al. 2012). Pretreatment of wood for dimensional stability and applying the flexible and photostable coating is another way to achieve durable exterior coated wood products (de Meijer and Nienhuis 2009; Evans et al. 2015). Also, it has been shown that phenol-formaldehyde resins can improve weathering stability of plywood samples (Passauer et al. 2021; Williams 2005).

Although several studies have evaluated the photostability performance of different wood coatings, they were mainly focused on assessing color change as a visual indicator (Tolvaj and Mitsui 2010), to the best of our knowledge, there is no published work on examining the interaction between lignin, as the main UV susceptible component of the wood, with a wide range of UV stabilizers. The aim of the present research was to find the most effective additives that can reduce lignin degradation. The results of this study can help coating formulators or preservative producers choose additives proven to minimize lignin degradation, thus improving the UV performance of wood products in exterior applications.

2 Materials and methods

Since most exterior wood products (fences and decks) are made of softwood in North America, a high purity softwood organosolv lignin provided by Lignol (Current Suzano) was used. An organosolv lignin was chosen because, among technical (commercially available) lignins, organosolv lignin has the closest structure to the structure of native lignin in the wood due to the mild ethanol biorefinery isolation process (Mandlekar et al. 2018). Eighteen different additives (Table 1), including organic UVAs, organic HALSs, and inorganic UVAs, were kindly supplied by chemical industries. All other chemicals were purchased from Fisher Scientific Co and Sigma Aldrich and used as received.

Table 1:

Composition of prepared samples.

ID Sample name Role Supplier
1 Tinuvin-1130 Organic UV absorber BASF
2 Tinuvin-400 Organic UV absorber BASF
3 Tinuvin-479 Organic UV absorber BASF
4 Tinuvin-384 Organic UV absorber BASF
5 Chiguard 5330 Organic UV absorber Chitec Technology
6 Tinuvin-292 Organic HALSa BASF
7 Tinuvin-123 Organic HALS BASF
8 Chiguard 101 Organic HALS Chitec Technology
9 Tinuvin-5333 Organic UV absorber & HALS BASF
10 Tinuvin-5248 Organic UV absorber & HALS BASF
11 Tinuvin-479-123 Organic UV absorber & HALS BASF
12 Tinuvin-292-1130 Organic UV absorber & HALS BASF
13 Tinuvin-384-292 Organic UV absorber & HALS BASF
14 Tinuvin-400-123 Organic UV absorber & HALS BASF
15 Tinuvin-479-292 Organic UV absorber & HALS BASF
16 Fe3O4 b Inorganic UV absorber US Research Nanomaterials
17 Cerium oxideb Inorganic UV absorber Strem Chemical, Inc.
18 Zirconium oxideb Inorganic UV absorber US Research Nanomaterials
19 Zinc Oxideb,c Inorganic UV absorber Zochem
20 Titanium oxideb,c Inorganic UV absorber NYACOL Nano Technologies Inc.
21 Minexc UV and binder stabilizer Covia Canada Ltd.
22 Control (pure lignin) Lignol (Current Suzano)
  1. aHALS, hindered amine light stabilizer. bNanosized pigments. cProvided by the third-party supplier, and it is assumed were obtained from listed producers.

2.1 Sample preparation

First 4 g of organosolv softwood lignin was dissolved in 15 g of tetrahydrofuran (THF). Next 2 wt.% of individual additives were added to the mixture (lignin and THF). The solution was mixed for 15 min at room temperature (200 rpm) and then was poured into aluminum pans (40 mm diameter, 10 mm height). For some samples, the mixture of both organic UVA and HALS was used, as recommended by the additives manufacturers. The mixtures of inorganic UVAs in lignin-THF were placed in a sonication bath for 10 min to ensure their homogenous dispersions. Minex, a functional filler made from nepheline syenite, that is used as a performance enhancer for brightness, weathering stability, abrasion, and burnish resistance in coating formulations, was also added to the lignin as an additive. The control sample (lignin, without any additives) was also dissolved in THF to obtain a uniform and smooth surface similar to other samples. Later, all samples were placed under a fume hood (with lights off for 24 h) to let the solvent evaporate (THF). Then the samples were kept in the dark place for one week at room temperature to ensure complete removal of solvent while avoiding any potential exposure to light that might trigger undesirable reactions of photoactive compounds. The names and compositions of all samples are shown in Table 1.

2.2 UV exposure

Photodegradation of the lignin mixtures was studied following the EN 927-6 Standard procedure (EN 927-6 2006). The UVA-340 lamp (recommended by EN 927-6 Standard) manufactured by Q-Lab Corporation (Canada) was chosen for this study due to its similar spectrum to sunlight (Table 2). All samples were placed under UV light irradiation at a 5 cm distance from the lamp for 35 days. UV exposure was run in ambient conditions (24 °C, 70–80 RH%, and air atmosphere). There were not any dark periods during the UV exposure, except for brief sample collections. Because powdered lignin was used during the test, the samples were not exposed to water during the photodegradation test.

