Ökonomische Herausforderungen des Klimawandels

Literatur

Acemoglu, D., P. Aghion, L. Bursztyn und D. Hemous (2012), The environment and directed technical change, American Economic Review 102, S. 131–66.Search in Google Scholar

Ahlheim, M. (2003), Zur ökonomischen Bewertung von Umweltveränderungen, in: B. Genser (Hrsg.), Finanzpolitik und Umwelt, Duncker & Humblot, Berlin, S. 9–71.Search in Google Scholar

Althammer, W. und W. Buchholz (1993), Internationaler Umweltschutz als Koordinationsproblem, in: A. Wagner (Hrsg.), Dezentrale Entscheidungsfindung bei externen Effekten – Innovation, Integration und internationaler Handel, Francke Verlag, Tübingen und Basel, S. 289–315.Search in Google Scholar

Aldy, J. E., A. J. Krupnick, R. G. Newell, I. W. H. Parry und W. A. Pizer (2010), Designing climate mitigation policy, Journal of Economic Literature 48, S. 903–48.Search in Google Scholar

Allcott, H. und S. Mullainathan (2010), Behavioral science and energy policy, Science 327, S. 1204 f.10.1126/science.1180775Search in Google Scholar

Allcott, H. und T. Rogers (2014), The short-run and long-run effects of behavioral interventions: Experimental evidence from energy conservation, American Economic Review 104, S. 3003–37.Search in Google Scholar

Andersen, M. S. und P. Ekins (2009), Carbon-Energy Taxation: Lessons from Europe, Oxford University Press, Oxford.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199570683.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Andreoni, J. (1988), Why free-ride?: Strategies and learning in public goods experiments, Journal of Public Economics 37, S. 291–304.Search in Google Scholar

Andreoni, J. (1990), Impure altruism and donations to public goods: A theory of warm-glow-of-giving, Economic Journal 100, S. 464–77.Search in Google Scholar

Anthoff, D. und R. S. J. Tol (2010), FUND – Climate Framework for Uncertainty, Negotiation, and Distribution, technische Beschreibung (Version 3.5) auf www.fund-model.org.Search in Google Scholar

Anthoff, D., C. J. Hepburn und R. S. J. Tol (2009), Equity weighting and the marginal damage cost of climate change, Ecological Economics 68, S. 836–48.Search in Google Scholar

Arrow, K. J. (1962), The economic implications of learning by doing, Review of Economic Studies 29, S. 155–73.Search in Google Scholar

Arrow, K. J. (1999), Discounting, morality, and gaming, in: P. R. Portney und J. R. Weyant (Hrsg.), Discounting and Intertemporal Equity, Resources for the Future Press, Washington DC.Search in Google Scholar

Arrow, K. J. et al. (2014), Should governments use a declining discount rate in project analysis?, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 8, S. 145–63.Search in Google Scholar

Arrow, K. J. und M. Priebsch (2014), Bliss, catastrophe, and rational policy, Environmental and Resource Economics 58, S. 491–509.Search in Google Scholar

Asheim, G. B. und B. Holtsmark (2009), Renegotiation-proof climate agreements with full participation: Conditions for Pareto-efficiency, Environmental and Resource Economics 43, S. 519–33.Search in Google Scholar

Asheim, G. B., C. B. Froyn, J. Hovi und F. C. Menz (2006), Regional versus global cooperation for climate control, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 51, S. 93–109.Search in Google Scholar

Auerswald, H., K. A. Konrad und M. Thum (2011), Adaptation, mitigation and risk-taking in climate policy, CESifo Working Paper 3320.10.2139/ssrn.1752133Search in Google Scholar

Azar, C. (1999), Weight factors in cost-benefit analysis of climate change, Environmental and Resource Economics 13, S. 249–68.Search in Google Scholar

Baldursson, F. und N.-H. M. von der Fehr (2004), Price volatility and risk exposure: On market-based environmental policy instruments, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 48, S. 682–704.Search in Google Scholar

Bardt, H. et al. (2011), Zur Diskussion gestellt: Emissionsvermeidung oder Anpassung an den Klimawandel: Welche Zukunft hat die Klimapolitik?, ifo Schnelldienst 64–5, S. 3–29.Search in Google Scholar

Barrett, S. (1994), Self-enforcing international environmental agreements, Oxford Economic Papers 46, S. 878–94.Search in Google Scholar

Barrett, S. (2002), Consensus treaties, Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 158, S. 529–47.Search in Google Scholar

Barrett, S. (2003), Environment and Statecraft: The Strategy of Environmental Treaty-Making, Oxford University Press, Oxford.10.1108/meq.2003.14.5.622.3Search in Google Scholar

Barrett, S. (2005), The theory of international environmental agreements, in: K.-G. Mäler und J. R. Vincent (Hrsg.), Handbook of Environmental Economics, Band 3: Economywide and International Issues, Elsevier, Amsterdam et al., S. 1457–516.Search in Google Scholar

Barrett, S. (2007), Why Cooperate? The Incentive to Supply Global Public Goods, Oxford University Press, Oxford.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199211890.003.0001Search in Google Scholar

Baumgärtner, S., M. Drupp und M. Quaas (2015), Subsistence, substitutability and sustainability in consumption, Environmental and Resource Economics, im Erscheinen.10.1007/s10640-015-9976-zSearch in Google Scholar

Baumol, W. und W. Oates (1988), The Theory of Environmental Policy, 2. Aufl., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9781139173513Search in Google Scholar

Beccherle, J. und J. Tirole (2011), Regional initiatives and the cost of delaying binding climate agreements, Journal of Public Economics 95, S. 1339–48.Search in Google Scholar

