Abstract
The term ‘entrepreneurial eco-system’ (EES) currently belongs to the most popular ones in economic geography – and in the practice of start-up support policies in many countries, too. Due to its exclusively positive connotations the usage of this term creates unrealistic hopes among entrepreneurship support practitioners. Scholars may be reminded to previous supposed panaceas of regional economic policies like clusters, ‘creative class’ members or high-tech industries. As for these predecessors as well, the concept is “fuzzy” (Markusen 1999), the available empirics are “scanty” (ibid.) and its perception among policymakers is oversimplified, exclusively positive and partially naïve. To a degree, this is a consequence of an extremely unclear definition of what is meant by an EES. The undertheorization of the EES discourse, as observed by some scholars, is not due to a lack of conceptual approaches per se, but due to a lack of convincing, theoretically strong approaches. In fact, the majority of the EES publications is conceptual or even theoretical, usually without any serious empirical underpinning. From our perspective the latter has one important consequence: EES theory is weak because there is a lack of representative, comprehensive and sophisticated empirical studies, indicators and methods to measure EES. This paper provides a unique attempt to measure EES at the sub-national level of regions, that is, from our perspective, the most appropriate spatial level to identify and measure (and theorize) EES as the regional entrepreneurship literature provides striking evidence in favor of entrepreneurship as being primarily a regional (or local) event. Our paper contributes to the current EES debate by arguing that a robust empirical measurement of various EES at the sub-national level may help to improve the quality of EES theory. We propose to start with Erik Stam’s interpretation of an EES based upon ten “conditions” for whom we develop specific variables for application in concrete data collection exercises in different regions. We develop an overall EES index as well as subnational indices for each of the ten conditions. We also propose a method to care for the various weighting problems to be solved. Our attempt has been successfully pretested in Germany and Spain and has meanwhile entered a more ambitious pilot phase in 2018. One of this paper’s aims is to get feedback from scholars studying EES regarding our proposed method.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Lower Saxony Ministry of Science and Culture (Germany) under Grant number 76202-17-1/14. We would like to thank two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comment on earlier drafts. All mistakes remain, of course, our own.
References
Acs, Z. J./Stam, E./Audretsch, D. B./O’Connor, A. (2017): The lineages of the entrepreneurial ecosystem approach. Small Business Economics, 49, 1–10.10.1007/s11187-017-9864-8Search in Google Scholar
Acs, Z./Autio, E./Szerb, L. (2014): National systems of entrepreneurship: measurement issues and policy implications. Research Policy, 43, 476–494.10.2139/ssrn.2008160Search in Google Scholar
Alvedalen, J./Boschma, R. (2017): A critical review of entrepreneurial ecosystems research: towards a future research agenda. European Planning Studies, 25, 887–903.10.1080/09654313.2017.1299694Search in Google Scholar
Audretsch, D. B./Belitski, M. (2017): Entrepreneurial ecosystems in cities: establishing the framework conditions. Journal of Technology Transfer, 42, 1030–1051.10.1007/s10961-016-9473-8Search in Google Scholar
Autio, E./Kenney, M./Mustar, P./Siegel, D./Wright, M. (2014): Entrepreneurial innovation: the importance of context. Research Policy, 43, 1097–1108.10.1016/j.respol.2014.01.015Search in Google Scholar
Autio, E./Levie, J. (2017): Management of entrepreneurial ecosystems. In: Ahmetoglu, G., Chamorro-Premuzic, T., Klinger, B., Karcisky T. (Eds.). The Wiley handbook of entrepreneurship: 423–449. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons10.1002/9781118970812.ch19Search in Google Scholar
