Abstract
A pilot scale Upflow Anaerobic Contactor (UAC), based on upflow sludge blanket principle, was designed to treat vinasse waste obtained from beet molasses fermentation. An assessment of the anaerobic digestion of vinasse was carried out for the production of biogas as a source of energy. Average Organic loading rate (OLR) was around 7.5 gCOD/m3/day in steady state, increasing upto 8.1 gCOD/m3/day. The anaerobic digestion was conducted at mesophilic (30–37 °C) temperature and a stable operating condition was achieved after 81 days with average production of 65 % methane which corresponded to a maximum biogas production of 85 l/day. The optimal performance of UAC was obtained at 87 % COD removal, which corresponded to a hydraulic retention time of 16.67 days. The biogas production increased gradually with OLR, corresponding to a maximum 6.54 gCOD/m3/day (7.4 % increase from initial target). A coupled Artificial Neural Network-Differential Evolution (ANN-DE) methodology was formulated to predict chemical oxygen demand (COD), total suspended solids (TSS) and volatile fatty acids (VFA) of the effluent along with the biogas production. The method incorporated a DE approach for the efficient tuning of ANN meta-parameters such as number of nodes in hidden layer, input and output activation function and learning rate. The model prediction indicated that it can learn the nonlinear complex relationship between the parameters and able to predict the output of the contactor with reasonable accuracy. The utilization of the coupled ANN-DE model provided significant improvement to the study and helps to study the parametric effect of influential parameters on the reactor output.
Acknowledgements
Ousman R. Dibaba wishes to acknowledge the support of KU Leuven – Campus Group T for a scholarship to pursue Master’s studies in Belgium and to Ron Gerards for granting an internship in Waterleau NV at Wespelaar, Belgium.
References
1. Abbasi, T., Abbasi, S., 2012. Formation and impact of granules in fostering clean energy production and wastewater treatment in upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactors. Renewable and Sustainable Energy 16, 4303–4322.10.1016/j.rser.2011.11.017Search in Google Scholar
2. Ahring, A., Jingquan, L., Birgitte, K., 2005. Effects of temperature and hydraulic retention time on thermophilic anaerobic pretreatment of sewage sludge. Environmental Microbiotechnology 6, 125–131.Search in Google Scholar
3. Appels, L., Baeyens, J., Degreve, J., Dewil, R., 2008. Principles and potential of the anaerobic digestion of waste-activated sludge. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science 34, 755–781.10.1016/j.pecs.2008.06.002Search in Google Scholar
4. Aquino, S. F., Chernicaro, C. A., 2005. Buildup of volatile fatty acids (VFA) in anaerobic reactors under stress conditions: causes and control strategies. Engenharia Sanitaria e Ambiental 10, 152–161.10.1590/S1413-41522005000200009Search in Google Scholar
5. Babu, B. V., Sastry, K. K. N., 1999. Estimation of heat transfer parameters in a trickle-bed reactor using differential evolution and orthogonal collocation, Computers & Chemical Engineering 23, 327–339.10.1016/S0098-1354(98)00277-4Search in Google Scholar
6. Baughman D.R, Liu Y. A., 1995. Neural Networks in Bioprocessing and Chemical Engineering, Academic Press, Inc., New York.Search in Google Scholar
7. Becerra, R. L., Coello Coello, C. A., 2006. Cultured differential evolution for constrained optimization. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering. 195, 4303–4322.10.1016/j.cma.2005.09.006Search in Google Scholar
8. Bertolino, S. M., Rodrigues, I. C., Guerra-Sá, R., Aquino, S. F., Leão, V. A., 2012. Implications of volatile fatty acid profile on the metabolic pathway during continuous sulfate reduction. Journal of Environmental Management 103,15–23.10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.02.022Search in Google Scholar PubMed
9. Beyers, L., Dutta, A., Lahiri, S., Blanpain, B., Verhaeghe, F., 2015. Hybrid artificial neural network and genetic algorithm modelling of slag properties. European Metallurgical Conference (EMC), Düsseldorf, Germany, 14–17.Search in Google Scholar
10. Bindhu, B. K., Madhu, G., 2013. Influence of organic loading rates on aerobic granulation process for the treatment of wastewater. Journal of Clean Energy Technologies 1, 84–86.10.7763/JOCET.2013.V1.20Search in Google Scholar
11. Bishop, C. M., 1995. Neural Networks For Pattern Recognition. Oxford University Press, Oxford.10.1201/9781420050646.ptb6Search in Google Scholar
