Abstract
Effect of fuel spray cone angle in an aerogas turbine combustor has been studied using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and full-scale combustor testing. For CFD analysis, a 22.5° sector of an annular combustor is modeled and the governing equations are solved using the eddy dissipation combustion model in ANSYS CFX computational package. The analysis has been carried out at 125 kPa and 303 K inlet conditions for spray cone angles from 60° to 140°. The lean blowout limits are established by studying the behavior of combustion zone during transient engine operation from an initial steady-state condition. The computational study has been followed by testing the practical full-scale annular combustor in an aerothermal test facility. The experimental result is in a good agreement with the computational predictions. The lean blowout fuel–air ratio increases as the spray cone angle is decreased at constant operating pressure and temperature. At higher spray cone angle, the flame and high-temperature zone moves upstream close to atomizer face and a uniform flame is sustained over a wide region causing better flame stability.
References
1. Cohen H, Rogers GFC, Saravanamuttoo HIH. Gas turbine theory. New York: Longman Group Limited, 1996.Search in Google Scholar
2. Giampaolo Tony. The gas turbine hand book: principles and practices. 2nd ed. Lilburn, Georgia: Fairmont Press, Inc, 2003.Search in Google Scholar
3. Lefebvre AH. Gas turbine combustion. Philadelphia: Taylor & Francis, 1998.Search in Google Scholar
4. Lefebvre AH. Atomization and spray. Philadelphia: Taylor & Francis, 1989.Search in Google Scholar
5. Reitz RD, Beracco FV. On the dependence of spray angle and other spray parameters on nozzle design and operating conditions. SAE Paper 790494, 1979.10.4271/790494Search in Google Scholar
6. Yokota K, Matsuoka S. An experimental study of fuel spray in a diesel engine. Trans Jpn Soc Mech Eng 1973;43:3455–64.10.1299/kikai1938.43.3455Search in Google Scholar
7. Hiroyasu H, Arai M. Fuel spray penetration and spray angle in diesel engines. Trans Jpn Soc Mech Eng 1980;21:5–11.Search in Google Scholar
8. Ohrn TR, Senser DW, Lefebvre AH. Geometrical effects on spray cone angle for plain orifice atomizers. Atomization Sprays 1991;I:253–68.10.1615/AtomizSpr.v1.i3.20Search in Google Scholar
9. Chen SK, Lefebvre AH, Rollbuhler J. Factors influencing the effective spray cone angle of pressure-swirl atomizers. J Eng Gas Turbines Power 1992;114:97–103.10.1115/1.2906313Search in Google Scholar
10. McVey JB, Russell S, Kennedy JB. High-resolution patternator for the characterization of fuel sprays. J Propul Power 1987;3:202–9.10.2514/6.1986-1726Search in Google Scholar
11. Kulshreshtha DB, Dikshit S, Channiwala SA. Experimental investigations of air assisted pressure swirl atomizer. Ind J Sci Technol 2011;4:126–30.10.17485/ijst/2011/v4i2.3Search in Google Scholar
12. Shafaee M, et al. Effect of flow conditions on spray cone angle of a two-fluid atomizer. J Mech Sci Technol 2011;25:365–9.10.1007/s12206-010-1215-5Search in Google Scholar
13. Bryan R, Godbole PS, Norster ER. Characteristics of airblast atomizers. Combustion and Heat Transfer in Gas Turbine Systems, Cranfield International Symposium Series, Procedeengs of International Propulsion Symposium, College of Aeronautics, Cranfield, UK, edited by Norster ER, London: Pergamon Press, 1971;11:343–59.Search in Google Scholar
14. Zheng QP, Jasuja AK, Lefebvre AH. Influence of air and fuel flows on gas turbine sprays al high pressures. In: Twenty-Sixth Symposium (International) on Combustion, 2757–62, The Combustion Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, 1996.10.1016/S0082-0784(96)80113-5Search in Google Scholar
15. Zheng QP, Jasuja AK, Lefebvre AH. Structure of airblast sprays under high ambient pressure conditions. J Eng Gas Turbines Power 1997;119:512–18.10.1115/96-GT-131Search in Google Scholar
16. Li L, Liu T. Combustion and cooling performance in aero-engine annular combustor. J Appl Therm Eng 2006;26:1771–9.10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2005.11.023Search in Google Scholar
17. Armand S, Chen M. A combustion study of gas turbines using multi-species/reacting computational fluid dynamic. In: Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2002, GT–2002–30105.10.1115/GT2002-30105Search in Google Scholar
18. Philip J. CFD modeling of industrial burners and furnaces. In: 6th European Conference on Industrial Furnaces and Boilers, Sintra, Portugal, April, 2002.Search in Google Scholar
19. Khavkin YI. Theory and practice of swirl atomizers. London: Taylor & Francis, 2003.Search in Google Scholar
20. Crowe CT, Schwarzkopf JD, Sommerfeld M, Tsuji Y. Multiphase flows with droplets and particles. London: CRC Press, 2011.10.1201/b11103Search in Google Scholar
21. Kennedy JB. Combustion instrumentation, Von Karman Institute for Fluid Dynamics, Lecture series 1990–02, vol. 2, 1–39.Search in Google Scholar
22. Bentley RE. Theory and practice of thermoelectric thermometry. Vol 3. Singapore: Springer-Verlag Singapore Pte. Ltd:1998.Search in Google Scholar
23. Ballal DR, Lefebvre AH. Ignition of liquid fuel sprays at subatmospheric pressures. Combust Flame 1978;31:115–26.10.1016/0010-2180(78)90122-0Search in Google Scholar
24. Peng F, Aggarwal SK. A review of droplet dynamics and vaporization modeling for engineering calculations. ASME paper 94-GT–215–199410.1115/94-GT-215Search in Google Scholar
25. Yi T, Gutmark EJ. Stability and control of lean blowout in chemical kinetic controlled combustion system. Combust Sci Technol 2009;181:226–44.10.1080/00102200802424559Search in Google Scholar
26. Stohr M, Boxx I, Carter C, Meier W. Dynamics of lean blow Out Of a swirl-stabilized flame in a gas turbine model combustor. Proc Combust Inst 2011;33:2953–60.10.1016/j.proci.2010.06.103Search in Google Scholar
27. Hedman PO, Fletcher TH, Graham SG, Timothy GW, Flores DV, Haslam JK. Observations of flame behavior in a laboratory-scale premixed natural gas/air gas turbine combustor from PLIF measurements of OH. ASME Paper GT-2002-30052, 2002.10.1115/GT2002-30052Search in Google Scholar
28. Norton DG. Combustion characteristics and flame stability at the microscale: a CFD study of premixed methane/air mixtures. Chem Eng Sci 2003;58:4871–82.10.1016/j.ces.2002.12.005Search in Google Scholar
©2016 by De Gruyter
