Welche Rolle spielen negative Emissionen für die zukünftige Klimapolitik?

Literaturverzeichnis

Acemoglu, D., P. Aghion, L. Bursztyn und D. Hemous (2012), The environment and directed technical change, American Economic Review 102(1), S. 131–66. 10.3386/w15451Search in Google Scholar

Acemoglu, D. und W. Rafey (2018), Mirage on the horizon, geoengineering and carbon taxation without commitment, Working Paper 24411, National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series, online verfügbar unter http://www.nber.org/papers/w24411.Search in Google Scholar

Allen, M. R. et al. (2009), Warming caused by cumulative carbon emissions towards the trillionth tonne, Nature 458, S. 1163–66. 10.1038/nature08019Search in Google Scholar

Antoniou, F. und R. Strausz (2017), Feed-in subsidies, taxation, and inefficient entry, Environmental and Resource Economics 67(4), S. 925–40. 10.1007/s10640-016-0012-8Search in Google Scholar

Bahr, G., D. Narita und W. Rickels (2012), Recent developments in European support systems for renewable power, Kiel Policy Brief 53, Institut für Weltwirtschaft.Search in Google Scholar

Braun, C., C. Merk, G. Pönitzsch, K. Rehdanz und U. Schmidt (2018), Public perception of climate engineering and carbon capture and storage in Germany, Survey evidence, Climate Policy 18(4), S. 471–84. 10.1080/14693062.2017.1304888Search in Google Scholar

Bürgerforum Climate Engineering (2018), Bürgergutachten zum Bürgerforum „Climate Engineering – eine Möglichkeit gegen den Klimawandel?“, online verfügbar unter www.spp-climate-engineering.de/buergerforum.html?file=files/ce-projekt/media/download_PDFs/BF-Gutachten.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

EASAC – European Academies Science Advisory Council (2018), Negative emission technologies: What role in meeting Paris Agreement targets?, EASAC Secretariat, Halle an der Saale.Search in Google Scholar

Eichner, T. und R. Pethig (2011), Carbon leakage, the green paradox and perfect future markets, International Economic Review 52(3), S. 767–805.10.1111/j.1468-2354.2011.00649.xSearch in Google Scholar

Dütschke, E., D. Schumann und K. Pietzner (2015), Chances for and limitations of acceptance for CCS in Germany, in: A. Liebscher und U. Münch (Hrsg.), Geological Storage of CO₂ – Long Term Security Aspects, Cham, Springer International, S. 229–45.10.1007/978-3-319-13930-2_11Search in Google Scholar

Fischer, C. und R. G. Newell (2008), Environmental and technology policies for climate mitigation, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 55(2), S. 142–62. 10.1016/j.jeem.2007.11.001Search in Google Scholar

Gasser, T. et al. (2018), Path-dependent reductions in CO2 emission budgets caused by permafrost carbon release, Nature Geoscience 11, S. 830–835.10.1038/s41561-018-0227-0Search in Google Scholar

Geden, O. und A. Löschel (2017), Define limits for temperature overshoot targets, Nature Geoscience 10(12), S. 881–82. 10.1038/s41561-017-0026-zSearch in Google Scholar

Golub, A. A. et al. (2013), Global climate policy impacts on livestock, land use, livelihoods, and food security, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110(52), S. 20894–99.Search in Google Scholar

Harstad, B. (2012), Buy coal! A case for supply-side environmental policy, Journal of Political Economy 120(1), S. 77–115.10.1086/665405Search in Google Scholar

Hausfather, Z. (2018a), Analysis: Why the IPCC 1.5C report expanded the carbon budget, Carbon Brief, online verfügbar unter https://www.carbonbrief.org/analysis-why-the-ipcc-1-5c-report-expanded-the-carbon-budget.Search in Google Scholar

Hausfather, Z. (2018b), Analysis: How much ‘carbon budget’ is left to limit global warming to 1.5 °C, Carbon Brief, online verfügbar unter https://www.carbonbrief.org/analysis-how-much-carbon-budget-is-left-to-limit-global-warming-to-1-5c.Search in Google Scholar

Held, H., E. Kriegler, K. Lessmann und O. Edenhofer (2009), Efficient climate policies under technology and climate uncertainty, Energy Economics 31, S. 50–61. 10.1016/j.eneco.2008.12.012Search in Google Scholar