Autio, E./Pathak, S./Wennberg, K. (2013): Consequences of cultural practices for entrepreneurial behaviors. Journal of International Business Studies. Vol. 44, No. 4 (May 2013), pp. 334–362. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2229397 10.2139/ssrn.2229397Search in Google Scholar
Baumgartner, D./Pütz, M./Seidl, I. (2013): What kind of entrepreneurship drives regional development in European non-core regions? A literature review on empirical entrepreneurship research. European Planning Studies, 21, 1–33.10.1080/09654313.2012.722937Search in Google Scholar
Bosma, N. (2013): The global entrepreneurship monitor (GEM) and its impact on entrepreneurship research. Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship, 9, 143–248.10.1561/0300000033Search in Google Scholar
Bosma, N./Sternberg, R. (2014): Entrepreneurship as an urban event? Empirical evidence from European cities. Regional Studies, 48(6), 1016–1033, DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2014.90404110.1080/00343404.2014.904041Search in Google Scholar
Brixy, U./Sternberg, R./Stüber, H. (2013): Why some nascent entrepreneurs do not seek professional assistance. Applied Economics Letters, 20(2), 157–161.10.1080/13504851.2012.684783Search in Google Scholar
Bruns, K./Bosma, N./Sanders, M./Schramm, M. (2017): Searching for the existence of entrepreneurial ecosystems: A regional cross‐section growth regression approach. Small Business Economics, 49, 31–54.10.1007/s11187-017-9866-6Search in Google Scholar
Coduras, A./Clemente, J.A./Ruiz, J. (2016): A novel application of fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis to GEM data. Journal of Business Research, 69(4), 1265–1270.10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.10.090Search in Google Scholar
Dubini, P. (1989): The Influence of motivations and environment on business start-ups: Some hints for public polices. Journal of Business Venturing 4, 11–26.10.1016/0883-9026(89)90031-1Search in Google Scholar
European Commission, REGIO DG 02 (2013): REDI: The regional entrepreneurship and development index – measuring regional entrepreneurship. Final report.Search in Google Scholar
Feld, B. (2012): Startup Communities. Building an entrepreneurial ecosystem in your city. New Jersey: John Whiley & Sons.10.1002/9781119204459Search in Google Scholar
Feldman, M. P. (2001): The entrepreneurial event revisited: Firm formation in a regional context. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10, 861–891.10.4337/9781848445079.00026Search in Google Scholar
Feldman, M.P./Zoller, T. (2012): Dealmakers in place: Social capital connections in regional entrepreneurial economies. Regional Studies, 46, 23–37.10.4337/9781783476831.00011Search in Google Scholar
Florida, R. (2002): The rise of the creative class. New York.Search in Google Scholar
Geibel, R.C./Manickam, M. (2015): The startup ecosystems in Germany and in the USA. Explorative analysis and comparison of the startup environments. Conference Paper 2015. DOI: 10.5176/2251-2039_IE15.9.10.5176/2251-2039_IE15.9Search in Google Scholar
Glaeser, E.L./Kallal, H.D./Scheinkman, J.A./Shleifer, A. (1992): Growth in cities. Journal of Economic Geography, 1, 27–50.10.3386/w3787Search in Google Scholar
Huggins, R./Thompson, P. (2015): Entrepreneurship, innovation and regional growth: network theory. Small Business Economics, 45, 103–128. DOI 10.1007/s11187-015-9643-310.4337/9781783475018.00017Search in Google Scholar
Hundt, C./Sternberg, R. (2016): Explaining new firm creation in Europe from a spatial and time perspective: A multilevel analysis based upon data of individuals, regions and countries. Papers in Regional Science 95(2), 223–258. DOI: 10.1111/pirs.1213310.1111/pirs.12133Search in Google Scholar
Isenberg, D. (2010): How to start an entrepreneurial revolution. Harvard Business Review, 88(6), 40–50.Search in Google Scholar
Kalnins, A. (2007): Sample selection and theory development: Implications of firms’ varying abilities to appropriately select new ventures. The Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1246–1264.10.5465/amr.2007.26586802Search in Google Scholar
