Skip to content
BY-NC-ND 3.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter September 14, 2016

Recent advances in the manufacturing processes of functionally graded materials: a review

  • Rityuj Singh Parihar , Srinivasu Gangi Setti and Raj Kumar Sahu EMAIL logo

Abstract

Functionally graded materials (FGMs) are engineered materials that are inhomogeneous and can be purposefully processed to obtain discrete or continuously varying compositions/microstructures over a definable geometrical length. FGMs can be used in a number of applications, such as aircrafts, combustion nozzles, gas turbines, energy conversion cells, biomaterials, etc. The objective of this paper is to review the new developments in production processes and their prospects in the creation of next-generation FGMs. Traditionally, four potential methods were used for fabrications of FGMs, i.e. powder metallurgy, chemical vapor deposition, self-propagating high-temperature synthesis, and plasma spraying. Some of the recently developed methods are the cast-decant-cast process, friction stir processing, and laser-engineered net shaping, which are usually cost-effective and used to make a quiet change in properties. An effective production method for conversion of the concept of gradient into practice is still a challenge for the research community. In this paper, research works toward meeting these challenges will be highlighted, and the future scopes of investigation in this area will be explored.

1 Introduction

Functionally graded materials (FGMs) are an advanced class of engineered materials in which two or more materials are present and the microstructure/composition varies in discrete or continuous fashion over a definable geometrical length. FGMs are naturally available, in the form of culms of bamboo and barley, and in the bone, seashells, and teeth. These naturally available FGMs completely match advanced FGMs in terms of desired properties and function at the desired surface. The first ever historical effort in the study of gradient materials was done by the M.I.T. metallurgist M.B. Bever in 1972, after the results of his “deliberate research work” were published. In 1984, Dr. M. Ninno, A. Kumakawa, and other material scientists in Japan recommended the conception of FGMs as a way of developing thermal barrier materials. In 1987, after the initialization of a commercial supersonic space shuttle development program, the need for crucial thermal barrier coating (TBC) for ambitious vehicles arose. This need resulted in the first ever detailed research on gradient materials. Extensive research effort has been done in order to control the property gradation, which also controls the chemical composition/microstructure across the component and results in composites with graded properties, which are known as FGMs. It is one of the promising candidates for a variety of applications such as biomaterial implants [1], thermal barriers [2], materials for energy conversion [3], metal cutting and rock drilling tools [4], mechanical element as gears [4], and optical and optoelectronic applications [5]. A range of FGM development techniques, including powder metallurgy (PM), centrifugal casting, thermal or plasma spraying, electrochemical processing, and chemical vapor deposition (CVD) and physical vapor deposition (PVD), have been available. State-of-the-art processes like cast-decant-cast, friction stir processing (FSP), and laser-engineered net shaping have been applied to fabricate this hybrid material. FGMs have gained importance because of their tailored properties and the absence of well-distinguished boundaries or interfaces between their different regions, which is difficult with conventional composite materials. Due to high local interlaminar stresses in conventional composites, the layers become separated, which causes disruption of the load transfer mechanism between the matrix and the reinforcement, loss of stiffness, and destruction of structural integrity, which finally leads to failure of functional and structural ability. FGMs possess a good chance of reducing the mechanical and thermal stress concentrations in many structural materials that can be developed for specific applications [6]. Still, the production of the gradation and elaboration of instruments for micro- and macro-structure design in FGMs is a challenge for the modern industry. Mathematical modeling and numerical simulations are extremely helpful tools for the design and investigation of FGMs. Efforts toward research work meeting these challenges were taken and reported extensively [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8]. With the help of numerical simulations, chemical composition and design optimization may be achieved, which increases the performance of FGM significantly. For instance, an optimized composition gradient of a metal cutting tool may improve the tool life and wear resistance [9]. Similarly, in dental implants, optimized composition gradients and gradient thickness result in improvement in implant life and its compatibility [10].

2 FGM types

FGMs can be categorized into several criteria. They may be classified on the basis of their uses, types of gradation, composition, and material combination. Based on the above-mentioned different criteria, the classifications of FGM along with their types are given in Table 1 [2], [4], [7].

Table 1:

Classification of FGM.

Sr. noClassification based onTypeExample
1Area of applicationBiomaterial FGMHA-Ti
2Piezoelectric FGMPZT-Ag
3Heat-resistant FGMPSZ-steel
4Energy conversion FGMNiO-YSZ
5Type of gradientContinuous graded typeAl-Al3Zr
6Stepwise graded typeWC-Co
7Changing compositionFunctionally gradient typeWC-Co
8Functionally gradient coating typeWC-Co-Fe
9Material combinationMetal/ceramicPSZ-steel
10Ceramic/ceramicAl2O3-ZrO2
11Ceramic/glassCaO/ZrO2/SiO2

3 FGM application

FGM is versatile in nature with a broad area of application. The different areas of application of FGM are as follows:

  1. TBC is the first need behind the extensive research on this material. It can be used as a space shuttle material because when it enters into space it has to face extremely high temperatures on the outer side (the temperature difference between outside and inside is 1000°C). In such extreme conditions, FGMs sustain very effectively with the combination of ceramic and metal of low thermal expansion coefficient, and the composition of each element vary from one side to the other side [partially stabilized zirconia (PSZ) ceramic/austenitic steel]. A similar type of ceramic/metal combination is used in different technology areas such as cryogenics, nuclear fusion and nuclear fission (where high-energy radiation hits a cold container), laser, and plasma technology [2].

  2. Tools used in metal cutting and rock drilling are another field of application of FGM where it can replace conventional material. Cutting of metal or rock drilling needs highly localized and vibrating stress, and generates large amounts of heat; hence, FGM can be used as an effective material for cutting and rock drilling tools to attain economic cutting condition, optimum cutting speed, and maximized tool life. Diamond-Co and WC-Co are combinations of materials that can be used in cutting and rock drilling tools [4].

  3. Corrosion of metallic or non-metallic component at high temperatures is very common, and its prevention can be effectively done by FGM coating. Gas turbine blades as well as areas that are subjected to thermo-mechanical stresses or fatigue exposure can be effectively protected by multiphase intermetallic FGM (“MeCrAlY” commonly used FGM coating) [4].

  4. Gears and other functional components of machines can be manufactured with greater economy and good performance as compared to conventional costly alloy steel [4].

  5. The FGM technique can be successfully utilized in the field of energy conversion materials. Thermoelectric and thermionic FGMs have been successfully fabricated. By application of the FGM technique, there is a noticeable improvement in the performance of photoelectric, thermoelectric, thermionic, and nuclear energy conversion [3].

  6. Piezoelectricity and ferroelectricity are other fields of application of the FGM technique. The concept of functionally graded piezoelectric material was evolved to further improve the performance and lifetime of piezoelectric materials. FGM has the ability to reduce stress concentration, improve residual stress distribution, and reduce delamination, and has good thermal properties and greater fracture toughness [5].

  7. Biomaterial is another area of application of the FGM technique. In the human body, the concept of gradation is present in teeth and bone. Keeping this in mind, it is possible to use FGM as an implant material. Thus, FGM can be used in healing of fractures as a bone plate, dental implant, biomaterial disc in the lumbar spine, femoral component for knee replacement, hip prosthesis coating, etc. Nevertheless, the problems of stress shielding effect, corrosion, reduced fatigue life, implant loosening, and poor response to magnetic resonance imaging remain [1]. When dental implants are prepared in the form of FGM, its properties can be optimized by the desired variation of elastic modulus having different compositions of HAP/Ti. This variation improves biocompatibility and implant life [10]. Metallic alloys with functionally graded porosity can be successfully prepared for bioengineering [11]. In order to prepare this HAP/Ti dental implant, cold isostatic pressing (CIP) and sintering process were successfully adapted [12]. In general, fabrication of biomaterial especially for dental implants and creation of FGM is a challenging task. Apart from the available fabrication technique, research is still ongoing on the development of defect-free and biocompatible FGMs [13].

  8. Optical and optoelectronic applications are another field of application, in which glass fiber can be made with a variation of refractive index, and lenses with varying optical wave transmissions and absorption properties [5].

Based on the above-mentioned applications of FGM, a lot of research has been done in this field; however, researchers have shown the further possibility for future applications of this novel concept in FGMs.

4 Production methods of FGM

The main challenge for the implementation of the concept of FGM is the effective method of fabrication with the desired gradient. All the methods that are used in the production of homogeneous structures are more or less effective for obtaining inhomogeneous structures, such as PM and centrifugal casting; however, these methods are not flexible enough for the required structure. Based on the processing route, different fabrication methods are available, such as powder metallurgy, self-propagating high-temperature synthesis (SHS), spark plasma sintering (SPS), friction stir processing, centrifugal casting, CVD, PVD, etc. In the following subsections, these methods are explained in detail.

4.1 PM process

The PM process is a very feasible and promising route for FGM fabrication. The steps followed for FGM production using the PM process is given in Figure 1.

Figure 1: Flowchart of the powder metallurgy process.
Figure 1:

Flowchart of the powder metallurgy process.

Initially, selection of material combination was done, followed by the design of the most conducive distribution of composition; stacking of premixed powder in a continuous or a stepwise manner according to the predefined composition distribution; then compaction of stacked powder by CIP; and finally the prepared compact is consolidated in a sintering furnace.

In order to reduce the defects like small porosity and small cracks during processing by the PM method, two main factors should always be kept in mind. First is the type of method used for preparation of graded green compact, and second is sintering of the prepared compact in such a way that the temperature should be uniform throughout the compact.

Using the PM technique, it is possible to create different types of gradients, e.g. porosity gradient or pore size gradient, gradient in chemical composition, and volume content of phases. Mainly two types of gradients are important from the application point of view: stepwise gradient and continuous gradient.

Several methods are available to obtain graded green compact. For continuous gradation, the available methods are wet powder spray forming, wet filtration process, centrifugal process, vibrating stacking process, slurry dipping process, and sequential slip casting. It is easier to produce a step-by-step gradation comparable to continuous gradation. For stabilization of prepared green bodies for all the above-mentioned processes, binders are necessary; apart from this, a de-waxing process, which is the same as metal injection molding, is also required [14]. Uniform sintering is also a considerable factor because it is a challenging task for different mixing ratios of constituent materials. Sintering imbalance due to non-uniform sintering is the prime reason for warping, frustum formation, splitting, cracking, etc. These problems may be avoided by size control of powder particles with the addition of activating element (in most cases, transition metals such as iron and copper) and by pressure sintering, such as hot pressing and hot isostatic pressing (HIP) [14], etc.

Based on this gradient type, the PM method can be further classified as discussed below.

4.1.1 Processing route for creating a stepwise gradient

Die compaction of layers (powder stacking) is effective and popular for the creation of a step gradient. In this method, to create the gradient, a number of powder layers with different compositions are deposited in a compaction die. The conveyor belt is used in a continuous supply of powder for deposition of powder in a stepwise manner, resulting in a stepped gradient. In the die compaction method, the number of powder layers to be deposited is limited, e.g. in the laboratory up to 10 layer combinations can be produced, but in potential application, it is limited to three layers. Other limitations are the control on individual layer thickness, the limited produced component size, and low productivity [15], [16], [17].

Sheet lamination is another method of obtaining a stepped gradient. Thin sheets of different thicknesses are prepared separately and joined to create a stepped gradient. To create a thin sheet, dry and wet powder techniques such as tape casting or roll compaction are used. Production of a large surface area with very small thickness is made by the above-mentioned techniques. This powder rolling process is used in an industrial scale. In this method, metal powder is supplied continuously into a rolling mill and simultaneously heated. The deposited powder layer is pressed and compacted inside rolls into strip after this prepared strip undergoes sintering. In tape casting, there is a preparation of thin strip from slurry; in this process, a slurry of desired composition is placed in the storing chamber where a gap is provided for slurry supply. Below this gap, one polymer tape passes continuously and slurry forms a strip over a tape. The tape and slurry pass through the oven where this slurry strip becomes dry, and finally this strip is wound on a spool. This method is used in the production of electronic ceramics (capacitors with multilayers and substrates with insulation), solid oxide fuel cells, knives, membranes, and structural laminates. The strips that are produced by this method have a thickness in the range of 25 µm to 1 mm tape thickness [14], [18].

The slurry dipping and slip casting methods can be used in the case where a limited number of layers are to be deposited. In slip casting, there is one porous medium that acts as a substrate. When this substrate is dipped in a slurry of desired powder combination, the slurry is dragged into the pores by the capillary effect [14], [19].