Table 2:

Relative spectral irradiance of UV-A 340 lamp.

Wavelength (nm) Relative spectra irradiance (%)
290 < λ ≤ 400 100
λ ≤ 290 0.0
290 < λ ≤ 300 0.2
300 < λ ≤ 320 6.2–8.6
320 < λ ≤ 340 27.1–30.7
340 < λ ≤ 360 34.2–35.4
360 < λ ≤ 380 19.5–23.7
380 < λ ≤ 400 6.6–7.8

2.3 Lignin characterization

The pure lignin and mixture of additives and lignin samples were analyzed with Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) before UV irradiation and then every week during 35 days of UV irradiation. A Jasco FTIR-ATR-6600 equipped with an attenuated total reflection accessory (ATR) was used to monitor potential chemical changes of samples because of the photodegradation reaction. Spectra were recorded in a wavenumber range between 500 and 4000 cm−1 at a resolution of 4 cm−1 with 64 scans. All spectra were normalized and baseline-corrected before quantitative analysis using OriginPro 2015 software (version 2.214). The spectra were normalized by selecting the C–H deformation band at 2921 cm−1 as a reference since its intensity remained the same during UV exposure. Linear background correction in the absorbance mode was applied to remove any potent background compound. The same procedure was applied for selected bands (aromatic skeleton or carbonyl), which are expected to change during the UV exposure. The lignin and carbonyl indexes were calculated by dividing the absorbance of a specific band (after background correction) by the absorbance of the C–H band (the unchanged band used as reference).

A Q100 differential scanning calorimeter (DSC) by TA Instrument, equipped with refrigerated cooling, was used to analyze the thermal property of the lignin sample. About 5–10 mg of lignin was placed in an aluminum pan, and a non-isothermal test with a heating rate of 10 °C/min under a nitrogen flow of 70 mL/min was carried out at a temperature range of 25–200 °C in a heat-cool-heat cycle. The second heating cycle was used to calculate the glass transition temperature (T g ) before and after UV-irradiation.

Gel permeation chromatography (GPC) was used to determine the molar mass distribution of the lignin sample. The samples were dissolved in THF (HPLC grade) at a 5 mg/mL concentration and were filtered using a syringe filter (PTFE, 0.45 μm); the filtrate samples were used for GPC analysis. A Waters GPC system was then used to analyze the filtrate at a flow rate of 1 mL/min, using a 300 mm × 7.8 mm column, Styragel HR 3 THF (500–30 k Å). Polystyrene standards of specific molecular weight (162, 370, 580, 945, 1440, 1920, 3090, 4730, 6320, 9590 Da) were used as calibration standards.

The hydroxyl contents of the lignin samples were measured using phosphorus-31 nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (31P NMR) (Asgari and Argyropoulos 1998). About 40 mg oven-dried lignin was dissolved in 500 μL of a mixture of anhydrous pyridine/deuterated chloroform (1.6:1, v/v). Next, 100 μL cyclohexanol solution (22 mg/mL in anhydrous pyridine and deuterated chloroform [1.6:1, v/v]), was added as an internal standard, and 50 μL of chromium (III) acetylacetonate solution (5.6 mg/mL in anhydrous pyridine and deuterated chloroform [1.6:1, v/v]) was used as a relaxation reagent. Finally, 100 μL phosphitylating reagent (2-chloro-4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-1,3,2-dioxaphospholane [TMDP]) was added to the mixture and mixed for 30 s. Subsequently, 600 μL of the mixture was transferred to a 5 mm NMR tube, and NMR analyses were performed using an Agilent DDR2 500 MHz NMR spectrometer equipped with 7600AS, running VnmrJ 3.2A, with a relaxation delay of 5 s, and 128 scans. To avoid any decomposition, prepared samples were tested within 1 h of sample preparation.

The hydroxyl content of each lignin sample was calculated based on the ratio of the internal standard peak area (cyclohexanol) to integrated areas over the following spectral regions: aliphatic hydroxyls (149.1–145.4 ppm), cyclohexanol (145.3–144.9 ppm), condensed phenolic units (144.6–143.3; and 142.0–141.2 ppm), syringyl phenolic units (143.3–142.0 ppm), guaiacyl phenolic hydroxyls (140.5–138.6 ppm), p-hydroxyphenyl phenolic units (138.5–137.3 ppm), and carboxylic acids (135.9–134.0 ppm). The entire region of (144.6–138.6) was considered as condensed phenolic since softwoods do not have any syringyl units (Asgari and Argyropoulos 1998).

