Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter March 31, 2020

Performance Comparison of Free-Space Optical (FSO) Communication Link Under OOK, BPSK, DPSK, QPSK and 8-PSK Modulation Formats in the Presence of Strong Atmospheric Turbulence

  • A. K. M. Sharoar Jahan Choyon EMAIL logo and Ruhin Chowdhury

Abstract

Free-space optical (FSO) communication system provides several advantages over radio frequency (RF) system offering high bandwidth, low cost, small space requirements and more secure transmission which is free from Electromagnetic Interference (EMI). However, when the transmitted light signal passes through the atmosphere it experiences attenuation and fluctuations due to atmospheric turbulence. This paper analyzes the bit error rate (BER) performance of FSO communication systems under strong atmospheric turbulence for on-off keying (OOK), binary phase-shift keying (BPSK), differential phase shift keying (DPSK), quadrature phase shift keying (QPSK) and 8-phase shift keying (8-PSK) for link distances of 500, 1,000, 1,500 and 2,000 m. The probability density function (pdf) of the received irradiance is modelled using the gamma-gamma distribution model. It is found that the system exhibits the best BER performance and compensates the lowest power penalty at BER of 10 - 9 for BPSK modulation compared with other modulation techniques which makes BPSK more appropriate to be used with FSO turbulent system.

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank my beloved wife Ruhin Chowdhury for her sincere help and motivations for the completion of this paper.

References

1. Wang JY, Wang JB, Chen M, Huang N, Jia LQ, Guan R. Ergodic capacity and outage capacity analysis for multiple-input single-output free-space optical communications over composite channels. Opt Eng 2014;53:016107.Search in Google Scholar

2. Liu X. Free-space optics optimization models for building sway and atmospheric interference using variable wavelength. Fiber Integr Opt. 2009;57:492–8.Search in Google Scholar

3. Abou-Rjeily C. On the optimality of the selection transmit diversity for MIMO-FSO links with feedback. IEEE Commun Lett 2011;15:641–3.Search in Google Scholar

4. Krishnan P, Kumar S. Performance analysis of free-space optical systems employing binary polarization shift keying signaling over gamma-gamma channel with pointing errors. Opt Eng 2014;53:076105.Search in Google Scholar

5. Letzepis N, Holland I, Cowley W, The Gaussian free space optical MIMO channel with Q-ary pulse position modulation. IEEE Trans Wireless Commun. 2008;7:1744–53.Search in Google Scholar

6. Popoola WO, Ghassemlooy Z. BPSK subcarrier intensity modulated free-space optical communications in atmospheric turbulence. J Lightw Technol. 2009;27:967–73.Search in Google Scholar

7. Korotkova O, Andrews LC, Phillips RL. Phase diffuse at the transmitter for lasercom link, effect of partially coherent beam on the bit error rate. Proc SPIE. 2003;4976:70–7.Search in Google Scholar

8. Majumdar AK. Free-space laser communication performance in the atmospheric channel. J Opt Fiber Commun Rep. 20052:345–96.Search in Google Scholar

9. Li J, Liu JQ, Taylor DP. Optical communication using subcarrier PSK intensity modulation through atmospheric turbulence channels. IEEE Trans Commun 2007;55:1598–606.Search in Google Scholar

10. Wang Z, Zhong W, Fu S, Lin C. Performance comparison of different modulation formats over free-space optical (FSO) turbulence links with space diversity reception technique. IEEE Photon J. 2009;1:277–85.Search in Google Scholar

11. Patnaik B, Sahu PK. Design and study of high bit-rate free-space optical communication system employing QPSK modulation. Int J Sig Imag Syst Eng. 2013;6:3–8.Search in Google Scholar

12. Andrews LC, Phillips RL. Laser beam propagation through random media. Bellingham: SPIE Press, 2005.Search in Google Scholar

13. Krishnan P. Performance analysis of FSO systems over atmospheric turbulence channel for Indian weather conditions. In: Barille R, editor. Turbulence and related phenomena. Rijeka: IntechOpen. 2019:7–16.Search in Google Scholar

14. Jarangal E, Dhawan D. Comparison of channel models based on Atmospheric turbulences of FSO system - a review. Int J Res Electron Comput Eng. 2018;6:282–7.Search in Google Scholar

15. Zhang H, Li H, Dongya X, Chao C. Performance analysis of different modulation techniques for free-space optical communication system, Chao Institute of Space Optical Communication. Changchun Univ Sci Technol. 2015;13:880–8.Search in Google Scholar

16. Yan L, Yin P, Chen DJ, Hui TM, Gang LY. Performance analysis of OOK, BPSK, QPSK modulation schemes in uplink of ground-to-satellite laser communication system under atmospheric fluctuation. Opt Commun. 2014;317:57–61.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2019-09-25
Accepted: 2020-03-11
Published Online: 2020-03-31

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 5.6.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/joc-2019-0250/html
Scroll to top button