Bergstrom, T. C. (1982), On capturing oil rents with a national excise tax, American Economic Review 72, S. 194–201.Search in Google Scholar

Bergstrom, T. C. (1989), Puzzles: Love and spaghetti – The opportunity cost of virtue, Journal of Economic Perspectives 3, S. 165–73.Search in Google Scholar

Bergstrom, T. C., L. Blume und H. Varian (1986), On the private provision of public goods, Journal of Public Economics 29, S. 25–49.Search in Google Scholar

Berrens, R. P. et al. (2004), Information and effort in contingent valuation surveys: Application to global climate change using national internet samples, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 47, S. 331–63.Search in Google Scholar

Berry, P. M. et al. (2015), Cross-sectoral interactions of adaptation and mitigation measures, Climatic Change 128, S. 381–93.Search in Google Scholar

Boadway, R., Z. Song und F. J. Tremblay (2011), The efficiency of voluntary pollution abatement when countries can commit, European Journal of Political Economy 27, S. 352–68.Search in Google Scholar

Böhringer, C. (2014), Two decades of European climate policy: A critical appraisal, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 8, S. 1–17.Search in Google Scholar

Böhringer, C. und K. E. Rosendahl (2010), Green promotes the dirtiest: On the interaction between black and green quotas in energy markets, Journal of Regulatory Economics 37, S. 316–25.Search in Google Scholar

Botzen, W. J. W. und J. C. J. M. van den Bergh (2014), Specifications of social welfare in economic studies of climate policy, Environmental and Resource Economics 58, S. 1–33.Search in Google Scholar

Bovenberg, A. L. (1999), Green tax reforms and the double dividend: An updated reader’s guide, International Tax and Public Finance 6, S. 421–43.Search in Google Scholar

Buchholz, W. et al. (2012), Die Zukunft der Energiemärkte: Ökonomische Analyse und Bewertung von Potenzialen und Handlungsmöglichkeiten, ifo Forschungsbericht 57.Search in Google Scholar

Buchholz, W. (2014), Discounting in an uncertain world: Disentangling the debate on the Weitzman-Gollier puzzle, CESifo Working Paper 4967.10.2139/ssrn.2506502Search in Google Scholar

Buchholz, W. und K. A. Konrad (1994), Global environmental problems and the strategic choice of technology, Journal of Economics 60, S. 299–321.Search in Google Scholar

Buchholz, W. und K. A. Konrad (1995), Strategic transfers and private provision of public goods, Journal of Public Economics 57, S. 489–505.Search in Google Scholar

Buchholz, W. und T. Sandler (2015), Successful leadership in global public good provision: Incorporating behavioural approaches, unveröffentlichtes Manuskript, Universität Regensburg.10.1007/s10640-016-9997-2Search in Google Scholar

Buchholz, W. und J. Schumacher (2008), Discounting the long-distant future: A simple explanation for the Weitzman-Gollier puzzle, CESifo Working Paper 2357.Search in Google Scholar

Buchholz, W. und J. Schumacher (2010), Discounting and welfare analysis over time: Choosing the Eta, European Journal of Political Economy 26, S. 372–85.Search in Google Scholar

Buchholz, W. und M. Schymura (2012), Expected utility theory and the tyranny of catastrophic risks, Ecological Economics 77, S. 234–39.Search in Google Scholar

Buchholz, W., L. Dippl und M. Eichenseer (2015), Technological transfers in global climate policy, CESifo Working Paper 5548.10.2139/ssrn.2686502Search in Google Scholar

Buchholz, W., A. Haupt und W. Peters (2005), International environmental agreements and strategic voting, Scandinavian Journal of Economics 107, S. 175–95.Search in Google Scholar

Buchholz, W., W. Peters und A. Ufert (2014), Spielräume für uni- und multilateralen Klimaschutz, Zeitschrift für Umweltpolitik & Umweltrecht 37, S. 326–44.Search in Google Scholar

Buchholz, W., R. Cornes, W. Peters und D. Rübbelke (2015), Pareto improvement through unilateral matching of public good contributions: The role of commitment, Economics Letters 132, S. 9–12.Search in Google Scholar

Cameron, T. (2005), Individual option prices for climate change mitigation, Journal of Public Economics 89, S. 283–301.Search in Google Scholar

Cansier, D. (1991), Bekämpfung des Treibhauseffektes aus ökonomischer Sicht, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg und Berlin.10.1007/978-3-642-76700-5Search in Google Scholar

Carraro, C. und D. Siniscalco (1993), Strategies for the international protection of the environment, Journal of Public Economics 52, S. 309–28.Search in Google Scholar

Carraro, C. und C. Marchiori (2003), Stable coalitions, in: C. Carraro (Hrsg.), The Endogenous Formation of Economic Coalitions, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.10.4337/9781781009888Search in Google Scholar

Carson, R. T. und M. W. Hanemann (2005), Contingent valuation, in: K.-G. Mäler und J. R. Vincent (Hrsg.), Handbook of Environmental Economics, Band 2: Valuing Environmental Changes, Elsevier, Amsterdam et al., S. 821–936.Search in Google Scholar

Chander, P. und H. Tulkens (1995), A core-theoretic solution for the design of cooperative agreements on transfrontier pollution, International Tax and Public Finance 2, S. 279–93.Search in Google Scholar

Chander, P. und H. Tulkens (2008), Cooperation, stability, and self-enforcement in international environmental agreements: A conceptual discussion, in: R. Guesneries und H. Tulkens (Hrsg.), The Design of Climate Policy, The MIT Press, Cambridge.10.7551/mitpress/9780262073028.003.0008Search in Google Scholar