Kemeny, T./Feldman, M.P./Ethridge, F./Zoller, T. (2016): The economic value of local social networks. Journal of Economic Geography, 16, 1101–1122.10.1093/jeg/lbv043Search in Google Scholar
Khedhaouria, A./Thurik, R. (2017): Configurational conditions of national innovation capability: a fuzzy set analysis approach. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 120, 48–58.10.1016/j.techfore.2017.04.005Search in Google Scholar
Kibler, E./Kautonen, T./Fink, M. (2014): Regional social legitimacy of entrepreneurship: implications for entrepreneurial intention and start-up behavior. Regional Studies, 48(6), 995–1015.10.4324/9781315691985-4Search in Google Scholar
Kraus, S./Ribeiro-Soriano, D./Schüssler, M. (2017): Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) in entrepreneurship and innovation research – the rise of a method. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 14(1), 15–33. DOI: 10.1007/s11365-017-0461-8.10.1007/s11365-017-0461-8Search in Google Scholar
Levie, J./Autio, E. (2011): Regulatory burden, rule of law, and entry of strategic entrepreneurs: an international panel study. Journal of Management Studies, 48(6), 1392–1419. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.01006.x.10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.01006.xSearch in Google Scholar
Levie, J./Autio, E./Reeves, C./Chisholm, D./Harris, J./Grey, S./Ritchie, I./Cleevely, M. (2014): Assessing regional innovative entrepreneurship ecosystems with the global entrepreneurship and development index: the case of Scotland. Paper presented at the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor Research Conference.Search in Google Scholar
Mack, E./Mayer, H. (2016): The evolutionary dynamics of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Urban Studies, 53, 2118–2133.10.1177/0042098015586547Search in Google Scholar
Malecki, E. J. (2009): Geographical environments for entrepreneurship. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 7, 175–190.10.1504/IJESB.2009.022805Search in Google Scholar
Malecki, E.J. (2018): Entrepreneurship and entrepreneurial ecosystems. Geography Compass, 12, DOI: 10.1111/gec3.1235910.1111/gec3.12359Search in Google Scholar
Mason, C./Brown, R. (2014): Entrepreneurial ecosystems and growth oriented entrepreneurship. Background paper prepared for the workshop organised by the OECD LEED Programme and the Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs on Entrepreneurial Ecosystems and Growth Oriented Entrepreneurship. The Hague, Netherlands, 7th November 2013.Search in Google Scholar
Morris, M. H./Neumeyer, X./Kuratko, D. F. (2015): A portfolio perspective on entrepreneurship and economic development. Small Business Economics, 45, 713–728.10.1007/s11187-015-9678-5Search in Google Scholar
Napier, G./Hansen, G. (2011): Ecosystems for young scalable firms. Copenhagen: FORA.Search in Google Scholar
Neck, H. M./Meyer, G. D./Cohen, B./Corbett, A. C. (2004): An entrepreneurial system view of new venture creation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 42, 190–208.10.1111/j.1540-627X.2004.00105.xSearch in Google Scholar
Nicotra, M./Romano, M./Del Giudice, M./Schillachi, C.E. (2018): The causal relation between entrepreneurial ecosystem and productive entrepreneurship: a measurement framework. Journal of Technology Transfer, 43, 640–673.10.1007/s10961-017-9628-2Search in Google Scholar
Obschonka, M./Stuetzer, M. (2017): Integrating psychological approaches to entrepreneurship: The entrepreneurial personality system (EPS). Small Business Economics, 49(1), 203–231.10.1007/s11187-016-9821-ySearch in Google Scholar
Porter, M.E. (1998): Clusters and competition: New agendas for companies, governments and institutions. In: Porter, M.E. (Ed.): On competition. Boston, 197–287.Search in Google Scholar
Qian, H./Acs, Z.J./Stough, R. R. (2013): Regional systems of entrepreneurship: the nexus of human capital, knowledge and new firm formation. Journal of Economic Geography, 13, 559–587.10.4337/9781784718053.00023Search in Google Scholar