3 Results

3.1 Lignin degradation

To confirm that the lignin structure was not changed after dissolving it in THF and solvent was entirely removed, the sample was analyzed with 31P NMR. The analysis showed that the drying method was effective with no residual THF in lignin (based on quantitative data). No change in lignin structure was observed compared with spectra of original lignin before dissolving it in THF. FTIR spectroscopy was used to monitor chemical changes of lignin (with and without additives) before UV irradiation and at weekly intervals over 35 days of UV irradiation. Table 3 shows different assignments of FTIR bands in lignin. The C=C stretching vibrations of aromatic rings, which have an absorption band at 1508 cm−1, were considered as the lignin bands (Anderson et al. 1991). The carbonyl groups showed an absorption band at 1714 cm−1, which moved to 1735 cm−1 after UV exposure that was assigned to formed quinone groups (Pandey 2005a,b). The wide absorption band around 3400 cm−1 was assigned to hydroxyl groups (Kline et al. 2010). The FTIR spectra of pure lignin before and after each week of UV irradiation are shown in Figure 1.

Table 3:

Summary of the major Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) peaks of the organosolv lignin.

Wavenumber (cm−1) Band assignment
3414 O–H stretching
2925 C–H stretching
2842 C–H stretching
1714 C=O stretching
1508 Aromatic skeletal vibration
1182 Guaiacyl C–H
Figure 1: 
Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) spectra of pure lignin sample (control) before and after 35 days of UV-irradiation, 1508 cm−1, vibrations of aromatic rings; 1735 cm−1, vibration of carbonyl groups.
Figure 1:

Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) spectra of pure lignin sample (control) before and after 35 days of UV-irradiation, 1508 cm−1, vibrations of aromatic rings; 1735 cm−1, vibration of carbonyl groups.

All spectra were baseline corrected and normalized using the band at 2921 cm−1 as reference band, which was not affected by photodegradation (Stark and Matuana 2004). Two parameters were used to monitor potential photodegradation of lignin: I 1508/2921 and I 1735/2921, corresponding to lignin and carbonyl indices, respectively, where “I” represents the measured intensity from the top band to the baseline (Stark and Matuana 2004).

(1) Lignin index = A 1508 A 2921

(2) Carbonyl index = A 1735 A 2921

Different indices of pure lignin at different UV irradiation times are displayed in Figure 2. The lignin content decreased rapidly as a result of photodegradation, which was accompanied by the formation of carbonyl groups (Popescu et al. 2011). It can be seen that with the increase in exposure time, lignin index (I 1508/2921) decreased as a result of the decreased amount of aromatic rings during the photodegradation phenomenon, as also confirmed by previous studies (Ganne-Chédeville et al. 2012; Pandey 2005a,b). On the contrary, carbonyl index (I 1735/2921) increased due to ortho and para-quinoid formation forming as free radicals react with oxygen forming carbonyl and carboxylic groups (Feist and Hon 1984; Hon and Shiraishi 2000). The results showed that the rate of carbonyl formation significantly increased after 21 days of UV irradiation.

Figure 2: 
Lignin and carbonyl indices of pure lignin at different UV irradiation times.
Figure 2:

Lignin and carbonyl indices of pure lignin at different UV irradiation times.

Table 4 shows the properties of pure lignin before and after 35 days of UV irradiation. The molecular weight of lignin increased after UV irradiation. This enhancement may be related to radical coupling reactions, causing the formation of higher molecular weight compounds such as condensed phenyl propane structures like 5-5, 4-O-5, and β-5 (Argyropoulos and Sun 1996; Castellan et al. 1991). Also, the polydispersity index (PDI) of lignin was increased significantly, which is probably due to depolymerization and repolymerization of lignin polymeric chains under UV light (Azadfalah et al. 2008; Holmbom 1991). The T g s of lignin increased from 93 °C to 122 °C after UV exposure. The increase in T g is reported to be due to the formation of polar groups, such as carbonyl during UV irradiation, confirmed by FTIR data (Aloui et al. 2007; Hill et al. 1994).

Table 4:

Summary of the measured lignin properties before and after 35 days of UV irradiation.

Lignin properties Before After 35 days of UV irradiation
Mn (Da) 1190 1290
Mw (Da) 5250 7050
PDI 4.4 5.5
T g (°C) 93 ± 2 122 ± 3
Aliphatic hydroxyl (mmol/g) 1.31 1.04
Phenolic hydroxyl (mmol/g) 2.39 1.99
Carboxylic acid (mmol/g) 0.42 0.68

Figure 3 illustrates the 31P NMR spectra of lignin before and after UV irradiation. The aliphatic and phenolic hydroxyl functional groups of lignin decreased by 21% and 17%, respectively, after UV exposure, while the carboxylic groups increased by 62%. The decrease in aliphatic and phenolic hydroxyl groups could be related to the formation of quinone structures, whereas an increase in carboxylic acid functional groups could be due to the ring-opening of quinone compounds (Wang et al. 2016).