Chichilnisky, G. (2000), An axiomatic approach to choice under uncertainty with catastrophic risks, Resource and Energy Economics 22, S. 221–31.Search in Google Scholar

Chichilnisky, G. (2008), Catastrophic risks, International Journal of Green Economics 3, S. 130-41.Search in Google Scholar

Cline, W. (1992), The Economics of Global Warming, The Peterson Institute Press, Washington.Search in Google Scholar

Coase, R. (1960), The problem of social cost, Journal of Law and Economics 3, S. 3-44.Search in Google Scholar

Cornes, R. und T. Sandler (1996), The Theory of Externalities, Public Goods, and Club Goods, 2. Aufl., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9781139174312Search in Google Scholar

Cornes, R. und T. Sandler (2000), Pareto-improving redistribution and pure public goods, German Economic Review 1, S. 269–86.Search in Google Scholar

Cramton, P., A. Ockenfels und S. Stoft (2015), An international carbon-price commitment promotes cooperation, Economics of Energy and environmental Policy 4, S. 51–64.Search in Google Scholar

Croson, R. und N. Treich (2014), Behavioral environmental economics: Promises and challenges, Environmental and Resource Economics 58, S. 335–51.Search in Google Scholar

Damme, E. van (1989), Renegotiation-proof equilibria in repeated prisoners’ dilemma, Journal of Economic Theory 47, S. 206–07.Search in Google Scholar

Dannenberg, A., A. Lange und B. Sturm (2014), Participation and commitment in voluntary coalitions to provide public goods, Economica 81, S. 257–75.Search in Google Scholar

Dasgupta, P. (2008), Discounting climate change, Journal of Risk and Insurance 37, S. 141–69.Search in Google Scholar

Dasgupta, P. (2011), The ethics of intergenerational distribution; reply and response to John E. Roemer, Environmental and Resource Economics 50, S. 475–93.10.1007/s10640-011-9496-4Search in Google Scholar

DeCanio, S. J. und A. Fremstad (2013), Game theory and climate policy, Ecological Economics 85, S. 177–87.Search in Google Scholar

DeLong, B. (2006), Partha Dasgupta makes a mistake in his critique of the Stern Review, online: http://delong.typepad.com/sdj/2006/11/partha_dasgaptu.html (Zugriff: 8.10.2015).Search in Google Scholar

Diederich J, und T. Göschl (2014), Willingness to pay for voluntary climate action and its determinants: Field-experimental evidence, Environmental and Resource Economics 57, S. 405–29.Search in Google Scholar

Dietz, S. und N. Stern (2015), Endogenous growth, convexity of damages and climate risk: How Nordhaus’ framework supports deep cuts in carbon emissions, Economic Journal 125, S. 674–502.Search in Google Scholar

Dietz, S., C. Gollier und L. Kessler (2015), The climate beta, Grantham Research Centre on Climate Change and the Environment, Working Paper Nr. 190.Search in Google Scholar

EFI (2014), Gutachten zu Forschung, Innovation und Technologischer Leistungsfähigkeit Deutschlands 2014, EFI, Berlin.Search in Google Scholar

Edenhofer, O., Ch. Flachsland, M. Jakob und K. Lessmann (2015), The atmosphere as a global commons, in: L. Bernard und W. Semmler (Hrsg.), The Oxford Handbook of the Macroeconomics of Global Warming, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Search in Google Scholar

Eichner, T. und R. Pethig (2012), Stable climate coalitions (Nash) and international trade, CESifo Working Paper 3915.10.2139/ssrn.2140738Search in Google Scholar

Eichner, T. und R. Pethig (2013), Self-enforcing environmental agreements and international trade, Journal of Public Economics 102, S. 37–50.Search in Google Scholar

Ellerman, A. D., F. J. Convery und C. De Perthuis (2010), Pricing Carbon: The European Union Emissions Trading Scheme, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Search in Google Scholar

Endres, A. (2008), Ein Unmöglichkeitstheorem für die Klimapolitik?, Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik 9, S. 360–82.Search in Google Scholar

Endres, A. (2013), Umweltökonomie, 4. Auflage, Kohlhammer, Stuttgart.Search in Google Scholar

Epstein, L. G. und S. E. Zin (1989), Substitution, risk aversion, and the temporal behavior of consumption and asset returns: A theoretical framework, Econometrica 57, S. 937–69.10.2307/1913778Search in Google Scholar

Espey, J. A. und M. Espey (2004), Turning on the lights: A meta-analysis of residential electricity demand elasticities. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 36, S. 65–81.10.1017/S1074070800021866Search in Google Scholar

Falkinger, J., F. Hackl und G. J. Pruckner (1996), A fair mechanism for efficient reduction of global CO₂ Emissions, FinanzArchiv 53, S. 308–31.Search in Google Scholar

Farrell, J. und E. Maskin (1989), Renegotiation in repeated games, Games and Economic Behavior 1, S. 327–60.Search in Google Scholar

Fehr, E. und K. M. Schmidt (2006), The economics of fairness, reciprocity and altruism, in: S.-C. Kolm und J. M. Ythier (Hrsg.), Handbook of Giving, Altruism, and Reciprocity, Band 1, Elsevier, Amsterdam, S. 615–91.10.1016/S1574-0714(06)01008-6Search in Google Scholar

Feess, E. und A. Seeliger (2013), Umweltökonomie und Umweltpolitik, 4. Auflage, Franz Vahlen, München.10.15358/9783800643653Search in Google Scholar

