Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter March 1, 2013

Developmental outcomes of economically disadvantaged adolescents in Hong Kong: a replication

  • Daniel T.L. Shek EMAIL logo and Pik-fong Tsui

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the relationships between economic disadvantage and adolescent and developmental outcomes as well as perceived family qualities in 3580 Secondary 2 students in Hong Kong. Developmental outcomes include positive youth development constructs, problem behavior and drug taking behavior, whereas perceived family qualities include perceived family interaction and parental parenting. Generally speaking, poor and non-poor adolescents differ in terms of overall positive youth development and family life quality. Although adolescents experiencing poverty do not display significant differences from non-poor adolescents in terms of risk behavior and psychosocial competencies, adolescents with economic disadvantage show lower levels of positive identity, family interaction, and perceived paternal parenting than do those without economic disadvantage.


Corresponding author: Professor Daniel T.L. Shek, PhD, FHKPS, BBS, JP, Chair Professor of Applied Social Sciences, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Department of Applied Social Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Room HJ407, Core H, Hunghom, Hong Kong, P.R. China, E-mail:

The preparation for this paper and the Project P.A.T.H.S. were financially supported by The Hong Kong Jockey Club Charities Trust.

References

1. World Bank. World Development Report 2000/2001: attacking poverty. Washington, DC: World Bank, 2000.10.1596/0-1952-1129-4Search in Google Scholar

2. Murry VM, Berkel C, Gaylord-Harden NK, Copeland-Linder Nikeea. Neighborhood poverty and adolescent development. Res Adolesc 2011;21:114–28.10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00718.xSearch in Google Scholar

3. Oxfam Hong Kong. Press release on 2011 Aug 17. Oxfam Hong Kong survey reveals 1 in 6 poor families caught in a hunger trap. Available from: http://www.oxfam.hk/en/news_1630.aspx. Accessed on 20 January, 2011.Search in Google Scholar

4. McLoyd VC, Kaplan R, Purtell KM, Bagley E, Hardaway CR, et al. Poverty and socioeconomic disadvantage in adolescence. In: Lerner RM, Steingberg L, editors. Handbook of adolescent psychology. Vol. 2: Contextual influences on adolescent development, 3rd ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley, 2009:444–91.Search in Google Scholar

5. Dashiff C, DiMicco W, Meyers B, Sheppard K. Poverty and adolescent mental health. J Child Adolesc Psychiatr Nurs 2009;22:23–32.10.1111/j.1744-6171.2008.00166.xSearch in Google Scholar

6. Eamon MK. Influences and mediators of the effect of poverty on young adolescent depressive symptoms. J Youth Adolesc 2002;31:231–42.10.1023/A:1015089304006Search in Google Scholar

7. Wadsworth ME, Berger LE. Adolescents coping with poverty-related family stress: prospective predictors of copying and psychological symptoms. J Youth Adolesc 2006;35:57–70.Search in Google Scholar

8. Najman JM, Hayatbakhsh MR, Calvarino A, O’Callaghan MJ, Williams GM. Family poverty over the early life course and recurrent adolescent and young anxiety and depression: a longitudinal study. Am J Public Health 2010;100:1719–23.10.2105/AJPH.2009.180943Search in Google Scholar

9. Bolland JM. Hopelessness and risk behavior among adolescents living in high-poverty inner-city neighourhoods. J Adolesc 2003;26:145–58.10.1016/S0140-1971(02)00136-7Search in Google Scholar

10. Oberwittler D. The effects of neighbourhood poverty on adolescent problem behaviours: a multi-level analysis differentiated by gender and ethnicity. Housing Stud 2007;22:781–803.10.1080/02673030701474727Search in Google Scholar

11. Eamon MK. Poverty, parenting, peer, and neighborhood influences on young adolescent antisocial behavior. J Soc Serv Res 2002;28:1–23.10.1300/J079v28n01_01Search in Google Scholar

