Understandable robots - What, Why, and How

References

[1] D. Doran, S. Schulz, T. R. Besold, What does explainable AI really mean? A new conceptualization of perspectives, 2017, arXiv:1710.00794 [cs.AI]Search in Google Scholar

[2] A. Chandrasekaran, D. Yadav, P. Chattopadhyay, V. Prabhu, D. Parikh, It takes two to tango: Towards theory of AI’s mind, 2017, arXiv:1704.00717Search in Google Scholar

[3] T. Fong, I. Nourbakhsh, K. Dautenhahn, A survey of socially interactive robots: Concepts, design and applications, Technical Report CMU-RI-TR-02-29, Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, 2002Search in Google Scholar

[4] S. Bensch, A. Jevtić, T. Hellström, On interaction quality in human-robot interaction, In: International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence (ICAART), 2017, 182-18910.5220/0006191601820189Search in Google Scholar

[5] T. Nomura, K. Kawakami, Relationships between robot’s selfdisclosures and human’s anxiety toward robots, In: Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conferences on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology, IEEE Computer Society, 2011, 66-6910.1109/WI-IAT.2011.17Search in Google Scholar

[6] G. Baud-Bovy, P. Morasso, F. Nori, G. Sandini, A. Sciutti, Human machine interaction and communication in cooperative actions, In: S. I. Publishing (Ed.), Bioinspired Approaches for Human-Centric Technologies, 2014, 241-26810.1007/978-3-319-04924-3_8Search in Google Scholar

[7] M. J. Gielniak, A. L. Thomaz, Generating anticipation in robot motion, In: 2011 RO-MAN, 2011, 449-45410.1109/ROMAN.2011.6005255Search in Google Scholar

[8] M. Nilsson, S. Thill, T. Ziemke, Action and intention recognition in human interaction with autonomous vehicles, In: Experiencing Autonomous Vehicles: Crossing the Boundaries between a Drive and a Ride, Workshop in conjunction with CHI2015 (2015), 2015Search in Google Scholar

[9] V. M. Lundgren, A. Habibovic, J. Andersson, T. Lagström, M. Nilsson, A. Sirkka, et al., Will there be new communication needs when introducing automated vehicles to the urban context?, In: Advances in Human Aspects of Transportation, 2016, 484, 485-49710.1007/978-3-319-41682-3_41Search in Google Scholar

[10] L. Wang, G. A. Jamieson, J. G. Hollands, Trust and reliance on an automated combat identification system, Human Factors, 2009, 51(3), 281-29110.1177/0018720809338842Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[11] M. M. de Graaf, B. F. Malle, A. Dragan, T. Ziemke, Explainable robotic systems, In: Companion of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, HRI ’18, New York, NY, USA, ACM, 2018, 387-38810.1145/3173386.3173568Search in Google Scholar

[12] L. Takayama, D. Dooley, W. Ju, Expressing thought: Improving robot readability with animation principles, In: 2011 6th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), 2011, 69-7610.1145/1957656.1957674Search in Google Scholar

[13] C. Lichtenthäler, T. Lorenzy, A. Kirsch, Influence of legibility on perceived safety in a virtual human-robot path crossing task, In: 2012 IEEE RO-MAN: The 21st IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2012, 676-68110.1109/ROMAN.2012.6343829Search in Google Scholar

[14] C. Lichtenthäler, Legibility of Robot Behavior Investigating Legibility of Robot Navigation in Human-Robot Path Crossing Scenarios, PhD thesis, Technische Universität München, 2014Search in Google Scholar

[15] K. Dautenhahn, S. Woods, C. Kaouri, M. Walters, K. L. Koay, I. Werry, What is a robot companion - friend, assistant or butler?, In: Proc. IEEE IRS/RSJ Int. Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, 2005, 1488-149310.1109/IROS.2005.1545189Search in Google Scholar

[16] A. D. Dragan, K. C. Lee, S. S. Srinivasa, Legibility and predictability of robot motion, In: Proceedings of the 8th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-robot Interaction, HRI ’13, Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2013, 301-308 IEEE Press10.1109/HRI.2013.6483603Search in Google Scholar

[17] J. Novikova, Designing Emotionally Expressive Behaviour: Intelligibility and Predictability in Human-Robot Interaction, PhD thesis, University of Bath, 2016Search in Google Scholar

