Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter January 31, 2020

Nozzle Geometry Effect on Twin Jet Flow Characteristics

  • Muthuram A , Thanigaiarasu S EMAIL logo , Rakesh Divvela and Rathakrishnan Ethirajan

Abstract

Effect of nozzle geometries on the propagation of twin jet issuing from nozzles with circle-circle, circle-ellipse, circle-triangle, circle-square, circle-hexagon and circle-star geometrical combinations was investigated for Mach numbers 0.2, 0.4, 0.6 and 0.8. In all the cases, both jets in the twin jet had the same Mach number. All the twin jets of this study are free jets, discharged into stagnant ambient atmosphere. The result of the twin jets issuing from circle-circle nozzle is kept as the reference in this study. For all the twin jet nozzles, the inter nozzle spacing; the distance between the nozzle axes (S) was 20 mm and all the nozzles had an equivalent area of 78.5 mm2. Thus for all the cases of the present study, S/D ratio is 2. The results show that the mixing of the combined jet, after the merging point is strongly influenced by the combined effect of the nozzle geometry and jet Mach number. Among the six different twin jet nozzle configuration studied, circle-square combination is found to be the most superior mixing promoter.

PACS: 47.85.lk

Nomenclature

D

nozzle exit diameter

M

Mach number

S

Jet spacing

U

Mean velocity in the X-direction

X

Streamwise coordinate along centerline

Y

Coordinate normal to the centerline

Z

Coordinate normal to ground plane

CMD

Centerline Mach number Decay

e

Nozzle exit conditions

References

1. Tanaka E. The interference of two-dimensional parallel jets, 1st report, experiments on dual jet. Bull JSME. 1970;13:272–80. DOI:10.1299/jsme1958.13.272.Search in Google Scholar

2. Tanaka E. The interference of two-dimensional parallel jets, 2nd report, experiments on the combined flow of dual jet. Bull JSME. 1974;17:920–7. DOI:10.1299/jsme1958.17.1920.Search in Google Scholar

3. Moustafa GH. Experimental investigation of high-speed twin jets. AIAA J. 1994;32:2320–2. DOI:10.2514/3.12293.Search in Google Scholar

4. Anderson. EA, Spall RE. Experimental and numerical investigation of two-dimensional parallel jets. J Fluids Eng Trans ASME. 2001;123:401–6. DOI:10.1115/1.1363701.Search in Google Scholar

5. Murai K, Taga M, Akagawa K. An experimental study on confluence of two two-dimensional jets. Bull JSME. 1976;19:958–64.DOI:10.1299/jsme1958.19.958.Search in Google Scholar

6. Rathakrishnan E, Vijayabhaskar Reddy P, Padmanaban K. Some studies on twinjet propagation. Mech Res Commun. 1989;16:279–87. DOI:10.1016/0093-6413(89)90063-3.Search in Google Scholar

7. Yin Z, Zhang H, Lin J. Experimental study on the flow field characteristics in the mixing region of twin jets. J Hydrodyn Ser B. 2007;19:309–13.10.1016/S1001-6058(07)60063-8Search in Google Scholar

8. Mi J, Kalt P, Nathan GJ. Mixing characteristics of a notched-rectangular jet and circular jet. In: 15th Australasian fluid mechanics conference. Australia: Sydney, 2004.Search in Google Scholar

9. Mi J, Nathan GJ, Luxton RE. Centreline mixing characteristics of jets from nine differently shaped nozzles. Exp Fluids. 2000;28:93–4.10.1007/s003480050012Search in Google Scholar

10. Zaman KB. Spreading characteristics of compressible jets from nozzles of various geometries. J Fluid Mech. 1999;383:197–228. DOI:10.1017/S0022-11099003833.Search in Google Scholar

11. Ghanshyam S, Sundararajan T, Bhaskaran KA. Mixing and entrainment characteristics of circular and non circular confined jets. J Fluids Eng. 2003;125:835–42. DOI:10.1115/1.1595676.Search in Google Scholar

12. Durve A, Patwardhan AW, Banarjee I, Padmakumar G, Vaidyanathan G. Numerical investigation of mixing in parallel jets. Nucl Eng Des. 2012;242:78–90. DOI:10.1016/j.nucengdes.2011.10.051.Search in Google Scholar

13. Hashiebaf A, Romano GP. Particle image velocimetry investigation on mixing enhancement of non-circular sharp-edged nozzles. Int J Heat Fluid Flow. 2013;44:208–21. DOI:10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2013.05.017.Search in Google Scholar

14. Seyed SA, Mark FT, Mikhail K. PIV measurements in the near and intermediate field regions of jets issuing from eight different nozzle geometries. Flow Turbulent Combust. 2017;99:329–51. DOI:10.1007/s10494-017-9820-3.Search in Google Scholar

15. Miller RS, Madnia CK, Givi PV. Numerical simulation of non circular jets. Pergamon Comput Fluids. 1995;24:1–25. DOI:10.1016/0045-7930(94)00019-U.Search in Google Scholar

16. Gutmark EJ, Grinstein FF. Flow control with non-circular jets. Ann Rev Fluid Mech. 1999;31:239–72. DOI:10.1146/annurev.fluid.31.1.239.Search in Google Scholar

17. Papamoschou D, Roshko A. The compressible turbulent shear layer: an experimental study. J Fluid Mech. 1988;197:453–77. DOI:10.1017/S0022112088003325.Search in Google Scholar

18. Elbanna H, Gahin S. Investigation of two plane parallel jets. AIAA J. 1983;21: 986–91. DOI:10.2514/3.8187.Search in Google Scholar

19. Lin YF, Sheu MJ. Investigation of two plane parallel unventilated jets. Exp Fluids. 1990;10:17–22. DOI:10.1007/BF00187867.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2019-12-20
Accepted: 2019-12-24
Published Online: 2020-01-31
Published in Print: 2022-12-16

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 10.5.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/tjj-2019-0049/html
Scroll to top button