4.1.2 Processing route to create the continuous gradient

The centrifugal powder forming method is used to prepare a continuous gradient. In this method, powder of different compositions is continuous supplied into the distributor plate of the rotating cylinder. After a time on the plate, powder particles strike the inner wall of the cylinder and simultaneously an organic binder is sprayed to form a body of sufficient strength. The shape of the parts is the only limitation – a cylindrical shape is required. Gravity sedimentation is used to create a pore size gradient, in which particles of different velocities or different densities cause sedimentation in the column, which creates the pore size gradient [14].

The electrophoretic deposition (EPD) method is also used to create a continuous gradient. This is a low-cost technique and capable of producing complex geometry. It is also possible to create stepped gradient FGM. This was discovered by G.M. Bose in 1740 in a liquid siphon experiment. It consists of two processes: one is electrophoresis and the other is deposition. Electrophoresis is the study of the effect of electricity on the suspension, which shows the effect of an electric field on the motion of suspension particles. Sedimentation of suspension particles is called deposition. For EPD, it is necessary that particles of suspension should respond to the applied electric field, and that particles should be stable – either electrostatically or electrosterically stable. Table 2 shows efforts made by different researchers for the development of FGM with the EPD technique.

Table 2:

List of different authors who used EPD for fabrication of FGM.

Sr. no.Material combinationAuthorRemarks
1YSZ/Al2O3Sarkar et al. [20]Using the EPD process, green compact with composition gradient through the thickness was formed.
2Al2O3/YSZ, Al2O3/MoSi2Sarkar et al. [21]Effect of suspension stability was examined with the help of the DLVO (Derjaguin-Landau-Verwey-Overbeek) theory.
3WC/CoPut et al. [22]FGM with continuous Co gradient was successfully created.
4Al2O3-Y-TZP/Al2O3Kaya [23]Tubular FGM was prepared with a tough inner surface and a hard outer surface.
5Al2O3/ZrO2Anne et al. [24]Fabricated disc showing considerable increase (almost double) in strength due to a graded structure was prepared.
6Al2O3-ZrO2Hvizdos et al. [25]Al2O3-ZrO2 FGM was prepared by the EPD process using suspension of n-butylamine with acetone.
7Hydroxyapatite CaSiO3-chitosanPang et al. [26]Material for biomedical application was developed by room temperature processing.
8Al2O3/ZrO2Mehrali et al. [27]Using a non-aqueous stable suspension in the EPD process, a composition gradient was created with improved hardness.
9Al2O3/SiC/ZrO2Askari et al. [28]Material for artificial joint was prepared with a hard outer surface.
10NiO-YSZZarabian et al. [29]Voltage decay EPD was used to fabricate an electrode for solid oxide fuel cell.

Graded composition is created by the difference in the electrophoretic response of different powders under an applied electric field. Several theories have been proposed to explain the mechanism of EPD: the DLVO theory (named after the Russian scientists B. Derjaguin and L. Landau, and the Dutch scientists E. Verwey and J. Overbeek) is one of them, which explains the stability of colloidal suspension by considering the concept of attractive and repulsive energy. Sarkar et al. [20] prepared FGM with a continuous gradient of Al2O3/Y2O3-stabilized zirconia (YSZ) using a suspension made from Al2O3 and ZrO2 in ethanol and acetic acid. After EPD and sintering, the prepared FGM hardness varied from 16 to 24 HV and the fracture toughness ranged from 2 to 10 MPa-m1/2. Sarkar et al. [21] explained the EPD mechanism in the background of the DLVO theory and lyosphere distortion/thinning. The authors fabricated Al2O3/YSZ, MoSi2/Al2O3, YSZ/Ni, and Al2O3/Ni by using the EPD technique. The starting materials were YSZ, Al2O3, MoSi2, and Ni, and after deposition of powder, sintering was done in air at 1525°C. The EPD method is very effective to synthesize FGMs with stepped gradient as well as continuous-profile FGMs. Börner et al. [17] used this method to fabricate Al2O3-ZrO2 FGM with grain size gradient along with the gradient of the zirconia concentration. This gradient can be controlled accurately by controlling several factors, such as deposition current density, flow rate, suspension concentration, etc. It is difficult to create WC-Co FGM due to the fast migration rate of cobalt, which results in the homogenization of previously prepared layers. Put et al. prepared fully dense and closed porosity WC-Co FGMs by preparing acetone and hard metal suspension containing 4–17% cobalt by EPD with pressureless sintering at 1290–1340°C and liquid phase sintering for 1 h at 1400°C [22]. Tubular-shaped Al2O3-Y-TZP/Al2O3 FGM was prepared with continuous gradient, resulting in improved hardness, improved fracture toughness, and small grain size.

The scanning electron microscope (SEM) micrograph in Figure 2 represents the microstructure at different points along the thickness from the center, from Figure 2A having high fracture toughness to a pure alumina layer having high hardness (Figure 2D). Also, a significant change in microstructure was observed. In Figure 2A, Al2O3 is shown to have a fine grain size, and when the amount of Al2O3 is increased, the grain size is also increased [23].

Figure 2: SEM micrographs of Al2O3-Y-TZP graded layer where the dark phase is alumina and the light phase is TZP. (A) Al2O3 with 71 vol.% TZP. (B) Al2O3 with 35 vol.% TZP. (C) Al2O3 with 13 vol.% TZP. (D) Pure alumina surface layer. The effect of different percentages of TZP of grain size is clearly observed [23].
Figure 2:

SEM micrographs of Al2O3-Y-TZP graded layer where the dark phase is alumina and the light phase is TZP. (A) Al2O3 with 71 vol.% TZP. (B) Al2O3 with 35 vol.% TZP. (C) Al2O3 with 13 vol.% TZP. (D) Pure alumina surface layer. The effect of different percentages of TZP of grain size is clearly observed [23].

Al2O3/ZrO2 discs fabricated by EPD followed by sintering and HIP showed increase in strength because of the compressive surface residual thermal stresses generated in the Al2O3 surface layer. Due to the gradient in composition, the strength also increased from 288 to 513 MPa, which is very difficult to fabricate because of thermal expansion mismatch [24]. Al2O3-ZrO2 FGM was prepared by the EPD process using a suspension of n-butylamine with acetone. The prepared FGM had fine grains as well as improved hardness (15–25 GPa), as compared with pure Al2O3. The transverse crack propagation resistance also increased under impact loading due to this composition gradient [25].

The EPD method is more suitable for the development of biomaterials. In this method, processing at room temperature is possible. EPD has been used for the development of hydroxyapatite (HA)-CaSiO3 (CS)-chitosan composite coatings with excellent corrosion resistance for biomedical applications at room temperature. With this method, HA and CS are co-deposited to form an HA-CS coating; other materials can also be co-deposited with this method to make this composite coating more functionalized. Figure 3 shows the cross sections of the HA-CS layers prepared with different thicknesses along with pure chitosan for layer separation [26].

Figure 3: (A, B) Cross section of the prepared FGM having a layer of different materials in the form of laminates, where hydroxyapatite (H) and chitosan (Ch) form different layers [26].
Figure 3:

(A, B) Cross section of the prepared FGM having a layer of different materials in the form of laminates, where hydroxyapatite (H) and chitosan (Ch) form different layers [26].

For improvement in the mechanical properties, Al2O3-ZrO2 composite was prepared by using a suspension prepared in 2-butanone, n-butylamine, and cellulose nitrate solution, which resulted in improved hardness (15–25 GPa) as compared to pure alumina [27]. Al2O3/SiC/ZrO2 FGM for bio-implants (artificial joints) were developed from EPD followed by the pressureless sintering process applied as pre-sintering. Then, to densify the deposit and for hardness improvement, HIP was performed. By incorporating SiC in Al2O3-ZrO2 composite, an outer layer with compressive stress and an inner layer with tensile stress were developed [28]. Because of its flexibility to control the thickness and morphology of the deposit layer, it was used in the development of electrode for solid oxide fuel cells, and NiO/YSZ FGMs were prepared with varying NiO concentrations and porosities [29]. Despite all of the above-mentioned advancements in the EPD process, there is still scope for improvement in terms of processing cost and time reduction. In addition to that, one may concentrate on the development of a mechanism to generate an accurate and precise gradient thickness and composition distribution as required.

Slip casting (pressure-infiltration technique) is another method to prepare FGMs with continuous gradient, in which there is one mold whose material is porous in nature and is filled with slurry. The slurry is made of desired material that is fed through a cavity provided with the mold. After filling, the liquid part of the slurry is absorbed by the mold via capillary action, and the material particles whose size is larger than the size of pores remain in the mold. For producing hollow casting, the remaining slurry is drained from the mold after sufficient thickness is achieved. Sometimes, it is accompanied by pressure infiltration (liquid or gas). With this method, it is possible to obtain a gradient in porosity and in composition. The mold can comprise plaster of Paris, gypsum mold, alumina mold, porous resin mold, acrylic mold, etc.

Gypsum mold is commonly used in slip casting; however, it has some shortcomings such as chances of CaSO4 contamination and low productivity because of the time consumed in drying. Jung and Choi [30] prepared TZP (tetragonal zirconia polycrystals) SUS (stainless steel 304) FGM with gypsum mold and alumina mold to investigate the property changes, and found that alumina mold had no contamination on the surface and a comparatively easy-to-control layer thickness. Thus, alumina mold is superior to gypsum mold. Figure 4 shows the microstructure of SUS-TZP FGM sintered by using a tube furnace with an Ar-H2 environment. H2 is used to avoid erosion of interfaces of layers.

Figure 4: Microstructure of SUS-TZP FGM having 11 layers prepared in alumina mold [30].
Figure 4:

Microstructure of SUS-TZP FGM having 11 layers prepared in alumina mold [30].

Yan et al. [31] utilized the behavior of the constituent of suspension under applied magnetic field and prepared Ni-ZrO2 FGM by using slip casting along with gradient magnetic fields applied by the Maxwell coil system. Continuous gradient can be created along the field direction. Katayama et al. used this method to prepare Al2O3-W FGM by slip casting using acrylic mold, and the prepared FGM was used in high-intensity discharge lamps as a sealing and conducting component that has a translucent alumina envelope [32].

The above-mentioned methods are the initial steps in the PM process for preparation of green compact. After powder preparation, powder is mixed for desired composition, and stacked or pressed for consolidation by cold pressing or hot pressing before sintering of green compact. Sintering is the process in which powder after compaction is heated in a furnace below its melting point, which causes diffusion of atoms and results in a bonding that takes place by diffusion of atoms to form a dense compact with close adherence between powder particles [33]. Table 3 shows the development in the PM technique by listing different authors’ work of FGM fabrication along with the material combination chosen.

Table 3:

List of different authors who used powder metallurgy for fabrication of FGM.

Sr no.Material combinationAuthorsRemarks
1PSZ/stainless steelKawasaki and Watanabe [34]TBC was prepared. The responsible mechanism for crack formation, deflection, and spallation was explained by considering the effect of stress distributions in the specimen.
2HA-TiChenglin et al. [35]The prepared HA-Ti FGM is a prominent material as a bone implant because of its improved bending strength and toughness.
3ZrO2-NiCrZhu et al. [36]FGM was prepared with improved mechanical properties and a macro interface between layers was eliminated.
4Mullite/MoJin et al. [37]A multilayered mullite/Mo composite was prepared with high thermal shock resistance.
5Pb-Sn-TeGelbstein et al. [38]Annealing of the sintered product was performed to remove the sintering defects of thermoelectric material.
6Al/SiC and Ni/Al2O3Bhattacharyya et al. [39]It was found that in the prepared FGM with increased number of layers, thermal shock resistance and fatigue strength were also increased.
7Ni and Al2O3Yang et al. [40]Defects like distortion and bending that occurred due to non-uniform shrinkage during sintering led to cracking. To prevent this defect, a mathematical model was proposed to uniformly distribute the shrinkage throughout the layers.
8HA-SS316L-CNTHussain et al. [41]HA-SS316L-CNT defect-free FGM prepared successfully by pressureless sintering showed suitability as a bio-implant.
9Ni- Al2O3Bykov et al. [42]For the creation of gradient, generation of temperature gradient was found to be very effective, so millimeter-wave heating was used to prepare the metal-ceramic or metal-ceramic-metal combination.

In an oxidation environment, spalling appears in ceramic coating. When TBC undergoes thermal cycling, large thermal stresses are developed. Due to the difference of thermal expansion between ceramic coatings, a metal bond coat and substrate thermal stress are generated. With the replacement of a homogeneous composite with FGM coating, thermal shock cracking can be avoided. For preparation of TBC, green compact that is prepared by stacking of layers of different compositions after CIP undergoes pressureless sintering and hot pressing [34].