Figure 3: 
Phosphorus-31 nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (31P NMR) spectra of lignin before (red) and after 35 days (blue) of UV irradiation.
Figure 3:

Phosphorus-31 nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (31P NMR) spectra of lignin before (red) and after 35 days (blue) of UV irradiation.

3.2 Efficacy of different additives on improving UV stability of lignin

Figure 4 shows the percent decrease of the lignin index ( A 1508 A 2921 ) as a measure of lignin loss. Pure lignin (control) showed the highest decrease (85%), and the sample containing 2 wt.% cerium oxide had the lowest lignin loss (28%), possibly due to its excellent UV absorption capacity, as also indicated by Dao et al. (2011). Additionally, samples containing a mixture of organic UVA and HALS (T-479/T-292, T-5248, and T-5333) illustrated lower lignin loss than other additives.

Figure 4: 
Decrease in lignin index (%) 




(


A
 
1508


A
2921


)




$(\frac{A\hspace{0.17em}1508}{A2921})$



 of various samples after 35 days of UV irradiation (lower numbers are better), the bars with the same color are not significantly different (α = 0.05).
Figure 4:

Decrease in lignin index (%) ( A 1508 A 2921 ) of various samples after 35 days of UV irradiation (lower numbers are better), the bars with the same color are not significantly different (α = 0.05).

The average lignin loss of organic UVAs (65%) was significantly lower than the average lignin loss of HALSs (74%), and other additives (78%). The combination of organic UVAs and HALSs showed 58% lignin loss, which is remarkably lower than using them individually. Overall, inorganic UVAs (56%) were more effective in reducing lignin loss than a mixture of organic UVAs and HALSs (UVAs 65% and HALSs 74%) and other additives (78%). Also, using a mixture of both organic UVAs and HALSs were more effective in reducing the photodegradation of lignin (58% lignin loss) than using individual components. When they are used together, UVA helps to absorb UV light, and HALS captures any free radicals that form during exposure resulting in reducing the UV degradation of lignin (Jia et al. 2007).

When lignin undergoes photodegradation, quinone groups, which have two carbonyl groups, are formed (Scheme 1). Therefore, the photodegradation of lignin will increase the number of carbonyl groups in the lignin. As such, the carbonyl index of all samples increased after 35 days of UV irradiation (Figure 5). Among tested additives, the organic UVA (T-479), zinc oxide, and to some extent, cerium oxide proved to be the most effective additives in protecting lignin, which resulted in lower carbonyl group formation. It was shown that zinc oxide could quench free radicals and acts as a radical scavenger (Kumar et al. 2014; Soren et al. 2018). UVAs filter the high-energy UV spectrum while radical scavengers neutralize high-energy and destructive free radicals. Therefore, when organic UVAs and HALSs were used together, the UV protection was significantly improved compared to using each additive individually.

Figure 5: 
Increase in carbonyl index (%) 




(


A
 
1735


A
2921


)




$(\frac{A\hspace{0.17em}1735}{A2921})$



 of different samples after 35 days of UV irradiation (lower numbers are better), the bars with the same color are not significantly different (α = 0.5).
Figure 5:

Increase in carbonyl index (%) ( A 1735 A 2921 ) of different samples after 35 days of UV irradiation (lower numbers are better), the bars with the same color are not significantly different (α = 0.5).

4 Discussion

In this study, lignin was used as a model compound to evaluate the efficacy of a wide range of light stabilizer additives used in coatings. It was observed that zinc oxide and a mixture of organic UVA/HALS were the most effective additives for increasing the photostability of lignin. It was assumed that these additives can potentially increase the UV stability of wood when added to coating formulations designed for exterior applications. Although other wood components, especially extractives, can also play a role in photodegradation of wood, reducing structural degradation of lignin which absorbs 80–95% of UV-light (Hon and Shiraishi 2000), is a good starting point in choosing the right additives for formulating clear wood coatings. It is important to point out that the organosolv lignin used in this study has a different structure than native lignin in the wood. It is indisputable that any isolation process will change the structure of lignin; therefore, the additives that have worked in this study might not have the same interaction effect with the lignin on the surface of the wood. That is why the effectiveness of these best-performing additives are being studied (by authors) when added into different resins (alkyd, acrylic, and polyurethane). The performance of coated-wood samples will be monitored during exposure to a combination UV and rain (accelerated weathering).