[18] H. Karvonen, I. Aaltonen, Intent communication of highly autonomous robots, In: The 12th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI 2017), 2017Search in Google Scholar

[19] N. Mirnig, M. Tscheligi, Comprehension, coherence and consistency: Essentials of robot feedback, In: J. Markowitz (Ed.), Robots that talk and listen - technology and social impact, De Gruyter, 2015Search in Google Scholar

[20] J. Knifka, On the significance of understanding in human-robot interaction, In: M. Nørskov (Ed.), Social Robots: Boundaries, Potential, Challenges, Ashgate, 2016, 3-17Search in Google Scholar

[21] C. Breazeal, Towards sociable robots, Robotics and autonomous systems, 2002, 4210.1016/S0921-8890(02)00373-1Search in Google Scholar

[22] K. Dautenhahn, The art of designing socially intelligent agents: Science, fiction, and the human in the loop, Applied Artificial Intelligence, 1998, 12(7-8), 573-61710.1080/088395198117550Search in Google Scholar

[23] R. H. Wortham, A. Theodorou, J. J. Bryson, Robot transparency, trust and utility, Connection Science, 2017, 29(3), 242-24810.1080/09540091.2017.1313816Search in Google Scholar

[24] J. B. Lyons, Being transparent about transparency: A model for human-robot interaction, In: Proceedings of AAAI Spring Symposium on Trust in Autonomous Systems, 2013, 48-53Search in Google Scholar

[25] M. P. Anderson, What is communication, The Journal of Communication, 1959, 5(9)Search in Google Scholar

[26] C. E. Shannon, A mathematical theory of communication, Bell System Technical Journal, 1948, 3(27), 379-42310.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.xSearch in Google Scholar

[27] D. Chandler, The transmission model of communication, http: //visual-memory.co.uk/daniel/Documents/short/trans.html, 1994, (Accessed: May 20 2018)Search in Google Scholar

[28] W. Schramm, The Beginnings of Communication Study in America, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1997Search in Google Scholar

[29] C. L. Baker, J. B. Tenenbaum, Modeling human plan recognition using bayesian theory of mind, In: Plan, activity, and intent recognition: Theory and practice, 2014, 177-20410.1016/B978-0-12-398532-3.00007-5Search in Google Scholar

[30] S. Baron-Cohen,Mindblindness: An essay on autism and theory of mind, MIT Press, Cambridge, 199510.7551/mitpress/4635.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

[31] D. G. Premack, G. Woodruff, Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1978, 1(4), 515-52610.1017/S0140525X00076512Search in Google Scholar

[32] M. Michlmayr Simulation theory versus theory theory: Theories concerning the ability to read minds,Master’s thesis, University of Innsbruck, 2002Search in Google Scholar

[33] P. M. Churchland, Folk psychology and the explanation of human behavior, In: J. D. Greenwood (Ed.), The future of folk psychology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1991, 51-6910.1017/CBO9780511551659.003Search in Google Scholar

[34] R. Verbrugge, L. Mol, Learning to apply theory of mind, Journal of Logic, Language and Information, 2008, 4(17), 489-51110.1007/s10849-008-9067-4Search in Google Scholar

[35] B. Hare, J. Call, M. Tomasello, Do chimpanzees know what conspecifics know and do not know?, Animal Behaviour, 2001, 61(1), 139-15110.1006/anbe.2000.1518Search in Google Scholar

[36] T. Bugnyar, S. A. Reber, C. Buckner, Ravens attribute visual access to unseen competitors, Nature Communications, 2015, 710.1038/ncomms10506Search in Google Scholar

[37] L. M. Hiatt, J. G. Trafton, A cognitive model of theory of mind, In: International Conference on Cognitive Modeling, 2010Search in Google Scholar

[38] L. Barlassina, R. M. Gordon, Folk psychology as mental simulation, In: E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer Edition), 2017Search in Google Scholar

[39] M. A. Arbib, A. Billard, M. Iacoboni, E. Oztop, Synthetic brain imaging: Grasping, mirror neurons and imitation, Neural Networks, 2000, 13, 975-99710.1016/S0893-6080(00)00070-8Search in Google Scholar

[40] A. I. Goldman, Theory of mind, In: E. Margolis, R. Samuels, S. P. Stich (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Cognitive Science, 201210.1093/oxfordhb/9780195309799.013.0017Search in Google Scholar