Radosevic, S. (2007): National systems of innovation and entrepreneurship: In search of a missing link. UCL School of Slavonic and East European Studies. Economics Working Paper No. 73.Search in Google Scholar
Shane, S. (2009): Why encouraging more people to become entrepreneurs is bad public policy. Small Business Economics (2009) 33:141–149. DOI 10.1007/s11187-009-9215-5.10.1007/s11187-009-9215-5Search in Google Scholar
Sorenson, O. (2017): Regional ecologies of entrepreneurship. Journal of Economic Geography 17 (2017) pp. 959–974. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbx031.10.1093/jeg/lbx031Search in Google Scholar
Spigel, B. (2015): The relational organization of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. DOI: 10.1111/etap.12167.Search in Google Scholar
Spilling (1996): The entrepreneurial system: On entrepreneurship in the context of a mega-event. Journal of Business Research 36, 91–103 (1996). DOI: 10.1016/0148-2963(95)00166-2.10.1016/0148-2963(95)00166-2Search in Google Scholar
Stam, E. (2015): Entrepreneurial ecosystems and regional policy: A sympathetic critique. European Planning Studies, 23(9), 1759–1769. DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2015.1061484.10.1080/09654313.2015.1061484Search in Google Scholar
Stam, E. (2018): Measuring entrepreneurial ecosystems. In: O’Connor, A./Stam, E./Sussan, F./Audretsch, D.B. (eds.): Entrepreneurial ecosystems. Place-based transformations and transitions. New York, 173 ff.10.1007/978-3-319-63531-6_9Search in Google Scholar
Stam, E./Spigel, B. (2018): Entrepreneurial ecosystems. In: Blackburn, R./De Clercq, D./Heinonen, J./Wang, Z. (eds.): The Sage handbook of small business and entrepreneurship. London, pp. 407–422.10.4135/9781473984080.n21Search in Google Scholar
Stangler, D./Bell‐Masterson, J. (2015): Measuring an entrepreneurial ecosystem. Kansas City, MO.10.2139/ssrn.2580336Search in Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. (2009): Regional dimensions of entrepreneurship. Boston, Delft: Now Publishers (= Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship, Vol. 5, Issue 4).10.1561/0300000024Search in Google Scholar
Sternberg, R./Krauss, G. (eds.) (2014): Handbook of research on entrepreneurship and creativity. Cheltenham.10.4337/9781781004432Search in Google Scholar
Stuetzer, M./Obschonka, M./Brixy, U./Sternberg, R./Cantner, U. (2014): Regional characteristics, opportunity perception and entrepreneurial activities. Small Business Economics, 42(2), 221–244.10.1007/s11187-013-9488-6Search in Google Scholar
Szerb, L./Vörös, Z./Komlósi, E./Acs, Z.J./Páger, B./Rappai, G. (2017): The regional entrepreneurship and development index: structure, data, methodology and policy applications. Pecz/Hungary (FIRES project).Search in Google Scholar
Taich, C./Piazza, M./Carter, K./Wilcox, A. (2016): Measuring entrepreneurial ecosystems. Urban publications 12‐2016. Cleveland: Cleveland State University, Maxine Goodman Levin College of Urban Affairs.Search in Google Scholar
Trettin, L./Welter, F. (2011): Challenges for spatially oriented entrepreneurship research. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 23(7–8), 575–602. DOI: 10.1080/0898562100379298810.1080/08985621003792988Search in Google Scholar
Van de Ven, A. H. (1993): The development of an infrastructure for entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 8,211–230.10.1016/0883-9026(93)90028-4Search in Google Scholar
Van Maanen, J./Sorensen, J.B./Mitchell, T.R. (2007): The interplay between theory and method. The Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1145–1154.10.5465/amr.2007.26586080Search in Google Scholar
Vogel, P. (2013): The employment outlook for youth: Building entrepreneurship ecosystems as a way forward. Conference Proceedings of the G20 Youth Forum, 2013. 46, 2013.Search in Google Scholar
Wyrwich, M./Stuetzer, M./Sternberg, R. (2016): Entrepreneurial role models, fear of failure, and institutional approval of entrepreneurship: a tale of two regions. Small Business Economics, 46(3), 467–492. DOI: 10.1007/s11187-015-9695-4.10.1007/s11187-015-9695-4Search in Google Scholar
© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
