Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Mouton June 10, 2017

Punches or punchlines? Honor, face, and dignity cultures encourage different reactions to provocation

  • Kuba Krys EMAIL logo , Cai Xing , John M Zelenski , Colin A Capaldi , Zhongxin Lin and Bogdan Wojciszke
From the journal HUMOR

Abstract

Research on culture-related violence has typically focused on honor cultures and their justification of certain forms of aggression as reactions to provocation. In contrast, amusement and humor as the preferred reactions to provocation remain understudied phenomena, especially in a cross-cultural context. In an attempt to remedy this, participants from an honor culture (Poland), dignity culture (Canada), and face culture (China) were asked how they would react and how they would like to react to a series of provocative scenarios. Results confirmed that aggression may be the preferred reaction to provocation in honor cultures, while the preferred reaction to provocation in dignity cultures may be based on humor and amusement. The third kind of provocation reaction, withdrawal, turned out to be more complex but was most popular in dignity and face cultures. Furthermore, results confirmed that the way individuals think they would behave is more culturally diversified than the way individuals would like to behave.

Funding statement: Parts of this research were supported by the National Science Centre grant 2011/01/N/HS6/04285 awarded to Kuba Krys.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express their gratitude to all partners engaged in translations and data collection.

References

Ajzen, I., T. Brown & F. Carvajal 2004. Explaining the discrepancy between intentions and actions: The case of hypothetical bias in contingent valuation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 30. 1108–1121.10.1177/0146167204264079Search in Google Scholar

American Psychiatric Association. 2000. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th edition). Washington, DC: Author.Search in Google Scholar

Averill, J. 1983. Studies on anger and aggression: Implications for theories of emotion. American Psychologist 38. 1145–1160. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.38.11.1145.Search in Google Scholar

Barnes, C., R. Brown & L. Osterman 2012. Don’t tread on me: Masculine honor ideology in the U.S. and militant responses to terrorism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 38. 1018–1029. doi:10.1177/0146167212443383Search in Google Scholar

Berry, J. 2013. Achieving a global psychology. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne 54. 55–61. doi:10.1037/a0031246.Search in Google Scholar

Bettencourt, B. & N. Miller 1996. Gender differences in aggression as a function of provocation: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin 119. 422–447. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.119.3.422.Search in Google Scholar

Cohen, D. 1998. Culture, social organization, and patterns of violence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2. 408–419. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.75.2.408.Search in Google Scholar

Cohen, D., R. Nisbett, B. Bowdle & N. Schwarz 1996. Insult, aggression, and the southern culture of honor: An experimental ethnography. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 70. 945–960. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.70.5.945.Search in Google Scholar

Cohen, D. & J. Vandello 2001. Honor and “faking” honorability. In R. Nesse (ed.), Evolution and the capacity for commitment, 163–185. New York: Russell Sage.Search in Google Scholar

Cross, S., A. Uskul, B. Gerçek-Swing, C. AlöZkan & B. Ataca 2013. Confrontation vs. withdrawal: Cultural differences in responses to threats to honor. Group Processes Intergroup Relations 16. 345–362. doi:10.1177/1368430212461962.Search in Google Scholar

Dworkin, E. & J. Efran 1967. The angered: Their susceptibility to varieties of humor. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 6. 233–236. doi: 10.1037/h0024568.Search in Google Scholar

Fischer, A., P. Rodriguez Mosquera, A. Van Vianen & A. Manstead 2004. Gender and culture differences in emotion. Emotion 4. 87–94. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.4.1.87.Search in Google Scholar

Fredrickson, B., R. Mancuso, C. Branigan & M. Tugade 2000. The undoing effect of positive emotions. Motivation and Emotion 24. 237–258. doi: 10.1023/A:1010796329158.Search in Google Scholar

Freud, S. 1905/1957. The joke and its relation to the unconscious. London: Hogarth.Search in Google Scholar

Gelfand, M., L. Nishii & J. Raver 2006. On the nature and importance of cultural tightness–looseness. Journal of Applied Psychology 91. 1225–1244. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.91.6.1225.Search in Google Scholar

Henry, P. 2009. Low-status compensation: A theory for understanding the role of status in cultures of honor. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 97. 451–466. doi: 10.1037/a0015476.Search in Google Scholar

Kim, Y. & D. Cohen 2010. Information, perspective, and judgments about the self in face and dignity cultures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 36. 537–550. doi: 10.1177/0146167210362398.Search in Google Scholar

Krys, K. 2010. May amusement serve as a social courage engine? Polish Psychological Bulletin 41. 67–73. doi: 10.2478/v10059-010-0009-z.Search in Google Scholar