[41] P. Carruthers, Simulation and self-knowledge: a defence of theory-theory, In: P. Carruthers, P. R. Smith (Ed.), Theories of theories of mind, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1996, 22-3810.1017/CBO9780511597985.004Search in Google Scholar

[42] G. Gergely, Z. Nfidasdy, G. Csibra, S. Biro, Taking the intentional stance at 12 months of age, Cognition, 1995, 56, 165-19310.1016/0010-0277(95)00661-HSearch in Google Scholar

[43] E. Bonchek-Dokow, Cognitive Modeling of Human Intention Recognition, PhD thesis, Bar Ilan University, 2012Search in Google Scholar

[44] R. Chadalavada, H. Andreasson, R. Krug, A. J. Lilienthal, That’s on my mind! robot to human intention communication through on-board projection on shared floor space, In: Proceedings of European Conference on Mobile Robots, 201510.1109/ECMR.2015.7403771Search in Google Scholar

[45] S. Augustsson, J. Olsson, L. G. Christiernin, G. Bolmsjö, How to transfer information between collaborating human operators and industrial robots in an assembly, In: Proceedings of the 8th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Fun, Fast, Foundational, NordiCHI ’14, New York, USA, ACM, 2014, 286-29410.1145/2639189.2639243Search in Google Scholar

[46] M. Matthews, G. V. Chowdhary, Intent communication between autonomous vehicles and pedestrians, In: Robotics: Science and Systems, 2015Search in Google Scholar

[47] K. Kobayashi, S. Yamada, Making a mobile robot to express its mind by motion overlap, In: V. A. Kulyukin (Ed.), Advances in Human-Robot Interaction, InTech, 200910.5772/6829Search in Google Scholar

[48] D. Dennett, The Intentional Stance, MIT Press, Cambridge, 1987Search in Google Scholar

[49] F. Hegel, S. Krach, T. Kircher, B. Wrede, G. Sagerer, Theory of mind (ToM) on robots: A functional neuroimaging study, In: HRI’08, Netherlands, 2008, 335-34210.1145/1349822.1349866Search in Google Scholar

[50] X. Zhao, C. Cusimano, B. F. Malle, Do people spontaneously take a robot’s visual perspective?, In: HRI ’16: The Eleventh Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, 201610.1145/2701973.2702044Search in Google Scholar

[51] S. lai Lee, I. Y. man Lau, S. Kiesler, C.-Y. Chiu, Human mental models of humanoid robots, In: Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation ICRA 2005, IEEE, 2005, 2767- 2772Search in Google Scholar

[52] T. Nakata, T. Sato, T. Mori, Expression of emotion and intention by robot body movement, In: Proc. of the Intl. Conf. on Autonomous Systems, 1998Search in Google Scholar

[53] A. Zhou, D. Hadfield-Menell, A. Nagabandi, A. D. Dragan, Expressive robot motion timing, In: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, HRI 2017, Vienna, Austria, March 6-9 2017, 2017, 22-3110.1145/2909824.3020221Search in Google Scholar

[54] T. Ono, M. Imai, R. Nakatsu, Reading a robot’s mind: A model of utterance understanding based on the theory of mind mechanism, Advanced Robotics, 2000, 14(4), 311-32610.1163/156855300741609Search in Google Scholar

[55] S. H. Huang, D. Held, P. Abbeel, A. D. Dragan, Enabling Robots to Communicate their Objectives, ArXiv e-prints, 201710.15607/RSS.2017.XIII.059Search in Google Scholar

[56] H. Kautz, A Formal Theory of Plan Recognition, PhD thesis, University of Rochester, 1987Search in Google Scholar

[57] E. Charniak, R. P. Goldman, A Bayesian model of plan recognition, Artificial Intelligence, 1993, 64(1), 53-7910.1016/0004-3702(93)90060-OSearch in Google Scholar

[58] M. Vilain, Getting serious about parsing plans: A grammatical analysis of plan recognition, In: Proceedings of National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 1990Search in Google Scholar

[59] H. H. Bui, S. Venkatesh, G. West, Policy recognition in the abstract hidden Markov model, Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 2002, 17, 451-49910.1613/jair.839Search in Google Scholar

[60] E. A. Billing, T. Hellström, A formalism for learning from demonstration, Paladyn, Journal of Behavioral Robotics, 2010, 1(1), 1-1310.2478/s13230-010-0001-5Search in Google Scholar