Fell, H., D. Burtraw, R. D. Morgenstern und K. L. Palmer (2012), Soft and hard price collars in a cap-and-trade system: A comparative analysis, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 64, S. 183–98.Search in Google Scholar

Finus, M. (2001), Game Theory and International Environmental Cooperation, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.10.4337/9781843762898Search in Google Scholar

Finus, M. und S. Tjøtta (2003), The Oslo protocol on sulfur reduction: The great leap forward?, Journal of Public Economics 87, S. 2031–48.Search in Google Scholar

Finus, M. (2008), Game theoretic research on the design of international environmental agreements: Insights, critical remarks, and future challenges, International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics 2, S. 29–67.Search in Google Scholar

Finus, M. und D. T. Rübbelke (2013), Public good provision and ancillary benefits: The case of climate agreements, Environmental and Resource Economics 56, S. 211–26.Search in Google Scholar

Finus, M. und B. Rundshagen (1998), Renegotiation-proof equilibria in a global emission game when players are impatient, Environmental and Resource Economics 12, S. 275–306.Search in Google Scholar

Fischer, C. und L. Preonas (2010), Combining policies for renewable energy: Is the whole less than the sum of its parts?, Resource for the Future Discussion Paper Nr. 10–19.Search in Google Scholar

Fischer, C. und R. G. Newell (2008), Environmental and technology policies for climate mitigation, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 55, S. 142–62.Search in Google Scholar

Fleurbaey, M. (2008), Fairness, Responsibility, and Welfare, Oxford University Press, Oxford.10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199215911.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Froyn, C. B. und J. Hovi (2008), A climate agreement with full participation, Economics Letters 99, S. 317 ff.10.1016/j.econlet.2007.07.013Search in Google Scholar

Goeschl, T., D. Heyen und J. Moreno-Cruz (2013), The intergenerational transfer of solar radiation management capabilities and atmospheric carbon stocks, Environmental and Resource Economics 56, S. 85–104.Search in Google Scholar

Gollier, C. (2002), Time horizon and the discount rate, Journal of Economic Theory 107, S. 463–73.Search in Google Scholar

Gollier, C. (2004), Maximizing the expected net future value as an alternative strategy to gamma discounting, Finance Research Letters 1, S. 85–89.Search in Google Scholar

Gollier, C. (2010), Debating about the discount rate: The basic economic ingredients, Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik 11(1), S. 38–55.Search in Google Scholar

Gollier, C. (2013), Pricing the Planet’s Future – The Economics of Discounting in an Uncertain World, Princeton University Press, Princeton.10.1515/9781400845408Search in Google Scholar

Gollier, C. und J. Tirole (2015), Negotiating effective institutions against climate change, Economics of Energy and Environmental Policy 4, S. 5–28.Search in Google Scholar

Gollier, C. und M. L. Weitzman (2010), How should the distant future be discounted when discount rates are uncertain?, Economics Letters 107, S. 350–53.Search in Google Scholar

Grösche, P. und C. Schröder (2013), On the redistributive effects of Germany’s feed-In tariff, Empirical Economics 46, 1339–83.10.1007/s00181-013-0728-zSearch in Google Scholar

Goulder, L. H. (1995), Environmental taxation and the double dividend hypothesis: A reader’s guide, International Tax and Public Finance 2, S. 157–83.Search in Google Scholar

Goulder, L. H. und I. W. H. Parry (2008), Instrument choice in environmental policy, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 2, S. 152–74.Search in Google Scholar

Goulder, L. H. und A. R. Schein (2013), Carbon taxes versus cap and trade: A critical review, Climate Change Economics 4–1350010.10.1142/S2010007813500103Search in Google Scholar

Goulder, L. H., M. A. C. Hafstead und M. Dworsky (2010), Impacts of alternative emissions allowance allocation methods under a federal cap-of-trade program, Journal of Public Economics 60, S. 161–81.Search in Google Scholar

Hahn, R. W. (1984), Market power and transferable property rights, Quarterly Journal of Economics 99, S. 753–65.Search in Google Scholar

Hanemann, M. (2010), Cap-and-trade: A sufficient or necessary condition for emission reduction?, Oxford Review of Economic Policy 26, S. 225–52.Search in Google Scholar

Hanley, N. und C. L. Spash, (1993), Cost-Benefit Analysis and the Environment, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.Search in Google Scholar

Harstad, B. (2012a), Buy coal! A case for supply-side environmental policy, Journal of Political Economy 120, S. 77–115.10.1086/665405Search in Google Scholar

Harstad, B. (2012b), Climate contracts: A game of emissions, investments, negotiations, and renegotiations, Review of Economic Studies 79, S. 1527–57.10.1093/restud/rds011Search in Google Scholar

Heindl, P. (2015), The impact of administrative transaction costs in the EU emission trading system, Climate Policy, im Erscheinen.10.2139/ssrn.2699120Search in Google Scholar

Heindl, P. und A. Löschel (2014), Social implications of green growth policies from the perspective of energy sector reform and its impact on households, OECD Issue Note, Paris.10.2139/ssrn.2578953Search in Google Scholar

Heindl, P., P. J. Wood und F. Jotzo (2015), Combining international cap-and-trade with national carbon taxes, in: M. Gronwald und B. Hintermann (Hrsg.), Emissions Trading as a Policy Instrument – Evaluation and Prospects, The MIT Press, Cambridge, S. 123–47.10.7551/mitpress/9780262029285.003.0006Search in Google Scholar

Hepburn, C. (2006), Regulation by prices, quantities, or both: A review of instrument Choice, Oxford Review of Economic Policy 22, S. 226–47.Search in Google Scholar