With the PM route, microstructure and properties can be effectively controlled; hence, this technique was used in preparation of multilayered mullite/Mo FGM for TBC. Due to the thermal residual stress generated after the sintering process, mullite/Mo FGM became more thermal shock resistant. It is clear from optical micrographs (Figure 5) that polished samples have a macroscopically heterogeneous structure without any defect at the interlayer, and delamination is also absent because of the composition gradient [37].

Figure 5: Optical micrograph of a cross section of mullite-Mo FGM [37].
Figure 5:

Optical micrograph of a cross section of mullite-Mo FGM [37].

The PM process is not good enough for fabrication of thermoelectric materials due to defects like atomic defect, local strains, and alteration in carrier concentration. Functionally graded Pb-Sn-Te materials that underwent annealing after sintering showed improved thermoelectric properties along with dense structure and good carrier concentration. It is explained that the electronic transport properties of Pb-Te and Pb-Sn-Te depend on the processing condition, and due to the PM conditions atomic defect and local strains are generated. To reduce or eliminate this defect, annealing has been done to stabilize its thermoelectric property [38]. The PM process is very effective in eliminating ceramic/metal interfaces; hence, ZrO2-NiCr FGM was prepared by CIP and sintering at 1400°C by different powder composition and processing. From microscopic observations, it was found that there is an absence of a macroscopic ceramic/metal interface along with a stepwise change in chemical composition [36].

The developed HA-Ti FGMs have improved bending strength, fracture toughness, and absent macroscopic interphase. The dark phase (Figure 6) represents HA and the white phase is titanium, and change in composition from HA to Ti is stepwise and a clear interface is absent. Fracture toughness and bending strength improved considerably with increasing Ti volume fraction (Figure 7) [35].

Figure 6: Microstructure of a cross section of HA-Ti FGM having a continuous composition gradient where TI percentage continuously increases from (A) to (E) [35].
Figure 6:

Microstructure of a cross section of HA-Ti FGM having a continuous composition gradient where TI percentage continuously increases from (A) to (E) [35].

Figure 7: Effect of the volume fraction of HA on Young’s modulus, Vickers hardness, and fracture toughness of HA-Ti FGM [35].
Figure 7:

Effect of the volume fraction of HA on Young’s modulus, Vickers hardness, and fracture toughness of HA-Ti FGM [35].

It is very difficult to make FGMs with carbon nanotubes (CNTs); however, with the PM process, its fabrication is possible. FGM with HA, stainless-steel 316L (SS316L), and CNT composition gradient were prepared using the PM technique. Application of uniaxial compression along with pressureless sintering resulted in increased hardness, fracture toughness, biocompatibility, and bioactivity [41]. It is a well-known fact that powder metallurgy is a relatively simple FGM fabrication process in which composition can be accurately controlled. In case of multilayered materials, there is a chance of distortion and cracking due to different shrinkage properties. This non-uniform shrinkage can be prevented by the prediction of shrinkage and preparation of uniform shrinkage gradient. Thus, Yang et al. has proposed one mathematical expression to establish the relation between material composition and dimensional shrinkage, and Ni-Al2O3 multilayer samples have been prepared with a uniform shrinkage gradient [40].

It is a challenge to prepare materials having different sintering behaviors such as metal-ceramic. Because of differences in the temperature range of densification, it is better to generate a temperature gradient at the time of sintering. Various methods have been proposed to do this, including pulse electric discharge consolidation, field-assisted sintering technique, and SPS. In this category, microwave heating provides several advantages like separation of thermal source from sink, resulting in ease in the creation of a desirable temperature gradient. Along with this, each material have different dielectric properties, so their capacity to absorb microwave is also different and results in selective heating. Thus, Bykov et al. prepared bulk multilayer graded Ni-Al2O3 samples with millimeter-wave heating to avoid cracks and delamination of layers. Figure 8 shows the cross section of polished samples sintered in an inhomogeneous temperature field [42].

Figure 8: Microstructure of Al2O3-Ni FGM having layers with different compositions [42].
Figure 8:

Microstructure of Al2O3-Ni FGM having layers with different compositions [42].

Al/SiC FGM has been prepared, and resulted in noticeable improvement in flexural strength, thermal fatigue behavior, and thermal shock resistance with an increase in the number of layers [39]. The concept of FGM is successfully utilized in dental implants with help of the effective combination of mechanical and biocompatible properties. This property combination is helpful in solving several implant failure problems such as lack of biomechanical bonding, insufficient mechanical strength, etc. Other concerns with this concept are the cost of production (which is very high) and the desired shape of the implant. Still, many techniques have evolved that are capable of overcoming these problems [43]. HA/Ti is a suitable material combination for use as a bone implant, in which HA provides biocompatibility and Ti provides mechanical strength. However, the sintering temperatures of both are different, so there are chances that coating of HA on Ti will peel off. To prepare uniform biocompatible bioceramics, functionally graded HA is fabricated by press forming and sintering with a gradient of nano-/micrograin. Functionally graded HA with nanograins have a rough surface that provides biocompatibility, and micrograins provide better mechanical properties [44]. An HA/316L gradient was prepared by a pressureless sintering process, and it was found that nanosized HA gives more densification and there is interdiffusion of chromium from the 316L to the HA interface. Nanograined FGMs show the best hardness and corrosion resistance as compared to micrograined FGMs due to interfacial reaction [45]. For improvement of biocompatibility and mechanical properties of HA, it is prepared in the form of CNT- and 316L-reinforced HA FGM; however, due to the difference in thermal expansion coefficient, after sintering, residual thermal stresses are generated and result in cracking. Thus, with the optimum combination of sintering parameters and binder content, this problem can be controlled and the reinforcement plays a critical role here [46]. SS316L/HA and SS316L/CS (calcium silicate) were prepared using solid-state sintering, and it was found that SS316L/CS had better mechanical properties as well as load-bearing capacity as compared to SS316L/HA with increasing sintering temperature [47]. Al2O3-ZrO2 gradient FGM was prepared and found to be very useful, with improved impact resistance by delay in crack propagation and improved layer integrity [48]. The main advantage of the PM technique is the elimination of macroscopic interface, atomic defect, cracks, ability to prepare FGM with continuous or stepwise gradient, as well as higher composition uniformity along with the absence of segregation and second-phase carbides. The precipitates that form after processing are also more uniformly distributed. Despite all these research works and advancement in this method, still some disadvantages remain, such as the high cost of the material and bulk production, etc. These are the main associated problems that require further research [49].

4.2 Self-propagating high-temperature synthesis

An effective means of surface hardening of steel components is SHS, which produces refractory compounds and functional coatings by the solidification of liquid reaction products. SHS was discovered in 1967 and has been used in practice to produce various powders, refractory compounds, and functional coatings.

The use of SHS is economically attractive, as it does not require expensive and complex high-temperature heating systems. Although the process occurs at 1500–4000°C, the temperature is attained by the internal energy of the reacting system. At these temperatures, the time required for synthesis is reduced from a few hours to a few minutes or even seconds, and consequently the products are of high purity. The initial components are metals, non-metals, and metal oxides in most cases. The reaction of these components in extreme conditions (high temperature and pressure) yields new compounds and phases. By considering the above-mentioned advantages, many studies for the application and improvement of this process have been done. Table 4 shows the development by listing different authors who used SHS for fabrication of FGM along with the material combinations.

Table 4:

List of different authors who used SHS for fabrication of FGM.

Sr. no.Material combinationAuthorDescription
1MoSi2/Al2O3Dumont et al. [50]Tape casting was used to prepare green compact and followed by SHS to densify the MoSi2/Al2O3 multilayered product, which gave the desired result for electrical devices.
2Al/TIChoy [51]SHS process was effectively utilized for preparation of metallic foam after addition of blowing agent in the reactant mixture, and its microstructure was optimized to make it suitable for biomedical application.
3ZrC-ZrB2Yong et al. [52]Combustion synthesis was combined with centrifugal casting to prepare FGM from a high melting temperature or refractory material.

The MoSi2/Al2O3 combination is very useful for application in electrical devices because MoSi2 has good electrical property and Al2O3 has excellent mechanical property. It is a very good combination for the preparation of a multilayered composite by the SHS technique. Tape casting is used to prepare layers of different compositions. Then, these layers are stacked in sequence and processed with SHS under a weak load to densify the product. Preservation and restoration of the gradient depend on the amount of liquid, which has to be controlled precisely. To control the amount of liquid, the maximum temperature reached during the reaction should be close to the melting temperature of the reaction product. Another way is to add inert powder so that the heat dissipated is utilized by the product. Variation in electrical resistivity has been obtained with >10 orders of magnitude through the composite [50]. It is also suitable for biomaterial preparation due to the ease in developing a porosity gradient. Addition of blowing agent in the mixture helps create a porosity gradient. SHS was used to create functionally graded porous Al-Ti metallic foam, and a strong dependence of microstructure on the gasifying agent was found by mixing nanoscale titanium and nanoscale aluminum. Nanoscale powder has higher surface energy, reduced melting temperatures, and distinctive absorption properties that result in higher ignition sensitivity [51]. Combustion synthesis was combined with centrifugal casting to prepare FGM from a high melting temperature or refractory material (intermetallics, ceramic, and composite material). Along with this, it is also possible to prepare carbide and boride. Hence, ZrC-ZrB2 FGM was prepared for aerospace application by SHS, using different compositions of Zr powders, CrO2 powders, and Al powders as raw materials. It was found that with increases in the amount of CrO3+Al, the grain size also continuously increases [52]. From the above-mentioned work, it is clear that the SHS process consumes less energy, and is a simple process capable of producing a high-purity product. However, some time for preheating of reactant mixture is required to increase the ignition capability. Moreover, sometimes, the relatively longer time of heating of the reactants as compared to the combustion time results in compound formation by a solid-state reaction, which causes inhibition of ignition.

4.3 Spark plasma sintering

SPS is a sintering technique with some modification over the conventional sintering technique, with direct heating of compacted powder instead of separate heating in the furnace; that uses pulsed DC current that passes through the die and powder compact, causing internal heating; and with simultaneous use of temperature and pressure, resulting in a high heating rate along with a high sintering rate. Because of internal heating, only a few minutes are sufficient to complete the sintering process; the holding time is very small at the sintering temperature, so that it completes quickly.

SPS is very effective in the fabrication of FGMs, that is why nowadays research on fabrication with the SPS technique obtained momentum. Figure 9 shows the setup of the SPS system with various components. There are two movable punches for applying pressure during heating. The DC power supply is used for heating when it passes through graphite punch and causes internal heating of the powder. A vacuum and cooling chamber is present to provide inert atmosphere and cooling. The prepared powder is placed into the graphite die, which is closed by punching and this assembly is placed into the SPS chamber under the required atmosphere condition (vacuum/argon, etc.). Finally, with the help of a control unit, the product is prepared in less time. Many researches have been done in the field of SPS because of its effectiveness in fabrication, and improved material properties were obtained as compared to the conventional sintering process. Table 5 lists the work done by different researchers on the SPS technique.

Figure 9: System configurations.
Figure 9:

System configurations.

Table 5:

List of different authors who used SPS for fabrication of FGM.

Sr. no.Material combinationAuthorDescription
1Al2O3/Ti3SiC2Yongming et al. [53]SPS method was used to develop a new material for application as a substrate material, or for armor application because of its ability to sinter material with good properties in a short processing time.
2TiN/HAPKondo et al. [54]TiN/HAP FGM was successfully developed, which is very difficult with conventional sintering.
3Ti-TiB-TiB2Feng et al. [55]It is a very useful combination for defense purposes and with SPS processing can be done at a low temperature and less time, with cracking and unwanted phases.
4ZrO2/AISI316LMishina et al. [56]It has use in joint prostheses and was successfully prepared by SPS, because with this technique granules of different kinds having different melting temperatures can be sintered in a vacuum with less time and low sintering temperature.
5Si3N4Belmonte et al. [57]Continuous graded in situ Si3N4 FGM with α and β phases. The problem of residual stress generation and scaling up for mass production can be solved.
6SUS316L/Al2O3Radwan et al. [58]In FGM, there is a problem of radial cracking in the Al2O3-rich region regardless of the number of layers or the gradient compositional profile, which is solved by short sintering time and low sintering temperature.
7WC-CoEriksson [59]It is difficult to prepare FGM with conventional sintering due to Co migration. This problem can be solved by the SPS technique.

SPS is also used in the fabrication of biomaterials and metal-ceramic combination for high fracture toughness, bending strength, and wear resistance. The prepared biomaterial is applicable in joint prostheses, as bone implant material without decomposition. The compliant pad for thermoelectric energy conversion is prepared from nickel and aluminum by SPS with an optimum composition distribution, and densification can be optimized.