12. Leventhal T, Dupere V. Moving to opportunity: does long-term exposure to “low-poverty” neighborhoods make a difference for adolescents? Soc Sci Med 2011;73:737–43.10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.06.042Search in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Hay C, Fortson EN, Hollist DR, Altheimer I, Schiable LM. Compounded risk: the implications for delinquency of coming from a poor family that lives in a poor community. J Youth Adolesc 2007;36:593–605.10.1007/s10964-007-9175-5Search in Google Scholar

14. Phillips TM, Pittman JF. Identity processes in poor adolescents: exploring the linkages between economic disadvantage and the primary task of adolescence. Identity: Int J Theory Res 2003;3:115–29.10.1207/S1532706XID030202Search in Google Scholar

15. Crocker J, Major B. Social stigma and self-esteem: the self-protective properties of stigma. Psychol Rev 1989;96: 608–30.10.1037/0033-295X.96.4.608Search in Google Scholar

16. Mickelson KD, Williams SL. Perceived stigma of poverty and depression: examination of interpersonal and intrapersonal mediators. J Soc Clin Psychol 2008;27:903–30.10.1521/jscp.2008.27.9.903Search in Google Scholar

17. Shek DTL, Tsui PF. Family and personal adjustment of economically disadvantaged Chinese adolescents in Hong Kong. ScientificWorldJ 2013; Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/2012/142689. Accessed 1 March 2012.10.1100/2012/142689Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

18. Hammack PL, Robinson WL, Crawford I, Li ST. Poverty and depressed mood among urban African-American adolescents: a family stress perspective. J Child Fam Stud 2004;13: 309–23.10.1023/B:JCFS.0000022037.59369.90Search in Google Scholar

19. Conger KJ, Rueter MA, Conger RD. The role of economic pressure in the lives of parents and their adolescents: the family stress mode. In: Crockett LJ, Silbereisen RK, editors. Negotiating adolescence in times of social change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2000:201–23.Search in Google Scholar

20. Leung JTY, Shek DTL. Poverty and adolescent developmental outcomes: a critical review. Int J Adolesc Med Health 2011;23:109–14.Search in Google Scholar

21. Leung JTY, Shek DTL. Quantitative and qualitative approaches in the study of poverty and adolescent development: separation or integration? Int J Adolesc Med Health 2011;23: 115–21.10.1515/ijamh.2011.020Search in Google Scholar PubMed

22. Shek DTL. Perceived parent control processes, parent-child relational qualities, and psychological well-being in Chinese adolescents with and without economic disadvantage. J Genet Psychol 2005;166:171–88.10.3200/GNTP.166.2.171-188Search in Google Scholar PubMed

23. Shek DTL. A longitudinal study of perceived family functioning and adolescent adjustment in Chinese adolescents with economic disadvantage. J Fam Issues 2005;26: 518–43.10.1177/0192513X04272618Search in Google Scholar

24. Shek DTL. Economic disadvantage, perceived family life quality, and emotional well-being in Chinese adolescents: a longitudinal study. Soc Indic Res 2008;85:169–89.10.1007/s11205-007-9087-5Search in Google Scholar

25. Catalano RF, Berglund ML, Ryan JAM, Lonczak HS, Hawkins JD. Positive youth development in the United States: research findings on evaluations of positive youth development programs. Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci 2004;591:98–124.10.1177/0002716203260102Search in Google Scholar

26. Ezell M. Are social workers ignoring the “cornerstone of science” by failing to replicate their research? Soc Work Res 2011;35:131–4.10.1093/swr/35.3.131Search in Google Scholar

27. Shek DTL, Siu AMH, Lee TY. The Chinese Positive Youth Development Scale: a validation study. Res Soc Work Pract 2007;12:380–91.10.1177/1049731506296196Search in Google Scholar

28. Shek DTL, Ma CMS. Dimensionality of the Chinese Positive Youth Development Scale: confirmatory factor analyses. Soc Indic Res 2010;98:41–59.10.1007/s11205-009-9515-9Search in Google Scholar