[61] E. A. Billing, T. Hellström, L. E. Janlert, Behavior recognition for learning from demonstration, In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Alaska, Anchorage, 2010, 866-87210.1109/ROBOT.2010.5509912Search in Google Scholar

[62] A. Billard, S. Calinon, R. Dillmann, S. Schaal, Robot Programming by Demonstration, Springer, 200810.1007/978-3-540-30301-5_60Search in Google Scholar

[63] C. L. Nehaniv, K. Dautenhahn, Of hummingbirds and helicopters: An algebraic framework for interdisciplinary studies of imitation and its applications, World Scientific Press, 2000, 24, 136-16110.1142/9789812792747_0007Search in Google Scholar

[64] B. Jansen, T. Belpaeme, A computational model of intention reading in imitation, Robotics and autonomous systems, 2005, 54, 394-40210.1016/j.robot.2006.01.006Search in Google Scholar

[65] S. Trott, M. Eppe, J. Feldman, Recognizing intention from natural language: Clarification dialog and construction grammar, In: Proceedings of 2016 Workshop on Communicating Intentions in Human-Robot Interactionnd Systems in NYC, NY, 2016Search in Google Scholar

[66] A. Sutherland, S. Bensch, T. Hellström, Inferring robot actions from verbal commands using shallow semantic parsing, In: H. Arabnia (Ed.), Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence ICAI’15, 2015, 28-34Search in Google Scholar

[67] A. Rasouli, L. Kotseruba, J. K. Tsotsos, Agreeing to cross: How drivers and pedestrians communicate, In: Proceedings of the IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), 201710.1109/IVS.2017.7995730Search in Google Scholar

[68] B. Scassellati, Theory of mind for a humanoid robot, Autonomous Robots, 2002, 12, 1310.1023/A:1013298507114Search in Google Scholar

[69] A. M. Leslie, Tomm, toby, and agency: Core architecture and domain specificity, In: l. A. Hirschfeld, S. A. Gelman (Ed.),Mapping the Mind: Domain Specificity in Cognition and Culture, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1994, 119-148Search in Google Scholar

[70] B. Benninghoff, P. Kulms, L. Hoffmann, N. Krämer, Theory of mind in human-robot-communication: Appreciated or not?, Kognitive System, 2013, 1Search in Google Scholar

[71] M. Berlin, J. Gray, A. L. Thomaz, C. Breazeal, Perspective taking: An organizing principle for learning in human-robot interaction, In: Nat. Conf. on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 21. AAAI Press, MIT Press, 2006Search in Google Scholar

[72] G. Milliez, M. Warnier, A. Clodic, R. Alami, A framework for endowing an interactive robot with reasoning capabilities about perspective-taking and belief management, In: Int. Symp. on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, IEEE, 2014, 1103-110910.1109/ROMAN.2014.6926399Search in Google Scholar

[73] K.-J. Kim, H. Lipson, Towards a simple robotic theory of mind, In: Proceedings of the 9thWorkshop on Performance Metrics for Intelligent Systems (PerMIS09), New York, USA, ACM, 2009, 131-13810.1145/1865909.1865937Search in Google Scholar

[74] S. Devin, R. Alami, An implemented theory of mind to improve human-robot shared plans execution, In: The Eleventh ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human Robot Interaction (HRI16), Piscataway, NJ, USA, IEEE, 2016, 319-32610.1109/HRI.2016.7451768Search in Google Scholar

[75] L. M. Hiatt, A. M. Harrison, J. G. Trafton, Accommodating human variability in human-robot teams through theory of mind, In: IJCAI International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2011, 2066-2071Search in Google Scholar

[76] C. Bereiter, Education and mind in the Knowledge Age, L. Erlbaum Associates, 2002Search in Google Scholar

[77] D. Vernon, S. Thill, T. Ziemke, The role of intention in cognitive robotics, In: A. Esposito, L. C. Jain (Ed.), Toward Robotic Socially Believable Behaving Systems - Volume I, pages 15-27. Springer International Publishing, 201610.1007/978-3-319-31056-5_3Search in Google Scholar

[78] S. Thrun, J. Schulte, C. Rosenberg, Robots with humanoid features in public places: A case study, IEEE Intelligent Systems archive, 2000, 15(4), 7-11Search in Google Scholar