12. Budiyono, I., Siswo, S., 2014. Kinetic model of biogas yield production from vinasse at various initial pH: Comparison between modified Gompertz model and first order kinetic model. Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology 7, 2798–2805.10.19026/rjaset.7.602Search in Google Scholar
13. Chaisri, R., Boonsawang, P., Prasertsan, P., Chaiprapat, S., 2007. Effect of organic loading rate on methane and volatile fatty acids productions from anaerobic treatment of palm oil mill effluent in UASB and UFAF reactors. Songklanakarin Journal of Science and Technology s2, 311–323.Search in Google Scholar
14. Chakraborty, U. K., 2008. Advances in Differential Evolution. In: Studies in Computational Intelligence 143, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg.10.1007/978-3-540-68830-3Search in Google Scholar
15. Christofoletti, C. A., Esher, J. P., Correia, J. E., Marinho, F. U. J., Fontanetti, C. S., 2013. Sugarcane vinasse Environmental implication of its use. Waste Management 33, 272–276.10.1016/j.wasman.2013.09.005Search in Google Scholar
16. Cortez, L. A. B, Pérez, L. E., 1997. Experiences on vinasse disposal Part III: Combustion of vinasse-# 6 Fuel oil emulsions. Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 14, https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0104-66321997000100002.10.1590/S0104-66321997000100002Search in Google Scholar
17. Dincer I., 2000. Renewable energy and sustainable development. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 4, 157–175.10.1016/S1364-0321(99)00011-8Search in Google Scholar
18. Elnekave, M., Celik, S. O., Tatlier, M., Tufecki, N., 2012. Artificial neural network predictions of Up-flow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket (UASB) reactor performance in the treatment of citrus juice wastewater. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies 21 (1), 49–56.Search in Google Scholar
19. Glória, N. A. da, 1975. Utilização Agrícola da Vinhaça (in Portuguese), Brasil Açucareiro 86, 11–17.Search in Google Scholar
20. Haykin, S., 1999. Neural Networks, a Comprehensive Foundation, 2nd edition, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.Search in Google Scholar
21. Horan, N., Smyth, M., May, A., 2011. Optimisation of digester performance and gas yield through analysis of VFA speciation. In: 16th European Bio-solids and Organic Resources Conference.Search in Google Scholar
22. Hill, D. T., Holmberg, R. D., 1988. Long chain volatile fatty acid relationships in anaerobic digestion of swine waste. Biological Wastes 23, 195–21410.1016/0269-7483(88)90034-1Search in Google Scholar
23. Holm-Nielsen, J. B., Al Seadi, T., Oleskowicz-Popiel, P., 2009. The future of anaerobic digestion and biogas utilization, Bioresource Technology 100, 5478–5484.10.1016/j.biortech.2008.12.046Search in Google Scholar PubMed
24. Lahiri, S. K., Ghanta, K. C., 2008. Development of an artificial neural network correlation for prediction of hold-up of slurry transport in pipelines. Chemical Engineering Science. 63, 1497–1509.10.1016/j.ces.2007.11.030Search in Google Scholar
25. Lettinga, G., 1995. Anaerobic digestion and wastewater treatment systems. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 67, 3–28.10.1007/BF00872193Search in Google Scholar PubMed
26. Lettinga, G., Van Haandel, A., 1992. Anaerobic Digestion for Energy Production and Environmental Protection. Chapter 19 in Renewable Energy: Sources for Fuels and Electricity, Island Press, Covelo, CA, pp. 817–839.Search in Google Scholar
27. Lettinga, G., van Velsen, A. F. M., Hobma, S. W., de Zeeuw, W., Klapwijk, A., 1980. Use of the upflow sludge blanket (USB) reactor concept for biological wastewater treatment, especially for anaerobic treatment. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 22, 699–734.10.1002/bit.260220402Search in Google Scholar
28. Jin, Y., Branke, J.,2005. Evolutionary evolutionary optimization in uncertain environments – a survey. IEEE Transaction on Evolutionary Computation 9(3), 303–317.10.1109/TEVC.2005.846356Search in Google Scholar
29. Kaparaju, P., Serrano, M., Angelidaki, I., 2010. Optimization of biogas production from wheat straw stillage in UASB reactor. Applied Energy 87, 3779–3783.10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.06.005Search in Google Scholar
30. Moré, J. J., 1977. The Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm: implementation and theory, in: Watson, G. A. (ed.), Numerical Analysis, Lecture Notes in Mathematics 630, Springer Verlag, Berlin, pp. 105–116.10.1007/BFb0067700Search in Google Scholar