Some of these additives can still protect the wood surface without chemically bonding with lignin. They can reduce the UV degradation of wood by shielding (dispersion or absorption) the UV light or acting as radical scavengers to capture the formed radicals. Pánek et al. (2018) reported that the combination of UVA and HALS was the most effective treatment for color stabilization of wood in exterior applications. Since similar results were found, studying lignin degradation as a simpler structure than wood seems to be a reliable method to evaluate the performance of newly developed light stabilizers.

5 Conclusions

The main goal of this work was to investigate the photodegradation phenomena of lignin and study the efficacy of different additives in improving the UV stability of lignin. The analysis of samples with FTIR before and after 35 days of UV exposure showed that the aromatic rings in lignin (lignin index) decreased (85%), while the carbonyl index increased (94%). Also, the glass transition temperature, molecular weight, and carboxylic acid content of lignin increased after UV exposure. The addition of nanosized metal oxides like cerium oxide significantly reduced the photodegradation of lignin. Moreover, it was observed that using a combination of organic UVAs and HALS (such as T-292/T-1130, T-479/T-123, T-400/T-123, and T-5333) were very effective in improving the overall UV stability of lignin, compared to using each additive individually. The results of this study can serve as the first step in choosing the most effective additives for formulating high-performance, durable transparent/clear wood coatings. Keeping lignin intact on the wood surface as a hydrophobic compound reduces wood discoloration and fiber delamination and improves the dimensional stability of wood by improving its water-resistance properties.


Corresponding author: Mojgan Nejad, Department of Forestry, Michigan State University, 480 Wilson Road, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA; and Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, Michigan State University, 428 S. Shaw Lane, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA, E-mail:

Award Identifier / Grant number: DE-EE0008148

Funding source: Wood-Based Composites Center, a National Science Foundation Industry/University Cooperative Research Center

Award Identifier / Grant number: 1624536-IIP

Award Identifier / Grant number: 1021850

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank technical advisors from Willamette Valley, Oxiquim, Arauco, Louisiana Pacific (LP), Bosie Cascade, and Timber Specialties for their invaluable advice throughout the project.

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: The authors appreciate the funding supports from the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) EERE under contract no. DE-EE0008148, the Wood-Based Composites Center, a National Science Foundation Industry/University Cooperative Research Center (Award 1624536-IIP), and the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture, McIntire Stennis, 1021850.

  3. Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.

References

Abe, Z. (1994). The color change of sugi (Cryptomeria japonica D. Don) heartwood from reddish brown to black. I. The color changes and its causes. Mokuzai Gakkaishi 40: 1119–1125.Search in Google Scholar

Aloui, F., Ahajji, A., Irmouli, Y., George, B., Charrier, B., and Merlin, A. (2007). Inorganic UV absorbers for the photostabilisation of wood-clearcoating systems: comparison with organic UV absorbers. Appl. Surf. Sci. 253: 3737–3745, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2006.08.029.Search in Google Scholar

Anderson, E.L., Pawlak, Z., Owen, N.L., and Feist, W.C. (1991). Infrared studies of wood weathering. Part I: softwoods. Appl. Spectrosc. 45: 641–647, https://doi.org/10.1366/0003702914336930.Search in Google Scholar

Argyropoulos, D.S., and Sun, Y. (1996). Photochemically induced solid‐state degradation, condensation, and rearrangement reactions in lignin model compounds and milled wood lignin. Photochem. Photobiol. 64: 510–517, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-1097.1996.tb03098.x.Search in Google Scholar

Asgari, F., and Argyropoulos, D.S. (1998). Fundamentals of oxygen delignification. Part II. Functional group formation/elimination in residual kraft lignin. Can. J. Chem. 76: 1606–1615, https://doi.org/10.1139/cjc-76-11-1606.Search in Google Scholar

Azadfalah, M., Mirshokraei, S.A., Jahan, L.A., and Parspazhouh, D. (2008). Analysis of photodegraded lignin on cellulose matrix by means of FTIR spectroscopy and high pressure size exclusion chromatography. Iran. Polym. J. 17: 73–80.Search in Google Scholar

Castellan, A., Zhu, J., Colombo, N., Nourmamode, A., Davidson, R., and Dunn, L. (1991). An approach to understanding the mechanism of protection of bleached high-yield pulps against photoyellowing by reducing agents using the lignin model dimer: 3, 4-dimethoxy-a-(2′-methoxyphenoxy)-acetophenone. J. Photochem. Photobiol. Chem. 58: 263–273, https://doi.org/10.1016/1010-6030(91)85052-i.Search in Google Scholar

Chang, S.T., Wang, S.Y., Su, Y.C., Huang, S.L., and Kuo, Y.H. (1999). Chemical constituents and mechanisms of discoloration of Taiwania (Taiwania cryptomerioides Hayata) Heartwood. The structure reconfirmation and conversion mechanism of Taiwanin A. Holzforschung 55: 142–146, https://doi.org/10.1515/hf.1999.023.Search in Google Scholar