Leung, A. & D. Cohen 2011. Within- and between-culture variation: Individual differences and the cultural logics of honor, face, and dignity cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 10. 507–526. doi: 10.1037/a0022151.Search in Google Scholar

Martin, R. 2007. The psychology of humor. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.10.1016/B978-012372564-6/50024-1Search in Google Scholar

Martin, R., P. Puhlik-Doris, G. Larsen, J. Gray & K. Weir 2003. Individual differences in uses of humor and their relation to psychological well-being: Development of the humor styles questionnaire. Journal of Research in Personality 37. 48–75. doi: 10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00534-2.Search in Google Scholar

Mindess, H. 1971. Laughter and liberation. Los Angeles, CA: Nash Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Nisbett, R. & D. Cohen 1996. Culture of honor: The psychology of violence in the South. Boulder, CO: Westview.Search in Google Scholar

Osterman, L. & R. Brown 2011. Culture of honor and violence against the self. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 37. 1611–1623. doi: 10.1177/0146167211418529.Search in Google Scholar

Rodriguez Mosquera, P., A. Fischer, A. Manstead & R. Zaalberg 2008. Attack, disapproval, or withdrawal? The role of honor in anger and shame responses to being insulted. Cognition and Emotion 22. 1471–1498. doi: 10.1080/02699930701822272.Search in Google Scholar

Rodriguez Mosquera, P., A. Manstead & A. Fischer 2002. The role of honor concerns in emotional reactions to offenses. Cognition and Emotion 16. 143–163. doi: 10.1080/02699930143000167.Search in Google Scholar

Sasaki, J., D. Ko & H. Kim 2014. Culture and self-worth: Implications for social comparison processes and coping with threats to self-worth. In Z. Krizan & F. Gibbons (eds.), Communal functions of social comparison. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139035583.014Search in Google Scholar

Seligman, M. & M. Csikszentmihalyi 2000. Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist 55. 5–14.10.1007/978-94-017-9088-8_18Search in Google Scholar

Sherman, D. & G. Cohen 2006. The psychology of self-defense: Self-affirmation theory. In M. Zanna (ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 38, 183–242. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.10.1016/S0065-2601(06)38004-5Search in Google Scholar

Szmajke, A. 2008. Culture and aggression: Poland as an enclave of “culture of honor”. In M. Plopa & M. Błażek (eds.), Współczesny człowiek w świetle dylematów i wyzwań: Perspektywa psychologiczna (Contemporary man in the perspective of dilemmas and challenges: Psychological perspective), 105–113. Kraków: Impuls.Search in Google Scholar

Vaillant, G. 2000. Adaptive mental mechanisms: Their role in a positive psychology. American Psychologist 55. 89–98. doi:10.1037//0003-066X.55.1.89.Search in Google Scholar

Vandello, J., D. Cohen, R. Grandon & R. Franiuk 2009. Stand by your man: Indirect prescriptions for honorable violence and feminine loyalty in Canada, Chile, and the United States. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 40. 81–104. doi: 10.1177/0022022108326194.Search in Google Scholar

Vandello, J., D. Cohen & S. Ransom 2008. U.S. Southern and Northern differences in perceptions of norms about aggression: Mechanisms for the perpetuation of a culture of honor. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 39. 162–177. doi: 10.1177/0022022107313862.Search in Google Scholar

Appendix A – The Questionnaire (English version)

A The way things are

Below you can find a description of seven insulting situations. Each situation has three different endings. Would you behave this way in a real situation?

Please assess each of the below described behaviours – would you defend your worth by behaving this way? Please use the scale from 1 (I would never behave this way) to 7 (for sure I would do it).