Hintermann, B. (2015), Market power in emission permit markets: Theory and evidence from the EU ETS. Environmental and Resource Economics (im Erscheinen, verfügbar online seit 7. Juli 2015).10.1007/s10640-015-9939-4Search in Google Scholar

Hepburn, C. und B. Groom (2007), Gamma-discounting and expected net future value, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 53, S. 99–109.Search in Google Scholar

Hoel, M. (1991), Global environmental problems: The effects of unilateral action taken by one country, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 20, S. 55–70.Search in Google Scholar

Hoel, M. (1992), International environment conventions: The case of uniform reductions of emissions, Environmental and Resource Economics 2, S. 141–59.Search in Google Scholar

Hoel, M. und L. Karp (2002), Taxes vs. quotas for a stock pollutant, Resource and Energy Economics 24, S. 367–84.10.1016/S0928-7655(02)00014-3Search in Google Scholar

Hope, C. (2006), The marginal impact of CO₂ from PAGE 2002, Integrated Assessment Journal 6, S. 9–56.Search in Google Scholar

Horowitz, J. und A. Lange (2014), Cost-benefit analysis under uncertainty – A note on Weitzman’s dismal theorem, Energy Economics 42, S. 201 ff.10.1016/j.eneco.2013.12.013Search in Google Scholar

Ihori, T. (1996), International public goods and contribution productivity differentials, Journal of Public Economics 61, S. 139–54.Search in Google Scholar

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change IPCC (2014), Fifth Assessment Report, Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change, IPPC, Genf.10.1017/CBO9781107415416Search in Google Scholar

Jaffe, A. B. und S. Kerr (2015), The science, economics, and politics of global climate change: A review of The Climate Casino by William Nordhaus, Journal of Economic Literature 53, S. 79–91.Search in Google Scholar

Jaraitė-Kažukauskė, J. und A. Kažukauskas (2015), Do transaction costs influence firm trading behaviour in the European emissions trading system?, Environmental and Resource Economics (im Erscheinen, online seit 9. Oktober 2014).10.1007/s10640-014-9831-7Search in Google Scholar

Jayaraman, R. und R. Kanbur, (1999), International public goods and the case for foreign aid, in: I. Kaul, I. Grunberg und M. A. Stern (Hrsg.), Global Public Goods – International Cooperation in the 21st Century, Oxford University Press, Oxford, S. 418–35.10.1093/0195130529.003.0021Search in Google Scholar

Jensen, S., K. Mohlin, K. Pittel und T. Sterner (2015), An introduction to the green paradox: The unintended consequences of climate policy, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 9, S. 246–65.Search in Google Scholar

Johannson-Stenmann, O. und J. Konow (2010), Fair air, Environmental and Resource Economics 46, S. 147–66.Search in Google Scholar

Kahneman, D. und A. Tversky (1979), Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk, Econometrica 47, S. 263–91.Search in Google Scholar

Kalkuhl, M., O. Edenhofer und K. Lessmann (2012), Learning or lock-in: Optimal technology policies to support mitigation, Resource and Energy Economics 34, S. 1–23.Search in Google Scholar

Kaul, I., I. Grunberg und M. A. Stern (1999), Global Public Goods – International Cooperation in the 21^st Century, Oxford University Press, Oxford.10.1093/0195130529.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Kaul, I. und P. Conceicao (2006), The New Public Finance: Responding to Global Challenges, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Search in Google Scholar

Kaul, I. (2012), Global public goods: Explaining the underprovision, Journal of International Law 15, S. 729–50.Search in Google Scholar

Kesternich, M., A. Lange und B. Sturm (2014), The impact of burden sharing rules on the voluntary provision of public goods, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 105, S. 107–23.Search in Google Scholar

Kolstad, C. (2007), Systematic uncertainty in self-enforcing international environmental agreements, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 53, S. 68–79.Search in Google Scholar

Konrad, K. A. und M. Thum (2014), Climate policy negotiations with incomplete information, Economica 81, S. 244–56.Search in Google Scholar

Krysiak, F. (2008), Prices vs. quantities: The effects on technology choice, Journal of Public Economics 92, S. 1275–87.Search in Google Scholar

Lange, A. (2006), The impact of equity preferences on the stability of international environmental agreements, Environmental and Resource Economics 34, S. 247–67.Search in Google Scholar

Lange, A. und C. Vogt (2003), Cooperation in international environmental agreements due to a preference for equity, Journal of Public Economics 87, S. 2049–67.Search in Google Scholar

Lange, A., A. Löschel, C. Vogt und A. Ziegler (2010), On the self-Interested use of equity in international climate negotiations, European Economic Review 54, S. 359–75.Search in Google Scholar

Llavador, H., J. E. Roemer und J. Silvestre (2011), A dynamic analysis of human welfare in a warming planet, Journal of Public Economics 95, S. 1607–20.Search in Google Scholar

Llavador, H., J. E. Roemer und J. Silvestre (2015), Sustainability for a Warmer Planet, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.Search in Google Scholar

Löschel, A., K. I. Brockmann, P. Heindl, B. Lutz und J. Schumacher (2011), KfW/ZEW Kohlendioxid Barometer 2011: Hoher Anpassungsbedarf im EU-Emissionshandel ab 2013 – Deutliche Defizite bei der Vorbereitung in den Unternehmen, KfW Bankengruppe, Frankfurt a. M.Search in Google Scholar

Long, N. V. (2015), The green paradox in open economies: Lessons from static and dynamic models, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 9, S. 266–84.Search in Google Scholar