Chang, S.T., Hon, D.N.S., and Feist, W.C. (2007). Photodegradation and photoprotection of wood surfaces. Wood Fiber Sci. 14: 104–117.Search in Google Scholar

Dao, N.N., Dai Luu, M., Nguyen, Q.K., and Kim, B.S. (2011). UV absorption by cerium oxide nanoparticles/epoxy composite thin films. Adv. Nat. Sci. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2: 045013, https://doi.org/10.1088/2043-6262/2/4/045013.Search in Google Scholar

Davidson, R.S. (1996). The photodegradation of some naturally occurring polymers. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 33: 3–25, https://doi.org/10.1016/1011-1344(95)07262-4.Search in Google Scholar

de Meijer, M., and Nienhuis, J. (2009). Influence of internal stress and extensibility on the exterior durability of wood coatings. Prog. Org. Coating 65: 498–503, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.porgcoat.2009.04.011.Search in Google Scholar

Decker, C., Biry, S., and Zahouily, K. (1995). Photostabilisation of organic coatings. Polym. Degrad. Stabil. 49: 111–119, https://doi.org/10.1016/0141-3910(95)00068-w.Search in Google Scholar

European Standards (2006). Paints and varnishes. Coating materials and coating systems for exterior wood (EN 927.6-2006).Search in Google Scholar

Evans, P., and Schmalzl, K. (1989). A quantitative weathering study of wood surfaces modified by chromium VI and iron III compounds. Part 1. Loss in zero-span tensile strength and weight of thin wood veneers. Holzforschung 43: 289–292, https://doi.org/10.1515/hfsg.1989.43.5.289.Search in Google Scholar

Evans, P., Owen, N., Schmid, S., and Webster, R. (2002). Weathering and photostability of benzoylated wood. Polym. Degrad. Stabil. 76: 291–303, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0141-3910(02)00026-5.Search in Google Scholar

Evans, P.D. (2012). Weathering of wood and wood composites. In: Handbook of wood chemistry and wood composites. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA, pp. 166–231.Search in Google Scholar

Evans, P.D., Haase, J.G., Seman, A.S., and Kiguchi, M. (2015). The search for durable exterior clear coatings for wood. Coatings 5: 830–864, https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings5040830.Search in Google Scholar

Feist, W.C., and Hon, D.N.S. (1984). Chemistry of weathering and protection. In: The chemistry of solid wood. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, USA, pp. 401–451.10.1021/ba-1984-0207.ch011Search in Google Scholar

Feist, W.C., Rowell, R.M., and Ellis, W.D. (2007). Moisture sorption and accelerated weathering of acetylated and methacrylated aspen. Wood Fiber Sci. 23: 128–136.Search in Google Scholar

Forsthuber, B., and Grüll, G. (2010). The effects of HALS in the prevention of photo-degradation of acrylic clear topcoats and wooden surfaces. Polym. Degrad. Stabil. 95: 746–755, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2010.02.016.Search in Google Scholar

Funaoka, K., Kuroda, Y., Kai, Y., and Kondo, T. (1963). On the phenolic constituents from Cryptomeria japonica D. Don. I. Isolation and a few characteristics of two phenolic substances. Mokuzai Gakkaishi 9: 139–141.Search in Google Scholar

Ganne-Chédeville, C., Jääskeläinen, A.S., Froidevaux, J., Hughes, and M., and Navi, P. (2012). Natural and artificial ageing of spruce wood as observed by FTIR-ATR and UVRR spectroscopy. Holzforschung 66: 163–170.10.1515/HF.2011.148Search in Google Scholar

Hayoz, P., Peter, W., and Rogez, D. (2003). A new innovative stabilization method for the protection of natural wood. Prog. Org. Coating 48: 297–309, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0300-9440(03)00102-4.Search in Google Scholar

Hill, L., Korzeniowski, H., Ojunga-Andrew, M., and Wilson, R. (1994). Accelerated clearcoat weathering studied by dynamic mechanical analysis. Prog. Org. Coating 24: 147–173, https://doi.org/10.1016/0033-0655(94)85012-7.Search in Google Scholar

Holmbom, B. (1991). Analysis of chemical changes caused by exposure to light and bleaching of spruce groundwood. Mitt. Bundesforsch. Forst-Holzwirtsch. (Germany, FR) 168: 272–277.Search in Google Scholar

Hon, D.N.S. (2001). Weathering and photochemistry of wood. Wood Cellulosic Chem. 2: 512–546.10.1201/9781482269741-17Search in Google Scholar