It is also useful for the reduction of residual stress due to the particle size distribution and thermal expansion mismatch of different layers. Al2O3/Ti3SiC2 has been prepared for armor application with combined toughness, electrical conductivity, and increase in the Ti3SiC2 electrical conductivity; however, decreases in hardness have been reported. Figure 10 shows the optical micrograph of a polished sample in which interfaces between different layers are clearly shown, which clears the heterogeneous nature of the prepared composite due to the gradient distribution of composition [53].

Figure 10: Optical micrograph of polished Al2O3/Ti3SiC2 FGM [53].
Figure 10:

Optical micrograph of polished Al2O3/Ti3SiC2 FGM [53].

SPS has the capability to sinter product at lower temperatures as compared to conventional methods, because of which it is possible to prepare stable TiN/HAP FGM for bone implants. It was found to be very stable for implants with uniform hardness, improved flexural strength, and compression strength. Also, new bone is generated without inflammation. The prepared TiN/HAP FGM has a Brinell hardness of around 60 throughout the composite. The flexural strength of the prepared FGM with a sintering temperature of 1100°C and 1200°C was 65.4 MPa and 71.3 MPa, respectively, whereas the compression strength increased to >100 MPa as shown in Figure 11 [54].

Figure 11: Brinell hardness of each part of TiN/HAP FGM [54].
Figure 11:

Brinell hardness of each part of TiN/HAP FGM [54].

Hot pressing, microwave sintering, and combustion synthesis are also capable of sintering at fast rates; however, there are chances of generation of crack, whereas in the case of SPS it may be avoided because of internal heating. Ti-TiB-TiB2 FGM with intermetallic compound has been fabricated at a relatively decreased sintering temperature and in less holding time, and the developed FGM has three types of layers: Ti, Ti+TiB, and Ti+TiB+TiB2. It is a very useful combination for defense purposes. If it is prepared by any other process such as hot pressing, microwave sintering, or combustion synthesis, then there are chances of the occurrence of cracking problems and the formation of undesirable phases [55]. B4C-Al cermets were prepared successfully by SPS for B4C consolidation, and there was a need for high pressure and temperature. Initially, the porous compact of B4C is made by SPS. Then, this compact is infiltrated by pure molten aluminum and heated to remove moisture, and finally left in a vacuum furnace to cool down. Figure 12 shows the difference in hardness before and after infiltration; the increase in hardness is because of the reinforced aluminum [60].

Figure 12: Variations of hardness of the FGM with and without aluminum [60].
Figure 12:

Variations of hardness of the FGM with and without aluminum [60].

With this technique, granules of different kinds having different melting temperatures can be sintered in a vacuum at a relatively lower sintering temperature and sintering time. ZrO2/AISI316L FGM prepared for joint prostheses had good fracture toughness, wear resistance, and biotribological properties. FGMs were prepared by SPS from ZrO2 and AISI316L granules (10–50 vol.%) having two to six layers. The fracture toughness and wear resistance of FGM were improved due to the reinforced metallic AISI316L phases in the ZrO2 matrix, which created obstacles to crack propagation [56]. Functionally graded silicon nitride (Si3N4) with continuous variations in composition and grain size has been fabricated in mass production. Three FGMs were prepared at 1550°C, 1600°C, and 1650°C, and continuous gradients in α/β phase content as well as in grain sizes were obtained [57]. In FGM, there is a problem of radial cracking in the Al2O3-rich region, regardless of the number of layers or the gradient compositional profile, which is solved by a short sintering time and low sintering temperature. Crack-free and dense SUS316L/Al2O3 FGM is prepared with a multilayer system to reduce thermal stress along with YSZ as an intermediate layer. YSZ is added as a toughening phase to avoid radial cracking of the graded layer [58]. Another advantage of a short sintering time along with a low sintering temperature is controlled migration rate. It is difficult to prepare FGM with conventional sintering due to the Co migration problem, and this can be solved by the SPS technique. It is possible to achieve a small grain size due to the reduced sintering times at high temperature, and undesired phases are also minimized and other phases (ductile weldable part) are joined to the cemented carbide [59]. A ZrO2/Ti gradient was successfully prepared by SPS, along with ZrO2 and Ti; oxide of Ti was also formed and resulted in improved nanohardness. Simultaneously generated thermal residual stresses were also minimized with optimum combination of processing parameters and composition distribution [61]. A four-layered FGM with TiB-Ti gradient was prepared by the SPS process, and it showed a well-bonded interface layer with higher microhardness and resulted in improved fracture toughness and bending strength [62]. Using the finite element method, the temperature and stress distribution in FGM after the SPS process were predicted successfully, and the obtained results were useful to understand the process mechanism and optimization of the operating variable [63]. Three layered W-Cu FGM successfully prepared by SPS at 1050°C at 40 MPa and thermal conductivity, hardness as well as relative density increased considerably [64].

Despite all the advantages, there are some limitations of the SPS process. These include size limitation of the prepared sample and the very high cost of the machine. For mass production of the sample, more interventions are required.

4.4 Friction stir processing

FSP is another FGM-making process that follows a solid-state route. The concept of FSP comes from the process of friction stir welding (FSW) technology. The basic idea and principle behind both processes are the same; however, the goal of the two processes is different. FSW is a metal-joining process and FSP is a process of modifying the microstructure of a workpiece. In FSP, there is also one metallic tool provided with a shoulder and threaded pin. This pin plunges into the groove on the surface of the plate on which reinforcement is desired. This tool rotates continuously about its axis and plunges into the groove with a proper tool tilt angle along with the material to be reinforced, and then traverses along a predecided path. The frictional heat generated due to pin motion causes plastic deformation, and due to pin movement the material flows around the pin and is then forged and consolidated under hydrostatic pressure [65], [66].

The advantages that distinguish FSP from other processes are accurate control, homogeneity, densification, microstructural refinement, and variable depth of the processed zone. Moreover, FSP is environment friendly, consumes less energy, and does not change the size and shape of the processed component [65], [66].

FSP is mostly applied in aluminum, and the first ever application of this process was in the fabrication of AA5083/SiC FGM. SiC was reinforced successfully in the aluminum matrix by the FSP process [65]. This FSP process is mainly suited for aluminum-based alloys; however, it is also applicable for bronze, Cu alloy, Mg alloy, tool alloy, and Zr alloy. This method is very suitable for micro-/nanoparticle-reinforced composite and microstructure modification of casting. Hangai et al. used this FSP for producing functionally graded foam [67]. Functionally graded aluminum (FG) foam was fabricated with gradient in pore density by friction stir processing method and found that functionally graded foam have capability to control their deformation location [68], and then Miranda et al. used FSP along with a consumable tool technique in which there is some modification in the FSP process such as pre-preparation of U-shaped groove in which reinforcement has been placed [69].

Recently, Salehi et al. used this technique for the production of bulk Al-SiC functionally graded nanocomposites. Initially, the groove was prepared on a 6061 aluminum plate; then, this groove was filled with SiC nanoparticles and FSP was performed by using a tool with a pin of 6-mm length. Subsequently, the FSP was re-applied by using a tool with a pin of 3.2-mm length. The SiC content varied from 18% to 0% along the length, and correspondingly the microhardness varied with the highest hardness being 160 HV, which was 3.2 times higher than that of the SiC-depleted zone.

Figure 13 shows the macrograph of the cross section of a prepared FGM sample. It is clear from Figure 13 that the size of the rotating pin is a limiting factor for the dimension of the composite zone. Accordingly, three layers can be clearly observed from Figure 13, where the dark region is an SiC-rich zone; then, its content decreases up to the SiC-depleted zone [70].

Figure 13: Cross section of Al-SiC FGM prepared by the FSP process [70].
Figure 13:

Cross section of Al-SiC FGM prepared by the FSP process [70].

Use of finer particles or increase in SiC content during FSP results in the reduction of interparticle spacing. Figure 14 shows the variation of microhardness with the depth of an FGM sample. With the help of the strengthening mechanism of nanocomposite, it is possible to give the best explanation for linear correlation.

Figure 14: Variations of microhardness with change in distance from the top surface [70].
Figure 14:

Variations of microhardness with change in distance from the top surface [70].

FSP can also be used to produce polymeric composite materials. It can also play a very important role in the materials used in the energy sector, e.g. materials used in fusion reactors, including vanadium alloy joining and processing. Several shortcomings remain in FSP technology. The main problems that occur during the processing of reinforced composite materials is tool wear, fatigue, and reduced strength of the prepared joint [66]. An A1050/A6061gradient foam was prepared by FSW in which porosity was uniformly distributed similar to an aluminum foam. From a compression test, it was determined that the deformation behavior can be controlled by the position of the base material in the foam that resulted in improvement [67].

Beyond having the capacity to sinter high-quality products, the sample size and sample quantity are limitations. Moreover, the cost of processing and machinery is very high, and further research is needed for the commercialization of this process.

4.5 Cast-decant-cast process

This method was first used in 2005 in the University College Dublin (Ireland) by Scanlan and other materialists [71], for lightweight, wear-resistant functionally graded alloys, to obtain a smooth change in properties (microstructure/composition). At that time, the other ways of processing FGMs are expensive because the cost of production equipment is high. Mainly two routes are available: powder metallurgy and centrifugal casting. The limitation of powder metallurgy is the high cost of powder, whereas with the centrifugal method basic shape can be produced. With this cast-decant-cast process, FGM can be produced with contradictory material properties (lightweight-wear resistance, wear resistance-machinability, hardness-toughness) with cost-effectiveness, e.g. iron cylinder liner in aluminum cylinder. The first use was cited by Scanlan [71] for an aluminum silicon alloy. Three variations are invented for the cast-decant-cast process with the same end product and one common step in all, i.e. decanting: the first alloy (alloy A) is poured into the mold, and when this alloy is solidified on the mold wall or core and sufficient thickness is obtained, then the unsolidified part is decanted; then, another alloy (alloy B) is poured into the mold. Three available techniques are turnover, internal, and low-pressure decanting.

4.5.1 Turnover decanting

Figure 15 depicts the apparatus for the turnover decanting process. In this, the materials to be mixed are placed initially and then melted into the furnace separately. For example, to create an FGM of two materials, melts A and B are used. Melt A from the furnace is poured into the mold and when the desired thickness is produced, the mold is inverted with the given arrangement and then melt B is poured.

Figure 15: Apparatus used in the turnover decanting process.
Figure 15:

Apparatus used in the turnover decanting process.

4.5.2 Internal decanting process

Figure 16 shows the schematic diagram of the internal decanting process apparatus, where there is a reservoir for the collection of unutilized melt and drainage for the passing of melt to the reservoir. Two carbon rods prevent the melt from draining into the reservoir. First, melt A is poured from the furnace and then solidified. When the desired thickness of the solidified melt is produced, the carbon rods are pulled upward to open the drainage channel, then melt B is poured onto the mold from the furnace. (Here, melts A and B are used to create the FGM.) [72].

Figure 16: Schematic of the internal decanting process apparatus.
Figure 16:

Schematic of the internal decanting process apparatus.

4.5.3 Low-pressure technique

The schematic of the apparatus is shown in Figure 17. One crucible is partitioned into two parts to carry two different materials, and a crucible lead is present to make it air tight. Moreover, to prevent cross contamination, a barrel valve is provided. Initially, two different materials are put into two parts and then the crucible is placed into the furnace. When the melt forms there, then the melt from one of the partitions is forced through ceramic tube 1 using pressurized nitrogen into the mold, and at that time valve 2 is closed. After the melt has solidified and the desired amount of thickness is achieved, then valve 1 is opened and the remaining melt is decanted. Then, valve 1 is closed and the melt from the second partition is forced through the second ceramic tube with pressurized nitrogen into the mold. The main advantage of this process is its cost-effectiveness because the equipment used are standard foundry equipment, and also there is flexibility about the thickness of the gradient because the thickness of the gradient layer depends on the thickness of the first solidified layer. When the second melt is poured, then it is superheated to a temperature that will melt the first solidified layer, and a thicker gradient layer is achieved [72].

Figure 17: Schematic of the low-pressure casting technique.
Figure 17:

Schematic of the low-pressure casting technique.

This method also works with the Al-Mg, Al-Li, and Cu-Sn [72]. A smooth gradient between the A390/A356 alloys was produced by this casting process, with different decanting times and different superheating temperatures of the second melt, and the thickness of the gradient layer and wear resistance were tested.