Mäler, K. G. und J. R. Vincent (2006), Handbook of Environmental Economics, Band 2: Valuing of Environmental Changes, Elsevier, Amsterdam et al.Search in Google Scholar

Meyer, D. J. und J. Meyer (2005), Relative risk aversion: What do we know?, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 31, S. 243–62.Search in Google Scholar

Meyer, D. J. und J. Meyer (2006), Measuring Risk Aversion, Now Publishers, Delft.10.1561/0700000006Search in Google Scholar

Murdoch, J. C. und T. Sandler (1997), The voluntary provision of a public good: The case of reduced CFC emissions and the Montreal protocol, Journal of Public Economics 63, S. 331–49.Search in Google Scholar

Narayan, P. K., R. Smyth, A. Prasad (2007), Electricity consumption in G7 countries: A panel cointegration analysis of residential demand elasticities, Energy Policy 35, S. 4485–94.Search in Google Scholar

Neuhoff, K. (2011), Climate Policy after Copenhagen – The Role of Carbon Pricing, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9780511819605Search in Google Scholar

Newell, R. G. (2010), The role of markets and policies in delivering innovation for climate change mitigation, Oxford Review of Economic Policy 26, S. 253–69.Search in Google Scholar

Newell, R. G., W. Pizer und J. Zhang (2005), Managing permit markets to stabilize prices, Environmental and Resource Economics 31, S. 133–57.Search in Google Scholar

Nordhaus, W. D. (1977), Economic growth and climate: The carbon dioxide problem, American Economic Review 67, Papers and Proceedings, S. 341–46.Search in Google Scholar

Nordhaus, W. D. (1991), To slow or not to slow: The economics of the greenhouse effect, Economic Journal 101, S. 920–37.Search in Google Scholar

Nordhaus, W. D. (1993), Optimal greenhouse gas reductions and tax policy in the ‘DICE’ model, American Economic Review 83, S. 313–17.Search in Google Scholar

Nordhaus, W. D. (2007), The Stern Review on the economics of climate change, Journal of Economic Literature 45, S. 686–702.Search in Google Scholar

Nordhaus, W. D. (2013), Climate Casino – Risk, Uncertainty, and Economics for a Warming World, Yale University Press, New Haven.Search in Google Scholar

Nordhaus, W. D. (2015), Climate clubs: Overcoming free-riding in international climate policy, American Economic Review 105, S. 1339–70.Search in Google Scholar

OECD (2014), The Distributional Effects of Energy Taxes: Preliminary Report, OECD, Paris.Search in Google Scholar

Ohl, C. (2003), Staatliche Umweltregime und transnationales Risikomanagement, Campus, Frankfurt a. M.Search in Google Scholar

Ostrom, E. (2009), A polycentric approach for coping with climate change, Policy Research Working Paper Nr. 5095, World Bank, Washington.10.1596/1813-9450-5095Search in Google Scholar

Ostrom, E. (2010), Beyond markets and states: Polycentric governance of complex economic systems, American Economic Review 100, S. 1–33.Search in Google Scholar

Parry, I. W. H. und R. C. Williams (1999), A second-best evaluation of eight policy instruments to reduce carbon emissions, Resource and Energy Economics 21, S. 347–73.Search in Google Scholar

Pearce, D. (1991), The role of carbon taxes in adjusting to global warming, Economic Journal 101, S. 938–48.Search in Google Scholar

Pearce, D. (2003), The social cost of carbon and its policy implications, Oxford Review of Economic Policy 19, S. 362–84.Search in Google Scholar

Peinhardt, C. und T. Sandler (2015), Transnational Cooperation – An Issue Based Approach, Oxford University Press, Oxford.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199398607.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Pezzey, J. C. V. und F. Jotzo (2012), Tax-versus-trading and efficient revenue recycling as issues for greenhouse gas abatement, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 64, S. 230–36.Search in Google Scholar

Pigou, A. C. (1912), Wealth and Welfare, Macmillan, London.Search in Google Scholar

Pindyck, R. S. (2011), Fat tails, thin tails, and climate change policies, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 5(2), S. 258–74.Search in Google Scholar

Pindyck, R. S. (2013), Climate change policy: What do the models tell us?, Journal of Economic Literature 51, S. 860–72.Search in Google Scholar

Pittel, K. und D. T. Rübbelke (2008), Climate policy and ancillary benefits: A survey and integration into the modelling of international negotiations on climate change, Ecological Economics 68, S. 210–20.Search in Google Scholar

Pittel, K. und D. Rübbelke (2012), Transitions in the negotiations on climate change: From prisoner’s dilemma to chicken and beyond, International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 12, S. 23–39.Search in Google Scholar

Pittel, K. und D. Rübbelke (2013), International climate finance and its influence on fairness and policy, The World Economy 36, S. 419–36.Search in Google Scholar

Pittel, K., R. van der Ploeg und C. Withagen (2014), Climate Policy and Nonrenewable Resources: The Green Paradox and Beyond, MIT Press, Cambridge.10.7551/mitpress/9780262027885.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Pizer, W. (2002), Combining price and quantity controls to mitigate global climate change, Journal of Public Economics 85, S. 409–34.Search in Google Scholar

Plambeck, E. L. und C. Hope (1996), PAGE95: An updated valuation of the impacts of global warming, Energy Policy 24, S. 783–93.Search in Google Scholar

Ploeg, F. van der und C. Withagen (2012), Is there really a green paradox?, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 64, S. 342–63.Search in Google Scholar

Ploeg, F. van der und C. Withagen (2015), Global warming and the green paradox: A review of adverse effects of climate policy, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 9, S. 285–303.Search in Google Scholar