31. Mota, V., Santos, S. F., Amaral, C. S., 2013. Two stage anaerobic membrane bioreactor for the treatment of sugarcane vinasse: Assessment on biological activity & filtration performance. Bioresource Technology 146, 494–503.10.1016/j.biortech.2013.07.110Search in Google Scholar
32. Nayono, S. E., 2009. Anaerobic digestion of organic solid waste for energy production. PhD thesis, Institute of Karlsruhe for technology, Karlsruhe, Germany.Search in Google Scholar
33. Parawira, W., Murto, M., Zvauya, R., Mattiasson, B., 2006. Comparison of the performance of a UASB reactor and an anaerobic packed-bed reactor when treating potato waste leachate. Renewable Energy 36, 893–903.10.1016/j.renene.2005.05.013Search in Google Scholar
34. Pedersen, M. E. H., Chipperfield, A. J., 2011. Tuning differential evolution for artificial neural networks, in: Nelson, R. W. (Ed.), New Developments in Artificial Neural Networks Research, Nova Science Publishers Inc., New York, pp. 277–294.Search in Google Scholar
35. Prado, R. D.M, Caione, G., Campos, C. N. S., 2013. Filter cake and vinasse as fertilizers contributing to conservation agriculture. Applied and Environmental Soil Science 581984, 1–8.10.1155/2013/581984Search in Google Scholar
36. Storn, R., Price, K., 1997. Differential Evolution – a Simple and Efficient Heuristic for Global Optimization over Continuous Spaces. Journal of Global Optimization, 11, 341–359.10.1023/A:1008202821328Search in Google Scholar
37. Ráduly, B., Gernaey, K. V., Capodaglio, A. G., Mikkelsen, P. S., Henze, M., 2007. Artificial neural networks for rapid WWTP performance evaluation: Methodology and case study. Environmental Modeling and Software 22(8), 1208–1216.10.1016/j.envsoft.2006.07.003Search in Google Scholar
38. Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E., Williams, R. J., 1986. Learning internal representations by error propagation, in: McClelland, G. A., Rumelhart, David E. (Eds.), Parallel Distributed Processing, Vol. 1, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 318–362.10.7551/mitpress/5236.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
39. Salomon, K. R., Lora, E. E. S., Rocha, M. H., Almazán, O. O., 2011. Cost calculations for biogas from vinasse biodigestion and its energy utilization. Zuckerind (Sugar Ind) 136, 217–223.10.36961/si11311Search in Google Scholar
40. Schmidt, B., Ahring, J., 1996. Granular sludge formation in Upflow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket (UASB) reactors. Biotechnology and Bioengineering49, 229–246.10.1002/(SICI)1097-0290(19960205)49:3<229::AID-BIT1>3.0.CO;2-MSearch in Google Scholar
41. Shin, S. Y., Lee, I. H., Kim, D., Zhang, B. T., 2005. Multi-objective evolutionary optimization of DNA sequences for reliable DNA computing. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 9(2), 143–158.10.1109/TEVC.2005.844166Search in Google Scholar
42. Thanikal, J., Torrijos, M., Habouzit, F., Mobetta, R., 2007. Treatment of distillery vinasse in a high rate anaerobic reactor using low density polyethene supports. World Science & Technology 56, 17–24.10.2166/wst.2007.467Search in Google Scholar
43. Trávníček, P., Kotek, L., 2015. Risks associated with the production of biogas in Europe. Process Safety Progress 34, 172–178.10.1002/prs.11734Search in Google Scholar
44. van Lier, J. B., Grolle, K. C., Frijters, C. T., Stams, A. J., Lettinga, G., 1993. Effects of acetate, propionate, and butyrate on the thermophilic anaerobic degradation of propionate by methanogenic sludge and defined cultures. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 59, 1003–1011.10.1128/aem.59.4.1003-1011.1993Search in Google Scholar
45. Wei, X., 2013. Modeling and optimization of wastewater treatment process with a data-driven approach. PhD Thesis, University of Iowa, Iowa, USA.Search in Google Scholar
46. Werbos, P. J., 1994. The Roots of Backpropagation: From Ordered Derivatives to Neural Networks and Political Forecasting, Chichester, Wiley.Search in Google Scholar
47. Wilkie, A. C., Riedesel, K. J., Owens, J. M., 2000. Stillage characterization and anaerobic treatment of ethanol stillage from conventional and cellulosic feedstock. Biomass Bioenergy 19, 63–10210.1016/S0961-9534(00)00017-9Search in Google Scholar
48. Zhang, Q., Sun, J., Tsang, E., 2005. An evolutionary algorithm with guided mutation for the maximum clique problem. IEEE Transaction on Evolutionary Computation 9(2), 192–200.10.1109/TEVC.2004.840835Search in Google Scholar
©2016 by De Gruyter
