Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter (A) August 12, 2021

What Russian University Stands for: Analyzing Socially Embedded Vision and Values

  • Valeria Chernyavskaya EMAIL logo and Olga Kamshilova

Summary

The present investigation is a response to the discourse analytical methodology expanded by corpus linguistic techniques. Within a discursive approach the university’s identity is seen as existing in and being constructed through discourse. The research interest is in how ideology and the obligation models set by the state construct the university’s self-image and university-based research as its core mission. The study is generally consistent with current trends in social constructivism where identity is considered as the process of identity construction rather than a rigid category. It is presumed that key factors are developed within a definite socio-cultural practice, which then shape the concept of collective identity. Detecting and analyzing such factors on the basis of Russian realities and modern Russian university is becoming a new research objective. The focus of the given article is on how certain values can be foregrounded in texts representing university strategies to the public. The research employs corpus linguistic methods in discourse analysis. The organization of the paper is as follows. First, it outlines the socio-political context in which the transformation of academic values and organizational principles of Russian national universities are embedded. Second, it discusses corpus findings obtained from an original research corpus which includes mission statements posted on the websites of Russian national research and federal universities. Conclusions concerning the university mission statements reflect ongoing transformations of the universities’ role in the society. The rhetoric of the statements is declarative and foregrounding new values. The linguistic data analysis shows their socially constructive nature as they build a framework for currently relevant uniformed ideas and concepts.

References

Abramov, Roman, Ivan Gruzdev & Evgeni Terentiev. 2016. Alarm and Enthusiasm in Discourses on the Academic World: International and Russian Contexts. In Novoe Literaturnoe obozrenie 2 (138). 16–32.Search in Google Scholar

Baker, Paul. 2012. Acceptable bias? Using corpus linguistics methods with critical discourse analysis. In Critical Discourse Studies 9. 247–256. 10.1080/17405904.2012.688297Search in Google Scholar

Baker, Paul, Costas Gabrielatos, Majid Khosravinik, Michal Krzyzanowski, Tony McEnery & Ruth Wodak. 2008. A useful methodological synergy? Combining critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistics to examine discourse of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK press. In Discourse and Society 19 (3). 273–306.10.1177/0957926508088962Search in Google Scholar

Baker, Paul & Tony McEnery (eds.). 2015. Corpora and discourse studies: Integrating discourse and corpora (= Palgrave Advances in Language and Linguistics). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781137431738Search in Google Scholar

Chernyavskaya, Valeria. 2019. Corpus-Assisted Discourse Analysis of Russian University 3,0 Identity. In Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filologiya – Tomsk State University Journal of Philology 58. 97–114. Search in Google Scholar

Chernyavskaya, Valeria & Elena Safronenkova. 2019. Towards Constructing Identity of a National University: “Our Past” at the Websites of Russian Universities. In Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences 3 (12). 1819–1839.10.17516/1997-1370-0491Search in Google Scholar

Chernyavskaya, Valeria & Sholpan Zharkynbekova. 2019. Linguistic and Social Construction of National University Identity: based on Kazakh and Russian Universities mission statements. In Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta. Yazyk i Literatura 2 (16). 304–319.10.21638/spbu09.2019.210Search in Google Scholar

Clarc, Burton. 1998. Creating entrepreneurial universities: organizational pathways of transformation. Oxford: Pergamon.Search in Google Scholar

Deem, Rosemary. 1998. “New Managerialism” and Higher Education: The Management of Performances and Cultures in Universities in the United Kingdom. In International Studies in Sociology of Education 8 (1). 47–70. 10.1080/0962021980020014Search in Google Scholar

Deem, Rosemary. 2001.Globalisation, New Managerialism, Academic Capitalism and Entrepreneurialism in Universities: Is the Local Dimension Still Important? In Comparative Education 37 (1). 7–20.Search in Google Scholar

Dmitriev, Alexander. 2013 a. Status of Knowledge (towards social markers of evolution of Russian university in the 3 decades in the XX century). In Novoe Literaturnoe obozrenie 4 (122). 108–133.Search in Google Scholar

Dmitriev, Alexander. 2013 b. Rediscovery of the soviet university. InLogos 1 (91). 41–64.Search in Google Scholar

Dmitriev, Alexander. 2014. The Russian University system and the First World War. In Studies in East European Thought 66 (1–2). 29–50.10.1007/s11212-014-9196-zSearch in Google Scholar

Duderstadt, James. 2000. A university for the 21st century. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.10.3998/mpub.16836Search in Google Scholar

Etzkowitz, Henry. 2002. MIT and the Rise of Entrepreneurial Science. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203216675Search in Google Scholar