Hon, D.N.S. (1984). ESCA study of oxidized wood surfaces. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 29: 2777–2784, https://doi.org/10.1002/app.1984.070290908.Search in Google Scholar

Hon, D.S., Chang, S.T., and Feist, W. (1982). Participation of singlet oxygen in the photodegradation of wood surfaces. Wood Sci. Technol. 16: 193–201, https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00353868.Search in Google Scholar

Hon, D.N.S., and Shiraishi, N. (2000). Wood and cellulosic chemistry. CRC Press, New York, USA.10.1201/9781482269741Search in Google Scholar

Jia, H., Wang, H., and Chen, W. (2007). The combination effect of hindered amine light stabilizers with UV absorbers on the radiation resistance of polypropylene. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 76: 1179–1188, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2006.12.008.Search in Google Scholar

Kalnins, M.A. (1966). Part II. Photochemical degradation of wood. Surface characteristics of wood as they affect durability of finishes. U.S. Forest Service Res. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Madison, WI, pp. 23–57.Search in Google Scholar

Kataoka, Y., Kiguchi, M., Williams, R.S., and Evans, P.D. (2006). Proceedings of the Fifth International Woodcoatings Congress: Enhancing Service Life, October 17–18, 2006: the effects of wavelength on photodegradation depth profiles in Japanese cedar (Cryptomeria japonica D. Don) earlywood, PRA Coatings Technology Centre, Prague, Czech Republic. Middlesex, UK.Search in Google Scholar

Klemchuk, P.P., Gande, M.E., and Cordola, E. (1990). Hindered amine mechanisms: part III—investigations using isotopic labelling. Polym. Degrad. Stabil. 27: 65–74, https://doi.org/10.1016/0141-3910(90)90097-q.Search in Google Scholar

Kline, L.M., Hayes, D.G., Womac, A.R., and Labbe, N. (2010). Simplified determination of lignin content in hard and soft woods via UV-spectrophotometric analysis of biomass dissolved in ionic liquids. BioResources 5: 1366–1383.Search in Google Scholar

Kumar, B., Smita, K., Cumbal, L., and Debut, A. (2014). Green approach for fabrication and applications of zinc oxide nanoparticles. Bioinorgan. Chem. Appl. 2014: 1–7, https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/523869.Search in Google Scholar

Kutz, M. (2018). Handbook of environmental degradation of materials. William Andrew, Norwich, New York, USA.Search in Google Scholar

Mandlekar, N., Cayla, A., Rault, F., Giraud, S., Salaün, F., Malucelli, G., and Guan, J.P. (2018). An overview on the use of lignin and its derivatives in fire retardant polymer systems. Lignin-Trends Appl. 207: 231, https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.72963.Search in Google Scholar

Morris, P., and McFarling, S. (2006). Proceedings of the International Research Group on Wood Protection Meeting, June 2006: enhancing the performance of transparent coatings by UV protective pretreatments. IRG Secretariat, Tromsø, Norway.Search in Google Scholar

Müller, U., Rätzsch, M., Schwanninger, M., Steiner, and M., and Zöbl, H. (2003). Yellowing and IR-changes of spruce wood as result of UV-irradiation. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 69: 97–105.10.1016/S1011-1344(02)00412-8Search in Google Scholar

Nejad, M., and Cooper, P. (2011). Exterior wood coatings. Part-1: performance of semitransparent stains on preservative-treated wood. J. Coating Technol. Res. 8: 449–458, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11998-011-9332-3.Search in Google Scholar

Nikafshar, S., Zabihi, O., Ahmadi, M., Mirmohseni, A., Taseidifar, M., and Naebe, M. (2017). The effects of UV light on the chemical and mechanical properties of a transparent epoxy-diamine system in the presence of an organic UV absorber. Materials 10: 180, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma10020180.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Nkeuwa, W.N., Riedl, B., and Landry, V. (2014). Wood surfaces protected with transparent multilayer UV-cured coatings reinforced with nanosilica and nanoclay. Part II: application of a standardized test method to study the effect of relative humidity on scratch resistance. J. Coating Technol. Res. 11: 993–1011, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11998-014-9609-4.Search in Google Scholar

Pandey, K.K. (2005a). A note on the influence of extractives on the photo-discoloration and photo-degradation of wood. Polym. Degrad. Stabil. 87: 375–379, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2004.09.007.Search in Google Scholar

Pandey, K.K. (2005b). Study of the effect of photo-irradiation on the surface chemistry of wood. Polym. Degrad. Stabil. 90: 9–20, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2005.02.009.Search in Google Scholar

Pánek, M., Oberhofnerová, E., Hýsek, Š., Šedivka, P., and Zeidler, A. (2018). Colour stabilization of oak, spruce, larch and douglas fir heartwood treated with mixtures of nanoparticle dispersions and UV-stabilizers after exposure to UV and VIS-radiation. Materials 11: 1653.10.3390/ma11091653Search in Google Scholar

