Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter November 9, 2019

Effects of Laser Linewidth on the Performance of DP-QPSK DWDM System

  • Neeraj Sharma EMAIL logo , Sunil Agrawal , Vinod Kapoor and Sumit Budhiraja ORCID logo

Abstract

This paper analyzes the effects of laser linewidth on the performance of eight-channel dual-polarization quadrature phase-shift keying (DP-QPSK) dense wavelength division multiplexing (DWDM) transmission at 50 GHz channel spacing. The performance of differential encoding and Gray coding is compared with the system without any coding for the DP-QPSK DWDM system. It is shown that the differentially-encoded system performs better for lasers with linewidth (∆ν) greater than 0.04 MHz compared to the system with Gray coding and system without any coding. However, for lasers with linewidth lesser than 0.04 MHz, the three systems considered here perform equally and there is no need for differential or Gray coding in such a case. It is also shown that if we apply frequency offset estimation (FOE) before adaptive equalization (AE) in the digital coherent receiver then it further improve the performance of the differentially encoded system with lasers sources having linewidth even greater than 0.1 MHz.

References

1. Fludger CR, Nuss D, Kupfer T. Cycle-slips in 100G DP-QPSK transmission systems. In: Proceedings OFC/NFOEC, Los Angeles, CA, 2012:1–3.10.1364/OFC.2012.OTu2G.1Search in Google Scholar

2. Karaki J, Le Bidan R, Pincemin E. A simple and high-performance method for combining soft-decision FEC with differential encoding in 100 Gbps dual-polarization QPSK system. In: Proceedings OFC 2014, San Francisco, CA, 2014:1–3.10.1364/OFC.2014.M3A.7Search in Google Scholar

3. Zhang H, Cai Y, Foursa D, Pilipetskii A. Cycle slip mitigation in POLMUX-QPSK modulation. In: Proceedings Optical Fiber Communication Conference/National Fiber Optic Engineers Conference, 2011:OMJ7.10.1364/OFC.2011.OMJ7Search in Google Scholar

4. Koike-Akino T, Kojima K, Millar DS, Parsons K, Miyata Y, Matsumoto W, et al. Cycle slip-mitigating turbo demodulation in LDPC-coded coherent optical communications. In: Proceedings Optical Fiber Communication Conference, OSA Technical Digest (online) (Optical Society of America), 2014:M3A.3.10.1364/OFC.2014.M3A.3Search in Google Scholar

5. Patel RB, Kothari DK. Performance enhancement of 12 × 160 Gbps (1.92 Tbps) WDM optical system for transmission distance upto 8000 km with differential coding. In: 5th Nirma University International Conference on Engineering (NUiCONE), Ahmedabad, 2015:1–6.10.1109/NUICONE.2015.7449623Search in Google Scholar

6. O’Carroll J, Phelan R, Kelly B, Huynh TN, Cardiff B, Smyth F, et al. Narrow-linewidth discrete-mode laser diodes for coherent communication applications. IEEE/OSA J Opt Commun Networking. 2012;4:A90–A96.10.1364/JOCN.4.000A90Search in Google Scholar

7. Zhang Y, Zhang Y, Zhao Q, Can L, Yang C, Feng Z, et al. Ultra-narrow linewidth full C-band tunable single-frequency linear-polarization fiber laser. Opt Express. 2016;24:26209–14.10.1364/OE.24.026209Search in Google Scholar PubMed

8. Torres JJ, Varughese S, Thomas VA, Chiuchiarelli A, Ralph SE, Soto AM, et al. Mitigation of time-varying distortions in Nyquist-WDM systems using machine learning. Opt Fiber Technol. 2017;38:130–5.Search in Google Scholar

9. Olsson SL, Eliasson H, Astra E, Karlsson M, Anndrekson PA. Long-haul optical transmission link using low-noise phase-sensitive amplifiers. Nat Commun. 2018;9:1–6.10.1038/s41467-018-04956-5Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

10. Chang F, Onohara K, Mizuochi T. Forward error correction for 100 G transport networks. IEEE Commun Mag. 2010;48:548–55. DOI:10.1109/MCOM.2010.5434378.Search in Google Scholar

11. Savory SJ. Digital filters for coherent optical receiver. Opt Express. 2008;16:804–17.10.1364/OE.16.000804Search in Google Scholar PubMed

12. Du B, Liang J. Lowery Arthur, improved single channel back progation for intra-channel fiber nonlinearity compensation in long-haul optical communication systems. Opt Express. 2010;18:1705–17088.10.1364/OE.18.017075Search in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Kikuchi K, Fukase M, Kim S. Electronic post-compensation for nonlinear phase noise in a 1000-km 20-Gbit/s optical QPSK transmission system using the homodyne receiver with digital signal processing. In: Proceedings OFC/NFOEC 2007-2007 Conference on Optical Fiber Communication and the National Fiber Optic Engineers Conference, Anaheim, CA, 2007:1–310.1109/OFC.2007.4348759Search in Google Scholar

14. Lowery AJ. Fiber nonlinearity mitigation in optical links that use ofdm for dispersion compensation. IEEE Photonics Technol Lett. 2007;19:1556–8.10.1109/LPT.2007.903962Search in Google Scholar

15. Oerder M, Meyr H. Digital filter and square timing recovery. IEEE Tran Commun. 1988;36:605–12.10.1109/26.1476Search in Google Scholar

16. Morelli M, Mengali U. Feed forward frequency estimation for PSK: a tutorial review. IEEE Tran Commun. 1988;9:103–16.10.1002/ett.4460090203Search in Google Scholar

17. Godard D. Self-recovering equalization and carrier tracking in two-dimensional data communication systems. IEEE Tran Commun. 1980;28: 1867–75.10.1109/TCOM.1980.1094608Search in Google Scholar

18. Pfau T, Hoffmann S, Noe R. Hardware-efficient coherent digital receiver concept with feed-forwrad carrier recovery for M-QAM constellations. J Lightwave Technol. 2009;27:989–99.10.1109/JLT.2008.2010511Search in Google Scholar

19. Li J, Tao Z, Zhang H, Yan W, Hoshida T, Rasmussen JC. Spectrally efficient quadrature duobinary coherent systems with symbol-rate digital signal processing. J Lightwave Technol. 2011;29:1098–104. DOI:10.1109/JLT.2011.2105461.Search in Google Scholar

20. Tipsuwannakul E, Li J, Karlsson M, Andrekson PA. Performance comparisons of DP-16QAM and duobinary-shaped DP-QPSK for optical systems with 4.1 Bit/s/Hz spectral efficiency. J Lightwave Technol. 2012;30:2307–14. DOI:10.1109/JLT.2012.2196976.Search in Google Scholar

21. Yu J, Zhang J. Receent progress in high-speed optical transmission. Digital Commun Networks. 2016;2:65–76.10.1016/j.dcan.2016.03.002Search in Google Scholar

22. Torres JJ, Varughese S, Thomas VA, Chiuchiarelli A, Ralph SE, Ana M, et al. Mitigation of time-varying distortions in Nyquist-WDM systems using machine learning. Opt Fiber Technol. 2017;38:130–5. ISSN 1068–5200, DOI:10.1016/j.yofte.2017.09.008.Search in Google Scholar

23. Kikuchi K. Fundamentals of coherent optical fiber communications. J Lightwave Technol. 2016;34:157–79. DOI:10.1109/JLT.2015.2463719.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2019-07-11
Accepted: 2019-10-24
Published Online: 2019-11-09
Published in Print: 2024-01-29

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 19.5.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/joc-2019-0182/html
Scroll to top button