Frank, David & Jay Gabler. 2006. Reconstructing the University: Worldwide Shifts in Academia in the 20th Century. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.10.1515/9781503625853Search in Google Scholar

Henkel, Mary. 2005. Academic Identity and Autonomy in a Changing Policy Environment. In Higher Education 49 (1/2). 155–176. 10.1007/s10734-004-2919-1Search in Google Scholar

Kirk, Camille. 2000. Nexus: Mission critical – higher education for the 21st century. In Planning for Higher Education 29. 14–22. Search in Google Scholar

Kolsaker, Ailsa. 2008.Academic Professionalism in the Managerialist Era: A Study of English Universities. In Studies in Higher Education 33 (5). 513–525.10.1080/03075070802372885Search in Google Scholar

Kuße, Holger. 2012. Kulturwissenschaftliche Linguistik. Eine Einführung. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.10.36198/9783838537450Search in Google Scholar

Lynch, Kathleen & Mariya Ivancheva. 2015. Academic freedom and the commercialisation of universities: a critical ethical analysis. In Ethics in Science and Enviromental Politics 15. 1–6. 10.3354/esep00160Search in Google Scholar

Mautner, Gerlinde. 2005.The Entrepreneurial University: A Discursive Profile of a Higher Education Buzzword. In Critical Discourse Studies 2 (2). 95–120.10.1080/17405900500283540Search in Google Scholar

Morphew, Cristipher & Matthew Hartley. 2006. Mission statements: A thematic analysis of rhetoric across institutional type. In The Journal of Higher Education 5 (1). 456–471.10.1353/jhe.2006.0025Search in Google Scholar

O’Neil, Robert. 2011. Academic Freedom: Past, Present, and Future. In Philip G. Altbach, Patricia J. Gumport & Robert O. Berdahl (eds.), American Higher Education in the Twenty-First Century: Social, Political, and Economic Challenges. 3rd ed., 88–113. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Pohoryles, Ronald. 2002. The European Research Area: Bureaucratic vision versus academic mission? In Innovation 15. 389–395. 10.1080/1351161022000042606Search in Google Scholar

Polster, Claire. 2000. The future of the liberal university in the era of the global knowledge grab. In Higher Education 39. 19–41. 10.1023/A:1003878305633Search in Google Scholar

Schulte, Peter. 2004. The entrepreneurial university: a strategy for institutional development. In Higher Education in Europe 29 (2). 187–191.10.1080/0379772042000234811Search in Google Scholar

Sivak, Elizaveta & Maria Yudkevich. 2017. The academic profession in Russia’s two capitals: The impact of 20 years of transition. In European Educational Research Journal 16 (5). 626–644. 10.1177/1474904117701142Search in Google Scholar

Stensaker, Bjørn. 2015. Organizational identity as a concept for understanding university dynamics. In Higher Education 69 (1). 103–115. 10.1007/s10734-014-9763-8Search in Google Scholar

Välimaa,Jussi. 1998.Cultureandidentityinhighereducationresearch. InHigher Education36. 119–138.10.1023/A:1003248918874Search in Google Scholar

Weisbrod, Burton, Jeffry Ballou & Evelyn D. Asch. 2008. Mission and Money: Understanding the University. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Winter, Richard. 2009. Academic Manager or Managed Academic? Academic Identity Schisms in Higher Education. In Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 31 (2). 121–13110.1080/13600800902825835Search in Google Scholar

Xue, Wu & Lei Lei. 2016. Corpora and Discourse Studies: Integrating Discourse and Corpora. In Australian Journal of Linguistics 36 (4). 560–562.10.1080/07268602.2016.1181973Search in Google Scholar

Cited Sources

National Research Nuclear University MEphI. https://mephi.ru/;https://mephi.ru/about/nrnu_mephi. Retrieved February, 2019.Search in Google Scholar

North-Caucasus Federal University. https://www.ncfu.ru/;https://www.ncfu.ru/university/vizitnaya-kartochka-severo-kavkazskogo-federalnogo-universiteta/. Retrieved February, 2019.Search in Google Scholar

Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University. https://www.spbstu.ru/;https://www.spbstu.ru/university/about-the-university/mission-and-values/. Retrieved February, 2019.Search in Google Scholar

Tomsk State University. http://www.tsu.ru/;http://www.tsu.ru/university/mission.php. Retrieved February, 2019.Search in Google Scholar

University Higher School of Economics. https://www.hse.ru/;https://www.hse.ru/info/statement/. Retrieved February, 2019.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2021-08-12
Published in Print: 2021-08-27

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 30.4.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/slaw-2021-0020/html
Scroll to top button