Popp, D. (2010), Innovation and climate policy, Annual Review of Resource Economics, S. 275–98.Search in Google Scholar

Popp, D. (2011), International technology transfer, climate change, and the clean development mechanism, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 5, S. 131–52.Search in Google Scholar

Posner, E. A. und D. Weisbach (2010), Climate Change Justice, Princeton University Press, Princeton10.1515/9781400834402Search in Google Scholar

Ramsey, F. P. (1928), A mathematical theory of saving, Economic Journal 38, S. 543-59.Search in Google Scholar

Rausch, S., G. E. Metcalf und J. M. Reilly (2011), Distributional impacts of carbon pricing: A general equilibrium approach with micro-data for households, Energy Economics 33, S. 20–33.Search in Google Scholar

Rauscher, M. (2005), International trade, foreign investment, and the environment, in: K.-G. Mäler und J. R. Vincent (Hrsg.), Handbook of Environmental Economics, Band 3: Economywide and International Environmental Issues, Elsevier, Amsterdam, S. 1403–516.Search in Google Scholar

Rauscher, M. (2009), Kommentar zu Wolfgang Buchholz und Jan Schumacher: Die Wahl der Diskontrate bei der Bewertung von Kosten und Nutzen der Klimapolitik, in: J. Weimann (Hrsg.), Jahrbuch Politische Ökologie 6: Diskurs Klimapolitik, Metropolis, Marburg, S. 55–62.Search in Google Scholar

Rawls, J. (1971), A Theory of Justice, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.10.4159/9780674042605Search in Google Scholar

Reif, C., Löschel, A. und D. Rübbelke (2014), Improving voluntary public good provision by a non-governmental, endogenous matching mechanisms: Experimental evidence, ZEW Discussion Papers 14–075.10.2139/ssrn.2509205Search in Google Scholar

Requate, T. und W. Unold (2003), Environmental policy incentives to adopt advanced abatement technology: Will the true ranking please stand up?, European Economic Review 47, S. 125–46.Search in Google Scholar

Requate, T. (2005), Dynamic incentives by environmental policy instruments – A survey, Ecological Economics 54, S. 175–95.Search in Google Scholar

Ringius L., A. Torvanger und A. Underdal (2002), Burden sharing and fairness principles in international climate policy, International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 2, S. 1–22.Search in Google Scholar

Roemer, J. E. (2011), The ethics of intertemporal distribution in a warming planet, Environmental and Resource Economics 48, S. 363–90.Search in Google Scholar

Roemer, J. E. (2012), Once more on generational discounting in climate-change analysis: Reply to Partha Dasgupta, Environmental and Resource Economics 56, S. 141–48.Search in Google Scholar

Rubio, S. J. und A. Ulph (2006), Self-enforcing international environmental agreements revisited, Oxford Economic Papers 58, S. 233–66.Search in Google Scholar

Rübbelke, D. (2011), International support of climate change policies in developing countries: Strategic, moral and fairness aspects, Ecological Economics 70, S. 1470–80.Search in Google Scholar

Sachverständigenrat zur Begutachtung der gesamtwirtschaftlichen Entwicklung (2013), Jahresgutachten 2013/14: Gegen eine rückwärtsgewandte Wirtschaftspolitik, Kapitel 10, Energiepolitik: Warten auf dringend notwendige Weichenstellungen, Sachverständigenrat, Wiesbaden.Search in Google Scholar

Sandler, T. (1997), Global Challenges – An Approach to Environmental, Political and Economic Problems, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9781139174886Search in Google Scholar

Sandler, T. (2004), Global Collective Action, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9780511617119Search in Google Scholar

Schöb, R. (2009), Steuern oder Zertifikate: Wie wichtig ist die zweite Dividende für die Kimapolitik?, in: J. Weimann (Hrsg.), Jahrbuch Politische Ökologie 6: Diskurs Klimapolitik, Metropolis, Marburg, S. 169–88.Search in Google Scholar

Schmidt, R. C. und J. Heitzig (2014), Carbon leakage: Grandfathering as an incentive device to avert firm relocation, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 67, S. 209–23.Search in Google Scholar

Sen, A. K. (1967), Isolation, assurance and the social rate of discount, Quarterly Journal of Economics 81, S. 112–24.Search in Google Scholar

Sinn, H.-W. (2008), Public policies against global warming: A supply-side approach, International Tax and Public Finance 15, S. 360–94.Search in Google Scholar

Sinn, H.-W. (2012), Das grüne Paradoxon: Plädoyer für eine illusionsfreie Klimapolitik, Ullstein, Berlin.Search in Google Scholar

Sinn, H.-W. und U. Schmoltzi (1981), Eigentumsrechte, Kompensationsregeln und Marktmacht: Anmerkungen zum Coase Theorem, Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik 196, S. 97–117.Search in Google Scholar

Smith, A. (1776/1981), An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, Liberty Fund, Indianapolis.10.1093/oseo/instance.00043218Search in Google Scholar

Soest, D. P. van und E. H. Bulte (2001), Does the energy-efficiency paradox exist? Technological Progress and Uncertainty, Environmental and Resource Economics 18, S. 101–12.Search in Google Scholar

Stavins, R. N. (1995), Transaction costs and tradeable permits, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 29, S. 133–48.Search in Google Scholar

Stern, N. (2007), The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9780511817434Search in Google Scholar

Stern, N. (2008), The economics of climate change, American Economic Review 98, S. 1–37.Search in Google Scholar