A perfect and firm interface was obtained at 860°C. Figure 18A shows the microstructure at 860°C. In this gradient, the primary Si content is clearly shown. With 35 s of decanting time, the obtained width of the transition zone was higher than that obtained with other times, as shown in Figure 18B. The hardness of the sample varied from 120 HV to 75 HV with variation in the Si content, and the highest hardness was found at the transition zone because of its finer microstructure due to a higher solidification rate. The wear resistance of the surface was 35% because the wear resistance of A390 was higher [72].

Figure 18: (A) SEM microstructure of the prepared sample at 860°C. (B) SEM micrograph of the sample prepared at 35-s decanting time [72].
Figure 18:

(A) SEM microstructure of the prepared sample at 860°C. (B) SEM micrograph of the sample prepared at 35-s decanting time [72].

Although this process proved to be successful in formation of the gradient, very few research works are available in this area and the available studies are on a combination of two or three materials. There is a limitation on the thickness of the layer that can be grown before decanting.

4.6 Laser direct metal deposition (LDMD)

Sandia National Laboratories have done several works for direct preparation of prototypes and patterns. Direct preparation of fully dense materials from a computer-aided design (CAD) solid model is only possible with the laser engineered net shaping (LENS) method that is developed by Sandia. The same concept is utilized in traditional laser-initiated rapid prototyping (RP) technologies such as stereolithography and selective laser sintering. In these techniques, CAD data are used for fabrication of the physical part, and then metal particles are supplied continuously on the laser beam for deposition over the substrate. This metal particle coming under a focused laser is melted, and this melt is deposited over the substrate continuously. Layers are deposited consecutively to produce a three-dimensional part [73], [74].

The concept of this LENS technology is the same as the RP process that is used in the creation of casting patterns and prototypes from plastics. In both cases, a CAD model is prepared in the form of a slice or a thin layer in the orthogonal direction. This slice data provide a path for laser movement. The first outline is generated, and then the cross section is filled by using the rastering technique. This process is continuous until the part is completely finished. The distinguishing feature of LENS over RP processes is that it is possible to make components directly from structural metals. Thus, it is possible to use it in near-net-shaped prototype development as well as in fabrication of injection mold tools and other metal parts [73], [74], [75].

The laser beam is focused on the substrate, which is made up of the same material that will be deposited. Because of the focused laser, a melt pool is created over the substrate on which metal powder is deposited. The thin cross section is created by continuous movement of the substrate. This process is continuously repeated until the part is completely finished. To obtain good finishing and product quality, advanced powder delivery nozzles and powder feeders have been developed.

From the literature, it was found that by using an automatically generated code, it is not possible to produce a gradient perpendicular to the wall of the tube, and there is a need for low temperature annealing treatment to relieve internal stresses and to obtain high hardness and a good shaped component with high metallurgical quality by this process. Thin wall structures of Stainless Steel 316L and Inconel 718 FGM were fabricated, and the powder mass flow rate and laser power variation affected the performance of the prepared material. Due to the presence of a hard niobium carbide (NbC) and Fe2Nb, the hardness and wear resistance increased. It was also found that with increases in the laser power and powder mass flow rate, the tensile strength decreased [74]. A gradient of SS304L and IN625 nickel alloy was prepared by direct energy deposition, and by comparison of the gradient zone with a single material zone, it was found that hardness was reduced with the introduction of IN625. The different phases formed were compared with the results of the simulation software CALPHAD, and found to be in accordance with experimentally found results and to show the formation of secondary phases [75].

This method offers several advantages, such as minimum dilution of base metal, possibility to prepare a near net shape component, low distortion of workpiece, and potential for automization of the process. However, there are still some points on which more research is required, such as the low-dimensional accuracy of the product as well as the rough surface finish acquired by product that needs further machining or polishing.

4.7 Plasma transferred arc centrifugal cladding (PTACC)

PTACC is a technique that is used for cladding by iron because of its high temperature and high density of energy. It has gained application in the field of coating on the internal wall of cylinder by using iron-based FGM. Plasma transferred arc (PTA) is a high-energy heat source, with qualities like high efficiency, no need for pretreatment, availability of a high heat source, ease of operation, and synchronized powder feeding. Therefore, it is very useful for cladding to steel.

Figure 19 shows the diagram of the PTACC process. The substrate cylinder is fixed on a centrifugal machine where the rotation axis is horizontal, and the plasma torch travels axially inside the cylinder. PTACC combines the advantage of the PTA technique and centrifugal casting, because with the help of centrifugal casting it is possible to create a thick coating layer inside the cylinder. Lu et al. used this technique for coating of the cylinder inner wall by Fe-Cr-M-C. In this, the powders were first dried and form a blend; thereafter, during cladding, the substrate cylinder was fixed on the machine that was rotating this cylinder about a horizontal axis, and the plasma torch traveled inside the horizontal cylinder in axial direction. The wear resistance improved by 18 times due to graded coating as compared with the cylinder substrate, as in Figure 20. The improvement in wear resistance of the coating was because of the uniformly distributed carbide, which resulted in high hardness [73].

Figure 19: Apparatus of PTAC.
Figure 19:

Apparatus of PTAC.

Figure 20: Variations of microhardness across the graded coating [73].
Figure 20:

Variations of microhardness across the graded coating [73].

Figure 21 shows the backscattered electron and secondary electron images of the coating at the inner, intermediate, and outer layers. In the microhardness test, hardness varied throughout the thickness. In the inner layer, the microhardness ranged from 1062 HV0.5 to 1480 HV0.5; in the middle layer, it ranged from 797 HV0.5 to 891 HV0.5; and in the outer layer, it was around 800 HV0.5, as shown in Figure 22 [73].

Figure 21: Microstructure of the (A) inner, (B) intermediate, and (C) outer layers of the coating. (D) Outer layer microstructure at high magnification [73].
Figure 21:

Microstructure of the (A) inner, (B) intermediate, and (C) outer layers of the coating. (D) Outer layer microstructure at high magnification [73].

Figure 22: Variation of microhardness across the graded coating [73].
Figure 22:

Variation of microhardness across the graded coating [73].

Although it is effective in cladding, PTACC cannot be fully utilized for bulk FGM fabrication. Moreover, more expertise is required for effective control of processing parameters.

4.8 Chemical vapor deposition (CVD)

Thermal spraying is a technique by which a structure is coated with melted materials through a spraying process. Relating the process with FGM preparation, the melted materials will be the functionally varied materials that are used to make the coating layers. In this process, the coating precursor is heated either electrically or chemically. Two well-developed processes utilizing the vapor processing route are CVD and PVD (e.g. evaporation, sputtering, and ion plating). PVD techniques are simple processes and normally used by physicists. They utilize high-temperature vacuum evaporation or plasma sputter bombardment in PVD coating.

This method is used to produce highly pure materials without any external defect by depositing the desired material at the atomic level in a very controlled manner at the atomic/nanostructure level. The gradient is produced in CVD by the chemical reaction of gaseous reactant on the heated substrate, and the final product is chemically stable in nature. With this method, it is possible to produce single or multilayered, nanostructured functionally graded coating materials with accurately controlled dimension and structure. It has properties like low processing temperatures, non-line-of-sight-deposition capability, etc. CVD has a wide range of application in the field semiconductors for microelectronics, optoelectronics, energy conversion devices, metallic films (e.g. Mo, Al, Au, Cu, Pt) for microelectronics and protective coatings, fiber production (e.g. SiC monofilament fibers), and fiber coating. CVD is mainly used for producing coatings and films. With the vapor processing route, highly pure coating along with atomic and nanometer level structural control at low temperatures can be obtained, and this is very helpful in the microelectronics and opto-electronic industries [76].

There are several issues related to the CVD process, such as involvement of complex chemistry processes. To solve this problem, on-line monitoring and diagnostic tools have been used. With the help of process modeling of thermodynamics, the kinetics and mass transport of the CVD process chemistry and fluid dynamics in the CVD process can be understood. Moreover, the use of a single chemical precursor source has minimized the CVD process parameters that need to be controlled [37]. CVD is a very effective method for coating with a variety of combinations of material without any defect. So, in the present day, many studies have been done with this CVD technique. Figure 23 shows the mechanism of CVD in which atoms of a reactant gas is absorbed by the surface, which deposit as a surface coating.

Figure 23: Mechanism of CVD.
Figure 23:

Mechanism of CVD.

Table 6 shows the works done by different researchers for the development of the CVD technique by listing the different authors and material combinations used.

Table 6:

List of different authors who used CVD for fabrication of FGM.

Sr. no.Material combinationAuthorDescription
1C-Si coatingChu et al. [76]CVD proved to be very effective in the functional coating on carbon fibers.
2C/Si coating on carbon fiber reinforced carbon (C/C) compositeKim et al. [77]C/C composite has an application for aerospace vehicles and fusion reactors. It can be effectively coated with C/Si coating by the CVD process.
3Ti/TiN/TiCN/a-C:HGuo [78]For improvement of quality, efficiency, and lifetime of a microrouter, it was coated with multilayer Ti/TiN/TiCN/a-C:H by ECR-CVD for steady-state growth of the coated layer.
4Mullite (3Al2O3·2SiO2)-SiCBasu et al. [79]This coating was done on higher temperature operating gas turbine to protect it from corrosion and recession. CVD can prepare this coating without any porosity, crack with a completely crystalline phase.
5Tungsten coating on W/CuLian et al. [80]Tungsten is a promising candidate for armored component for the next generation of fusion reactors. Precisely deposited W-coating by the CVD technique can sustain a high heat load and has good thermo-mechanical properties.
6Tungsten coating on W/CuSong et al. [81]When FGM was combined with CVD-W, it showed the most desirable material combinations of plasma facing components used in fusion reactors.

This method proved to be very useful for coatings; it is possible to create a coating on materials, which is difficult for other methods such as coating on carbon fiber. The reasons behind this difficulty are that metals cannot completely wet carbon fiber, and the chemical compatibility between the matrix and the reinforcement is poor. The physical compatibility of the carbon fiber with the metal matrix is also poor due to the different thermal expansion coefficients and interfacial residual stresses. There are chances of oxidation of the carbon fiber at the time of composite processing, which results in decreased mechanical properties. With the help of the coating deposited on carbon fiber, this problem can be solved. Coating of carbon fiber with C-Si makes it compatible as reinforcement for aluminum matrix, and increases its oxidation resistance and oxidation weight loss [76].

The CVD process has proved to be very useful because of its ability to precisely control the composition and microstructure of coating materials. Carbon fiber reinforced carbon (C/C) composites are well suited for thermostructural applications; however, they are very reactive to atmospheric oxygen and hydrogen at high temperatures. Thus, they can be effectively protected by SiC coating; however, the difference of the thermal expansion coefficient causes cracking problems. Thus, it is difficult with other coating methods. To solve this problem for using SiC as a C/C composite coating, there is a need for a C/SiC FGM interlayer between these two that can be deposited by CVD. With CVD, it is easy to control its composition and microstructure, and to obtain optimum coating thickness, and the number of layers and compositional profiles can be obtained. In Figure 24, it is clearly observed from the image of the cross section that the C/SiC FGM has dense microstructures and the absence of delamination between the layers [77].

Figure 24: Image of the polished C/C composites coated with C/SiC FGM and SiC layers along the cross section [77].
Figure 24:

Image of the polished C/C composites coated with C/SiC FGM and SiC layers along the cross section [77].

The new approach of electron cyclotron resonance CVD (ECR-CVD) has been developed and used in growing C:H film in a steady state. With this technique, it is possible to obtain an independent control of the ion energy in depositions along with high-density plasma and low substrate temperature simultaneously. Printed circuit board (PCB) microrouters were coated with Ti/TiN/TiCN/a-C:H thin film by a hybrid PVD-ECR-CVD coating system. Coating causes reduction in friction between the microrouting surface and the trench sidewall, which results in improvement of quality, efficiency, and lifetime of microrouters, and reduces the time consumed in new microrouter replacement on PCBs. It also reduces the manufacturing cost and increases productivity [78]. CVD has a capability to prepare crack and porosity defect-free coating with precise microstuctural control. It proved to be very useful in environmental barrier coating for advanced high-temperature operating turbines. Hence, SiC substrates have been coated with uniform, crystalline, and highly dense mullite (3Al2O3.2SiO2) environmental barrier coatings by CVD [79].

Tungsten when deposited by the CVD technique has the advantage of producing a highly pure and dense large-sized product with better flexibility and better coverage along the surface as compared to other coating techniques. It is also possible to perform in situ repair of the damaged tungsten armor. W/Cu FGM has been used as an interlayer between W-CVD and CuCrZr. When this CVD-W combines with W/Cu FGM, it acquires excellent high-temperature material properties. Tungsten was deposited by CVD method on the W/Cu FGM, and this tungsten-coated surface was brazed to CuCrZr heat sink. In Figure 25, perfect gradation from CVD-W to W/Cu FGM and then CuCrZr heat sink is observed. In the micrograph, W, W-10Cu, W-32Cu, W-60Cu, and CuCrZr are shown. These solutions can reduce the cost of fabrication and environmental pollution [80], [81].