Hoel, M., (2011), The supply side of CO₂ with country heterogeneity, The Scandinavian Journal of Economics 113(4), S. 846–65.Search in Google Scholar

Huppmann, D. et al. (2018), IAMC 1.5 °C scenario explorer and data hosted by IIASA, hrsg. vom Integrated Assessment Modeling Consortium & International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.Search in Google Scholar

IEA (International Energy Agency) (2018), World Energy Outlook 2018, Paris.Search in Google Scholar

IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) (2018): Summary for policymakers, in: V. Masson-Delmotte et al. (Hrsg.), Global warming of 1.5 °C, An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5 °C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty, Genf.Search in Google Scholar

Jaffe, A. B., R. G. Newell, R. N. Stavins und N. Robert (2005), A tale of two market failures, Technology and environmental policy, Ecological Economics 54(2), S. 164–74. 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.12.027Search in Google Scholar

Keith, D. W., G. Holmes, D. St. Angelo und K. Heidel (2018), A process for capturing CO2 from the atmosphere, Joule 2(8), S. 1573–94.Search in Google Scholar

Keller, D. P., E. Y. Feng und A. Oschlies (2014), Potential climate engineering effectiveness and side effects during a high carbon-dioxide emission scenario, Nature Communications 5 (3304).10.1038/ncomms4304Search in Google Scholar

Kelly, D. L. und C. D. Kolstad (1999), Bayesian learning, growth, and pollution, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 23(4), S. 491–518.10.1016/S0165-1889(98)00034-7Search in Google Scholar

Klimarahmenkonvention (2015): Paris Agreement, hrsg. von United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, UNFCCC, online verfügbar unter https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/english_paris_agreement.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

Kriegler, E et al. (2018), Pathways limiting warming to 1.5 °C, A tale of turning around in no time? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 376 (2119).10.1098/rsta.2016.0457Search in Google Scholar

Leach, N. J., R. J. Millar, K. Haustein, S. Jenkins, E. Graham und M. R. Allen (2018), Current level and rate of warming determine emissions budgets under ambitious mitigation, Nature Geoscience 11(8), S. 574–79.10.1038/s41561-018-0156-ySearch in Google Scholar

Matter, J. M. et al. (2016), Rapid carbon mineralization for permanent disposal of anthropogenic carbon dioxide emissions, Science 352 (6291), S. 1312. 10.1126/science.aad8132Search in Google Scholar

Mauritsen, T. und R. Pincus (2017), Committed warming inferred from observations. Nature Climate Change 7, S. 652–55.10.1038/nclimate3357Search in Google Scholar

Mazzucato, M. und G. Semieniuk (2018), Financing renewable energy: Who is financing what and why it matters, Technological Forecasting and Social Change 127, S. 8–22.10.1016/j.techfore.2017.05.021Search in Google Scholar

Moslener, U. und T. Requate (2009), The dynamics of optimal abatement strategies for multiple pollutants – An illustration in the Greenhouse, Ecological Economics 68(5), S. 1521–34. 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.10.010Search in Google Scholar

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2019), Negative Emissions Technologies and Reliable Sequestration: A Research Agenda. Washington, The National Academies Press.Search in Google Scholar

Nordhaus, W. D. (1991), A sketch of the economics of the greenhouse effect, The American Economic Review 81(2), S. 146–50.Search in Google Scholar

Nordhaus, W. D. (1992): An optimal transition path for controlling greenhouse gases, Science 258 (5086), S. 1315–19. 10.1126/science.258.5086.1315Search in Google Scholar

Obersteiner, M. et al. (2018), How to spend a dwindling greenhouse gas budget, Nature Climate Change 8(1), S. 7–10. 10.1038/s41558-017-0045-1Search in Google Scholar

OECD (2018), Agricultural Policy Monitoring and Evaluation 2018, Paris.Search in Google Scholar

Peters, G. P. (2018), Beyond carbon budgets, Nature Geoscience 11, S. 378–80.10.1038/s41561-018-0142-4Search in Google Scholar

