Title: Seismic tests of precast concrete, moment-resisting frames and connections
Date: Summer, 2010
Volume: 55
Issue: 3
Page number: 102-121
Author(s): Weichen Xue, Xinlei Yang
https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.06012010.102.121

Click here to access the full journal article

Abstract

This paper presents the results of experimental investigations on four full-scale precast concrete connections and a half-scale, two-story, two-bay, precast concrete, moment-resisting frame, which consisted of composite concrete beams and cast-in-place concrete columns, under cyclic loading. The precast concrete connections investigated in this paper included an exterior connection, an interior connection, a T connection, and a knee connection. Test results revealed that the four precast concrete connections, as expected, exhibited a strong column–weak beam failure mechanism and failed due to concrete crushing and fracturing of longitudinal bars as a result of forming a plastic hinge at the fixed end of the beam. The four connections behaved in a ductile manner. However, the displacement ductility of the knee connection was the poorest among them. The precast concrete frame exhibited a mixed side-sway mechanism and behaved in a ductile manner. The hysteresis curves of the frame were full and exhibited good energy-dissipation capacity. The global and interstory displacement ductility of the frame was not less than 4.5. In general, the seismic behavior of the precast concrete frame was satisfactory. This research could provide structural engineers with useful information about the safety of precast concrete–frame structures.

References

1. Ochs, J. E., and M. R. Ehsani. 1993. Moment Resistant Connections in Precast Concrete Frames for Seismic Regions. PCI Journal, V. 38, No. 5 (September–October): pp. 64–75.

2. Park, R. 2002. Seismic Design and Construction of Precast Concrete Buildings in New Zealand. PCI Journal, V. 47, No. 5 (September–October): pp. 60–75.

3. Korkmaz, H. H., and T. Tankut. 2005. Performance of a Precast Concrete Beam-to-Beam Connection Subject to Reversed Cyclic Loading. Engineering Structures, V. 27, No. 9 (August): pp.  1392–1407.

4. Park, R., and D. K. Bull. 1986. Seismic Resistance of Frames Incorporating Precast Prestressed Concrete Beam Shells. PCI Journal, V. 31, No. 4 (July–August): pp. 54–93.

5. French, C. W., O. Amu, and C. Tarzikhan. 1989. Connections between Precast Elements - Failure outside Connection Region. Journal of Structural Engineering,  V. 115, No. 2 (February): pp.  316–340.

6. French, C. W., M. Hafner, and V. Jayashankar. 1989. Connections between Precast Elements - Failure within Connection Region. Journal of Structural Engineering, V. 115, No. 12 (December): pp.  3171–3192.

7. Englekirk, R. 1995. Development and Testing of a Ductile Connector for Assembling Precast Concrete  Beams and Columns. PCI Journal, V. 40, No. 2 (March–April): pp. 36–51.

8. Priestley, M. J. N., and G. A. MacRae. 1996. Seismic Tests of Precast Beam-to-Column Joint Subassemblages with Unbonded Tendons. PCI Journal, V. 41, No. 1 (January–February): pp. 64–80.

9.  Ertas, O., S. Ozden, and T. Ozturan. 2006. Ductile Connections in Precast Concrete Moment Resisting Frames. PCI Journal, V. 51, No. 3 (May–June): pp. 66–76.

10. Soubra, K. S., J. K. Wight, and A. E. Naaman. 1993. Cyclic Response of Fibrous Cast-in-Place Connections in Precast Beam-Column Subassemblages. ACI Structural Journal, V. 90, No. 3  (May–June): pp. 316–323.

11. Restrepo, J. I., R. Park, and A. H. Buchanan. 1995. Tests on Connections of Earthquake Resisting Precast Reinforced Concrete Perimeter Frames of Buildings. PCI Journal, V. 40, No. 4 (July– August): pp. 44–61.

12. Lin, Z. F., E. I. Sagan, and M. E. Kreger. 1998. Study on the Ductile Connections for Precast Aseismic Frame. Journal of Tongji University, V. 26, No. 2 (April): pp. 135–138.

13. Priestley, M. J. N., S. Sritharan, J. R. Conley, and S. Pampanin. 1999. Preliminary Results and Conclusions  from the PRESSS Five-Story Precast Concrete Test Building. PCI Journal, V. 44, No. 6  (November–December): pp. 42–67. Rodriguez, M., and J. Blandon. 2005. Tests on a Half- Scale Two-Story Seismic-Resisting Precast Concrete Building. PCI Journal, V. 50, No. 1 (January–February):    pp. 94–114.

14. Chinese Standard. 2001. Code for Seismic Design of Buildings. [In Chinese.] GB 50010-2001. Beijing, China: Chinese Building Press.

15. American Concrete Institute (ACI) Committee 318. 2008. Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-08) and Commentary (ACI 318R- 08). Farmington Hills, MI: ACI.

16. Park, R. 1989. Evaluation of Ductility of Structures and Structural Assemblages from Laboratory Testing. Bulletin of the New Zealand National Society for Earthquake Engineering, V. 22, No. 3  (September): pp. 55–166.

17. Kwak, H. G., and S. P. Kim. 2002. Cyclic Moment-Curvature Relationship of an RC Beam. Magazine of Concrete Research, V. 54, No. 6 (December): pp. 435–447.