Figure 25: Micrograph of the cross section of W/Cu FGM prepared by CVD [80].
Figure 25:

Micrograph of the cross section of W/Cu FGM prepared by CVD [80].

CVD has proved to be very useful for FGM fabrication; however, it has some limitations that require further research for generalization. For example, the precursor used should be volatile at room temperature, the deposition of film should be preformed at high temperature, and thermal stresses are generated in materials of different thermal expansion coefficients.

4.9 Plasma spraying

Plasma spraying is the most promising technology for ceramic and metallic coatings in many industrial applications for making surfaces hard and wear-resistant, useful in bio-implants, thermal-barrier, and chemical-resistant coatings, etc. In this process, ceramic or metallic powder is melted by the application of high-energy plasma flame. This melted powder is deposited on the substrate with the help of gas pressure. This process is less time consuming, and large surface areas can be prepared in a single pass, in comparison to other processes such as hot and cold pressing and then sintering of tiles. Table 7 shows the development in the plasma spray technique, by listing different studies on fabrication of FGM and material combination used by the authors.

Table 7:

List of different authors who used plasma spraying for fabrication of FGM.

Sr. noMaterial combinationAuthorDetails
1ZrO2/NiCrAlYGu et al. [82]This material combination is suitable for coating on diesel engines and gas turbines. Plasma spraying is the most effective method for FGM coating, but post-treatment is sometimes necessary to further improve bond strength between the substrate and the coating.
2YSZ/NiCoCrAlYKhor et al. [83]With increase in the number of layers, bond strength can be increased, which prevents the problems of spallation and cracking.
3YSZ/NiCoCrAlYKhor and Gu [84]Plasma sprayed FGM showed improved thermal fatigue and oxidation resistance.
4YSZ/NiCoCrAlYKhor et al. [85]The bending strength and elastic modulus of prepared FGM decreased with increase in YSZ. The elastic modulus of the layer decreased with increasing temperature.
5HA/Ti-6Al-4VKhor et al. [86]This material is used in biomedical implants. With plasma spraying, it can be prepared without any clear interface between layers, and thermal stresses can be reduced.
6Al2O3/ZrO2Limargaa et al. [87]With the introduction of an interlayer in TBC, oxidation resistance can be improved because interlayer residual stress reduced.
7Glass/AluminaCannillo et al. [88]The plasma spray method was used to deposit glass/alumina FGM coating on alumina substrate, which showed improved bond strength and reduced thermal stress.
8TiO2- HACannillo et al. [89]TiO2-HA FGM was deposited on Ti6Al4V substrates. For the desired result, spraying parameters were optimized. The prepared coating had dense coating and less residual porosity. With post-treatment, the defect can reduced.
9ZrO2/Al2O3Puric and Kobayashi [90]To solve the problem of spallation, the gas tunnel-type plasma system was developed.
10LaMgAl11O19/YSZChen et al. [91]This combination is a newly developed material for TBC application. It was prepared by air plasma spraying and showed better thermal and mechanical properties and higher strain tolerance.

Plasma spraying has sufficient flexibility and low cost as compared to other coating methods. When mechanical or thermal stresses are applied to plasma-sprayed TBCs, the poor bond strength between the coating and substrate causes problems. To improve its performance, plasma spray has been used to prepare FGMs. With increase in the number of layers, its bond strength has been improved. The ZrO2-NiCrAIY FGM coating was fabricated in which residual stress decreased and bond strength increased considerably. HIP treatment and tempering treatment was performed on the prepared FGM and resulted in improved bond strength due to densification of the microstructure, interdiffusion between layers, and the reduction in the residual thermal stresses.

Figure 26 shows the microhardness distribution in duplex coating and FGM coating, and a significant difference between both types of coatings are represented. In FGM coating, the bond strength between the coating and the substrate is improved because of reduction in the difference of elastic modulus between the ceramic and metal layers [82].

Figure 26: Variations of microhardness in coating [82].
Figure 26:

Variations of microhardness in coating [82].

YSZ/NiCoCrAlY FGM coating was prepared by plasma spraying and resulted in chemical homogeneity. It also had a uniform density as well as improved bond strength, and had no delamination [83]. YSZ and NiCoCrAlY powders (8 wt.%) were used for coating preparation in YSZ/NiCoCrAlY, and different NiCoCrAlY contents were mixed with YSZ, ball milled and spheroidized, and finally plasma sprayed. It was reported that the coefficient of thermal expansion, thermal conductivity, heating temperature, and diffusivity increased considerably with increase in NiCoCrAlY content, which resulted in increased resistance of thermal fatigue (five times as compared to duplex coating) and improvement of the oxidation resistance (up to 100 h) [84]. In a similar way, FGM was prepared by plasma spraying YSZ/NiCoCrAlY on the aluminum substrate, and it was reported that with an increase in the content of YSZ, the elastic modulus and bending strength of functionally graded coating decreased [85].

A plasma sprayed product does not have a clear interface boundary, which means that the composition varies smoothly over the length. HA/Ti-6Al-4V coating was prepared and it was found that with change in composition, the mechanical and microstructural properties also changed progressively. In Figure 27, the dark-gray phase is HA and the bright phases are Ti-6Al-4V. Between the HA phase and the Ti-6Al-4V phase, some light-gray phases are present, which are the mixtures of HA and Ti-6Al-4V. It is clear from the microstructure that the composition varies in a continuous manner, so Young’s modulus and fracture toughness vary in an anisotropic manner [86].

Figure 27: Functionally graded HA/Ti-6Al-4V coating [86].
Figure 27:

Functionally graded HA/Ti-6Al-4V coating [86].

Al2O3/ZrO2 TBC prepared via plasma spraying showed superior mechanical properties and oxidation resistance. Al2O3 was introduced as the interlayer in the TBC to improve bonding strength, hardness, and fracture toughness. The results showed that the thickness of Al2O3 should be less to obtain good mechanical properties [87]. Glass-alumina functionally graded coatings were prepared on alumina substrate to solve problems like defective microstructure and interface between the graded coating, by proper thickness control and thermal treatment of the prepared coating. The alumina substrate resulted in improvement in the performances of the glass-alumina FGM [88]. Onto Ti-64 substrates, TiO2-HA functionally graded coatings were deposited. For the desired result, spraying parameters were optimized. The prepared coating had dense coating and less residual porosity. With post-treatment, the defect can be reduced [89]. A ZrO2/Al2O3 composite system was developed for high functionally graded TBC with the help of magnetoplasma compressor of compact geometry and a novel gas tunnel-type plasma source, which exhibited improved hardness and oxidation resistance [90]. Functionally graded TBC based on LaMgAl11O19 (LaMA)/YSZ was designed and prepared by air plasma spraying, and the presence of LaMA resulted in improved hardness and wear resistance [91].

The advantage of plasma sintering over conventional sintering is the extremely high heat transfer rate to the sample, which may result in rapid sintering (in minutes) with minimal grain growth. In this process, electricity is used as an energy source, which influences the process economics unfavorably. A further consideration is that plasma processes have more process parameters to control than traditional processes, and therefore requires a higher degree of automation in the process control. However, still there is lack of research on a solid engineering base for certain types of large-scale installations. Furthermore, in this process, another problem is the occurrence of relatively high energy losses.

4.10 Centrifugal casting

Centrifugal casting is the most viable and reliable method to produce FGMs. In this method, molten metal is poured into the mold under the effect of gravity force. This gravity force generated due to the rotation of the mold along with centrifugal force acts on the mold assembly due to the rotational or spinning motion. Because of these forces, mold filling is very good with the advantages of effective control on the microstructure and, hence, enhanced mechanical properties. For fabrication of a perfect FGM, the centrifugal casting method can be modified by three methods: centrifugal method, centrifugal slurry method, and centrifugal pressurization method.

In a centrifugal casting method for FGM generation, the mold is filled with homogeneous molten metal having dispersed intermetallic or ceramic particles. When the molt metal starts rotating, centrifugal force is applied to the molten metal; however, due to the density difference, the amount of centrifugal force on solid particles and molten metal is also different, which is the main reason behind the gradient formation.

In the centrifugal slurry method, there are two types of particles: one is high-velocity or high-density or large-sized particles and another is low-velocity or low-density or small-sized particles. Due to these different characteristics of the particles, the amount of centrifugal force is different, which allows the control of the migration rate of these particles. After sedimentation is completed, the liquid part is removed from the slurry, so that it will not become any part of the prepared FGM. Thereafter, the prepared green body will undergo sintering by SPS or other sintering methods, and finally FGM with continuous gradient will be prepared.

In the centrifugal pressurization method, centrifugal force is used to generate pressure. Initially, a powder mixture of matrix metal A and reinforcement metal B is placed inside the rotating mold, then the matrix metal in the melted form is poured into the rotating mold where the powder mixture A + B is already present. Now, molten metal A penetrates into the interparticle space of particles A and B; at the same time, this molten metal will melt the particles of powder A. After all these processes, finally FGM is obtained with reinforced particle B. It is very effective for in situ and ex situ fabrication of FGM. Many studies have been done for fabrication of FGM by the centrifugal casting method. Figure 28 shows the mechanism of centrifugal casting in which molten metal is poured into the rotating mold. Table 8 shows the development in the centrifugal casting technique by listing different research works for fabrication of FGM and the material combination used by the authors.

Figure 28: Centrifugal casting process.
Figure 28:

Centrifugal casting process.

Table 8:

List of different authors who used centrifugal casting for fabrication of FGM.

Sr. noMaterial combinationAuthorDetails
1Al-Al3NiFukui et al. [92]The intermetallic phase has good high-temperature properties. When this intermetallic material was used as reinforcement in matrix, superior properties were obtained. This type of FGM can be prepared by the centrifugal casting method.
2Al-Mg2SiZhang et al. [93]Al-Mg2Si in situ FGM was prepared by the centrifugal method in which the Mg2Si particle concentration was high in both outer and inner layers. This reinforcement resulted in improved hardness, but the tensile strength was reduced.
3Al-Al3TiWatanabe et al. [94]This material combination is useful in lightweight structural application in a high-temperature environment and prepared by the centrifugal method. Bonding between the intermetallic material and the matrix is very strong, which is collected in the outer region and increased wear resistance.
4Zn-Al-SiChen et al. [95]It is a perfect material combination where higher wear resistance and hardness are required on the inner surface. The in situ centrifugal method is very effective in such preparations.
5Al A359/SiCCastro and Kelestemar [96]In this FGM, SiC particles are graded continuously inside the matrix.
6Al-Cu-Fe alloyWatanabe et al. [97]This ternary alloy has gone through centrifugal processing and the four phases formed were Al, Al2Cu, Al7Cu2-Fe (ω), and Al13Fe4. Finally, FGM with orientation and aspect ratio gradient was formed.
7Al-Al3NiWatanabe et al. [98]In situ Al-Al3Ni FGM was prepared. Microstructure gradient and composition gradient were formed.
8Al alloy/SiCVieira et al. [99]The dry sliding wear test was performed, and higher wear resistance in the portion with higher SiC volume fraction was found.

AI-A13Ni FGM was produced by the centrifugal casting method and resulted in decrease in fracture load and fracture stress with an increase in the volume fraction of Al3Ni. Fractographic study was also performed, and it was found that on the fractured surface, the cleavage fracture of the Al3Ni phase was surrounded by dimple fractures of the aluminum phase [92]. The developed Al-Mg2Si reinforced in situ composite resulted in poor ultimate tensile strength (UTS) and elongation due to Mg2Si clusters, and increased hardness. As in Figure 29, in the inside wall, the Mg2Si particles were finer sized and clustered; in the outside wall, there was a higher volume fraction of Mg2Si; and in middle layer, Mg2Si particles were also present. Hardness varied with the presence of Mg2Si particle distribution [93].

Figure 29: Microstructures at different positions of the centrifugal cast Al-Mg2Si specimen: (A) inside the wall, (B) outside the wall, and (C) the middle area [93].
Figure 29:

Microstructures at different positions of the centrifugal cast Al-Mg2Si specimen: (A) inside the wall, (B) outside the wall, and (C) the middle area [93].

Wear-resistant, light Al-Al3Ti FGM was prepared, which showed significantly higher wear resistance than pure aluminum ingot [94]. Zn-AI-Si in situ FGMs were fabricated with a high volume fraction of Si particles in the inner layer, which resulted in the highest hardness and wear resistance. In Figure 30A, the primary Si particle is shown. Figure 30B shows the transition zone segregation of the primary Si particle. Figure 30C is similar to the inner layer, but polyhedral primary silicon particles are absent and needle-like eutectic silicon particles are observed. Finally, in Figure 30D, large primary Si particles are shown [95].