[79] F. Stulp, J. Grizou, B. Busch, M. Lopes, Facilitating intention prediction for humans by optimizing robot motions, In: International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 201510.1109/IROS.2015.7353529Search in Google Scholar

[80] H. Romat, M.-A. Williams, X. Wang, B. Johnston, H. Bard, Natural human-robot interaction using social cues, In: The Eleventh ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human Robot Interaction, HRI ’16, Piscataway, NJ, USA, IEEE Press, 2016, 503-50410.1109/HRI.2016.7451827Search in Google Scholar

[81] J. Hough, D. Schlangen, It’s not what you do, it’s how you do it: Grounding uncertainty for a simple robot, In: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI ‘17), 201710.1145/2909824.3020214Search in Google Scholar

[82] K. Baraka, M. M. Veloso, Mobile service robot state revealing through expressive lights: Formalism, design, and evaluation, Journal of Social Robotics, 201710.1007/s12369-017-0431-xSearch in Google Scholar

[83] B. Kühnlenz, S. Sosnowski, M. Buß, D. Wollherr, K. Kühnlenz, M. Buss, Increasing helpfulness towards a robot by emotional adaption to the user, Int J Soc Robot, 2013, 5(4), 457-47610.1007/s12369-013-0182-2Search in Google Scholar

[84] A. Moon, B. Panton, M. V. der Loos, E. Croft, Using hesitation gestures for safe and ethical human-robot interaction, In: IEEE ICRA’10 Workshop on Interactive Communication for Autonomous Intelligent Robots, 2010, 11-13Search in Google Scholar

[85] R. A. Knepper, On the communicative aspect of human-robot joint action, In: IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication Workshop: Toward a Framework for Joint Action, What about Common Ground?, New York, NY, USA, 2016Search in Google Scholar

[86] R. A. Knepper, C. I. Mavrogiannis, J. Proft, C. Liang, Implicit communication in a joint action, In: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, HRI ’17, pages 283-292, New York, NY, USA, ACM, 201710.1145/2909824.3020226Search in Google Scholar

[87] A. Sciutti, G. Sandini, Interacting with robots to investigate the bases of social interaction, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 2017, 25, 2295-230410.1109/TNSRE.2017.2753879Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[88] C. Breazeal, A. Edsinger, P. Fitzpatrick, B. Scassellati, Active vision systems for sociable robots, IEEE Trans. Syst.Man Cybern., 2001, 31, 443-45310.1109/3468.952718Search in Google Scholar

[89] A. Watanabe, T. Ikeda, Y. Morales, Communicating robotic navigational intentions, In: 2015 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 201510.1109/IROS.2015.7354195Search in Google Scholar

[90] R. T. Azuma, A survey of augmented reality, Presence, 1997, 6(4), 355-38510.1162/pres.1997.6.4.355Search in Google Scholar

[91] J. Carff, M. Johnson, E. M. El-Sheikh, J. E. Pratt, Human-robot team navigation in visually complex environments, In: 2009 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2009), 2009, 3043-305010.1109/IROS.2009.5354321Search in Google Scholar

[92] C. Breazeal, P. Fitzpatrick, That certain look: Social-amplification of animate vision, In: AAAI 2000 Fall Symposium, 2000, 18-22Search in Google Scholar

[93] F. Broz, A. Di Nuovo, T. Belpaeme, A. Cangelosi, Talking about task progress: Towards integrating task planning and dialog for assistive robotic services, Paladyn, Journal of Behavioral Robotics, 2015, 6(1), 111-11810.1515/pjbr-2015-0007Search in Google Scholar

[94] R. Kelley, A. Tavakkoli, C. King, M. Nicolescu, M. Nicolescu, Understanding activities and intentions for human-robot interaction, In: D. Chugo (Ed.), Advances in Human-Robot Interaction, In-Tech, 2010, 288-30510.5772/8127Search in Google Scholar

[95] H. Knight, R. Simmons, Layering laban effort features on robot task motions, In: Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction Extended Abstracts, New York, NY, USA, ACM, 2015, 135-13610.1145/2701973.2702054Search in Google Scholar

[96] J. G. Trafton, N. L. Cassimatis, M. D. Bugajska, D. P. Brock, F. E. Mintz, A. C. Schultz, Enabling effective human-robot interaction using perspective-taking in robots, Systems,Man and Cybernetics, 2005, 35(4), 460-47010.1109/TSMCA.2005.850592Search in Google Scholar