Abstract
It is shown that voting procedure in any authority can be treated as Hopfield neural network analogue. It was revealed that weight coefficients of neural network which has discrete outputs −1 and 1 can be replaced by coefficients of a discrete set (−1, 0, 1). This gives us the opportunity to qualitatively analyze the voting procedure on the basis of limited data about mutual influence of members. It also proves that result of voting procedure is actually taken by network formed by voting members.
References
[1] Arrow, K.J., Social Choice and Individual Values, 2nd ed., Wiley, New York, 1951 Search in Google Scholar
[2] Aizerman M., Aleskerov F., Theory of Choice, Foresight, 1995 Search in Google Scholar
[3] Geanakoplos J., Three brief proofs of Arrow’s impossibility theorem, Economic Theory, 2005, 26, 211–215 10.1007/s00199-004-0556-7Search in Google Scholar
[4] Polterovich V., The crisis of economic theory, Presentation at the seminar “Unknown economy”, CEMI RAS, 1997 URL: http: //www.rusreforms.ru/vmp.htm Search in Google Scholar
[5] Suleimenov I., Gabrielyan O., Mun G., Panchenko S., Amirzhan T., Suleimenova K., Voting Procedure and Neural Networks, Int. J. on Communications, 2014, 3, 16–20. Search in Google Scholar
[6] Ergozhin E., Aryn E., Suleimenov I., Belenko N., Gabrielyan O., Suleimenova K., et al., Nanotechnology. Economics. Geopolitics, «Print-S», Almaty – Moscow – Sophia Antipolis – Simferopol, 2010 Search in Google Scholar
[7] Yergozhin Ye., Aryn Ye., Suleimenov I.,Mun G.A., Belenko N.M., Gabrielyan O.A., et al., Nanotechnology versus the global crisis, Hollym Corporation Publishers, Seoul, 2010 Search in Google Scholar
©2016 I. Suleimenov et al.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