Figure 30: Microstructure of the composite: (A) inner layer, (B) transitional layer, (C) middle layer, and (D) outer layer [95].
Figure 30:

Microstructure of the composite: (A) inner layer, (B) transitional layer, (C) middle layer, and (D) outer layer [95].

Al A359/SiC FGM was fabricated and a significant effect of casting rotational speeds and elevated cooling rates were found. Figure 31 depicts the microstructure of the prepared FGM at different points along the thickness. In the outer layer, the volume fraction of SiC was high as compared to the middle and inner layers, which resulted in higher wear resistance [96].

Figure 31: Microstructure of the composite: (A) outer layer, (B) middle layer, and (C) inner layer [96].
Figure 31:

Microstructure of the composite: (A) outer layer, (B) middle layer, and (C) inner layer [96].

Al-Cu-Fe ternary in situ FGM ring phases were formed, which consisted of four different phases, namely Al, Al2Cu, Al7Cu2Fe, and Al13Fe4 [96]. Al-Al3Ni in situ intermetallic composites were prepared using different Al-Ni alloys. The high volume fraction of Al3Ni in the outer periphery of the fabricated Al-Al3Ni FGM resulted in a gradient with the size and shape of the Al3Ni particle [97].

The fabricated Al-SiC FGM showed increase of SiC content and decrease of the FGM composite wear coefficient. Figure 32 shows the microstructure at different mold rotation speeds [99].

Figure 32: Optical micrographs of the FGMs processed under 1500 rpm (A, B) and under 2000 rpm (C, D) [99].
Figure 32:

Optical micrographs of the FGMs processed under 1500 rpm (A, B) and under 2000 rpm (C, D) [99].

Although this processing method is very effective for FGM preparation, some areas that need modification remain: the inner diameter of the sample cannot be controlled, not all alloys can be processed, and there is a shape limitation (the shape should be symmetrical or cylindrical).

5 Scope of research work

FGM is a modern hybrid material that revolutionizes the world of materials science by customizing the material property according to the application requirement. However, obstacles remain in the way of achieving this objective. In addition to the major problem of cost, the other problems include technologies like mass production to better utilize this concept, lack of design data, etc. Many research works are already being done on effective fabrication methods for FGM; however, there are still many issues that need to be resolved with these developing technologies. More research is needed to make a sufficient database, by extensive characterization of FGMs, and for the development of predictive models for proper process control so that more effective FGMs can be created. In fully developed automated production systems, there is a need for an effective feedback system; thus, extensive research is required for overall process control improvement. By using these tools, the overall performance of the process will be improved, which will bring down the cost of FGMs and increase the reliability of the fabrication process.

Each developed process has some limitations, and there is a need for more research activity to achieve perfection in FGM fabrication. Powder metallurgy is very effective for FGM fabrication; however, some issues still need improvement, e.g. size and shape limitation, cost of powder (which is high as compared to ingot material), difficulty in achieving a continuous gradient, and sintering defect. SPS is effective in reducing sintering defect; however, for mass production, there is need for further improvement. Centrifugal casting is very effective for the production of continuous gradient FGM; however, the prepared part should be symmetric or cylindrical. Cast-decant-cast is a low-cost, environmentally friendly process, but more research is required for effective control of processing parameters so that desired thickness and gradients can be achieved. FSP also needs improvement because one of the main problems is the wear of the tool during processing of composite materials with reinforcement and another one is the low joining strength and the fatigue property and how to improve these. CVD, PVD, and plasma spraying are very accurate and effective coating technologies; however, the main problem is the cost of the machinery and desired gradient thickness.

6 Conclusion

Keeping in mind the potential of FGMs, these materials have various fields of application. For utilizing this concept of the FGM, different processing methods are available. The development of FGMs requires knowledge and skills in various areas, e.g. chemistry, physics, and engineering. For conversion of the concept of gradient into reality with accuracy and precision, two important factors are absolutely necessary. The first necessary factor is how to obtain the desired chemical composition and microstructure based on the quantitative estimation of the property distribution to attain the desired features. Another important factor is the availability of the fabrication process and capability to reproduce the desired gradient precisely directly from the data obtained by computation done by the material designer. An approach that should be followed to achieve this desired gradient can be called “concept of materialization.” It is a combination of three processes, as shown Figure 33: material design, material fabrication, and material evaluation. By continuously following these steps, the desired gradient with precise distribution can be obtained.

Figure 33: Concept of materialization.
Figure 33:

Concept of materialization.

In the materials design approach, mathematical calculations should be performed for the quantitative estimation of properties by considering the effect of microstructure and chemical compositions. Optimization of the composition profile should be done by considering the desired function as desired criteria. By using the feedback of design criteria, it is possible to obtain a reasonable composition profile.

FGM can be fabricated by several processes. For the successful fabrication of FGM, the following points should always be remembered for better processing:

  1. The most suitable processing routes should be selected for the desired field of application.

  2. The geometry of the component to be fabricated (optimum size and shape) and type of gradient to be produced should be selected.

  3. Available materials combination and material property data related to the process route to use should be utilized for a practically possible and effective design.

  4. With the help of numerical simulation tools, optimization of manufacturing processes and design of parts is possible, because simulation tools can help establish the desired gradient throughout the entire process by precise control of processing parameters, resulting in minimizing the problems of warpage or cracking.

  5. Evaluation of the performance of the fabricated component by a suitable methodology should be done, and the results should be used for further improvement.

Despite all these state-of-the-art processes, there is further need for advancement in the processing technique for the mass production and upgrade of existing processes, repeatability along with reliability and accuracy, cost-effectiveness, and high-quality and defect-free products.

Evaluation can be performed by using different performance tests such as microstructure and material property evaluation, and the obtained results can be used as feedback for material design. The mechanical behavior, thermal behavior, and fracture behavior should also be evaluated. Table 9 shows the overview of all production methods.

Table 9:

Overview of the FGM processing method.

Sr no.ProcessComponent shapeComponent sizeCost of processingLimitationApplication
1Powder metallurgySimple to complexMedium to largeLowHigh cost of metal powder, difficulty in bulk productionBiomaterials, cutting tools
2SHSSimpleMedium to large, coatingLow to highRequirement for reactant preheatingElectrical devices
3SPSSimple to complexSmallHighSmall-sized sample, high machinery costHigh-density biomaterials, cutting tools, compliant pads
4FSPSimpleCoatingHighSample size and mass production, tool wearPolymeric FGM, surface modification
5Cast-decant-castSimpleMediumLow to highControl of gradient layer thicknessPrototype casting
6LDMDSimple to complexSmall to large, coatingHighMachinery and processing costNear-net-shape component, injection mold tooling
7PTACCSurface modificationCoating, claddingHighMachinery costCoating on internal wall of cylinder
8CVDSurface modificationCoatingHighThermal distortion of workpieceEnergy conversion device, fiber coating
9Plasma sprayingSurface modificationCoatingHighHigh-energy loss, sample sizeTBC, biomaterial
10Centrifugal castingSimple to complex (axi-symmetric)Medium to largeLowShape limitation, control on inner diameterHigh-density cylindrical FGM

References

[1] Mehboob H, Chang SH. Compos. Struct. 2014, 117, 105–113.10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.06.019Search in Google Scholar

[2] Koizumi M. Compos. Pt. B Eng. 1997, 28, 1–4.10.1016/S1359-8368(96)00016-9Search in Google Scholar

[3] Muller E, Drasar D, Schilz J, Kaysser WA. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2003, 362, 17–39.10.1016/S0921-5093(03)00581-1Search in Google Scholar

[4] Ilschner B. Le J. Phys. IV 1993, 03, C7-763–C7-772.10.1051/jp4:19937121Search in Google Scholar

[5] Bharti I, Gupta N, Gupta KM. Int. J. Mater. Mech. Manuf. 2013, 1, 221–224.10.7763/IJMMM.2013.V1.47Search in Google Scholar

[6] Jha DK, Kant T, Singh RK. Compos. Struct. 2013, 96, 833–849.10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.09.001Search in Google Scholar

[7] Sobczak JJ, Drenchev LB. Metal Based Functionally Graded Material. Bentham Science Publishers: United Arab Emirates, 2009, 2–17, ISBN: 978-1-60805-038-3.Search in Google Scholar

[8] Lee I. Adv. Compos. Mater. 2006, 15, 39–79.10.1163/156855106776829347Search in Google Scholar

[9] Xu CH, Wu GY, Xiao GC, Fang B. Int. J. Refract. Metals Hard Mater. 2014, 45, 125–129.10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2014.04.006Search in Google Scholar

[10] Ichim PI, Hu X, Bazen JJ, Yi W. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. – Pt. B Appl. Biomater. 2016, 104, 58–66.10.1002/jbm.b.33345Search in Google Scholar

[11] Farley C, Turnbull T, Pantoya ML, Hunt EM. Acta Mater. 2011, 59, 2447–2454.10.1016/j.actamat.2010.12.044Search in Google Scholar

[12] Watari F, Yokoyama A, Saso F, Uo M, Kawasaki T. Compos. Pt. B Eng. 1997, 28, 5–11.10.1016/S1359-8368(96)00021-2Search in Google Scholar

[13] Watari F, Yokoyama A, Omori M, Hirai T, Kondo H, Uo M, Kawasaki T. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2004, 64, 893–908.10.1016/j.compscitech.2003.09.005Search in Google Scholar

[14] Kieback B, Neubrand A, Riedel H. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2003, 362, 81–106.10.1016/S0921-5093(03)00578-1Search in Google Scholar

[15] Jayaraman J, Kuppusamy R, Rao H. Sci. Eng. Compos. Mater. 2016, 23, 31–36.Search in Google Scholar

[16] Leushake U, Winter AN, Rabin BH, Corff BA. Mater. Sci. Forum 1999, 308–311, 13–18.10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.308-311.13Search in Google Scholar

[17] Börner A, Herbig R, Mangler M, Tomandl G. Mater. Sci. Forum 1999, 308–311, 89–94.10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.308-311.89Search in Google Scholar

[18] Yeo JG, Jung YG, Choi SC. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 1998, 18, 1281–1285.10.1016/S0955-2219(98)00054-5Search in Google Scholar

[19] Shen ZJ, Nygren M. Key Eng. Mater. 2002, 206–213, 2155–2158.10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.206-213.2155Search in Google Scholar

[20] Sarkar P, Datta S, Nicholson PS. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1993, 76, 1055–1056.10.1111/j.1151-2916.1993.tb05335.xSearch in Google Scholar

[21] Sarkar P, Datta S, Nicholson PS. Compos. Pt. B Eng. 1997, 28, 49–56.10.1016/S1359-8368(96)00022-4Search in Google Scholar

[22] Put S, Vleugels J, Van der Biest O. Scr. Mater. 2001, 45, 1139–1145.10.1016/S1359-6462(01)01126-5Search in Google Scholar

[23] Kaya C. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2003, 23, 1655–1660.10.1016/S0955-2219(02)00370-9Search in Google Scholar

[24] Anne G, Mijic SH, Richter H, Biest OV, Vleugels J. Scr. Mater. 2006, 54, 2053–2056.10.1016/j.scriptamat.2006.03.011Search in Google Scholar

[25] Hvizdos P, Jonsson D, Anglada M, Anne G, Van Der Biest O. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2007, 27, 1365–1371.10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2006.05.030Search in Google Scholar

[26] Pang X, Casagrande T, Zhitomirsky I. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2009, 330, 323–329.10.1016/j.jcis.2008.10.070Search in Google Scholar

[27] Mehrali M, Wakily H, Metselaar IHSC. Adv. Appl. Ceram. 2011, 110, 35–40.10.1179/174367610X12804792635143Search in Google Scholar

[28] Askari E, Mehrali M, Metselaar IHSC, Kadri NA, Rahmana MM. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2012, 12, 144–150.10.1016/j.jmbbm.2012.02.029Search in Google Scholar

[29] Zarabian M, Yar AY, Vafaeenezhad S, Sani MAF, Simchi A. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2011, 33, 1815–1823.10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2013.01.032Search in Google Scholar

[30] Jung Y, Choi S. Mater. Lett. 1998, 37, 312–319.10.1016/S0167-577X(98)00112-8Search in Google Scholar

[31] Yan M, Peng X, Ma T. J. Alloys Compd. 2009, 479, 750–754.10.1016/j.jallcom.2009.01.042Search in Google Scholar