29. Shek DTL. Paternal and maternal influences on the psychological well-being, substance abuse, and delinquency of Chinese adolescents experiencing economic disadvantage. J Clin Psyc 2005;61:219–34.10.1002/jclp.20057Search in Google Scholar PubMed

30. Shek DTL. Assessment of family functioning in Chinese adolescents: the Chinese Family Assessment Instrument. In: Singh NN, Ollendick TH, Singh AN, editors. International perspectives on child and adolescent mental health. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2002:297–316.Search in Google Scholar

31. Snedker KA, Herting JR, Walton E. Contextual effects and adolescent substance use: exploring the role of neighborhoods. Soc Sci Q 2009;90:1273–97.10.1111/j.1540-6237.2009.00677.xSearch in Google Scholar

32. Conger RD, Ge X, Elder Jr. GH, Lorenz FO, Simons RL. Economic stress, coercive family process, and developmental problems of adolescents. Child Dev 1994;65:541–61.10.2307/1131401Search in Google Scholar

33. Korenman S, Miller JE. Effects of long-term poverty on physical health of children in the national longitudinal survey of youth. In: Duncan G, Brooks-Gunn, J, editors. Consequences of growing up poor. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1997: 70–99.Search in Google Scholar

34. Jarjoura GR, Triplett RA, Brinker GP. Growing up poor: examining the link between persistent childhood poverty and delinquency. J Quant Criminol 2002;18:159–87.10.1023/A:1015206715838Search in Google Scholar

35. Carr M. Chinese “Face” in Japanese and English (Part 2). The Review of Liberal Arts 1993;85:69–101.Search in Google Scholar

36. Shek DTL, Ma CMS, Tang CYP. Predictors of subjective outcome evaluation findings in a positive youth development program in Hong Kong. Int J Disabil Hum Dev 2011;10:249–55.10.1515/ijdhd.2011.040Search in Google Scholar

37. Shek DTL, Sun RCF, Merrick J. Training programs and implementation process of positive youth development programs. Int J Adolesc Med Health 2011;23:303–4.10.1515/IJAMH.2011.025Search in Google Scholar

38. Shek DTL, Ma HK, Sun RCF. A brief overview of adolescent developmental problems in Hong Kong. ScientificWorldJ 2011;11:2243–56.10.1100/2011/896835Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

39. Shek DTL. Quality of life research: responses to emerging issues in a changing world. Soc Indic Res 2011;100:371–4.10.1007/s11205-010-9628-1Search in Google Scholar

40. Sun RCF, Shek DTL. Positive youth development, life satisfaction and problem behaviour among Chinese adolescents in Hong Kong: a replication. Soc Indic Res 2012;105:541–59.10.1007/s11205-011-9786-9Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

41. Shek DTL, Ma CMS. Impact of the Project P.A.T.H.S. in the junior secondary school years: objective outcome evaluation based on eight waves of longitudinal data. ScientificWorldJ 2013; Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/2012/170345. Accessed 1 March 2012.10.1100/2012/170345Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

42. Shek DTL, Yu L. Longitudinal impact of the Project P.A.T.H.S. on adolescent risk behavior: what happened after five years? ScientificWorldJ 2013; Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/2012/316029. Accessed 1 March 2012.10.1100/2012/316029Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

43. Shek DTL, Yu L. A review of validated youth prevention and positive youth development programs in Asia. Int J Adolesc Med Health 2011;23:317–24.Search in Google Scholar

44. Shek DTL, Sun RCF. The Project P.A.T.H.S. in Hong Kong—Lessons Learned and Implications for Positive Youth Development Programs. ScientificWorldJ 2013; Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/2012/687536. Accessed 1 March 2012.10.1100/2012/687536Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Received: 2012-3-15
Accepted: 2012-4-26
Published Online: 2013-03-01
Published in Print: 2013-12-01

©2013 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin Boston

Downloaded on 6.6.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijamh-2013-0037/html
Scroll to top button