1. During a party in the presence of many of your friends your acquaintance severely insulted your mother by abusively calling her a prostitute. As a reaction to this insult you would:
– do nothing and expect the host of the party to intervene1 2 3 4 5 6 7
– return the insult to that person using swear-words1 2 3 4 5 6 7
– humorously comment on that person’s behaviour1 2 3 4 5 6 7
2. During an informal meeting with co-workers your colleague unfavourably spoke of your spouse by questioning his/her morality and intellectual skills. As a reaction to this insult you would:
– do nothing and expect the boss of your team to intervene1 2 3 4 5 6 7
– return the insult to that person using swear-words1 2 3 4 5 6 7
– humorously comment on that person’s behaviour1 2 3 4 5 6 7
3. While walking with friends in the park your former neighbour coming from the opposite direction hit you with an arm, and on top of that called you ‘bitch’/‘asshole’. As a reaction to this insult you would:
– do nothing but consider reporting this behaviour to the police1 2 3 4 5 6 7
– return the insult to that person using words similar to what she/he used1 2 3 4 5 6 7
– turn to your friends and humorously comment on that person’s behaviour1 2 3 4 5 6 7
4. One of your former classmates spread insulting information about you (you’re a thief, a cheat and your moral conduct is poor). You met that person on the former class gathering. You would:
– do nothing and expect others not to believe in those rumours1 2 3 4 5 6 7
– call that person a dirty liar in the presence of others1 2 3 4 5 6 7
– humorously comment on that person’s behaviour1 2 3 4 5 6 7
5. A friend of one of your far relatives violently cut in line for a concert right in front of you with the words ‘move away you prick’. As a reaction to this insult you would:
– do nothing and expect the nearby security guard to intervene1 2 3 4 5 6 7
– return the insult to that person and try to defend your place in the line1 2 3 4 5 6 7
– humorously comment on that person’s behaviour1 2 3 4 5 6 7
6. During a family trip to another country someone on the railway station heard you use your language and called you ‘stupid Canadian/Pole/Chinese’. As a reaction to this insult you would:
– do nothing and expect the station security guard to intervene1 2 3 4 5 6 7
– publicly return the insult1 2 3 4 5 6 7
– turn to your family and humorously comment on that person’s behaviour1 2 3 4 5 6 7
7. During a night out in a pub/restaurant with friends your outfit was ridiculed aloud by someone living in your neighbourhood sitting nearby. As a reaction to this insult you would:
– do nothing and expect the pub/restaurant staff to intervene1 2 3 4 5 6 7
– publicly return the insult1 2 3 4 5 6 7
– humorously comment on that person’s behaviour1 2 3 4 5 6 7

B The way things generally should be

Below you can find a description of the same seven insulting situations. Again each situation has three different endings. Would you like to be able to behave this way? Do you see reactions displayed as justified? Imagine you will not be punished for your reaction – what would you ideally like to do?

Please assess each of the below described behaviours – would you like to behave this way to defend your worth? Please use the scale from 1 (I would not like to behave this way) to 7 (of course I would like to do it).

1. During a party in the presence of many of your friends your acquaintance severely insulted your mother by abusively calling her a prostitute. As a reaction to this insult you would ideally like to:
– do nothing and expect the host of the party to intervene1 2 3 4 5 6 7
– return the insult to that person using swear-words1 2 3 4 5 6 7
– humorously comment on that person’s behaviour1 2 3 4 5 6 7
2. During an informal meeting with co-workers your colleague unfavourably spoke of your spouse by questioning his/her morality and intellectual skills. As a reaction to this insult you would ideally like to:
– do nothing and expect the boss of your team to intervene1 2 3 4 5 6 7
– return the insult to that person using swear-words1 2 3 4 5 6 7
– humorously comment on that person’s behaviour1 2 3 4 5 6 7
3. While walking with friends in the park your former neighbour coming from the opposite direction hit you with an arm, and on top of that called you ‘bitch’/‘asshole’. You would ideally like to:
– do nothing but consider reporting this behaviour to the police1 2 3 4 5 6 7
– return the insult to that person using words similar to what she/he used1 2 3 4 5 6 7
– turn to your friends and humorously comment on that person’s behaviour1 2 3 4 5 6 7
4. One of your former classmates spread insulting information about you (you’re a thief, a cheat and your moral conduct is poor). You met that person on the former class gathering. You would ideally like to:
– do nothing and expect others not to believe in those rumours1 2 3 4 5 6 7
– call that person a dirty liar in the presence of others1 2 3 4 5 6 7
– humorously comment on that person’s behaviour1 2 3 4 5 6 7
5. A friend of one of your far relatives violently cut in line for a concert right in front of you with the words ‘move away you prick’. As a reaction to this insult you would ideally like to:
– do nothing and expect the nearby security guard to intervene1 2 3 4 5 6 7
– return the insult to that person and try to defend your place in the line1 2 3 4 5 6 7
– humorously comment on that person’s behaviour1 2 3 4 5 6 7
6. During a family trip to another country someone on the railway station heard you use your language and called you ‘stupid Canadian/Pole/Chinese’. As a reaction to this insult you would ideally like to:
– do nothing and expect the station security guard to intervene1 2 3 4 5 6 7
– publicly return the insult1 2 3 4 5 6 7
– turn to your family and humorously comment on that person’s behaviour1 2 3 4 5 6 7
7. During a night out in a pub/restaurant with friends your outfit was ridiculed aloud by someone living in your neighbourhood sitting nearby. As a reaction to this insult you would ideally like to:
– do nothing and expect the pub/restaurant staff to intervene1 2 3 4 5 6 7
– publicly return the insult1 2 3 4 5 6 7
– humorously comment on that person’s behaviour1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Published Online: 2017-6-10
Published in Print: 2017-7-26

© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 31.5.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/humor-2016-0087/html
Scroll to top button