[32] Katayama T, Sukenaga S, Saito N, Kagata H, Nakashima K. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2011, 18, 202023.10.1088/1757-899X/18/20/202023Search in Google Scholar

[33] Kawasaki A, Watanabe R. Ceram. Int. 1997, 8842, 73–83.10.1016/0272-8842(95)00143-3Search in Google Scholar

[34] Kawasaki A, Watanabe R. Compos. Pt. B Eng. 1997, 28, 29–35.10.1016/S1359-8368(96)00017-0Search in Google Scholar

[35] Chenglin C, Jingchuan Z, Zhongda Y, Shidong W. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 1999, 271, 95–100.10.1016/S0921-5093(99)00152-5Search in Google Scholar

[36] Zhu J, Lai Z, Yin Z, Jeon J, Lee S. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2001, 68, 130–135.10.1016/S0254-0584(00)00355-2Search in Google Scholar

[37] Jin G, Takeuchi M, Honda S, Nishikawa T, Awaji H. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2005, 89, 238–243.10.1016/j.matchemphys.2004.03.031Search in Google Scholar

[38] Gelbstein Y, Dashevsky Z, Dariel MP. Phys. B Condens. Matter 2007, 391, 256–265.10.1016/j.physb.2006.10.001Search in Google Scholar

[39] Bhattacharyya M, Kumar AN, Kapuria S. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2008, 487, 524–535.10.1016/j.msea.2007.10.040Search in Google Scholar

[40] Yang S, Kim H, Leen CS. Ceram. Int. 2013, 39, 93–99.10.1016/j.ceramint.2012.05.100Search in Google Scholar

[41] Hussain MA, Maqbool A, Khalid FA, Bakhsh N, Hussain A, Rahman JU, Park JK, Park TG, Hyun LJ, Kim MH. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 2014, 24, s90–s98.10.1016/S1003-6326(14)63293-3Search in Google Scholar

[42] Bykov YV, Egorov SV, Eremeev AG, Holoptsev VV, Plotnikov IV, Rybakov KI, Semenov VE, Sorokin AA. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2014, 214, 210–216.10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2013.09.001Search in Google Scholar

[43] Mehrali M, Shirazi FS, Mehrali M, Metselaar HSC, Kadri NAB, Osman NAA. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. – Pt. A 2013, 101, 3046–3057.10.1002/jbm.a.34588Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[44] Zhou C, Deng C, Chena X, Zhao X, Chen Y, Fan Y, Zhang X. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2015, 48, 1–11.10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.04.002Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[45] Akmal M, Khalid FA, Hussain MA. Ceram. Int. 2015, 41, 14458–14467.10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.07.082Search in Google Scholar

[46] Hussain MA, Maqbool A, Khalid FA, Farooq MU, Abidi IH, Bakhsh N, Amin W, Kim JY. Ceram. Int. 2015, 41, 10125–10132.10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.04.110Search in Google Scholar

[47] Oshkour AA, Pramanik S, Mehrali M, Yau YH, Tarlochan F, Osman NAA. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2015, 49, 321–331.10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.05.020Search in Google Scholar

[48] Huang CY, Chen YL. Mater. Des. 2016, 91, 294–305.10.1016/j.matdes.2015.11.091Search in Google Scholar

[49] Navas EMR, Garcia R, Gordo E, Velasco FJ. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2003, 143–144, 769–775.10.1016/S0924-0136(03)00369-8Search in Google Scholar

[50] Dumont AL, Bonnet JP, Chartier T, Ferreira JMF. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2001, 21, 2353–2360.10.1016/S0955-2219(01)00198-4Search in Google Scholar

[51] Choy KL. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2003, 48, 57–170.10.1016/S0079-6425(01)00009-3Search in Google Scholar

[52] Yong C, Xunjia S, Genliang H, YaKun X. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2013, 419, 012057.10.1088/1742-6596/419/1/012057Search in Google Scholar

[53] Yongming L, Wei P, Shuqin L, Ruigang W, Jianqiang L. Mater. Sci. 2003, 345, 99–105.10.1016/S0921-5093(02)00400-8Search in Google Scholar

[54] Kondo H, Yokoyama A, Omori M, Ohkubo A, Hirai T, Watari F, Uo M, Kawasaki T. Mater. Trans. 2004, 45, 3156–3162.10.2320/matertrans.45.3156Search in Google Scholar

[55] Feng H, Meng Q, Zhou Y, Jia D. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2005, 397, 92–97.10.1016/j.msea.2005.02.003Search in Google Scholar

[56] Mishina H, Inumaru Y, Kaitoku K. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2008, 475, 141–147.10.1016/j.msea.2007.05.004Search in Google Scholar

[57] Belmonte M, Julian JG, Miranzo P, Osendi MI. Acta Mater. 2009, 57, 2607–2612.10.1016/j.actamat.2009.01.043Search in Google Scholar

[58] Radwan M, Nygren M, Flodstro K, Esmaelzadeh S. J. Mater. Sci. 2011, 46, 5807–5814.10.1007/s10853-011-5536-2Search in Google Scholar

[59] Eriksson M, Radwan M, Shen Z. Int. J. Refract. Met. Hard Mater. 2013, 36, 31–37.10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2012.03.007Search in Google Scholar

[60] Hulbert DM, Jiang D, Tamburini UA, Unuvar C, Mukherjee AK. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2008, 488, 333–338.10.1016/j.msea.2007.11.054Search in Google Scholar

[61] Wei S, Zhang ZH, Shen XB, Wang FC, Sun MY, Yang R, Lee SK. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2012, 60, 168–175.10.1016/j.commatsci.2012.03.024Search in Google Scholar

[62] Zhang Z, Shen X, Zhang C, Wei S, Lee S, Wang F. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2013, 565, 326–332.10.1016/j.msea.2012.12.060Search in Google Scholar

[63] Tsukamoto H. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2015, 640, 338–349.10.1016/j.msea.2015.06.005Search in Google Scholar

[64] Tang X, Zhang H, Du D, Qu D, Hu C, Xie R, Feng Y. Int. J. Refract. Met. Hard Mater. 2014, 42,193–199.10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2013.09.005Search in Google Scholar

[65] Gan YX, Solomon D, Reinbolt M. Materials (Basel) 2010, 3, 329–350.10.3390/ma3010329Search in Google Scholar

[66] Deepak D, Sidhu RS, Gupta VK. Int. J. Mech. Eng. 2013, 3, 1–11.Search in Google Scholar

[67] Hangai Y, Kubota N, Utsunomiya T, Kawashima H, Kuwazuru O, Yoshikaw N. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2015, 639, 597–603.10.1016/j.msea.2015.05.007Search in Google Scholar

[68] Hangai Y, Takahashi K, Utsunomiya T, Kitahara S, Kuwazuru O, Yoshikawa N. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2012, 534, 716–719.10.1016/j.msea.2011.11.100Search in Google Scholar

[69] Miranda RM, Santos TG, Gandra J, Lopes N, Silva RJC. J. Mater. Process. Tech. 2013, 213, 1609–1615.10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2013.03.022Search in Google Scholar

[70] Salehi M, Farnoush H, Mohandesi JA. Mater. Des. 2014, 63, 419–426.10.1016/j.matdes.2014.06.013Search in Google Scholar

[71] Scanlan M, Browne DJ, Bates A. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2005, 413– 414, 66–71.10.1016/j.msea.2005.09.004Search in Google Scholar

[72] Rahvard MM, Tamizifar M, Botuorabi M, Shiri SG. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 2014, 24, 665–672.10.1016/S1003-6326(14)63109-5Search in Google Scholar

[73] Lu F, Li H, Ji Q, Zeng R, Wang S, Chi J, Li M, Chai L, Xu H. Surf. Coatings Technol. 2011, 205, 4441–4446.10.1016/j.surfcoat.2011.03.071Search in Google Scholar

[74] Shah K, Haq IU, Khan A, Shah SA, Khan M, Pinkerton AJ. Mater. Des. 2014, 54, 531–538.10.1016/j.matdes.2013.08.079Search in Google Scholar

[75] Carroll BE, Otis RA, Borgonia JP, Suh J, Dillon RP, Shapiro AA, Hofmann DC, Liu ZK, Beese AM. Acta Mater. 2016, 108, 46–54.10.1016/j.actamat.2016.02.019Search in Google Scholar

[76] Chu S, Wang H, Wu R. Surf. Coatings Technol. 1996, 88, 38–43.10.1016/S0257-8972(96)02866-6Search in Google Scholar

[77] Kim JI, Kim WJ, Choi DJ, Park JY, Ryu WS. Carbon N. Y. 2005, 43, 1749–1757.10.1016/j.carbon.2005.02.025Search in Google Scholar

[78] Guo CT. Surf. Coatings Technol. 2007, 201, 7122–7129.10.1016/j.surfcoat.2007.01.015Search in Google Scholar

[79] Basu SN, Kulkarni T, Wang HZ, Sarin VK. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2008, 28, 437–445.10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2007.03.007Search in Google Scholar

[80] Lian Y, Liu X, Xu Z, Song J, Yu Y. Fusion Eng. Des. 2013, 88, 1694–1698.10.1016/j.fusengdes.2013.02.155Search in Google Scholar

[81] Song J, Yu Y, Zhuang Z, Lian Y, Liu X, Qi Y. J. Nucl. Mater. 2013, 442, S208–S213.10.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.01.326Search in Google Scholar

[82] Gu YW, Khor KA, Fu YQ, Wang Y. Surf. Coat. Technol. 1997, 96, 305–312.10.1016/S0257-8972(97)00185-0Search in Google Scholar

[83] Khor KA, Gu YW, Dong ZL. J. Thermal Spray Technol. 2000, 9, 245–249.10.1361/105996300770349999Search in Google Scholar

[84] Khor KA, Gu YW. Thin Solid Films 2000, 372, 104–113.10.1016/S0040-6090(00)01024-5Search in Google Scholar

[85] Khor KA, Gu YW, Dong ZL. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2001, 139, 200–206.10.1016/S0257-8972(01)00997-5Search in Google Scholar

[86] Khor KA, Gu YW, Quek CH, Cheang P. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2003, 168, 195–201.10.1016/S0257-8972(03)00238-XSearch in Google Scholar

[87] Limargaa AM, Widjajab TS, Yip TH. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2005, 197, 93–102.10.1016/j.surfcoat.2005.02.087Search in Google Scholar

[88] Cannillo V, Lusvarghi L, Siligardi C, Sola A. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2007, 27, 1935–1943.10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2006.05.105Search in Google Scholar

[89] Cannillo V, Lusvarghi L, Sola A. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2008, 28, 2161–2169.10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2008.02.026Search in Google Scholar

[90] Puric J, Kobayashi A. Vacuum 2010, 85, 555–562.10.1016/j.vacuum.2010.08.011Search in Google Scholar

[91] Chen X, Gu L, Binglin Z, Wang Y, Cao X. Surf. Coatings Technol. 2012, 206, 2265–2274.10.1016/j.surfcoat.2011.09.076Search in Google Scholar

[92] Fukui Y, Yamanaka N, Enokida Y. Compos. Pt. B 1997, 8368, 37–43.10.1016/S1359-8368(96)00018-2Search in Google Scholar

[93] Zhang J, Wang YQ, Zhou BL, Wu XQ. J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 1998, 17, 1677–1679.10.1023/A:1006635221379Search in Google Scholar

[94] Watanabe Y, Yamanaka N, Fukui Y. Metallurg. Mater. Transect. 1999, 30, 3253–3262.10.1007/s11661-999-0235-1Search in Google Scholar

[95] Chen W, Wang Q, Zai C, Ma C, Zhu Y, He W. J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 2001, 20, 823–826.10.1023/A:1010954527987Search in Google Scholar

[96] Castro RR, Kelestemar MH. J. Mater. Sci. 2002, 37, 1813–1821.10.1023/A:1014910225756Search in Google Scholar

[97] Watanabe Y, Sato R, Matsuda K, Fukui Y. Sci. Eng. Compos. Mater. 2011, 11, 185–200.10.1515/SECM.2004.11.2-3.185Search in Google Scholar

[98] Watanabe Y, Kurahashi M, Kim I, Miyazaki S, Kumai S, Sato A, Tanaka S. Composites 2006, 37, 2186–2193.10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.10.003Search in Google Scholar

[99] Vieira AC, Sequeira PD, Gomes JR, Rocha LA. Wear 2009, 267, 585–592.10.1016/j.wear.2009.01.041Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2015-9-18
Accepted: 2016-7-8
Published Online: 2016-9-14
Published in Print: 2018-3-28

©2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Downloaded on 25.4.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/secm-2015-0395/html
Scroll to top button