Passauer, L., Schubert, J., Schulz, T., Flade, P., Weib, B., and Burkhardt, H. (2021). Artificial weathering of surfaces from laminated phenol-formaldehyde resin impregnated compressed wood: impact of top veneer type and overlay application. Eur. J. Wood. Prod. 79: 567–578, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00107-020-01648-0.Search in Google Scholar

Popescu, C.-M., Popescu, M.C., and Vasile, C. (2011). Structural analysis of photodegraded lime wood by means of FT-IR and 2D IR correlation spectroscopy. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 48: 667–675, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2011.02.009.Search in Google Scholar

Rowell, R., Feist, W., and Ellis, W. (1981). Weathering of chemically modified southern pine [Polymer lumen fill treatments]. Wood Sci. 13: 202–208.Search in Google Scholar

Saha, S., Kocaefe, D., Boluk, Y., and Pichette, A. (2013). Surface degradation of CeO2 stabilized acrylic polyurethane coated thermally treated jack pine during accelerated weathering. Appl. Surf. Sci. 276: 86–94, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.03.031.Search in Google Scholar

Saiter, J., Delahaye, N., Liziard, M., and Podgorski, L. (1995). Characterization of alkyd based thermosetting resins. J. Therm. Anal. 45: 1145–1151, https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02547487.Search in Google Scholar

Sakakibara, A. and Sano, Y. (2000). Chemistry of lignin. In: Wood and cellulosic chemistry. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp. 109–173.Search in Google Scholar

Salla, J., Pandey, K.K., and Srinivas, K. (2012). Improvement of UV resistance of wood surfaces by using ZnO nanoparticles. Polym. Degrad. Stabil. 97: 592–596, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2012.01.013.Search in Google Scholar

Schaller, C., Rogez, D., and Braig, A. (2008). Hydroxyphenyl-s-triazines: advanced multipurpose UV-absorbers for coatings. J. Coating Technol. Res. 5: 25–31, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11998-007-9025-0.Search in Google Scholar

Schmalzl, K., and Evans, P. (2003). Wood surface protection with some titanium, zirconium and manganese compounds. Polym. Degrad. Stabil. 82: 409–419, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0141-3910(03)00193-9.Search in Google Scholar

Soren, S., Kumar, S., Mishra, S., Jena, P.K., Verma, S.K., and Parhi, P. (2018). Evaluation of antibacterial and antioxidant potential of the zinc oxide nanoparticles synthesized by aqueous and polyol method. Microb. Pathog. 119: 145–151, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2018.03.048.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Stark, N.M., and Matuana, L.M. (2004). Surface chemistry and mechanical property changes of wood‐flour/high‐density‐polyethylene composites after accelerated weathering. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 94: 2263–2273, https://doi.org/10.1002/app.20996.Search in Google Scholar

Tolvaj, L., and Mitsui, K. (2010). Correlation between hue angle and lightness of light irradiated wood. Polym. Degrad. Stabil. 95: 638–642, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2009.12.004.Search in Google Scholar

Turkulin, H., and Sell, J. (1997). Structural and fractographic study on weathered wood: an application of FE SEM microscopy to the “thin strip” method. EMPA, Dübendorf, Switzerland.Search in Google Scholar

Umezawa, T. (2000). Chemistry of extractives. Wood and cellulosic chemistry. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp. 213–242.Search in Google Scholar

Van den Bulcke, J., Rijckaert, V., Van Acker, J., and Stevens, M. (2006). Adhesion and weathering performance of waterborne coatings applied to different temperate and tropical wood species. J. Coating Technol. Res. 3: 185–192.Search in Google Scholar

Wang, J., Deng, Y., Qian, Y., Qiu, X., Ren, Y., and Yang, D. (2016). Reduction of lignin color via one-step UV irradiation. Green Chem. 18: 695–699, https://doi.org/10.1039/c5gc02180d.Search in Google Scholar

Williams, R.S. (2005). Weathering of wood. In: Handbook of wood chemistry and wood composites. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA, pp. 139–185.Search in Google Scholar

Xie, Y., Krause, A., Militz, H., and Mai, C. (2008). Weathering of uncoated and coated wood treated with methylated 1, 3-dimethylol-4, 5-dihydroxyethyleneurea (mDMDHEU). Holz als Roh- Werkst. 66: 455–464, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00107-008-0270-4.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2021-07-28
Accepted: 2021-10-20
Published Online: 2021-12-21
Published in Print: 2022-03-28

© 2021 Saeid Nikafshar and Mojgan Nejad, published by De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Downloaded on 6.6.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/hf-2021-0147/html
Scroll to top button