Oschlies, A. und G. Klepper (2017), Research for assessment, not deployment, of climate engineering: The German Research Foundation’s priority program SPP 1689, Earth’s Future 5(1), S. 128–34. 10.1002/2016EF000446Search in Google Scholar

Quaas, M. F., J. Quaas, W. Rickels und O. Boucher (2017), Are there reasons against open-ended research into solar radiation management? A model of intergenerational decision-making under uncertainty, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 84, S. 1–17. Search in Google Scholar

Quirion, P. et al. (2011), How CO2 capture and storage can mitigate carbon leakage. FEEM Working Paper Nr. 15.2011.10.2139/ssrn.1763165Search in Google Scholar

Rickels, W. et al. (2011), Gezielte Eingriffe in das Klima? Eine Bestandsaufnahme der Debatte zu Climate Engineering, Sondierungsstudie für das Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, Kiel Earth Institute, online verfügbar unter https://www.kiel-earth-institute.de/sondierungsstudie-climate-engineering.html?file=files/media/downloads/CE_gesamtstudie.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

Rickels, W., F. Reith, D. Keller, A. Oschlies und M. F. Quaas (2018), Integrated assessment of carbon dioxide removal, Earth’s Future 6(3), S. 565–82.10.1002/2017EF000724Search in Google Scholar

Schmidt, M. G. W., A. Lorenz, H. Held und E. Kriegler (2011), Climate targets under uncertainty: Challenges and remedies, Climatic Change 104(3–4), S. 783–91. 10.1007/s10584-010-9985-4Search in Google Scholar

Schuur, E. A. G. et al. (2015), Climate change and the permafrost carbon feedback, Nature 520, S. 171–79. 10.1038/nature14338Search in Google Scholar

Seneviratne, S. I. et al. (2018), The many possible climates from the Paris Agreement’s aim of 1.5 °C warming, Nature 558 (7708), S. 41–49. 10.1038/s41586-018-0181-4Search in Google Scholar

Sinn, H. W. (2008), Public policies against global warming: A supply side approach, International Tax and Public Finance 15, S. 360–94.10.1007/s10797-008-9082-zSearch in Google Scholar

Smith, P. et al. (2014), Agriculture, forestry and other land use (AFOLU), in: O. Edenhofer et al. (Hrsg.), Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change, Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, S. 811–922.Search in Google Scholar

Smith, P. et al. (2016), Biophysical and economic limits to negative CO2 emissions, Nature Climate Change 6, S. 42–50.10.1038/nclimate2870Search in Google Scholar

Springmann, M. et al. (2017), Mitigation potential and global health impacts from emissions pricing of food commodities, Nature Climate Change 7, 69–74. 10.1038/nclimate3155Search in Google Scholar

Strefler, J. et al. (2018), Between Scylla and Charybdis, Delayed mitigation narrows the passage between large-scale CDR and high costs, Environmental Research Letters 13(4), 44015.10.1088/1748-9326/aab2baSearch in Google Scholar

The Royal Society (2018), Greenhouse Gas Removal, London.Search in Google Scholar

Vuuren, D. P. van et al. (2018), Alternative pathways to the 1.5 °C target reduce the need for negative emission technologies, Nature Climate Change 8(5), S. 391–97. 10.1038/s41558-018-0119-8Search in Google Scholar

WBGU (Wissenschaftlicher Beirat der Bundesregierung) (2018), Zeitgerechte Klimapolitik: Vier Initiativen für Fairness, Politikpapier Nr. 9. Search in Google Scholar

Weltbank und Ecofys (2018), State and Trends of Carbon Pricing 2018, Weltbank, Washington.Search in Google Scholar

Wiltshire, A. und T. Davies-Barnard (2015), Planetary limits to BECCS negative emissions, AVOID2, 1104872/AVOID2 WPD.2 a Report 1.Search in Google Scholar

Wohland, J., D. Witthaut und C. F. Schleussner (2018), Negative emission potential of direct air capture powered by renewable excess electricity in Europe, Earth’s Future 6(10), S. 1380–84. 10.1029/2018EF000954Search in Google Scholar

Wollenberg, E. et al. (2016), Reducing emissions from agriculture to meet the 2 °C target, Global Change Biologie 22(12), S. 3859–64. 10.1111/gcb.13340Search in Google Scholar