Stern, N. (2013), The structure of economic modelling of the potential impacts of climate change: Grafting gross underestimation of risk onto already narrow science models, Journal of Economic Literature 51, S. 838–59.Search in Google Scholar

Stern, N. (2015), Why are we Waiting? The Logic, Urgency, and Promise of Tackling Climate Change, MIT Press, Cambridge und London.10.7551/mitpress/10408.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Sterner, T. (2012), Distributional effects of taxing transport fuel, Energy Policy 41, S. 75–83.Search in Google Scholar

Sterner, T. und U. M. Persson (2008), An even sterner review: Introducing relative prices in the discounting debate, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 2, S. 61–76.Search in Google Scholar

Stiglitz, J. E. (2015), Overcoming the Copenhagen failure with flexible commitments, Economics of Energy and Climate Policy 4, S. 29–36.Search in Google Scholar

Sugden, R. (2009), On nudging: A review of Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth and Happiness by Richard H. Thaler and Cass R. Sunstein, International Journal of the Economics of Business 16, S. 365–73.10.1080/13571510903227064Search in Google Scholar

Sunstein, C. R. (2007), Of Montreal and Kyoto: A tale of two protocols, Harvard Environmental Law Review 31, S. 1–65.Search in Google Scholar

Szekeres, S. (2013), The Weitzman-Gollier puzzle is not a paradox but a mistake, and it is most likely moot, Open Science Repository Economics, e23050448.Search in Google Scholar

Tavoni, A., A. Dannenberg, G. Kallis und A. Löschel (2011), Inequality, communication and the avoidance of disastrous climate change in a public goods game, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108, S. 11825–29.Search in Google Scholar

Thaler R. H. und C. R. Sunstein (2008), Nudge – Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness, Yale University Press, New Haven.Search in Google Scholar

Tietenberg, T. H. (2013), Reflections – Carbon pricing in practice, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 7, S. 313–29.Search in Google Scholar

Tingley, D. und M. Tomz (2013), Conditional cooperation and climate change, Comparative Political Studies 20, S. 1–25.Search in Google Scholar

Tol, R. S. J. (2002a), Estimates of the damage costs of climate change, Part I: Benchmark estimates, Environmental and Resource Economics 21, S. 47–73.Search in Google Scholar

Tol, R. S. J. (2002b), Estimates of the damage costs of climate change, Part II: Dynamic estimates, Environmental and Resource Economics 21, S. 135–60.Search in Google Scholar

Tol, R. S. J. (2003), Is the uncertainty about climate change too large for expected cost-benefit analysis?, Climatic Change 56, S. 265–89.Search in Google Scholar

Traeger, C. (2013), Discounting under uncertainty: Disentangling the Weitzman and the Gollier effect, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 66, S. 573–82.Search in Google Scholar

Umweltbundesamt (2015), Die Treibhausgase, verfügbar online: http://www.umweltbundesamt.de/themen/klima-energie/klimaschutz-energiepolitik-in-deutschland/treibhausgas-emissionen/die-treibhausgase (letzter Zugriff: 8.10.2015).Search in Google Scholar

Varian, H. (1994), Sequential contributions to public goods, Journal of Public Economics 63, S. 429–45.Search in Google Scholar

Wagner, G. und M. L. Weitzman (2015), Climate Shock – The Economic Consequences of a Hotter Planet, Princeton University Press, Princeton.10.1515/9781400865475Search in Google Scholar

Weimann, J. (2008), Die Klimapolitik-Katastrophe: Deutschland im Dunkel der Energiesparlampe, Metropolis, Marburg.Search in Google Scholar

Weimann, J. (Hrsg.) (2009), Jahrbuch Politische Ökologie 6: Diskurs Klimapolitik, Metropolis, Marburg.Search in Google Scholar

Weimann, J. (2012), Atomausstieg und Energiewende: Wie sinnvoll ist der deutsche Alleingang?, Energiewirtschaftliche Tagesfragen 62(12), S. 34–38.Search in Google Scholar

Weitzman, M. L. (1974), Prices vs. quantities, Review of Economic Studies 41, S. 477–91.10.2307/2296698Search in Google Scholar

Weitzman, M. L. (1998), Why the far-distant future should be discounted at its lowest possible rate, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 36, S. 201–08.Search in Google Scholar

Weitzman, M. L. (2009), On modelling and interpreting the economics of catastrophic climate change, Review of Economics and Statistics 91, S. 1–19.Search in Google Scholar

Weitzman, M. L. (2011), Fat-tailed uncertainty in the economics of catastrophic climate change, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 5, S. 275–92.Search in Google Scholar

Weitzman, M. L. (2014), Can negotiating a uniform carbon price help to internalize the global warming externality?, Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists 1, S. 29–49.Search in Google Scholar

Weitzman, M. L. (2015a), Internalizing the climate externality: Can a uniform price commitment help?, Economics of Energy and Environmental Policy 4, S. 37–50.10.5547/2160-5890.4.2.mweiSearch in Google Scholar

Weitzman, M. L. (2015b), A review of William Nordhaus’ The Climate Casino: Risk, Uncertainty, and Economics for a Warming World, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 9, S. 145–56.10.1093/reep/reu019Search in Google Scholar

Wissenschaftlicher Beirat beim Bundesministerium für Finanzen (2010), Klimapolitik zwischen Emissionsvermeidung und Anpassung, BMF, Berlin.Search in Google Scholar

Wood, P. J. (2011), Climate change and game theory, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1219, S. 15–70.Search in Google Scholar

Yohe G. und K. Strepzek (2007), Adaptation and mitigation as complementary tools for reducing the risk of climate impacts, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 12, S. 727–39.Search in Google Scholar